1.2万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Accessibility audit skill for scanning, fixing, and verifying WCAG 2.2 Level A and AA compliance across React, Next.js, Vue, Angular, Svelte, and plain HTML codebases. Use when auditing accessibility, fixing a11y violations, checking color contrast, generating compliance reports, or integrating accessibility checks into CI/CD pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to implement, audit, or validate structured data (schema markup) on their website. Use when the user mentions 'structured data,' 'schema.org,' 'JSON-LD,' 'rich results,' 'rich snippets,' 'schema markup,' 'FAQ schema,' 'Product schema,' 'HowTo schema,' or 'structured data errors in Search Console.' Also use when someone asks why their content isn't showing rich results or wants to improve AI search visibility. NOT for general SEO audits (use seo-audit) or technical SEO crawl issues (use site-architecture).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to audit, review, or diagnose SEO issues on their site. Also use when the user mentions "SEO audit," "technical SEO," "why am I not ranking," "SEO issues," "on-page SEO," "meta tags review," or "SEO health check." For building pages at scale to target keywords, see programmatic-seo. For adding structured data, see schema-markup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up, audit, and debug analytics tracking implementation — GA4, Google Tag Manager, event taxonomy, conversion tracking, and data quality. Use when building a tracking plan from scratch, auditing existing analytics for gaps or errors, debugging missing events, or setting up GTM. Trigger keywords: GA4 setup, Google Tag Manager, GTM, event tracking, analytics implementation, conversion tracking, tracking plan, event taxonomy, custom dimensions, UTM tracking, analytics audit, missing events, tracking broken. NOT for analyzing marketing campaign data — use campaign-analytics for that. NOT for BI dashboards — use product-analytics for in-product event analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compliance OS — meta-orchestrator that lets compliance teams CONFIGURE which frameworks apply, COMPUTE cross-framework control overlap, SIMULATE internal audits, and CONSOLIDATE evidence across multiple frameworks. Four decisions: (1) Given a company profile, which of the 12 supported frameworks apply (ISO 27001/13485/42001/14971, EU AI Act, MDR 745, GDPR, SOC 2, FDA QSR, NIST CSF 2.0, NIS2, HIPAA)? (2) Across selected frameworks, which controls overlap and how much evidence reuses? (3) For a given framework + scope, what does a realistic mock audit produce — drawing from the 205-scenario library? (4) Across selected frameworks, what's the unified evidence checklist with reuse map? Use when standing up a multi-framework program, planning the annual audit calendar, or preparing for certification stage 1. Does NOT replace per-framework skills (it orchestrates them).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit assets against naming conventions, file size budgets, format standards. Finds orphaned assets, missing references.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security audit — save tampering, cheat vectors, network exploits, data exposure, input validation. Before public or multiplayer release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit GDD content counts against what's implemented — planned vs built.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits Filestore instances on Google Cloud across projects for disaster recovery readiness (missing or stale backups), security access governance (overly permissive NFS export rules, 0.0.0.0/0 exposure, missing ROOT_SQUASH), and reliability compliance (Physical Zone Isolation PZI and Physical Zone Separation PZS). Use when assessing storage health posture, auditing NFS export permissions, identifying unprotected file shares, or validating zone failure domains. Don't use for Cloud Storage buckets, Persistent Disk, or NetApp Volumes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply Apache ShardingSphere's written coding standards when explicitly requested, or when code-implementation routes task-changed production, test, script, build, generated, or Maven POM artifacts through repository standards. Also perform a standalone read-only compliance audit of a user-specified scope. Use CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md, applicable AGENTS.md rules, Checkstyle, Spotless, and other repository-defined standards, including naming and evidence-based defensive-code rules. Do not invoke independently for an ordinary implementation already governed by code-implementation, and do not independently audit architecture, runtime ownership, caches, or lifecycle.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reduces an always-on LifeOS context file that has grown too big via a human-gated pass — deterministic GC of stale entries first, then semantic merges and relocations — never dropping a directive and committing every change reversibly. USE WHEN /trim, trim the context, trim OPERATIONAL_RULES, this file is too big, reduce a doctrine file, prune an always-loaded file, fold the proposal inbox, shrink CLAUDE.md or DA_IDENTITY. NOT FOR general code refactoring, trimming video or audio media (use AudioEditor for audio files), or removing AI writing patterns from prose.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits any AI instruction set for over-prompting using the core test — would a smarter model make this rule unnecessary? Applies Five Questions to every rule (Claude already does this? Contradiction? Redundant? One-off fix? Vague?) then classifies as CUT/RESOLVE/MERGE/EVALUATE/SHARPEN/MOVE/KEEP. Workflows: Audit (full system, token savings), QuickCheck (single file). Principle: less scaffolding = better output. USE WHEN BPE, bitter pill, audit setup, over-prompting, trim instructions, dead weight, simplify setup, clean up CLAUDE.md. NOT FOR attacking logical flaws in ideas (use RedTeam).