809 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Chinese journal scout — searches candidate journals via Wanfang API, performs L1 deterministic rejection screening (language/funding/subject mismatch), and L2 citation fingerprint analysis (reference journal distribution → academic ecosystem positioning).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
International journal scout — searches candidate SCI/SSCI/EI/Scopus journals via Wanfang foreign journal API, performs L1 deterministic rejection screening, and L2 citation fingerprint analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect and remove the tells of AI-generated writing in BOTH English and Spanish, and read back the evidence honestly. Use when the user asks to "de-AI" / "humanize" / "un-slop" a draft, to examine whether text carries the tells (delve, tapestry, "it's not just X, it's Y", "here's the thing", em-dash overuse, an assistant's own closing line left in the document), to compare documents for overlap, or mentions signs-of-ai / SignsOfAI. Backed by the SignsOfAI engine — for a measured 0–100 score, sentence-rhythm burstiness, originality, citations, a writer baseline or perplexity, hand off to that engine (web app, CLI or MCP server) as described below. It cannot determine who wrote a text and must never imply that it can.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Iterative literature-review workflow for a research topic. Use this skill to draft up to 10 search keywords, build a seed set from OpenAlex title-and-abstract matches, expand by backward and forward citations, screen candidates by title and abstract, repeat until no new relevant papers remain, rank the final set, inspect up to 30 full texts, build a concept-reference knowledge graph, and write a literature review grounded only in the final included references.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks how to build with OpenAI products or APIs and needs up-to-date official documentation with citations, help choosing the latest model for a use case, or explicit GPT-5.4 upgrade and prompt-upgrade guidance; prioritize OpenAI docs MCP tools, use bundled references only as helper context, and restrict any fallback browsing to official OpenAI domains.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guidelines for designing tools and action spaces for AI agents. Use when building agent harnesses, designing tool interfaces, creating elicitation mechanisms, or optimizing agent-tool interactions. Covers progressive disclosure, tool design patterns, and lessons from Claude Code development.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert copy editor for Quarto (.qmd) files. Checks grammar, spelling, punctuation, and academic writing quality. Produces a structured markdown report organized by document section — never modifies the source file. Use when asked to proofread, check grammar, fix typos, or review prose in a .qmd document. For APSA style rules (numbers, citations, capitalization, abbreviations, neutral language), use the apsa-style skill instead. Supports an optional output-file argument and an optional @sec-label argument to restrict checking to one section.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writes expert academic paper summaries for social science research, particularly political science and applied statistics. Use when asked to summarize, review, or create a reading summary of an academic paper, PDF, or research article. Accepts a file (PDF or text format) or a directory of papers. Produces a structured markdown summary — approximately 400–600 words — covering primary contributions, major questions and answers with point estimates, methods and data, and limitations and robustness. Includes BibTeX citation retrieved from Google Scholar and keyword metadata.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Converts LaTeX article-class .tex documents to Quarto .qmd format for multi-format publishing (HTML, PDF, Word). Use when asked to convert, port, migrate, or translate a .tex LaTeX file to Quarto; when porting an academic paper or manuscript from LaTeX to Quarto; when a .tex document needs to render to HTML, Word, or Typst PDF. Covers preamble → YAML front matter, section headings, text formatting, math, citations (natbib/biblatex), cross-references, figures, tables, lists, footnotes, hyperlinks, and special characters.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when research writing, reviews, rebuttals, or related-work planning needs academic evidence. Searches literature, screens candidate papers, audits novelty and missing work, verifies DOI/BibTeX/reference metadata and citation authenticity, and checks whether sources support the stated claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this agent when you need to create a pathway summary for a gene after completing the main gene review. This agent should be invoked specifically to generate GENE-pathway.md files that summarize the gene's role in biological pathways with proper citations and mermaid diagrams.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Copy + discoverability requirements every delivered app must meet — real-brand extraction, anti-slop voice, per-page SEO/JSON-LD, pSEO, GEO/AI-search, truth/citations, competitor floor, i18n, trust surfaces.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Official Cohere TypeScript SDK patterns -- CohereClientV2, chat, embeddings, rerank, RAG with citations, tool use, streaming, and model selection
