1,683 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Verify that Codex Slides changes are durably reflected in project state and visibly reflected in the exact Codex Browser slide, panel, version, checkpoint, or presentation surface. Use after creation, rendering, editing, restyling, mark edits, speaker-note changes, version restores, or export.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fully automated review pipeline: CEO, Design, and Eng reviews with auto-decisions using 6 principles (completeness, boil lakes, pragmatic, DRY, explicit over clever, bias toward action). Only pauses for premise confirmation. Classifies decisions as Mechanical (silent) or Taste (surfaced at final gate).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Infrastructure-first security audit across 14 phases: attack surface mapping, secrets archaeology (git history), supply chain analysis, CI/CD pipeline security, LLM/AI threat detection, OWASP Top 10, STRIDE threat modeling. Confidence gates, exploit scenarios, parallel verification, trend tracking. Read-only.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose performance issues on Amazon SageMaker HyperPod clusters — uneven NCCL bandwidth across nodes and poor filesystem throughput. Read-only. Surfaces host-side signals (Xid, ECC, NVLink, EFA reachability, FSx saturation) and routes to the appropriate sibling skill (hyperpod-node-debugger, hyperpod-nccl, hyperpod-version-checker, hyperpod-issue-report) for any remediation. Triggers on uneven NCCL across nodes, straggler node, FSx slow, checkpoint slow, dataloader slow, filesystem bottleneck, FSx throughput, cross-AZ latency, topology mismatch.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design a delivery team's communication system — channel routing, meeting-load reduction, status structure, escalation SLAs, timezone norms. Use when the calendar is full, updates go unread, or blockers surface late.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Classify a batch of emails into action categories (reply now, reply later, archive, delete, unsubscribe) and surface unsubscribe candidates. Use after a busy week, running inbox zero, or triaging email overload.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Chaos engineering: hypothesis-driven fault injection to surface weakness before users do. Use when designing a chaos experiment, planning a gameday, choosing what to inject, computing blast radius, or building a chaos maturity model.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial thinking partner that stress-tests plans, prepares board meetings, and surfaces blind spots. Use when you need plan validation, board prep, hard-decision frameworks, or pre/post-mortem failure analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a one-time AEO audit of six AI answer engines, scored per surface. "check our AI search visibility"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when authoring a Relayflows flow (@relayflows/surface / @relayflows/sdk, the journal-based v2 engine — the CLI is `flows`, package versions 2.0.x) in TypeScript or YAML/JSON. Covers the three-rung ladder (run/llm/agent), the resident verbs (human/dispatch/done), verification gates, TypeScript vs YAML authoring, per-step cli/model selection and its resolution order, flows.json, and `flows check`/`run`/`resume` with their real refusal shapes and exit codes. Not for the older, unrelated `@relayflows/core` WorkflowBuilder engine (`.pattern('dag')`/.agent()/.step() chains) that `writing-agent-relay-workflows` and `migrating-persona-to-relayflow` cover — that's a different product despite the similar name.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to optimize content for AI search engines, get cited by LLMs, or appear in AI-generated answers. Also use when the user mentions 'AI SEO,' 'AEO,' 'GEO,' 'LLMO,' 'answer engine optimization,' 'generative engine optimization,' 'LLM optimization,' 'AI Overviews,' 'optimize for ChatGPT,' 'optimize for Perplexity,' 'AI citations,' 'AI visibility,' 'zero-click search,' 'how do I show up in AI answers,' 'LLM mentions,' 'optimize for Claude/Gemini,' 'llms.txt,' 'OKF,' 'Open Knowledge Format,' 'knowledge bundle,' or 'agent-readable site.' Use this whenever someone wants their content to be cited or surfaced by AI assistants and AI search engines. For traditional technical and on-page SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data implementation, see schema.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants multiple expert perspectives on a marketing question — a simulated board of advisors staffed by legendary marketers (Seth Godin, David Ogilvy, Eugene Schwartz, April Dunford, Rory Sutherland, Alex Hormozi, Byron Sharp, and more). Also use when the user mentions 'marketing council,' 'board of advisors,' 'advisory board,' 'what would Seth Godin say,' 'what would Ogilvy think,' 'channel Hormozi,' 'get multiple perspectives,' 'debate this,' 'have the council review,' 'marketing mentors,' or asks how a famous marketer would approach their problem. The council gives each advisor's take through their documented frameworks, surfaces where they disagree, and synthesizes a recommendation. For executing the winning direction, hand off to positioning, offers, copywriting, ads, or the relevant skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Edit, query, and transform Word documents with the SuperDoc CLI v1 operation surface. Use when the user asks to read, search, modify, comment, or review changes in .docx files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes a settlement letter on the right footing — and warns you when marking it 'without prejudice' won't actually keep it out of court. A genuine settlement letter is normally protected (the judge can't see it), but only if the substance is a real attempt to settle, and even then there are exceptions. The skill picks the correct footing — without prejudice (WP), without prejudice save as to costs (WPSATC / Calderbank), or open — drafts the finished letter, and surfaces the Unilever v Procter & Gamble exceptions