「you」の検索結果

Project documentation structure — standard proj-[name]/ layout with ADRs, stories, and operations guides. Use when: initializing docs for a new project, recording architecture decisions, or maintaining project knowledge bases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Council — 5 independent AI perspectives + mutual critique + synthesis (adapted from karpathy/llm-council for Claude Code). For high-stakes decisions where the answer does NOT follow unambiguously from the data — go/no-go before real consequences, critiquing a methodology, choosing between competing approaches, pressure-testing a conclusion you're attached to, designing risk controls. NOT for log/data analysis (the council has no data access) and not for factual lookups. Triggers — "convene the council", "run it past the council", "go/no-go", "pressure-test this".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security launch audit for a public web app BEFORE you ship or hand it to a client — "vibe coders are getting sued", systematized. An executable pipeline: classify (static / full-stack / AI) → run sections (secrets+supply-chain, DB, auth, infra+headers, legal, LLM/injection) orchestrating deterministic tools + manual checks → GO/NO-GO report. Adapted from Prajwal Tomar's playbook, extended with prompt-injection / supply-chain / secret-history / dependency-CVE layers. NOT the same as pre-push (that = clean push; this = is the product itself safe to launch). Triggers — "security checklist for the site", "audit before launch", "is the site safe", "check before handing to client".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prove — or honestly fail to prove — a specific technical claim: "the fix works", "it's deployed", "the service is running", "the site is done", "there are no vulnerabilities". Atomizes the claim, picks the shortest decisive signal on the evidence ladder, and returns a verdict from a fixed vocabulary (pass / partial / fail / skip) with an explicit coverage boundary. NOT code review, NOT a fix, NOT orchestration — only "what is proven, and what we merely hope". Triggers — "prove it works", "is it really done?", "are you sure?", "we deployed — is it live?", "verify that", "did we actually check?".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Autonomous goal loop — give it ONE goal plus how to verify it, the agent runs check→fix→check itself and comes back only with the finished result (code with audit, research with fact-check, content with critique, audit/backtest). Self-verification instead of constant supervision, with hard safety guards. Vary the loop with a verification rubric designed before it runs. Triggers — "work autonomously to the result", "don't come back until it's done", "run the loop yourself", "drive it to done".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate an incoming workflow upgrade — a skill, MCP server, subagent, library, external service, prompt, or pattern — through one disciplined pipeline before adopting it. Security is a blocking gate. Records every verdict so the same thing is never evaluated twice. Use when considering a new tool from a post, repo, or recommendation. Triggers — "vet this", "should we adopt", "is this safe to install", "evaluate this skill/MCP", "what do you think of this tool".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Preventive hygiene audit of your own Claude Code configuration — memory files, project context (CLAUDE.md), rules, permissions, skills — a deterministic scan of sizes / broken links / stale entries / excessive permissions / junk + interpretation + targeted fixes by agreement. Keeps the setup from rotting before it breaks. Triggers — "check the system", "system health", "workflow hygiene", "what to clean up", "audit memory", "optimize the system".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A gate before git push / deploy — assembled from your own tools (secret-grep + slop-scan + code-review + build/compile + optional worktree isolation), so AI junk (slop / bugs / secrets / uncompiled code) never reaches a remote or a production server. Turns "I hope it's clean" into a verifiable criterion. Branches: web/OSS (git push/PR) vs deploy-to-server service. Triggers — "check before push", "clean push", "gate before push", "finalize before commit", "run before deploy".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deliberate system-improvement loop — audit your own Claude Code setup (rules / memory / skills / MCP / agents / registry), evaluate incoming tools via /vet, adopt the worthwhile ones with discipline (backup → verify), and record every decision. Use when bringing in a tool/idea/collection to improve the setup, or when doing a tooling-improvement pass. Triggers — "upgrade the workflow", "audit our setup", "let's improve the tooling", "evaluate this for us", when handed a post/repo/reel with a tool.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself) review rules for code reviews: find the same knowledge — a rule, a constant, a parser, a validation, a protocol detail — implemented in several places that must change together, and tell it apart from code that merely looks alike. Use when reviewing a diff, a pull request or recent changes for duplication, on "DRY review", "is this duplicated", "copy-paste check", or when a review checklist asks for DRY. Pair it with the solid skill for design and with owasp-asvs for security.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

