「the」の検索結果

Scores inbound leads against the qualification rubric the user supplies (criteria, scale, weights, thresholds and disqualifiers as given): one DRAFT scorecard per lead with the evidence quoted per criterion, UNKNOWN wherever the lead's information is missing, totals shown with and without the UNKNOWN criteria, a ranked list and a suggested next step such as a qualification call, a request for missing details, nurture or a courteous decline. Use when the user asks to "score these inbound leads", "qualify this lead against our rubric", "run the web form submissions through our lead criteria", "which of these leads should sales call first" or "build a lead scorecard". Do not use for preparing the first call with a lead, use discovery-call-prep instead; for an existing account's growth plan use account-plan-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts one issue of an internal newsletter from the items the user provides (notes, messages, snippets, meeting outputs, contributor submissions): a running order with the reason for each position, a factual headline and one paragraph per item with its source line, one call to action per item with date and route, two subject-line options, an item register accounting for every item supplied, and a list of items that need an owner's confirmation before send. Use when the user asks to "draft this month's newsletter", "turn these items into the team update", "write the staff bulletin from these notes", "order and headline these items" or "prepare the internal digest". Do not use for one piece of news that needs its own send, use announcement-drafter instead; for a digest of external news, use news-monitor-digest; for a personal weekly status note, use weekly-status-update-writer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a DRAFT structured interview scorecard from a job description: five to eight competencies traced to it, past-behaviour and situational evidence questions with probes, four-level rating anchors written as observable behaviours, a blank scoring sheet, a panel plan and the items the hiring manager must confirm. Use when the user asks to "build an interview scorecard for this job description", "write competency questions for this role", "draft the interview guide for the panel", "set up a rating scale for the interviewers", "put together a structured interview kit" or "create a hiring rubric from the JD". Do not use for writing or fixing the job description itself, use job-description-drafter instead; for the new hire's first 90 days, use onboarding-plan-builder. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compares one clause (liability, termination, confidentiality or any other) across several contracts, templates or successive versions and returns a DRAFT comparison table: verbatim clause text per document, the clause split into elements with every difference from the baseline highlighted and categorised, and neutral questions for counsel. Never says which wording is better or enforceable. Use when the user asks to "compare the liability caps across these five supplier contracts", "line up the termination clause in these three drafts", "show how the confidentiality clause changed between versions", "contrast this clause with our template" or "benchmark the indemnity wording across our customer agreements". Do not use for a whole-contract review, use contract-review-pack instead; for screening one NDA against standard positions, use nda-triage. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a DRAFT month-end, quarter-end or year-end close checklist and status table for a finance team from the close calendar, the open items list and last month's close issues that the user attaches, pastes or the agent can reach, marks every task on time, due, late, at risk or blocked, and flags dependency chains and repeat issues. Use when the user asks to "build the close checklist", "where are we on the month-end close", "what is late or blocked in the close", "refresh the close tracker as of today" or "prepare the close status note". Do not use for a project tracker or weekly project status, use project-status-tracker instead; for corrective actions from audits or NCRs, use corrective-action-tracker. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or vendor contract in character as a Head of Procurement archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage or clause, commercial risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "review this from a procurement angle", "what would procurement say about this proposal", "pressure-test this vendor contract commercially", "find the holes before the sourcing committee" or "check the renewal terms like a Head of Procurement would". Do not use for liability, IP, regulatory or signing-authority questions, use general-counsel-reviewer instead; for whether the spend fits the budget, use cfo-reviewer; for vendor security, use ciso-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Customer Advocate archetype, the seat for paying customers not in the room, and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage, customer-side risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a customer advocate review", "do a voice-of-the-customer pressure-test", "what would our customers say about this" or "what does this plan really ask of paying customers". Do not use for the product evidence or roadmap case, use cpo-reviewer instead; for revenue or pricing strategy, use cro-reviewer; for the staff who operate the change, use frontline-skeptic-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Sweeps the last 24 hours of email, chat messages and meeting