8,128 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Business Intelligence Analyst — reconciling a metric discrepancy between reports, designing a dimensional model or semantic layer for self-service dashboards, setting a data freshness/latency SLA, or diagnosing why a dashboard's aggregate number is misleading.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Budget Analyst — reviewing a department's budget request or decision package for a new program, building or reconciling a budget-to-actual variance report, phasing costs for a new facility or position against its real start date, or advising on reserve/fund-balance adequacy ahead of a budget cycle.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Chief Data Officer — resolving conflicting metric definitions across dashboards, deciding whether a dataset should be retained or purged, assigning data ownership for a system feeding regulatory or board reporting, sizing a privacy/breach risk against a proposed data collection, or auditing data readiness before an AI/ML initiative kicks off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Postsecondary Chemistry Teacher — grading a lab report where the numeric result misses the "expected" value but the methodology is sound, distinguishing a conceptual misunderstanding from an arithmetic slip on a problem set, deciding how much procedural freedom to give students on an open-ended lab, or vetting whether a demo/lab procedure is safe to run in this specific room.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Childcare Worker — checking ratio/headcount compliance across mixed-age groups, deciding whether a fall or minor incident needs a written report versus a verbal mention at pickup, redirecting a behavior problem in an unstructured (non-curriculum) setting, or triaging which of several simultaneous demands (a crying toddler, a fight over a toy, a diaper) gets attention first.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Biological Technician — troubleshooting a failed assay or contaminated culture, deciding whether a batch of lab data is trustworthy enough to report, auditing a bench's SOP/QC discipline, or diagnosing calibration and reagent-lot problems behind inconsistent results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a biomedical/bioengineering engineer — running a design control phase (inputs, outputs, verification, validation) for a medical device, scoring a Design FMEA and deciding whether a failure mode needs mitigation, planning a human factors/usability validation study, building a design traceability matrix, or writing a design verification or risk-mitigation report. Distinct from a regulatory-affairs-specialist (owns the submission/clearance process, not the engineering itself) and from a clinical-data-manager/biostatistician (trial data and analysis, not device design).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an audiologist — interpreting an audiogram to classify hearing-loss type and severity, deciding whether a conductive component warrants an ENT referral before amplification, verifying a hearing-aid fitting against prescriptive targets, screening a vestibular/balance complaint, or writing an audiometric report for a referring physician.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a billing and posting clerk — generating an invoice against a rate/contract schedule, applying an incoming payment across multiple open invoices, processing a credit memo or adjustment, or investigating an aging-report discrepancy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Aircraft Structure, Surfaces, Rigging, and Systems Assembler — deciding whether an out-of-tolerance hole or fastener needs a nonconformance report versus a field fix, verifying torque and calibration status before a fastener installation, diagnosing a FOD (foreign object debris) risk before closing a structure, or reading a drawing callout against a conflicting work instruction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Acoustical Engineer — calculating room reverberation time (RT60) and specifying absorption/reflection treatment for a space, evaluating a wall or floor assembly's STC/IIC rating against a code or design target, diagnosing why a completed space fails its acoustic design intent, specifying industrial or mechanical equipment noise controls against OSHA/NIOSH exposure limits, or writing an acoustic design report or noise-control specification for a construction or renovation project.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Advertising and Promotions Manager — building a media plan backward from an objective and budget, briefing or evaluating creative against a brief, negotiating with agencies/media vendors, sanity-checking vendor-reported attribution, or reading a post-campaign debrief to separate delivery performance from response performance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Adult ESL/Basic Education Instructor — placing a new adult learner using standardized assessment scores, designing life-context-relevant lesson content for working adults, tracking NRS-reportable level gains, addressing attendance/retention barriers, or preparing a learner for GED/HSE or workplace English benchmarks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discover and characterize regulatory elements (enhancers, promoters, silencers, insulators, super-enhancers) using ENCODE data and the cCRE catalog. Use when the user wants to find candidate regulatory elements, identify active enhancers in a tissue, map promoter states, classify chromatin states with ChromHMM, identify super-enhancers with ROSE, understand the functional validation hierarchy (CRISPR > MPRA > reporter), or characterize non-coding genomic regions. Covers the full workflow from ENCODE cCRE lookup through chromatin state segmentation to functional validation and enhancer-gene linkage. Use this skill for ANY regulatory element discovery, classification, or characterization task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate publication-ready methods sections, figure legends, supplementary tables, and data availability statements from ENCODE analysis provenance. Implements the scientific documentation standards requiring complete metadata reporting. Use when the user needs to write methods, generate figure legends, create supplementary tables, draft data availability statements, compile tool citations, or auto-generate any publication text from their ENCODE analysis. Trigger on: methods section, figure legend, supplementary table, data availability, tool citations, publication writing, manuscript, write methods, methods draft, write up, write-up, paper writing, reproducible methods.