that get WP material admitted despite the label, which a plain template won't flag. Built for juniors and in-house counsel drafting a settlement or Calderbank offer who need the footing right the first time. Use when the user asks to draft a WP letter, a Calderbank, a settlement letter, or wants to know whether material is likely protected from disclosure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reviews or drafts the agreement that pays an employee to settle their claims — and flags the statutory conditions that decide whether it actually binds them. Works under s.203 ERA 1996 for England & Wales. Flags apparent s.203 condition gaps for a solicitor to confirm (writing, specific complaints, independent adviser, identification, insurance, statement of conditions), drafts the substantive terms (sum, tax characterisation, confidentiality, references, restrictive covenants, indemnities), and surfaces enforceability risks. Does not rule on validity and is not legal advice. Use when the user says 'review this settlement agreement', 'draft a settlement agreement', 'compromise agreement' (old term), or asks whether an agreement is binding.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Screens a dismissal — proposed or already done — against the unfair dismissal framework for England & Wales, and shows where it is exposed. Structures the qualifying-service question, the automatically-unfair categories (no qualifying period), and a Burchell / Polkey / band-of-reasonable-responses analysis for a solicitor to verify — it does not determine fairness. Surfaces specific procedural risks. Use when the user says 'is this unfair', 'screen this dismissal', 'ordinary unfair dismissal', 'automatic unfair dismissal', or wants a structured fairness review before or after dismissal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-flight privilege and work-product check for legal AI prompts. Use when the user is about to send legal content to a third-party AI surface (ChatGPT, Claude.ai, Copilot, Gemini, etc.) and wants to know whether the prompt risks blowing attorney-client privilege or work-product protection. Returns a SAFE/CAUTION/STOP band with cited factors, a discovery-impact line, and a redacted-safe rewrite.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Claude skill that turns Claude into a Connecticut-specific divorce planner — nine operating modes from pre-flight intake to post-judgment modification, modeled on Untangle.us's feature surface and grounded in C.G.S. Title 46b, Practice Book Chapter 25, and the 2026-08-01 CCSG schedule. Covers eligibility triage (nonadversarial under § 46b-44a vs standard), financial affidavit (JD-FM-6), child support (JD-FM-220 / CCSG-1 / 1A), alimony (§ 46b-82 fourteen factors), parenting plan (with GAL/AMC escalation under JD-FM-224), settlement agreement (JD-FM-172, TCJA-aware), filing packet (marshal 12-day rule, $360 + $50 fees, JD-FM-75 waiver), and post-judgment motion practice. Hard UPL gate: refuses non-CT, domestic violence (refers CTCADV 1-888-774-2900), hidden assets, courtroom advocacy. Heppner-aware: AI prompts are not privileged. First family-law skill in the Lawvable registry.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Give feature/pricing cards a premium feel: a soft radial spotlight follows the cursor across the card and lifts its border. Keep the glow subtle and low-contrast. Falls back to a plain static border under prefers-reduced-motion and on touch. Do not use on text-dense reading surfaces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Monthly CFO workflow for a company or agency — pull raw data from bank + payment processor + payroll + expense management, categorize and reconcile, compute end-of-month cash via transaction-sum method, update a scenario projector for forward forecasting, write the monthly snapshot report, surface decisions to leadership. Modes — monthly (default; the standing report), weekly (thin cash pulse), scenario (ad-hoc modeling in the projector), pickup (resume where the prior run left off). Anonymized team-scope sibling to personal-cfo (which handles personal household finances). Composes with company-brain (report gets stored + wiki-indexed there), toolify (wire company-specific data sources), loopify (schedule the monthly + weekly runs). Triggers on "/company-cfo," "/cfo," "monthly cash report," "do the CFO snapshot," "CFO monthly," "let's run CFO," "cash projection," "runway forecast," "monthly financials," "cash pulse."
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When you want multiple expert perspectives on a founder/operator question — a simulated board of advisors (Jason Fried, Elon Musk, Jeff Bezos, Jensen Huang, Bob Iger, Paul Graham, Naval Ravikant, Sara Blakely). Bring a real decision — "should I raise prices?", "hire my first employee?", "raise or bootstrap?", "kill this project?" — and the council weighs in through documented frameworks, surfaces disagreements, and synthesizes a recommendation. Also use for 'maker council,' 'board of advisors,' 'what would Bezos do,' 'what would Jason Fried say,' 'channel Naval,' 'ask the council,' or how a famous founder would approach a problem. Optional live-research pass via deep-research / watch-video / last30days. Marketing questions go to marketing-skills' marketing-council. Archives to ~/.config/makerskills/maker-council/archive/. To commit to a direction, hand off to decide.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Surface beliefs, assumptions, stories, and values shaping a system. Use when deeper mental models need examining with care and evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Map a current event below the surface into patterns, structures, and mental models. Use when a class or team needs systemic understanding before action.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When a learner gets something wrong or feels stuck, require them to diagnose the problem before receiving help. Ensures help targets the actual cognitive breakdown, not just the surface error.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。