「trust」の検索結果

Use when recovery planning requires verification that backups are restorable, complete, and safe to trust before an incident or recovery event.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes authorized attack simulations against Active Directory environments to identify misconfigurations, weak credentials, dangerous privilege paths, and exploitable trust relationships that could lead to domain compromise. The tester uses BloodHound for attack path analysis, Mimikatz for credential extraction, and Impacket for protocol-level attacks including Kerberoasting, AS-REP Roasting, and delegation abuse. Activates for requests involving Active Directory pentest, AD attack simulation, domain compromise testing, or Kerberos attack assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply Granovetter's embeddedness theory to analyze how economic behavior is embedded in ongoing social relations, avoiding both over-socialized and under-socialized accounts. Use this skill when the user needs to explain why market transactions deviate from pure economic rationality, analyze how trust and social ties shape business dealings, evaluate structural vs relational embeddedness in inter-firm networks, or when they ask 'why do firms prefer existing partners over cheaper alternatives', 'how do social relationships shape economic outcomes', or 'is this market truly arms-length'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Analyze market structures across perfect competition, monopolistic competition, oligopoly, and monopoly to predict firm behavior and market outcomes. Use this skill when the user needs to classify a market's competitive structure, predict pricing behavior, evaluate antitrust implications, or understand why an industry behaves the way it does — even if they say 'why can they charge so much', 'is this market competitive', or 'will prices come down'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Evaluate backlink quality using Domain Authority, Domain Rating, and trust metrics. Use this skill when the user needs to assess link profile health, identify toxic backlinks, or plan link building strategy — even if they say 'check my backlinks', 'link building', or 'domain authority analysis'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Combine multiple forecasting models into ensemble predictions for improved accuracy. Use this skill when the user needs to improve forecast reliability, combine ARIMA/Prophet/ETS outputs, or build a robust forecasting pipeline — even if they say 'combine forecasts', 'model averaging', or 'which forecast should I trust'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits whether a machine-readable regelrecht law model is faithful to the LETTER of the wettekst — and strictly separates the wettekst (leading) from the toelichting (Nota/Memorie van Toelichting; explanatory, not a norm). Runs in critical passes per article/lid and detects four deviation classes: toelichting-bleed (a modeled criterion that the letter only states as an open norm, or not at all), missing verbatim elements (a word/condition such as a "tenzij" or a qualifier dropped from the model), wrong legal_basis anchoring (an endpoint hung on a "kapstok"-article while the operative norm lives elsewhere), and verbatim-drift in text: (an ingetrokken/older redaction). Also detects positief-lid vs uitsluitings-lid conflicts and checks the chapeau for an explicit derogation rule ("zo nodig in afwijking van het eerste lid") before judging precedence. Classifies every finding as modelfout (fix), wettekst-gevolg (report, do not fix), or letter-vs-toelichting-question (jurist decides what is leading + revision signal). Use when the user wants to know if a model is "dicht bij de letter", mentions letter vs toelichting/bedoeling, fidelity, "natuurgetrouw", or before trusting feature outcomes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute advanced evasion by injecting malicious code into the memory space of a legitimate, suspended process (Process Hollowing). This skill details techniques to bypass static and dynamic analysis by masking malicious activity behind trusted processes like svchost.exe or explorer.exe.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SQL injection occurs when untrusted user input is interpolated directly into database queries, allowing attackers to alter query logic. Detect via single-quote errors, boolean-based blind responses (AND 1=1 vs AND 1=2), time-delay payloads (SLEEP, WAITFOR), UNION column enumeration, and error messages from MySQL, Oracle, MSSQL, PostgreSQL. Tools: sqlmap, sqlbftools, Burp Suite, wfuzz with SQLi fuzz strings.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SAML SSO assertion attack playbook. Use when testing signature validation, assertion wrapping, audience restrictions, ACS handling, XML trust boundaries, and enterprise SSO flaws.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prototype pollution testing for JavaScript stacks. Use when user input is merged into objects (query parsers, JSON bodies, deep assign), when configuring libraries via untrusted keys, or when hunting RCE gadgets via polluted Object.prototype in Node or the browser.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects insecure network communication in mobile apps (Android/iOS). Trigger on: cleartext HTTP, TLS misconfiguration, certificate pinning bypass, hostname verification disabled, allowCleartextTraffic, NSAllowsArbitraryLoads, ATS exceptions, custom TrustManager, ALLOW_ALL_HOSTNAME_VERIFIER, TLS 1.0/1.1, weak cipher suites, certificate pinning absent, Network Security Configuration, onReceivedSslError, SSLSocket, OkHttp, NSURL, URLSession, certificate transparency, HSTS, MITM. Covers MASVS-NETWORK-1 (TLS required) and MASVS-NETWORK-2 (certificate validation).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