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Pre-deployment security audit of Solidity smart contracts in a Foundry project. Combines static analysis (Slither, Aderyn), symbolic execution (Mythril), and property-based testing (forge fuzz + invariant tests with handlers) to catch reentrancy, access-control, oracle/price manipulation, and arithmetic bugs BEFORE deploying to an EVM chain. Also enforces key hygiene (no plaintext private keys, encrypted cast keystore) and a secure deploy workflow. Use when writing, reviewing, testing, or deploying Solidity/Foundry contracts, building a dApp, or working with forge/cast/anvil, MetaMask, or Web3/DeFi code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit experiment integrity before claiming results. Uses fresh-agent GPT-6-Astra review (same-family provisional in the base Codex mirror) to check for fake ground truth, score normalization fraud, phantom results, and insufficient scope. Use when user says "审计实验", "check experiment integrity", "audit results", "实验诚实度", or after experiments complete before writing claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit experiment integrity before claiming results. Uses cross-model review (external reviewer backend) to check for fake ground truth, score normalization fraud, phantom results, and insufficient scope. Use when user says "审计实验", "check experiment integrity", "audit results", "实验诚实度", or after experiments complete before writing claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run the Anti-Autoresearch integrity-forensics sweep (span-anchored evidence ledger → GPT auditors propose findings → a rules-only reporter that lists every proposal with what the auditor said about it) against a paper via a SHA-pinned thin launcher — then convert the verdict into a typed policy gate (BLOCK/WARN/NO_NEW_BLOCKER) and an append-only obligations ledger. Use when user says "integrity forensics", "forensic audit this paper", "投稿前自查诚信", "审这篇论文的诚信", or says "anti-autoresearch" when the upstream repo's own skills are not installed. Also invoked by /paper-writing (submission self-forensics, default ON), /peer-review (forensic appendix), /resubmit-pipeline.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automate Cloudinary media management including folder organization, upload presets, asset lookup, transformations, and usage monitoring through natural language commands
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Debug inference clients that use an attached provider and its native endpoint, including hosted APIs and host-local Ollama, vLLM, SGLang, TRT-LLM, LM Studio, or NIM. Use for provider attachment, endpoint policy, credential substitution, topology, and migration from the removed managed inference endpoint. Trigger keywords - debug inference, managed inference endpoint, local inference, ollama, lm studio, vllm, sglang, trtllm, NIM, inference failing, model server unreachable, credential_endpoint_mismatch, host.openshell.internal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes the missing CARLA documentation that the audit found — Python API entries in PythonAPI/docs/*.yml, sensors in ref_sensors.md, catalogue actors, broken links and nav entries — one audit category at a time, in CARLA's house style. Use when the user asks to "document this feature", "write the docs for X", "fix the audit findings", or names a category such as "the Python API part".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identifies security vulnerabilities, generates structured audit reports with severity ratings, and provides actionable remediation guidance. Use when conducting security audits, reviewing code for vulnerabilities, or analyzing infrastructure security. Invoke for SAST scans, penetration testing, DevSecOps practices, cloud security reviews, dependency audits, secrets scanning, or compliance checks. Produces vulnerability reports, prioritized recommendations, and compliance checklists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Auto-generate a professional, client-ready GEO service proposal from audit data. Creates a full proposal in markdown and PDF including executive summary, findings, recommended service packages (Basic/Standard/Premium), pricing, timeline, and terms. Use when user says "proposal", "proposta", "offerta", "preventivo", "generate proposal", or after completing a GEO audit for a prospect.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full website GEO+SEO audit with parallel subagent delegation. Orchestrates a comprehensive Generative Engine Optimization audit across AI citability, platform analysis, technical infrastructure, content quality, and schema markup. Produces a composite GEO Score (0-100) with prioritized action plan.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a codebase or directory for security issues (hardcoded secrets, injection, unsafe deserialization, weak crypto, authz gaps) and produce a structured findings report. Use when the user asks for a security review, an audit, or to check code for vulnerabilities. Report only — never fix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit paid-ad landing pages for message match, mobile experience, performance, accessibility, trust, forms, consent, tracking, security, and conversion friction. Use for landing-page audit, post-click experience, LP audit, conversion-rate optimization, form optimization, ad-to-page message match, redirects, blocked navigation, or requests involving private, loopback, link-local, or metadata IP destinations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。