「thesis」の検索結果

Builds or audits a literature review, producing an evidence map, the closest prior work, source clusters, a gap verdict, and a synthesis plan for the introduction. Use when the user asks whether a contribution is novel, who has studied a question, what the literature establishes, or how to organize a review, or wants a reading list, Zotero export, or pile of papers turned into one. For systematic reviews or meta-analyses it produces the protocol scaffold and routes registration (PROSPERO or OSF) and screening to dedicated tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drafts a referee report for a journal editor. Produces a recommendation, claim-and-design summary, three to six decision-driving concerns, additional concerns, and a revision plan through five parallel adversarial finders, Breaker, Butcher, Shredder, Void, Situator, a Blue Team error filter, Chief Reviewer synthesis, Tone Guard legal pass, and optional confidential editor note. Use when the user has been asked to referee a manuscript. Self-audits go to paper-review-lite or presubmit, and author responses go to referee-response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes or reviews a pre-analysis plan before data collection — registry choice (OSF, AEA RCT Registry, AsPredicted, registered reports), PAP structure, models and decision rules locked in advance, analysis code run on simulated data, contingencies for attrition, failed manipulations, and exclusions, deviation records, and timeline. Operationalizes the pre-data-collection side of DA-RT. Use when the user asks to draft or audit a pre-registration or PAP, choose a registry, decide what to lock versus leave exploratory, or handle a later deviation. Hypotheses and estimands come from hypothesis-building, post-hoc reporting from methods-reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns a theory into falsifiable, pre-registerable hypotheses, covering the DGP and DAG, identification, SATE versus PATE, counterfactual and directional framing, named estimands, justified SESOIs, the choice among NHST, equivalence, interval, and minimum-effect tests, scope conditions, and primary, secondary, and exploratory tiers. Use when the user asks to turn a research question or theory into hypotheses, whether a prediction is falsifiable, what the estimand is, or how to predict a null. Framing goes to narrative-building, the plan to pre-registration-writing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft a referee report on someone else's manuscript for a journal editor, using five adversarial finders, a Blue Team error filter, a Chief Reviewer synthesis, and a Tone Guard legal pass. Use when the user has been asked to referee a manuscript; self-audits go to paper-review-lite or presubmit, author responses to referee-response.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Builds or audits a literature review: evidence map, closest prior work, gap verdict, and synthesis plan. Use to check whether a contribution is novel, map what a literature establishes, or organize a review; systematic reviews get a protocol scaffold.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-step reasoning engine for complex analysis and systematic problem solving. Use when: (1) Complex debugging scenarios with multiple layers, (2) Architectural analysis and system design, (3) Problems requiring hypothesis testing and validation, (4) Multi-component failure investigation, (5) Performance bottleneck identification. Triggers: "--think", "--think-hard", "--ultrathink", "analyze step by step", "break down this problem", "systematic analysis". IMPORTANT: Do NOT use for simple single-step tasks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classifies raw pilot request → structured JSON {task_type, class, artifact, budget_estimate, confidence, routing_tag, resolution_path, schema_version, result_type, expected_result_kind, result_kind_resolution, hypothesis_relation}. Keyword-fast (<200ms) or Haiku fallback (<60s). Does NOT create WP or call executor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build structured ICP documentation by scraping case studies, testimonials, and solutions pages from your website. Produces firmographics, champion + economic buyer personas, pain points, decision criteria, anti-ICP, customer proof points, and voice-of-customer synthesis. Writes to marketing/icp/ICP.md as the canonical ICP every downstream skill reads. Triggers - "icp research", "ideal customer profile", "persona research", "customer segments", "who are our customers", "build ICP"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The commit-R protocol: a test-driven rewrite of one compartment of Anabasis v2. Commit what is in flight, remove the compartment's tests in an "R:" commit, write them again from a stated hypothesis so the production code fails on purpose, remove the production files in a second "R:" commit, then write the production code again, rewrite the neighbouring functions the old shape bent, and delete what served only it. Use when the operator says "commit R", "commit-R protocol", "remove and rewrite the tests" or "rewrite from scratch", or asks for a test-first pass that looks for a faster, simpler path to the same outcome.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert research analyst specializing in comprehensive information gathering, synthesis, and insight generation. Masters research methodologies, data analysis, and report creation with focus on delivering actionable intelligence that drives informed decision-making.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-provider deliberation panel for COMPLEX, multi-view questions — architecture, strategy, market research, and codebase sweeps. Runs a 4-stage deliberation across the provider fleet (diverge → contrarian red-team → adversarial verify → cited synthesis), the same multi-perspective rigour the plan-gate already applies to plan reviews, generalised to arbitrary questions. Use when one model's answer isn't enough and you want convergence THROUGH disagreement + verification, not a single opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Icarus Figures produces publication-grade figures for scientific papers — reproducible matplotlib/seaborn data figures and original TikZ method/framework/architecture figures, held to a four-axis quality bar (depth · elegance · unimpeachable · visible-gap) and exported as editable PDF+PNG+SVG with a runnable critique gate. Use this whenever a figure is destined for a paper, journal, conference submission, thesis, or report — making a plot/chart publication- or journal-ready, building a method/architecture/framework diagram or 技术路线图 (the hero figure a paper opens with), a schematic or workflow figure, or cleaning up a matplotlib/seaborn/TikZ figure that currently looks like a homework plot. Trigger even when the user never says "publication": if the figure goes into a written scientific document, this skill applies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn any website into an audio-enabled experience. Covers TTS reading mode (SpeechSynthesis API), pre-recorded MP3 audio player, and Voice CRO trigger system. Zero dependencies, works on any static or dynamic site. Use when adding read-aloud, audio player, or voice-based conversion features.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Keep Claude Code sessions grounded in prior decisions, project context, and daily handoff notes instead of starting from zero every time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

