「scoring」の検索結果

Optimize content for AI Overviews (formerly SGE), ChatGPT web search, Perplexity, and other AI-powered search experiences. Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) analysis including brand mention signals, AI crawler accessibility, llms.txt compliance, passage-level citability scoring, and platform-specific optimization. Use when user says "AI Overviews", "SGE", "GEO", "AI search", "LLM optimization", "Perplexity", "AI citations", "ChatGPT search", or "AI visibility".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write production-grade HackerOne reports — title formula, impact-led writing, CVSS 3.1 scoring, complete PoC formatting, attached files, and submission etiquette. Use AFTER triage-validation passes and you're ready to submit on HackerOne.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate design from a UX perspective with Nielsen's heuristics scoring, anti-pattern detection, persona-based testing, and actionable feedback. Report-only. Triggers on critique, UX review, design feedback, how does this look, evaluate the design, component review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized prompt-building methodology for content and communications tasks. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output) for writing, editing, content strategy, copywriting, audience analysis, editorial evaluation, cross-channel adaptation, and persuasion design. Use when building a Claude prompt or system prompt for content creation, editorial workflows, or communications tasks. Trigger on: "build a prompt for writing," "prompt for content strategy," "prompt for copywriting," "prompt for blog posts," "prompt for email sequences," "system prompt for editorial," "prompt for messaging framework," "content brief prompt," "prompt for audience analysis," "prompt that produces better content." Do NOT use for writing content directly — this Skill builds prompts that produce better content. Do NOT use for evaluating or scoring existing prompts — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available. Do NOT use for general prompt compilation — use rootnode-prompt-compilation if available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits Claude Code repositories. Two-phase workflow — Phase 1 sweeps 14 hygiene categories (permissions, hooks, CLAUDE.md bloat, Skills hygiene, process-abstraction, plus structural) and an optional 7-layer leak check. Phase 2 executes [APPROVED] markers from the report file. Use for repo cleanup, pre-distribution sanity, post-feature hygiene, environment audit, process-abstraction discovery. Trigger on "audit my CC repo," "sweep my repository for hygiene," "check this CC environment," "find process abstraction candidates," "review my CLAUDE.md," "clean up my .claude directory," "pre-distribution hygiene check," "find layer leaks in my CC setup." Routes structural findings to rootnode-cc-design REMEDIATE. Composes with rootnode-critic-gate. CC-only — does not scan Claude Projects. Do NOT use for building a Skill (use rootnode-skill-builder), compiling a prompt (use rootnode-prompt-compilation), scoring a single prompt (use rootnode-prompt-validation), or auditing a Project (use rootnode-project-audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds, validates, packages, tests, and optimizes deployment-ready Skill files (SKILL.md + references/ + scripts/ + agents/) from design specifications. Three pre-build gates + 9-dimension quality gate (with D9a/b/c empirical evidence tiers) + behavioral iteration loop + automated description optimizer + blind version comparator. Use for building, reviewing, revising, testing, or optimizing Skills. Trigger on: "build this Skill," "review this Skill," "test my Skill," "optimize the description," "compare these Skill versions," "should this be a hook instead," "build a template first." Also: "my Skill doesn't activate," "my description truncates," "my SKILL.md is too long," "my Skill is overtriggering." Do NOT use when designing Skill methodology — that's design work, not packaging. Do NOT use for prompt compilation, project auditing, or prompt scoring (use rootnode-prompt-compilation, rootnode-project-audit, or rootnode-prompt-validation if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized business strategy prompt methodology for Claude. Provides 11 tested approaches (3 identity, 4 reasoning, 4 output formats) for consulting, M&A, corporate strategy, and strategic planning tasks. Use when building prompts for deal evaluation, due diligence, portfolio strategy, business model analysis, board narratives, investment cases, market entry plans, or strategic options assessments. Trigger on: "build a prompt for M&A analysis," "due diligence prompt," "board narrative," "investment case," "market entry strategy," "strategic options," "portfolio strategy prompt," "business model analysis prompt," "consulting-style analysis." Do NOT use for evaluating or scoring existing prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available) or for auditing Claude Projects (use rootnode-project-audit if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnoses and fixes Claude behavioral issues in system prompts and Projects using tested countermeasure templates. Use when "Claude is too verbose," "keeps hedging," "agrees with everything," "claims it did something it didn't," "won't use a tool," "fix Claude's output," "tune Claude's behavior," "Claude ignores my preferences," "adds unsolicited disclaimers," "uses too many lists." Covers ten tendencies: agreeableness (output-content + persistent-preference), hedging, verbosity, list overuse, fabricated precision, over-exploration, tool miscalibration (over- and under-triggering), LaTeX defaulting, editorial drift, self-referential fabrication. Also use when auditing a system prompt for behavioral calibration or recalibrating a pre-4.7 prompt, and when users describe recurring output problems without naming a tendency. Do NOT use for scoring a prompt's overall quality — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized agentic and context engineering prompt methodology for Claude. Use when designing AI agents — system prompts, tool definitions, context window architectures, failure mode planning, multi-agent coordination, agent evaluation. Trigger on: "design an agent," "build a system prompt for an agent," "architect an agent's context," "design tool definitions," "agent system prompt," "context window architecture," "tool interface design," "evaluate agent behavior," "multi-agent coordination," "context engineering for agents," "ACI design." Provides 12 tested approaches for agent architecture (designing agents, not using them). Do NOT use for evaluating or scoring individual non-agent prompts (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available). Do NOT use for general software architecture that hosts agents (use standard technical reasoning for that).