1,421 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when creating, writing, reviewing, annotating, repairing, refactoring, or validating readable Verilog RTL, including synthesizable Verilog-2001 .v files, existing-RTL analysis, semantic comment annotation, testbench scaffold planning, ASIC-quality review, local or remote Vivado/xsim validation, evidence-backed repair, and workflow trace diagnosis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
只读检索小红书公开内容，并把账号数据、标题、封面、互动量、作者近期内容和低粉爆款整理成可追溯证据。用户要求查公开账号或笔记数据时使用；不得点赞、收藏、评论、发布、删除或导出登录凭证。 English: Read-only research for public Xiaohongshu content, collecting traceable evidence such as account data, titles, covers, engagement, recent posts, and low-follower breakout examples. Use for public account or post research; never like, save, comment, publish, delete, or export credentials.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when an agent, harness, gateway, MCP workflow, or multi-step automation claims completion and the available traces, checkpoints, approvals, tool calls, or deployment records must be judged without trusting self-reported success.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reconstruct workflow behind a past coding-agent artifact using local ax sessions/commits/skills/tool traces. Use when asked how X was built.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Triage a raw, vague issue or bug report into a structured document that names what is known, what is missing, and what to do next. Use when an incoming issue, bug report, or problem description is too vague or incomplete for investigation or planning, and recommend the right next han skill. Does not investigate root causes or trace code paths — use investigate for debugging, diagnosis, and root cause analysis. Does not plan features or build solutions — use plan-a-feature or plan-implementation for that.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create original short videos using the 地下轨迹破土｜尺度反转、追逐穿越与空场余波 Creative DNA for MiniMax H3 or Seedance 2.0. Use when the user wants this causal, camera, motion, rhythm, or payoff structure with new subjects and surfaces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a Seedance 2.0 prompt for a rough hand-drawn luminous entity that physically contacts a live-action space, continuously transforms while remaining traceable, escapes through adjacent geography, and is followed by a slightly delayed handheld camera. Use for playful 4–15 second mixed-media clips; not for horror, polished CG, unrelated cuts, or simple visual filters.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Investigate how a concept, code path, application, network flow, system, incident, document, or local artifact actually works, then deliver a two-depth visual HTML explainer with a dead-simple big-picture first layer and source-backed technical depth behind it. Use when the user invokes $xray, asks how something works under the hood, wants a module or app behavior traced across boundaries, requests web, code, network, or safe static artifact research before explanation, or asks for an evidence-backed explainer. Do not use for answer-only definitions, general web design, full codebase audits, or invasive binary reverse engineering without explicit authorization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit and safely repair cross-runtime Skill governance: canonical-source ownership, divergent or duplicate projections, exposure scopes and budgets, lifecycle drift, quarantine, and retirement. Use when the user explicitly requests cross-runtime or cross-scope Skill governance; ignore project-local Skill inventory, product/runtime loading or enablement checks, usage statistics, and mentions/traces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create distinctive, production-grade web frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use when the user explicitly asks to build or substantially redesign a web component, page, or application. Only applies when repository inspection confirms that the visual surface is a browser-rendered web UI. Do not use for native or GPU-rendered graphics, shaders, games, terminal UIs, or other non-web visual systems. Ignore incidental mentions and traces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search oip-visual-v2 for traceable prompt-image pairs and open local result galleries. Use when finding, inspecting, comparing, browsing, or copying real image-generation references or exact source prompts. After references are selected, adapt them into a derived bilingual prompt when requested; use img-gen-taste first when the visual direction is still unclear.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix "setState() or markNeedsBuild() called during build" error triggered from deactivate(). Use when: (1) Error occurs during widget disposal or navigation away, (2) Stack trace shows deactivate -> some notifier -> ValueListenableBuilder._valueChanged, (3) Video/audio player pause() or stop() calls in deactivate() cause the error. The fix is deferring state-modifying operations to addPostFrameCallback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fix ClickHouse "Code: 243 Cannot reserve 1.00 MiB, not enough space" errors caused by system log tables (text_log, trace_log, processors_profile_log, query_log) filling the disk. Use when: (1) ClickHouse inserts fail with NOT_ENOUGH_SPACE error, (2) Disk is 100% full but application tables are small, (3) system database is 10-100x larger than user databases, (4) Sentry shows batch insert/commit failures across multiple tables simultaneously. Covers both self-hosted ClickHouse (Altinity operator on K8s) and ClickHouse Cloud with different remediation paths for each.