基于 AST 检查 CDC/RDC 违例：对比 MAS clock_domains 找跨域信号，检查是否被 2ff-sync CBB 保护。触发场景：(1) bba-guru-synthesis 综合前；(2) 显式 /bb-check-cdc。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

**[DEPRECATED in v1.3 — common path uses bb-invoke-yosys' embedded ABC]** 独立调用 ABC（Berkeley Logic Synthesis）做逻辑优化，仅 `mapping_effort=high` 等高级调优场景使用。触发场景：(1) bb-invoke-yosys `chain_to_abc=true` 时；(2) 显式 /bb-invoke-abc 调试。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

解析 SystemVerilog RTL 为 AST JSON，供 CDC 检查 / signal path tracing / module dep 分析。统一 4 个后端 (babel-lsp / pyverilog / verible / slang)，auto 模式自动降级。触发场景：(1) bba-guru-synthesis CDC 前；(2) bb-trace-signal-path / bb-find-module-deps 之前；(3) 显式 /bb-parse-ast。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

调用 Yosys 0.35 对 RTL 进行逻辑综合并技术映射到 ASAP7 标准单元，产出门级网表 + QoR 报告。支持并行综合（基于空闲CPU数量）。Workflow: (1)生成综合脚本;(2)并行执行综合;(3)LLM检查结果并迭代优化。触发场景：(1) bba-guru-synthesis 已完成 SDC 与 CDC 检查、需要生成 netlist；(2) PD 反馈 area/path 超标需要重综合；(3) 显式 /bb-invoke-yosys。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

调用 OpenSTA 2.5.0 做静态时序分析（STA）。综合阶段验证 WNS/TNS；PD 阶段做 post-route signoff（多 PVT corner + SPEF）。触发场景：(1) bba-guru-synthesis 综合后查 timing；(2) bba-guru-pd 布线后跑 multi-corner signoff；(3) 显式 /bb-invoke-opensta。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

从 MAS（clock_domains / io_timing / path_exceptions）派生 Synopsys SDC 时序约束文件，OpenSTA 语法校验。触发场景：(1) bba-guru-synthesis 综合前；(2) post-PD timing fail 修订约束；(3) 显式 /bb-create-sdc。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Nature-style materials science manuscript reviewer skill for testing materials design, synthesis, processing, structure-property, mechanism, stability, scalability, computational prediction and application claims against materials evidence chains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Nature-style chemistry manuscript reviewer skill for testing synthesis, catalysis, chemical biology, molecular/materials chemistry and analytical claims against identity, purity, controls, selectivity, mechanism, scope, reproducibility and quantitative comparison.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Unified entry point for Stitch design work. Handles prompt enhancement (UI/UX keywords, atmosphere), design system synthesis (.stitch/DESIGN.md), and high-fidelity screen generation/editing via Stitch MCP.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。