transcripts for commitments in both directions, what the user promised others and what others promised the user, reconciles them against a running commitments ledger (open, done, overdue), lists overdue items first and returns the updated ledger plus a proposed task list as Markdown for the user to save. Use when the user asks to "check my commitments", "what did I promise", "what am I owed", "did anything slip" or "run the commitment sweep". Do not use for a general morning summary of mail, calendar and mentions, use custom-daily-brief instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds a self-contained single-file HTML project dashboard (status banner, milestones table, risks heat list, decisions log, links) from the project tracker files the user attaches, pastes or holds in configured knowledge sources, and returns the complete HTML source in chat ready to save as dashboard-project-date.html. Use when the user asks to "build a dashboard for this project", "make a status page I can pin in the team channel", "give me an HTML overview of milestones, risks and decisions", "refresh the project dashboard from the tracker" or "turn these tracker files into a one-page visual summary". Do not use for creating or updating the tracker files or for the written weekly status report, use project-status-tracker instead. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write the follow-up after a call in the owner's own voice instead of a bot template: recall the transcript, person card and full correspondence, extract agreements with an owner and due date, draft short and personal, show before/after against the old template, then send through the approval gate and file the result to the person card. Triggers: "/fa", "follow-up", "what should I write to <name> after the call", or a fresh call transcript landing in the vault.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load the operations codex that governs everyone acting as or for the owner (the owner, human assistants and AI agents) before outreach, replies in their chats, scheduling, purchases, hiring or household ops. Covers where the rules live in the vault, how to pull the right slice, and the rule that the newest entry wins per topic. Triggers: "/bible", "what do the rules say".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "build our pitch deck narrative", "write a fundraising story", or "structure the sales pitch narrative"; derives from the narrative canon a company pitch/deck narrative — problem → the undeniable shift → product-as-hero → proof → the ask — as a slide-beat outline (one narrative beat per slide, with the claim ID each proof beat rests on), for both a sales pitch and a fundraising deck. Every proof beat is labeled Measured / User-provided / '[needs source]' and unverified ones route to the claims candidates. Not for the launch-window battle cards and talk track — use sales-enablement-kit; not for the durable message hierarchy or the arc itself — use message-system-architect / strategic-narrative-designer; not for finished deck visual design — out of scope; not for claim adjudication — use offer-claims-registry. 路演叙事/融资故事/销售 pitch/幻灯节拍

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "test our messaging before we scale it", "design a message-market-fit panel", or "run a 5-second comprehension test on our new tagline"; produces a message-test design spec — hypothesis, panel and recruit criteria, comprehension / 5-second / message-market-fit (Wynter-style) protocols, stimulus set drawn from the canon, success thresholds, and a stop/revise decision rule — for the TALE Evaluate phase so the message is validated before any paid scale. It designs the test; it never runs the experiment or adjudicates a claim. Not for running the panel or A/B experiment — use send-experiment-designer or ad-test-designer; not for analyzing the results — use performance-analyzer; not for authoring the message itself — use message-system-architect. 消息测试/理解度测试/面板设计/五秒测试/消息市场契合

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fetch the latest upstream branch and merge it into the current branch, in the claude-statusline repo — feature branches (`dev-<feature>`) sync from `dev`, and `dev` itself syncs from `master`. Stages the merge, walks through any conflicts interactively, then creates the signed merge commit directly. Use whenever the user says "sync", "pull dev", "pull master", "update branch", "merge dev", "merge master", "get latest", or anything about bringing upstream changes into their working branch — even if they don't say the word "skill".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Step-by-step setup and troubleshooting for connecting an owner's Google Calendar to an OpenClaw agent with read and write access. Use when: setting up calendar access for the first time, fixing read-only access, re-authenticating a broken Google connection, explaining the difference between the owner's Google account and the agent's Google account, how an OpenClaw agent accesses Gmail or Google Workspace, where credentials are stored, how to use the agent inbox, how to give the agent write access to the owner's calendar, or guiding another agent or user through the email or calendar setup model.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orientation for custom (non-OpenAI) models running in the Codex app through the codex-router proxy. Explains that the app's native tools arrive as flattened codex_app__ and mcp__ names, that the router restores them so the app executes them, which companion skills to read before threads, browser, or computer-use work, and that a turn with no tool call ends the task. Use when the session uses a custom (non-OpenAI) model, for example deepseek-v4-flash or mimo-v2.5, when codex_app__ or mcp__ tool names appear in the tool list, when a tool result just arrived and more work remains, or when thread, browser, or computer-use work is requested.