728 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Continuous self-improvement through systematic logging, pattern detection, and behavioral updates. Use when: the owner corrects you, a task fails, you discover a better approach, or you notice a recurring pattern. Store raw learnings in .learnings/, update the specific skill or workflow that caused the issue when appropriate, and avoid vague promises to do better.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
4-phase root cause debugging: understand bugs before fixing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic strategic planning framework for philosophy and interdisciplinary academic papers targeting preprint platforms (PhilArchive, arXiv, PhilSci-Archive). Use when users want to: (1) plan a paper on a specific topic, (2) identify research gaps and assess originality, (3) develop optimized paper outlines, (4) prepare for preprint submission, or (5) understand platform requirements and writing standards. Triggered by phrases like 'plan a paper on,' 'help me design a paper about,' 'identify research gaps in,' 'is this idea original,' or when users need structured research planning. The skill guides through three phases: Platform Analysis (identifying target venue and studying sample papers), Theoretical Framework (AI-driven literature search and gap identification), and Outline Optimization (structured design with reviewer-perspective self-assessment). Each phase includes quality evaluation standards and validation checkpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically trace bugs backward through call stack to find original trigger
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Exploratory QA — web apps, bugs, evidence, reports, systematic testing
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomously deep-scan entire codebase line-by-line, understand architecture and patterns, then systematically transform it to production-grade, corporate-level professional quality with optimizations
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Make .NET projects compatible with Native AOT and trimming by systematically resolving IL trim/AOT analyzer warnings. USE FOR: making projects AOT-compatible, fixing trimming warnings, resolving IL warnings (IL2026, IL2070, IL2067, IL2072, IL3050), adding DynamicallyAccessedMembers annotations, enabling IsAotCompatible. DO NOT USE FOR: publishing native AOT binaries, optimizing binary size, replacing reflection-heavy libraries with alternatives. INVOKES: no tools — pure knowledge skill.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Enable nullable reference types in a C# project and systematically resolve all warnings. USE FOR: adopting NRTs in existing codebases, file-by-file or project-wide migration, fixing CS8602/CS8618/CS86xx warnings, annotating APIs for nullability, cleaning up null-forgiving operators, upgrading dependencies with new nullable annotations. DO NOT USE FOR: projects already fully migrated with zero warnings (unless auditing suppressions), fixing a handful of nullable warnings in code that already has NRTs enabled, suppressing warnings without fixing them, C# 7.3 or earlier projects. INVOKES: Get-NullableReadiness.ps1 scanner script.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transform code reviews from gatekeeping to knowledge sharing through constructive feedback, systematic analysis, and collaborative improvement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Establish build performance baselines and apply systematic optimization techniques. Only activate in MSBuild/.NET build context. USE FOR: diagnosing slow builds, establishing before/after measurements (cold, warm, no-op scenarios), applying optimization strategies like MSBuild Server, static graph builds, artifacts output, and dependency graph trimming. Start here before diving into build-perf-diagnostics, incremental-build, or build-parallelism. DO NOT USE FOR: non-MSBuild build systems, detailed bottleneck analysis (use build-perf-diagnostics after baselining).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transform debugging from frustrating guesswork into systematic problem-solving with proven strategies, powerful tools, and methodical approaches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
[Extended thinking: This workflow implements a sophisticated debugging and resolution pipeline that leverages AI-assisted debugging tools and observability platforms to systematically diagnose and res
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Transform slow database queries into lightning-fast operations through systematic optimization, proper indexing, and query plan analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic design quality evaluation. Hierarchy, type, color, space, craft, system. Use when evaluating whether a design is ready to ship, running quality audits, or setting quality standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
BDB Engineering Godmode, enforcing strict Domain-Driven Design, TypeScript strictness, and Clean Architecture. Use when implementing backend/fullstack features or running the systematic 5-step debugging triage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract and consolidate reusable components, design tokens, and patterns into your design system. Identifies opportunities for systematic reuse and enriches your component library. Use when the user asks to create components, refactor repeated UI patterns, build a design system, or extract tokens.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run tests and systematically fix all failing tests using smart error grouping. Use when user asks to fix failing tests, mentions test failures, runs test suite and failures occur, or requests to make tests pass.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomously deep-scan entire codebase line-by-line, understand architecture and patterns, then systematically transform it to production-grade, corporate-level professional quality with optimizations
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to edit, review, or improve existing marketing copy. Also use when the user mentions 'edit this copy,' 'review my copy,' 'copy feedback,' 'proofread,' 'polish this,' 'make this better,' or 'copy sweep.' This skill provides a systematic approach to editing marketing copy through multiple focused passes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematically finds and fixes bugs using proven debugging techniques. Traces from symptoms to root cause, implements fixes, and prevents regression.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic improvement of existing agents through performance analysis, prompt engineering, and continuous iteration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。