「by」の検索結果

Compare UX patterns across multiple reference apps using pattern libraries produced by ux-extract. Reads 2+ pattern-library.md files, walks them category by category, identifies where apps converge (strong signal), where they diverge (genuine design choice), what's unique to one app, and what's absent across the set. Produces an opinionated comparison document with recommendations for a new build. No browser needed — pure markdown analysis. Trigger with 'compare UX patterns', 'how do top apps handle X', 'ux comparison', 'pattern comparison across reference apps'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive skill for Adobe Substance 3D Painter texturing and material creation workflow. Use this skill when creating PBR materials, exporting textures for web/game engines, optimizing 3D assets for real-time rendering, or automating texture workflows. Triggers on tasks involving Substance 3D Painter, PBR texturing, material creation, texture export for Three.js, Babylon.js, Unity, Unreal, glTF optimization, or Python API automation. Creates optimized textures for threejs-webgl, react-three-fiber, and babylonjs-engine materials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Blender to web export workflows for 3D models and animations. Use this skill when exporting Blender models to glTF for web, optimizing 3D assets for Three.js or Babylon.js, batch processing models with Python scripts, automating Blender workflows, or creating web-ready 3D pipelines. Triggers on tasks involving Blender glTF export, bpy scripting, 3D asset optimization, model compression, texture baking, or Blender automation. Exports models for threejs-webgl, react-three-fiber, and babylonjs-engine skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Compare several Japanese NLP libraries, models, or datasets for a keyword (a specific tool name, or a function/task like '形態素解析') across a handful of criteria chosen for that comparison, rendered as a ○/△/✕ table. Use when the user wants a side-by-side comparison of multiple Japanese NLP tools/libraries/datasets, not just the single best one. Trigger phrases include 'X と Y と Z を比較して', '形態素解析ライブラリを比較', 'MeCab と Sudachi どっちがいい', 'どのツールを使うべき', 'compare japanese tokenizers', 'mecab vs sudachi vs janome', 'which embedding model should I use', '日本語NERライブラリの比較表', 'pros and cons of japanese OCR tools'. For a single ranked list use search; for alternatives to one specific tool (or contribution candidates) without a multi-axis table, use discover.

Audits existing table permissions on a Power Pages site by analyzing them against site code and Dataverse metadata, then GRADES the configuration with deterministic 1–5 scores across 3 security/usability/correctness categories (9 dimensions). Detection is anchored by a recurring-issue catalog so findings and severities stay consistent run-to-run. Generates an HTML report with an at-a-glance verdict and per-category scores in the Overview plus a single list of **major/minor** issues (each major issue labelled permissions-only or upstream-caused with a short justification), and suggested fixes. Use when the user wants to review, verify, check, score, or grade table permissions for security issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when generating or editing video with Seedance models on Scenario via MCP: text-to-video, image-to-video, first and last frame anchors, reference-to-video from identity, product, or world references, prompt-based editing, extending a clip, audio-conditioned motion or voice, shot sound without music, first-frame versus reference conditioning, or an output blocked by moderation. Keywords: Seedance 2.5 and 2.0, ByteDance, T2V, I2V, V2V, native audio, OutputVideoSensitiveContentDetected.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a video needs its spoken words on screen through Scenario via MCP: burned-in styled captions for a TikTok, Reels, or Shorts cut, ad captions for sound-off feeds, YouTube subtitles, an SRT sidecar, transcription of a clip's audio, captions translated into another language, karaoke or word-by-word styles, or restyling and correcting an existing transcript. Keywords: captions, subtitles, SRT, transcribe, karaoke, word-by-word, burn in, closed captions, translate video, caption style.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluate code (especially LLM-generated) for structural simplicity using Rich Hickey's "Simple Made Easy" framework. Use this skill whenever reviewing a PR, diff, or code snippet for accidental complexity — particularly when the code was generated by an AI coding assistant and line-by-line review isn't feasible. Also use when the user asks about complecting, simplicity vs. easiness, structural coupling, or concept deduplication. Trigger on phrases like "is this simple", "does this complect", "review for complexity", "structural analysis", or any reference to Hickey, Simple Made Easy, or grey-box review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan AEO/GEO strategy to get cited by AI: content, entities, schema, 90-day plan. "how do we get cited by AI"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scan content for decay by script and rank refreshes by recoverable traffic. "which content is losing traffic"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run fable-mode execution discipline on Claude Sonnet. When invoked by slash command or by name, spawns a Sonnet subagent that follows the staged loop — stage plan, parallel delegation, a failable verification check at each stage, and a skeptical self-review before delivery; a wording-only request runs the loop inline on the current model. Trigger when the user explicitly asks for thorough/systematic/"deep work" handling on Sonnet.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bypasses anti-bot protections using Oxylabs Web Unblocker, an AI-powered proxy that handles fingerprinting, JavaScript rendering, and retries automatically. Use when the user needs to scrape protected websites, bypass CAPTCHAs, access blocked content, or when regular proxies fail due to anti-bot measures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants to optimize content for AI search engines, get cited by LLMs, or appear in AI-generated answers. Also use when the user mentions 'AI SEO,' 'AEO,' 'GEO,' 'LLMO,' 'answer engine optimization,' 'generative engine optimization,' 'LLM optimization,' 'AI Overviews,' 'optimize for ChatGPT,' 'optimize for Perplexity,' 'AI citations,' 'AI visibility,' 'zero-click search,' 'how do I show up in AI answers,' 'LLM mentions,' 'optimize for Claude/Gemini,' 'llms.txt,' 'OKF,' 'Open Knowledge Format,' 'knowledge bundle,' or 'agent-readable site.' Use this whenever someone wants their content to be cited or surfaced by AI assistants and AI search engines. For traditional technical and on-page SEO audits, see seo-audit. For structured data implementation, see schema.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When the user wants multiple expert perspectives on a marketing question — a simulated board of advisors staffed by legendary marketers (Seth Godin, David Ogilvy, Eugene Schwartz, April Dunford, Rory Sutherland, Alex Hormozi, Byron Sharp, and more). Also use when the user mentions 'marketing council,' 'board of advisors,' 'advisory board,' 'what would Seth Godin say,' 'what would Ogilvy think,' 'channel Hormozi,' 'get multiple perspectives,' 'debate this,' 'have the council review,' 'marketing mentors,' or asks how a famous marketer would approach their problem. The council gives each advisor's take through their documented frameworks, surfaces where they disagree, and synthesizes a recommendation. For executing the winning direction, hand off to positioning, offers, copywriting, ads, or the relevant skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adjudicates whether a hit generated by sanctions, PEP, or adverse-media screening is a true positive, false positive, or requires human escalation. Use whenever a user presents a screening alert, a name match against a watchlist (OFAC SDN, EU consolidated list, UK OFSI, UN list, PEP list, adverse media hit, etc.), or asks to clear a screening hit / reduce false positives / determine whether a flagged name is actually the listed party. Use even when the user describes the task casually — "is this person actually on the sanctions list", "did we get a real match", "clear this alert", "I have a hit on X" — these are all screening-adjudication tasks. Produces a deterministic determination with full audit trail (structured JSON + human-readable narrative). Designed for use by compliance analysts and screening systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess and classify legal risks using a severity-by-likelihood framework with escalation criteria. Use when evaluating contract risk, assessing deal exposure, classifying issues by severity, or determining whether a matter needs senior counsel or outside legal review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