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze ENCODE functional genomics screens including CRISPR screens, MPRA (Massively Parallel Reporter Assays), and STARR-seq. Find screen data in ENCODE, process results, identify functional elements, and integrate with epigenomic annotations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Sync official Anthropic documentation and analyze impact on project components. Runs docs/reference/update-claude-docs.sh, computes diffs, and reports impacts on the skill validator, plugins, and project documentation. Use when user mentions "sync docs", "update reference docs", "refresh docs", or "check doc changes".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scan a project to detect configured quality and testing tools across JVM (Gradle/Maven), Android (AGP/Compose/KMP), Node.js/TypeScript, and Python ecosystems. Cross-reference against research-backed recommendations and assist with setup. Auto-detects project type(s) including monorepos with mixed ecosystems. Use when user asks to "audit tooling", "recommend tools", "quality stack", "what tools am I missing", "setup eslint", "setup detekt", "add coverage", "add ruff", "configure CI quality pipeline", "scan project tools", "tooling audit", "android tooling", "android quality", "compose testing", "kmp testing", or "screenshot testing".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive SEO analysis for any website or business type. Orchestrates 52 sub-skills (52 active): full site audits, technical SEO (CWV/INP), schema, E-E-A-T content quality, images, sitemaps, GEO for AI Overviews, llms.txt generation, AI crawler audit, plus live GSC and Ahrefs MCP data. GSC: overview, drops, opportunities, brand-vs-nonbrand, cannibalization, compare, content-decay, index-issues, new-keywords. Ahrefs: overview, backlinks, keywords, competitors, content-gap, broken-links, new-links, anchor-analysis, dr-history, top-pages. Cross-MCP: serp, content-brief, brand-radar, site-audit-pro, report. Local: log-analysis, ai-content-check, internal-links, local, migration-check, obsidian-kb. AI Readability: llms-txt, robots-ai. Performance: lighthouse-audit, core-web-vitals, page-experience. Quality & AI Search: rich-results, ai-optimization, eeat-audit, helpful-content. Triggers on: "SEO", "audit", "schema", "Core Web Vitals", "sitemap", "E-E-A-T", "AI Overviews", "GEO", "technical SEO", "content quality", "structured data", "GSC", "Ahrefs", "backlinks", "keywords", "search console", "domain rating", "local SEO", "migration", "lighthouse", "pagespeed", "LCP", "INP", "CLS", "page experience", "interstitials", "mobile friendly", "rich results", "rich snippets", "schema eligibility", "AI optimization", "AI search readiness", "EEAT", "trust signals", "helpful content", "people-first", "content quality gate".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Per-type rich result eligibility checker. Given a URL or page type, determine WHICH Google rich results the page is eligible for, validate existing JSON-LD against Google's required/recommended properties per type, and produce a gap report. Use when user says "rich results", "rich snippets", "eligible rich results", "structured data types", or "schema eligibility".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill any time a spreadsheet file is the primary input or output. This means any task where the user wants to: open, read, edit, or fix an existing .xlsx, .xlsm, .csv, or .tsv file (e.g., adding columns, computing formulas, formatting, charting, cleaning messy data); create a new spreadsheet from scratch or from other data sources; or convert between tabular file formats. Trigger especially when the user references a spreadsheet file by name or path — even casually (like "the xlsx in my downloads") — and wants something done to it or produced from it. Also trigger for cleaning or restructuring messy tabular data files (malformed rows, misplaced headers, junk data) into proper spreadsheets. The deliverable must be a spreadsheet file. Do NOT trigger when the primary deliverable is a Word document, HTML report, standalone Python script, database pipeline, or Google Sheets API integration, even if tabular data is involved.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Convert simplified Chinese to Traditional Chinese (zh-TW), covering characters, Taiwan vocabulary, and phrasing. Use when the user asks to convert 簡體 to 正體/繁體, localise mainland Chinese text for Taiwan, fix simplified characters left in a document or repository, check whether content is written in proper zh-TW, or normalise variant forms such as 着/裏/爲 to the Taiwan standard. Handles both files edited in place and text pasted into the conversation. Runs on Python 3 standard library alone, with no OpenCC and no installed packages.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create, run, and maintain API test collections using Bruno (OpenCollection YAML format and legacy Bru format). Use when the user wants to: (1) create a Bruno API test collection from scratch or from OpenAPI/Swagger specs, (2) write API request files with tests and assertions, (3) run API tests using bru CLI, (4) generate test reports (HTML, JUnit, JSON), (5) set up CI/CD pipelines (GitHub Actions) for automated API testing, (6) debug or fix failing Bruno API tests, (7) add environment configurations for API testing, (8) chain API requests with data extraction, or (9) work with any .yml/.bru Bruno collection files. Triggers on mentions of 'Bruno', 'bru CLI', 'API testing collection', 'OpenCollection', or requests to automate API testing with file-based collections.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill whenever the user wants to create, read, edit, or manipulate Word documents (.docx files). Triggers include: any mention of 'Word doc', 'word document', '.docx', or requests to produce professional documents with formatting like tables of contents, headings, page numbers, or letterheads. Also use when extracting or reorganizing content from .docx files, inserting or replacing images in documents, performing find-and-replace in Word files, working with tracked changes or comments, or converting content into a polished Word document. If the user asks for a 'report', 'memo', 'letter', 'template', or similar deliverable as a Word or .docx file, use this skill. Do NOT use for PDFs, spreadsheets, Google Docs, or general coding tasks unrelated to document generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。