1.8万 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Mask, redact, and anonymize sensitive data (PII, PCI, PHI) in databases, logs, and APIs. Use when protecting PII in dev/staging environments, redacting sensitive data from logs, anonymizing data for analytics, or applying k-anonymity and differential privacy for GDPR-compliant data sharing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run Codex CLI, Claude Code, or other coding agents as background processes for programmatic control. Use when a user asks to run a coding agent, delegate a task to another AI, spawn a sub-agent, run Claude Code in the background, or orchestrate multiple coding agents on separate tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Asana Automation via Rube MCP workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Automate Asana tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): tasks, projects, sections, teams, workspaces. Always search tools first for current schemas and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Asana Automation via Rube MCP workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Automate Asana tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): tasks, projects, sections, teams, workspaces. Always search tools first for current schemas and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ask Questions If Underspecified workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Clarify requirements before implementing. Use when serious doubts arise and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ActiveCampaign Automation via Rube MCP workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Automate ActiveCampaign tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): manage contacts, tags, list subscriptions, automation enrollment, and tasks. Always search tools first for current schemas and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ActiveCampaign Automation via Rube MCP workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Automate ActiveCampaign tasks via Rube MCP (Composio): manage contacts, tags, list subscriptions, automation enrollment, and tasks. Always search tools first for current schemas and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
半导体芯片制造工艺 (Semiconductor Process Engineering / 半导体芯片制造工艺 — 以「物理化学极限 + 良率经济双重约束」为特征的集成电路前道/后道制造工艺认知操作系统：从「器件架构与微缩路线（planar→FinFET→GAA nanosheet→CFET、等效微缩 DTCO/STCO、背面供电 BSPDN）→ 工艺整合（FEOL/MOL/BEOL 模块协同、PDK、流片 tape-out）→ 单元工艺（光刻 litho（DUV 浸没式 193i / EUV 13.5nm / 多重曝光 SADP-SAQP / OPC / mask）、刻蚀 etch（RIE/ICP/原子层刻蚀 ALE）、薄膜沉积 depo（CVD/PECVD/LPCVD/ALD/PVD/外延 epi/电镀 Cu）、掺杂 doping（离子注入 ion implant / 退火 RTA-laser anneal）、CMP 化学机械抛光、清洗 cleaning）→ 量测检测 metrology（CD-SEM / OCD / overlay / 椭偏 ellipsometry / 缺陷检测 defect inspection / e-beam）→ 良率工程 yield（缺陷密度 / SPC 统计过程控制 / FDC / APC / DOE 实验设计 / 良率爬坡 yield ramp）→ 先进封装 advanced packaging（2.5D/3D、CoWoS、HBM、混合键合 hybrid bonding、chiplet、TSV）」的完整器件-工艺-良率-量产决策链。覆盖 (a) 第一性张力 — **物理/化学/材料的硬约束（量子隧穿、短沟道效应、RC 延迟、热预算、缺陷物理、ppb 级污染控制）⇄ 良率/成本/产能的经济约束（每片晶圆成本、良率是主经济指标、D0 缺陷密度、wafer-per-hour、折旧）**；**持续微缩/摩尔定律（dimensional + equivalent scaling、节点路线图 N5/N3/N2/A16/A14、high-NA EUV）⇄ 物理极限/微缩放缓（原子尺度、漏电、功耗墙、成本墙、'摩尔定律已死'之争）**；**协同优化/整合（DTCO 设计-工艺协同、STCO 系统-工艺协同、模块间 trade-off）⇄ 单模块极致优化（单一 unit process 工艺窗口）**；**工艺配方的 tacit 手艺（process recipe 调试、工艺窗口、缺陷根因分析、量产 ramp 的经验）⇄ 可建模/可仿真/数据驱动（TCAD 仿真、ML 良率分析、APC/FDC、数字孪生）**；**性能-功耗-面积-成本 PPAC 四角权衡 ⇄ 良率/可制造性 DFM 优先**；**自主可控/国产替代（卡脖子、EUV 出口管制、设备/材料/EDA 国产化、SMIC/长江存储/长鑫/中微/北方华创/上海微电子）⇄ 全球高度分工（ASML 光刻垄断、AMAT/Lam/TEL/KLA 设备、TSMC/Samsung/Intel 代工、全球供应链）**。(b) 核心工作流 / pipeline（最标准、最易蒸高质量 + CLI 化）— 新节点/新工艺导入：器件目标与 PPAC 定义 → 工艺整合方案与 PDK → 单元工艺开发与配方调试（DOE 找工艺窗口）→ 量测建立与 SPC → 良率爬坡（缺陷分类 + 根因分析 + 工艺改善）→ 量产移交与持续改善。具体单元工艺 SOP：光刻（曝光条件 / OPC / overlay 控制 / 多重曝光分解）、刻蚀（选择比 / profile / loading effect / ALE）、沉积（台阶覆盖 / 应力 / 均匀性）、CMP（去除速率 / 碟形 dishing / 侵蚀 erosion）、量测与缺陷分析、良率分析与 FA 失效分析。(c) 工具栈 — 设备（光刻 ASML/上海微电子 SMEE；刻蚀+沉积 AMAT/Lam/TEL/中微 AMEC/北方华创 Naura；离子注入 AMAT/Axcelis；CMP AMAT/荏原 Ebara；量测检测 KLA/AMAT/中科飞测/上海精测）、EDA/TCAD/仿真（Synopsys Sentaurus/Silvaco/Coventor SEMulator3D、OPC Calibre/Synopsys）、良率与制造软件（SPC、MES、FDC/APC、缺陷分析 yield management、PWS）、材料（光刻胶 photoresist、CMP 浆料 slurry、特气、靶材、掩膜 mask blank）。(d) 知识正典 — 半导体工艺 canon 横跨器件物理与制造工程：核心教材（Plummer/Deal/Griffin《Silicon VLSI Technology》、Sze《Physics of Semiconductor Devices》《VLSI Technology》、Wolf & Tauber《Silicon Processing for the VLSI Era》、Campbell《Fabrication Engineering at the Micro and Nanoscale》、May & Spanos《Fundamentals of Semiconductor Manufacturing and Process Control》、Quirk & Serda《Semiconductor Manufacturing Technology》、肖国勇/施敏中文教材）、路线图（ITRS/IRDS、IEEE 国际器件与系统路线图）、顶会论文（IEDM、Symposium on VLSI Technology、IRPS 可靠性、SPIE Advanced Lithography、ISSCC、DAC）、行业分析（SemiAnalysis、TechInsights、IC Knowledge）。