When you or another skill needs to fetch the content of a social media post by URL — tweet, X thread, LinkedIn post, Instagram post, TikTok video, Bluesky post, Reddit thread, Mastodon status, Threads post, Hacker News thread. Returns normalized structured data (author, posted_at, text, engagement counts, media URLs, replies if requested) regardless of platform. Tries strategies in order: direct API (Bluesky, Mastodon, HN, Reddit), agent-browser with modal dismissal (LinkedIn, X preview), Wayback Machine (older posts), paid APIs (ScrapeCreators / Apify — only if env keys present). Triggers on "/social-fetch <url>," "fetch this tweet," "fetch this post," "what does this LinkedIn say," "read this thread," "pull this post." Used by deep-research (citing specific posts), jab-hook (inspiration account analysis), business-brainstorm (competitor / operator commentary).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a project's infrastructure and SaaS stack, then produce a cost report showing what the user currently pays and what they would save by consolidating onto Temps (self-hosted or Temps Cloud). Detects hosting platforms (Vercel, Netlify, Railway, Render, Heroku, Fly.io), analytics (PostHog, Plausible, Mixpanel, Amplitude, Fathom), error tracking (Sentry, Bugsnag, Rollbar, Honeybadger), session replay (LogRocket, FullStory, Hotjar, Highlight), uptime monitoring (Pingdom, UptimeRobot, Better Stack, Checkly), managed databases (Supabase, Neon, PlanetScale, MongoDB Atlas, Upstash, RDS), and transactional email (SendGrid, Postmark, Resend, Mailgun) from dependencies, config files, and env var names. Use when the user wants to: (1) Know how much they would save by switching to Temps, (2) Audit their SaaS/infrastructure spend, (3) Compare their current stack's cost against self-hosting, (4) Decide whether Temps is worth it, (5) Build a business case for consolidating tools. Triggers: "how much would I save", "temps savings", "cost comparison", "audit my stack", "am I overpaying", "saas spend", "calculate savings", "is temps cheaper".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Zenith performs gene set analysis on the result of differential expression using linear (mixed) modeling with dream by considering the correlation between gene expression traits. This package implements the camera method from the limma package proposed by Wu and Smyth (2012). Zenith is a simple extension of camera to be compatible with linear mixed models implemented in variancePartition::dream().

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Statial is a suite of functions for identifying changes in cell state. The functionality provided by Statial provides robust quantification of cell type localisation which are invariant to changes in tissue structure. In addition to this Statial uncovers changes in marker expression associated with varying levels of localisation. These features can be used to explore how the structure and function of different cell types may be altered by the agents they are surrounded with.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The analysis and visualization of alternative splicing (AS) events from RNA sequencing data remains challenging. SpliceWiz is a user-friendly and performance-optimized R package for AS analysis, by processing alignment BAM files to quantify read counts across splice junctions, IRFinder-based intron retention quantitation, and supports novel splicing event identification. We introduce a novel visualization for AS using normalized coverage, thereby allowing visualization of differential AS across

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

An implementation, which takes input data and makes it available for proper batch effect removal by ComBat or Limma. The implementation appropriately handles missing values by dissecting the input matrix into smaller matrices with sufficient data to feed the ComBat or limma algorithm. The adjusted data is returned to the user as a rebuild matrix. The implementation is meant to make as much data available as possible with minimal data loss.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。