豆包环境专用的视觉物料生产：PPT / Keynote / HTML deck、公众号封面与正文配图、B站/YouTube 视频封面。存在的全部理由是走豆包内置 image_gen（默认 seedream_5.0_pro 模型），不花第三方图像 API 的钱——不在豆包环境就别用。用户说做PPT、幻灯片、演示文稿、deck、公众号封面、视频封面时触发。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GEODE prompt-writing standards. Use when creating or editing runtime prompts, system prompts, tool/developer instructions, model-facing identity text, prompt templates, or scaffold rules that affect model behavior; especially when avoiding identity assertions such as "You are ...".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trigger when: (1) the user mentions "manim", "scene", "video", "EN/KO render", "GEODE_HERO_LANG", "1080p60", or (2) editing files under `scripts/visualizations/` ending in `.py`, or (3) the user asks to render, re-render, or extend any of the four validated scenes (`geode_hero.py`, `autoresearch_filewalk.py`, `autoresearch_compare.py`, `critical_floor.py`). GEODE Manim Scene authoring standard. Locks the patterns the four validated scenes already share — Anthropic-style palette, Helvetica Neue + Pretendard font pairing with weight=NORMAL, EN/KO multilingual lang via `GEODE_HERO_LANG` env, `_dashed_arrow_with_head` stage-coupled tinting, `verify_hero_layout.py` ratchet — so the next scene does not re-discover the kerning / padding / transition regressions catalogued in [[viz-frame-audit]].

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grilling session that challenges your plan against the existing domain model, sharpens terminology, and updates documentation (CONTEXT.md, ADRs) inline as decisions crystallise. Use when user wants to stress-test a plan against their project's language and documented decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create new Synapse skills from conversation. Describe what you want the skill to do and I'll generate it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate TUI screen/view with layout, keybindings, state management, and tests

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Setup web app page with component, layout, data fetching, and tests

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Jetpack Compose navigation expert with type-safe routes, Hilt DI, and MVVM/MVI architecture. Activate on: Jetpack Compose navigation, Compose type-safe routes, Hilt dependency injection, MVVM Android, MVI pattern, Compose state management, NavHost, ViewModel. NOT for: XML layouts (use frontend-architect), iOS SwiftUI (use swiftui-data-flow-expert), React Native (use react-native-architect).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Metal/wgpu/WGSL shader surfaces for native Rust gpui apps (Zed-family, pd-console), stockpiled with beautiful copy-pasteable shader-toy examples. Use for custom GPU fragment passes behind/around gpui panes: ocean/water shaders, pixelated waves and boats, a living harbor, dithered chrome borders, sonar sweeps, aurora/starfields, CRT/scanline post. Trigger on: wgsl, wgpu, metal shader, gpui shader, shadertoy, fragment shader, SDF, noise/fbm, ordered dithering, pixelation, render-to-texture, "pixelated waves and boats", living harbor water. NOT for: web/GLSL/three.js shaders (use a web tool), non-shader gpui motion (use rust-gpui-motion), general GUI layout/color (use beautiful-gui-design), CLI/TUI (use beautiful-cli-design).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose and eliminate the GraphQL N+1 resolver explosion using Facebook DataLoader's per-request batching, plus the second-order defenses (persisted queries, depth limits, cost analysis). Use when a GraphQL query that returns N items in a list triggers N+1 database round trips, when designing nested resolvers that load associations, when a list query times out under load, or when you need to budget query cost before resolvers run. NOT for REST-style endpoint design (use api-versioning-strategy), generic database query optimization (use database-query-optimizer), or schema design (use graphql-server-architect).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Long-running design anthropologist that builds comprehensive visual databases from 500-1000 real-world examples, extracting color palettes, typography patterns, layout systems, and interaction design across any domain (portfolios, e-commerce, SaaS, adult content, technical showcases). This skill should be used when users need exhaustive design research, pattern recognition across large example sets, or systematic visual analysis for competitive positioning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze design trends and recommend appropriate styles, color palettes, and typography systems for your project based on current design movements. NOT for accessibility auditing or full design system creation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Managing third-party dependencies — version pinning, security auditing, license compliance, update workflows, lockfile management, supply chain security. Activate on "npm audit", "dependabot", "renovate", "pin versions", "dependency update", "supply chain", "license compliance", "lockfile", "security advisory", "typosquatting", "SBOM". NOT for internal monorepo package management (use monorepo-management) or publishing your own packages to npm/PyPI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Choose, compare, and decompose work into the right coordination topology: dag, workflow, manager-driven team, swarm, blackboard, team-builder, or recurring loop. Use when the coordination shape is unclear, when you need topology-native breakdown instructions instead of a generic DAG, or when planning topology and runtime topology may differ. NOT for actual execution, node-level skill matching, or framework/tool installation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。