(e) figures/流派 — 学术与器件奠基（Gordon Moore 摩尔、Robert Dennard 登纳德微缩、胡正明 Chenming Hu FinFET/UTB-SOI 发明人 UC Berkeley、刘明 Tsu-Jae King Liu Berkeley、Krishna Saraswat Stanford、Mark Bohr Intel 工艺架构）、产业领袖与工艺大师（张忠谋 Morris Chang TSMC、林本坚 Burn-Jeng Lin 浸没式光刻、Martin van den Brink ASML、米玉杰/梁孟松 SMIC/三星工艺、Mark Liu/魏哲家 TSMC）、行业分析师（Dylan Patel SemiAnalysis、Scotten Jones IC Knowledge、TechInsights 拆解、Handel Jones）、科普与拆解（Asianometry、The Chip Letter、半导体行业观察）。流派分歧：等效微缩派 vs 摩尔定律已死派、前道微缩 vs 先进封装 chiplet 异构集成、dimensional scaling vs DTCO 协同优化、IDM vs 纯代工 foundry 模式、自主可控/国产替代路线 vs 全球分工。(f) 行业话术/黑话 — 制程节点 node / 流片 tape-out / 工艺窗口 process window / 良率 yield / 缺陷密度 D0 / 关键尺寸 CD / 套刻 overlay / 掩膜 reticle-mask / 光刻胶 PR / 浸没式 immersion / EUV/DUV / 多重曝光 multi-patterning SADP-SAQP / OPC / 刻蚀选择比 selectivity / profile / loading effect / 原子层刻蚀 ALE / 台阶覆盖 step coverage / 外延 epi / 离子注入 implant / 退火 anneal / RTA / CMP / dishing-erosion / FEOL-MOL-BEOL / FinFET / GAA / 纳米片 nanosheet / CFET / 背面供电 BSPDN / high-NA / PPAC / DTCO-STCO / DFM / SPC / FDC-APC / DOE / WAT-PCM / 良率爬坡 yield ramp / FA 失效分析 / particle 颗粒 / 洁净室 cleanroom-级别 / 12寸-8寸 wafer / chiplet / CoWoS / HBM / 混合键合 hybrid bonding / TSV / PDK / 等效微缩. (g) 争议/批判 — 「摩尔定律是否已死 vs 等效微缩继续」、「节点命名营销化（N3/N2 ≠ 物理 3nm/2nm，gate pitch/metal pitch 才是真尺度）」、「前道微缩 vs 先进封装异构集成谁是未来」、「自主可控/国产替代的现实（EUV 卡脖子、设备/材料/EDA 国产化进度、出口管制 entity list、良率与成熟度差距）」、「良率/成本/性能三角权衡」、「人才稀缺与工艺 know-how 的 tacit 性」、「中国大基金/产能扩张是否过剩」、「制裁与技术封锁」。(h) 大量隐性工艺手艺（process recipe 调试与工艺窗口寻找、缺陷根因分析与 FA、量产良率爬坡的经验判
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Delegates work to a subagent or spawned session by writing only the task, while a PreToolUse hook pages the parent transcript through Jev and appends the chunks that task needs. Use before writing any Agent tool prompt or create_session prompt, and when asked to delegate this, hand this off, use a subagent, spawn an agent, run agents in parallel, or brief a subagent on what we have done so far.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Load at the start of any task whose deliverable is prose another person will read — a PR description, commit message, README, doc, postmortem, blog post, issue or review comment, report, release note or essay — before drafting it, whether the result is pushed, posted, published or saved to a file, without being asked. Draft, then run this pass on the draft before handing it over. Also use when someone says "de-claude", "de-slop", "humanize this", "this reads like AI", "make it sound human", or asks for a voice, tone or register edit. Rewrites the constructions that mark prose as model-written (staged reveals, verdict headers, aphoristic closers, "it's not X, it's Y", em-dash drama, forced triads, flat-certainty adverbs) into plain technical prose and checks the rewrite kept every claim. Not for fiction, poetry, code, or quoted text; for a full adversarial review of a deliverable use challenging.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route HugeGraph MCP graph data extraction and controlled import/delete tasks to stable public tools. Use when the user asks to extract graph data from text, import structured vertices or edges, verify an import, or asks whether table, SQL, update, or delete graph writes are available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Route HugeGraph MCP structured graph query tasks to stable read-only tools. Use when the user asks graph questions, asks to generate Gremlin, provides Gremlin to explain, or needs read-only graph exploration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Delegate coding, code review, analysis, and research jobs to Google Antigravity CLI (agy) sub-agents that run alongside your own work. Use this whenever the user asks to spin off, offload, or delegate a task to Antigravity, agy, Gemini, or an "external agent"; wants a second opinion or independent review from a different model; wants intensive repo work (audits, large refactors, research sweeps) run in the background while you keep working; or says things like "have Antigravity do it", "spin up a sub-agent for this", or "get more done in parallel". Also use it proactively when a task is a good fit for parallel delegation and the user has expressed a preference for using Antigravity workers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan a product from idea to sprint tasks in one run: idea-validator, prd-generator, tad-generator, tasks-generator, resuming from existing files. Don't use for one document alone (PRD, TAD, tasks) or only validating an idea.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