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Consult this skill BEFORE proposing a fix to any CLI gap or schema gap that touches evidence, trust magnitude, evidence types, evidence grades, the TM formula, or star-level promotion gates. Also read it whenever an issue mentions citations, stars, commits, contributors, views, reviewers, percentile, arxiv, github-stars-own, repo-own, social-signal, benchmark-result, peer-review, self-attestation, fusion-recipe, verifier-attestation, or proxy-containment — those are the 10 canonical evidence types and the raw inputs that feed their formulas. Also read it when asked whether a skill qualifies for a given star level (0★–6★): the Star Bar and promotion gates live in `META.md`, not in the TM methodology page. Reading both prevents proposing a calibration that satisfies the TM grade threshold but violates a Star Bar installability or link requirement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answer questions against a persistent markdown wiki and optionally file the answer back into the wiki. Use this when the user asks what their wiki says about a topic, wants a comparison across notes, or wants citations grounded in the wiki.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit essays, reports, literature reviews, dissertations, proposals, and source-backed assignments for high-score academic quality. Use when the user asks whether a paper can get a high grade, wants teacher/rubric feedback addressed, needs a pre-submission review, or needs checks for strict rubric compliance, academic standards, prompt/rubric alignment, argument quality, comparative analysis, evidence hierarchy, table/figure integration, citation specificity, conclusion strength, academic language, source-claim integrity, or evidence boundaries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end SEO operations for B2B SaaS organic visibility. Use this skill when you need keyword research, technical SEO audits, content optimization, link building strategy, international expansion, AI/AEO optimization, schema markup, Core Web Vitals improvements, and organic traffic growth planning. Also triggers on: SEO, keyword research, can we rank for this keyword, which keywords are actually worth it, qualify these keywords, check the SERPs, keyword shortlist, too many keywords, technical SEO, link building, content optimization, international SEO, hreflang, x-default, multilingual site, translated pages not ranking, our German site gets no traffic, language switcher, auto-redirect by country, machine translation SEO, content parity, ccTLD vs subfolder, AI search, AEO, GEO, Core Web Vitals, schema markup, organic traffic, G2 listing, Capterra, TrustRadius, review-platform category page, best software roundup, listicle placement, directory submissions, do we need a Google Business Profile in [country], local SEO with no office, Google Business Profile eligibility, virtual office address SEO, coworking address business profile, business profile suspended, NAP consistency, local citations for SaaS, LocalBusiness schema, server log analysis, log file analysis, what is Googlebot crawling, is Googlebot hitting errors, verify Googlebot, fake Googlebot, crawl budget, do we have a crawl budget problem, Crawl Stats report, new pages not getting crawled.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write and revise rigorous research narratives, literature reviews, manuscript sections, citations, and figure discussions. Use for technical introductions, methods, results, discussions, review articles, abstracts, or related-work sections.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply source-aware mechanical-engineering judgment to research, analysis, coding, writing, teaching, research identity, and release work. Use for thermal-fluid systems, heat transfer, fluid mechanics, thermodynamics, HVAC, energy systems, turbomachinery, piping, multiphase flow, experiments, correlations, CFD, reduced-order models, AI/ML, uncertainty, engineering datasets, literature reviews, citations, manuscripts, reviewer revisions, Overleaf packages, figures, proposals, research software, reproducibility, public releases, engineering teaching materials, or a research-project logo and visual identity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Develop research proposals with solicitation alignment, reviewer-focused logic, evidence-bounded preliminary results, milestones, risks, and compelling figures. Use for federal, foundation, equipment, partnership, or internal research proposals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Door-to-Door Sales Worker — planning a canvassing route or street-vending spot, diagnosing a rep's or vendor's underperformance from doors/contacts/sits/close ratios, navigating solicitation-permit or curfew or cooling-off compliance, structuring a doorstep pitch and objection handling, or reconciling a shift's cash and inventory.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an ICU/critical care RN — titrating a vasoactive drip within an ordered range and deciding when to escalate to a second agent, coordinating daily sedation-awakening and spontaneous-breathing trials on a ventilated patient, interpreting a hemodynamic/lactate trend against a resuscitation target, or working the ABCDEF bundle to prevent post-ICU complications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Computer Systems Analyst — running requirements elicitation and gap analysis against a target system, writing a feasibility study for a build-vs-buy-vs-customize decision, designing a system integration approach (point-to-point vs middleware vs API-led), scoping data-migration risk before a cutover, or choosing between phased and big-bang implementation strategies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Automotive Engineer — computing weight transfer and tire friction-circle limits for a braking-while-cornering maneuver to set brake-force distribution, sizing a powertrain and gear ratio against a 0-60 mph acceleration target while checking traction versus power limits, sizing a crumple zone's crush distance against FMVSS 208 occupant-deceleration limits, or checking a powertrain-mount or driveline natural frequency against engine firing-order excitation for NVH isolation. Distinct from an automotive-service-technician (diagnoses and repairs a vehicle already designed) — this role owns the system-level design decisions (structure, powertrain sizing, suspension geometry, restraint/crash structure, NVH) that produce the vehicle the technician later services.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。