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects seven structural anti-patterns in Claude Projects that cause unpredictable output, ignored instructions, and degraded quality. Diagnoses Monolith, Orphan File, Echo Chamber, Phantom Conversation, Kitchen Sink, Misaligned Hierarchy, and Blurred Layers. Use when user says "what's wrong with my project," "Claude ignores my instructions," "diagnose my project," "why is output inconsistent," "review my project setup." Also trigger on symptom-phrased: "Claude doesn't follow my rules," "my instructions keep getting overridden," "my Project isn't behaving as designed." Use alongside rootnode-project-audit if available for deeper structural analysis. Activate whenever the user describes symptoms of unreliable, inconsistent, or degraded Claude Project output, even if they do not name a specific pattern. Do NOT use when the user's primary request is Memory-layer rebalancing (use rootnode-memory-optimization if available) or scoring a single prompt (use rootnode-prompt-validation if available).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user needs to design, run, or audit product or GTM analytics — metric hierarchies and north stars, funnels, cohort retention, churn, pipeline velocity, forecasting, lead scoring, NRR, A/B tests, or analytical SQL — or uploads a dataset to analyze. Triggers on questions like "why did activation drop", "is this metric meaningful", "review my dashboard", or "what should I measure". For writing the spec that defines a feature's success metrics, use product-spec.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establish and maintain longitudinal baselines of CLI binary contents across versions. Covers marker selection by category (API / identity / config / telemetry / flag / function), weighted scoring, threshold-based system-presence detection, and per-version baseline records. Use when tracking a feature's lifecycle across releases, when probing for dark-launched or removed capabilities, or when verifying that a scanning tool itself still catches known-good markers on old binaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan synthetic routes and judge whether a proposed molecule can actually be made, using AiZynthFinder's Monte-Carlo tree search over template-derived reactions and a purchasable building-block stock. Use this skill to configure expansion and filter policies, choose a stock file, run route search over a candidate set, and read the returned trees — solved fraction, route depth, and which building blocks a route bottoms out in. Also trigger on AiZynthFinder, retrosynthetic tree search, synthetic accessibility, SAscore, RAscore, building-block stock, reaction template, or route scoring.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate and optimise novel small molecules with REINVENT 4 — de novo sampling from a chemical language model, scaffold decoration with LibInvent, fragment linking with LinkInvent, and similarity-constrained analogue generation with Mol2Mol. Use this skill to set up reinforcement-learning or curriculum runs, compose a multi-parameter scoring function from docking scores, predictive models, and physicochemical desirability, and read the resulting sampled sets. Also trigger on REINVENT, LibInvent, LinkInvent, Mol2Mol, scaffold hopping, R-group replacement, linker design, chemical language model, or reinforcement-learning molecule optimisation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates market bubble risk through quantitative data-driven analysis using the revised Minsky/Kindleberger framework v2.1. Prioritizes objective metrics (Put/Call, VIX, margin debt, breadth, IPO data) over subjective impressions. Features strict qualitative adjustment criteria with confirmation bias prevention. Supports practical investment decisions with mandatory data collection and mechanical scoring. Use when user asks about bubble risk, valuation concerns, or profit-taking timing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when thumbnail concepts need real-size, accuracy-first scoring without misleading claims. Not for generating thumbnails or declaring winners that fail the accuracy rubric.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a visual needs repeatable fixed-view rendering and independent rubric scoring. Not for free-form visual review or subjective critique.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and fix AI-generated writing patterns (slop). Comprehensive detection with 50+ patterns across 3 severity tiers, structure weighted above lexical tells, scoring system, and editor mode that directly fixes problems. Use when scanning any content for AI tells, auditing drafts before publishing, checking if writing "sounds like AI", humanizing AI-generated text, or verifying content authenticity. Trigger on "check for slop", "does this sound like AI", "humanize this", "AI audit", "slop check", "clean up AI writing", or any request to detect/remove artificial-sounding patterns. Also use proactively before publishing any AI-assisted content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OpenTSC v2.1: Soul/Shell architecture for interpersonal intelligence. Local, offline-first, with event graphs, judgment engine (K7), self-creation (K8), three-layer attributes, calibrated predictions, 11 VSM professions, and a pluggable zvec memory index (semantic search, identity resolution, jieba segmentation, emotion scoring incl. batched+cached LLM) that runs with zero extra deps. Transforms implicit social judgment into explicit, queryable, auditable, evolving intelligence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Append a DiT-tuning round to history.yaml. DiT-side counterpart of the LLM-path accuracy_append.py; records practice.md5, inference_outputs, fp_baseline_outputs, and the scoring fields (scores / overall_score / loss_vs_baseline / is_satisfied) populated by quant-tuning-score-dit. Idempotent on practice_id.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sentiment & Momentum Analysis — news sentiment scoring, social media buzz (Reddit/StockTwits/X), analyst ratings consensus, institutional 13F activity, insider trading signals, and short interest / squeeze potential. Returns Sentiment Score (0-100). Triggered by "trade sentiment <TICKER>".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate enriched ICP-based lead lists with Exa Agent, including structured scoring and CSV output. Use when generating leads, building prospect lists, finding companies to sell to, outbound research, or ICP-based company discovery. Triggers on leads, lead gen, prospect list, find companies, ICP, outbound list. Distinct from lead-magnet (content asset that captures emails).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Interview Question Generator — produces 40-60 questions across behavioral (STAR), technical, culture, situational categories with scoring rubrics and recommended loop structure

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when scoring finished content against quality dimensions, evaluating whether a piece meets publishable standards, or determining which workflow phase needs rework based on quality gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。