npm package maintenance and lifecycle management for monorepo extensions. Covers health audits, dependency sync, version bumping, changelog updates, pre-publish checks, coordinated publishing, and post-publish verification. **Triggers — use this skill when:** - User asks to "publish", "release", or "version bump" extensions/packages - User says "audit packages", "check package health", "dependency sync" - User asks to "update changelogs", "prepare release", "pre-publish check" - User mentions "npm publish", "version management", "package lifecycle" - User wants to "sync dependencies" or "align versions" across packages - User asks "what needs publishing" or "which packages changed" **Covers:** Monorepo with multiple npm packages under `extensions/`. Each package has its own package.json, CHANGELOG.md, README.md, and version. Packages are scoped (e.g. `@e9n/pi-*`) and published individually.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a codebase and generate or update its README.md according to best practices. The skill performs static analysis of the project structure, dependencies, scripts, and existing documentation, then produces a comprehensive, accurate README. **Triggers — use this skill when:** - User asks to "review", "update", "improve", or "generate" a README - User says "create a README for this project" - User mentions "document this repo", "add documentation" - User asks to "fix my README" or "make my README better" - User provides a codebase and asks for documentation help **Covers:** Any project type — Node.js, Python, Rust, Go, Java, Ruby, PHP, monorepos, static sites, CLI tools, libraries, APIs, Docker-based projects, and more. Works with both new READMEs (from scratch) and existing ones (update/improve).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a self-contained handoff prompt that lets the user continue work in a fresh coding agent session with empty context. The prompt captures everything a new agent needs: project, goal, progress, decisions, current state, and remaining work. **Triggers — use this skill when:** - User says "handoff", "hand off", "hand-off" - User asks to "generate a continuation prompt" - User says "give me a prompt to continue this" - User asks to "wrap up for a new session" - User says "context transfer", "session transfer" - User asks "how do I pick this up later" - User wants to "pass this to another agent"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Allows you to view the user's screen as well as several hours of history. Use when the user makes a reference to their recent work, for which it'd be helpful to see the screen. This skill MUST be used whenever you need to resolve ambiguity in a user request, where the user hasn't specified enough context to do the task. Examples include disambiguating the specific user/app/document/error the user is referring to. You must also use this skill if the user asks about any question regarding Chronicle or asks what you can see from the screen.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when your context carries "The approved design this task builds" - comparing the running UI with the approved hand-off and mockup at each width and state, evidence screenshots attached to the task, Blocker/High/Medium/Nitpick findings and which of them fail the round
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task touches a Jupyter or marimo notebook, asks to productionise or schedule notebook logic, or when you are tempted to do the work in a notebook — extract logic into tested modules, keep the notebook thin and reproducible, and commit it the way the repo does
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task asks for a model, a score, a forecast or a prediction-driven feature — pin down the decision, target, unit, prediction time, metric and baseline before writing any modelling code
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the stakeholder asks for release notes or a changelog - group done/released work into Added, Changed, Deprecated, Removed, Fixed and Security, in outcome language, with task references
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you create an implementation board task directly - the required fields, one-role-one-deliverable rule, and dependency ordering
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use before booting anything - choosing local (start_task_preview or a workspace boot), the task's preview or stage, confirming the build is the PR head, and what to do when nothing can run
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。