OAuth and OIDC misconfiguration testing playbook. Use when reviewing redirect URI handling, state and nonce validation, PKCE, token audience, callback binding, and identity-provider trust flaws.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exploit an application's absolute trust in its underlying LLM (Overreliance). Use this skill to induce critical "hallucinations" (confident falsehoods) that cause downstream logical systems or automated agents tracking the LLM's output to make destructive actions or grant unauthorized access.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

JWT and OAuth token attack playbook. Use when validating token trust, signing algorithms, key handling, claim abuse, bearer flows, and OAuth account-binding weaknesses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Exploit insecure handling of the HTTP Host header to poison password resets, generate cache poisoning vectors, or bypass internal routing restrictions. Use this skill when web applications dynamically generate URLs, links, or redirects based on the arbitrary Host header value supplied by the client rather than relying on a static, trusted server configuration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Active Directory and network lateral movement assessment. Pass-the-hash, pass-the-ticket, Kerberoasting, AS-REP roasting, NTLM relay, SMB relay, WMI/WinRM/PSRemoting abuse, constrained/unconstrained delegation, RBCD, cross-trust exploitation, and pivoting. Uses impacket, netexec, enum4linux-ng, smbmap, smbclient, bloodhound-python, Responder, ntlmrelayx, mitm6, and ldap-utils. Chains from /post-exploit or /credential-audit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

HTTP Host header injection and routing abuse playbook. Use when the application trusts the Host header for generating URLs, routing requests, or access control — enabling password reset poisoning, web cache poisoning, SSRF via routing, and virtual host bypass.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Insecure deserialization playbook. Use when Java, PHP, or Python applications deserialize untrusted data via ObjectInputStream, unserialize, pickle, or similar mechanisms that may lead to RCE, file access, or privilege escalation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DNS rebinding attack playbook. Use when testing applications that trust DNS resolution for origin checks, interact with internal services from browser context, or when SSRF is not possible server-side but the target has client-side fetch/XHR to attacker-controlled domains.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advanced Content Security Policy bypass techniques. Use when XSS or data exfiltration is blocked by CSP and you need to find policy weaknesses, trusted endpoint abuse, nonce leakage, or exfiltration channels that CSP cannot block.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Application-level business logic security testing for any domain. Takes an understanding-first approach: map the intended workflows before probing them. Covers: value/quantity logic abuse (negative, zero, overflow, rounding on any numeric field), workflow and state machine bypass (skipping required steps, forcing illegal state transitions, reusing one-time tokens), trust boundary violations (BOLA horizontal/vertical, BFLA, cross-tenant access, negative ownership attacks), idempotency and replay attacks (duplicate submissions, double-spend, same-reference reuse), multi-step flow integrity (checkout, registration, approval, verification), quota and rate limit bypass, time/date manipulation, and authorization code / reference number predictability. Domain-agnostic — applies to SaaS, e-commerce, banking, gaming, social platforms, APIs, or any multi-user application with stateful workflows. Chains from /pentester; chains into /param-fuzz when boundary violations or mass assignment are confirmed.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CORS misconfiguration testing playbook. Use when analyzing cross-origin trust, credentialed browser reads, origin reflection, preflight policy bugs, and browser-based access to authenticated APIs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bypass authentication via forced browsing to protected URLs, parameter tampering (authenticated=yes, debug=true, fromtrustIP=true), session ID prediction from linear/incremental cookies, SQL injection on login forms, PHP unserialize() boolean type juggling (b:1 payload), and credential transport over HTTP. Detectable with Burp Suite, OWASP ZAP, WebGoat.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。