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates the tdmcp Anthropic Connectors Directory (Desktop Extension / MCPB) submission prep — designs the package, writes the privacy page, migrates .dxt→.mcpb, drafts all form answers, and QAs the result. Use for ANY work on the tdmcp directory/marketplace submission, including re-runs after a rejection ("update the submission", "redo the form answers", "re-migrate the bundle", "fix the privacy page", "the directory rejected us"). Drives a 4-agent pipeline (architect → docs-author ∥ bundle-engineer → QA).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search the public web and crawl URLs via the Unique AI Platform's `unique-cli web-search` command, with automatic per-turn citation tracking so cited web facts render as clickable external reference chips and `<sup>N</sup>` footnotes on the Unique platform. ALWAYS use this skill when the user asks to search the public web, research a topic online, look up news/articles/regulations, fetch the contents of one or more URLs, or perform any "two-phase" web research (search → review snippets → crawl selected URLs for full content). Routes through the Unique AI Platform's `/web-search-api` endpoints, so the engine (Google, Brave, Tavily, Jina, Firecrawl, …) and crawler are resolved server-side from the current environment — you never need to manage engine API keys yourself. Use this instead of fabricating answers from training data whenever fresh / source-cited information is needed. Do NOT use this skill for the internal knowledge base (`unique-cli search`) or for arbitrary tool execution (`unique-cli mcp`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for the frontend phase after the API contract exists — deciding the screens as units of work (one job a person finishes in one go, per actor of the event timeline), collecting the views and commands each screen needs, keeping the screen map in frontend/README.md, building against the Lean CLI, then handing over to frontend-ux-review and the human screen check. Not for the spec-animation mockup (domain-mockup).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to explore and make sense of PostHog Signals scouts — the scheduled agents that scan a project and emit findings into the Signals inbox. Use when a user wants to understand what scouts they have, how each one is behaving, and whether the fleet is actually working. Covers surveying the fleet and its schedules, reading recent scout runs and drilling into a single run's reasoning, inspecting the durable scratchpad memory the fleet has built up, tracing a run to the findings it emitted, and assessing a scout's health and performance over time (cadence, success rate, emit rate, signal-to-noise). Read-only and exploratory — to write or tune a scout, use `authoring-signals-scouts` instead. Trigger on "what are my scouts doing", "how is my <x> scout performing", "show me recent scout runs", "why did this scout find/emit nothing", "what has the fleet learned", "explore scout run <id>", "is my scout working".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Installs Scenic, the probabilistic scenario description language, for the CARLA in use — pip installing it into the same interpreter that holds the CARLA client, optionally cloning the upstream repo for the example scenarios the wheel does not ship, and verifying that the `scenic` CLI, the client and Scenic's version-keyed blueprint table all agree. Use when the user asks to "install Scenic", "set up Scenic", "download Scenic", "pip install scenic", wants to run `.scenic` files, or has a Scenic whose model import or blueprint lookup fails.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explores a CARLA map's road network through the Map/Waypoint API — a natural-language rundown of the whole map ("give me the topology"), drawing the topology to confirm the modelled map matches the visible one, enumerating junctions to resolve phrases like "the 4-way junction in the middle", nearest-waypoint lane facts, and next/previous lane navigation. Use when the user asks about the map's layout, lanes, junctions, topology, or to locate/navigate specific map elements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Spawns pedestrians that wander autonomously via WalkerAIController, and destroys them in the correct order. Pairs each walker.pedestrian.* with a controller.ai.walker, places them on the navigation mesh, and sends them to random navmesh points at walking speed. Use when the user asks to "spawn pedestrians/walkers", "add people/crowds", "make pedestrians walk around", or "remove the walkers". Reads the world settings first: if the world is already synchronous it never ticks it, and if it is asynchronous it makes it synchronous and drives the clock itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Controls the traffic-light actors on a running CARLA server — set a light green/red/yellow/off, freeze all lights (optionally all-green), set phase timing (green/yellow/red durations), and reset to the normal cycle. Target all lights, one by id, all in a junction, or the nearest. Use when the user asks to "make the light red", "freeze all lights green", "change the light timing", "turn the traffic lights off", or "reset the lights". This is the light actors, not the Traffic Manager (that's control-traffic).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。