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Instrument programs (Python, C/C++, Java) to capture snapshots of key program states at runtime, including variables, memory, and call stacks. Use when you need to debug complex issues, reproduce test cases, prepare traces for formal verification, or analyze program execution. Supports manual instrumentation points, automatic function/method instrumentation, and conditional triggers. Outputs structured JSON snapshots for debugging, replay, and verification workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze failing tests to detect functional bugs in code. Takes repository and failing test output as input, analyzes execution behavior, assertions, and stack traces to identify suspicious code regions and root causes. Use when debugging test failures, investigating regression bugs, or understanding why tests fail. Explains the bug mechanism, identifies affected code, and suggests fixes based on test expectations vs actual behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Summarize long Isabelle or Coq proof scripts into high-level logical steps and reasoning flow. Use when users need to: (1) Understand the structure of a complex proof, (2) Document proof strategies for others, (3) Extract the key reasoning steps from verbose proof scripts, (4) Create readable proof outlines from detailed tactical proofs. Produces hierarchical outlines with moderate detail showing proof structure, main cases, key lemmas, and reasoning flow for both Isabelle/Isar and Coq proofs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify bug-introducing commits using semantic analysis that extends traditional SZZ algorithm. Distinguishes semantic changes from refactorings or code movements using control-flow and data-flow similarity analysis. Use when analyzing bug-fix commits to trace back to bug-introducing changes, investigating software evolution, conducting empirical studies on defect prediction, or reducing false positives in bug localization. Supports git repositories and provides explanations for why commits are identified as bug-introducing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explains runtime errors and compilation failures with actionable debugging guidance. Use when Python or Java code throws runtime exceptions (NullPointerException, TypeError, AttributeError, etc.), compilation errors (syntax errors, type mismatches, import failures), or dependency issues. Analyzes error messages, stack traces, and code context to identify root causes and provide concrete fixes with examples. Distinct from test-related errors - focuses on errors during normal code execution and build processes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Locate root causes of failing regression tests by analyzing code changes, error messages, and test dependencies. Use when regression tests start failing after code changes, investigating test failures in CI/CD, debugging flaky tests, or understanding why previously passing tests now fail. Analyzes git diffs, stack traces, test output, and dependency changes to produce structured markdown reports ranking likely causes. Triggers when users ask to find why tests are failing, debug regression failures, investigate test breakage, or analyze failing test suites.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Verify that design documents, code implementations, and tests fully cover all specified requirements. Use this skill when validating requirement traceability, conducting design reviews, assessing implementation completeness, checking test coverage against requirements, performing compliance audits, or identifying missing functionality. Produces coverage reports showing which requirements are satisfied, partially satisfied, or missing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Selectively instruments code to capture runtime data for debugging failures and bugs. Use when investigating crashes, exceptions, unexpected behavior, test failures, or performance issues. Analyzes stack traces and error messages to identify suspicious code regions, then adds targeted logging, tracing, and assertions to capture variable values, execution paths, timing, and conditional branches. Supports Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, and C/C++.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explains test failures and provides actionable debugging guidance. Use when tests fail (unit, integration, E2E), builds fail, or code throws errors. Analyzes error messages, stack traces, and test output to identify root causes and suggest concrete fixes. Handles pytest, jest, junit, mocha, vitest, selenium, cypress, playwright, and other testing frameworks across Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Go, and other languages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compare behavior across multiple versions of programs or repositories. Use when you need to analyze how functionality changes between versions, identify regressions, compare outputs and exceptions, or validate upgrades. The skill compares execution behavior, test results, outputs, exceptions, and observable states across versions, generating detailed reports showing behavioral divergences, potential regressions, added/removed functionality, and areas requiring validation. Supports multiple programming languages and can work with test suites or execution traces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically generates executable tests that reproduce reported bugs from issue reports and code repositories. Use when users need to: (1) Create a test that reproduces a bug described in an issue report, (2) Generate failing tests from bug descriptions, stack traces, or error messages, (3) Validate bug reports by creating reproducible test cases, (4) Convert issue reports into executable regression tests. Takes a repository and issue report as input and produces test code that reliably triggers the reported bug.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。