1,055 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Conduct deep web research using the openbrowser-ai agent: decompose a query, investigate sub-questions across multiple sources, and produce a cited markdown report plus structured JSON under local_docs/research/. Trigger when the user asks to: research a topic, do a deep dive, investigate, gather evidence, compare options, write a literature review, build a briefing, or produce a cited report.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when you need to compare features and options side-by-side.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assess an openai-guardrails-python GitHub issue or pull request as a maintainer. Use to verify the claimed need and practical impact, compare supported alternatives or competing approaches, separate code quality from repository readiness, recommend the maintainer action, and draft a copy-ready comment when evidence, changes, or closure should be requested.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates automated test oracles to verify correct software behavior. Creates assertion-based oracles (expected values), property-based oracles (invariants), differential oracles (comparing implementations), and metamorphic oracles (input transformations). Use when you need to generate assertions for test cases, identify invariants that should always hold, compare new vs legacy implementations, create metamorphic test relationships, validate function correctness, or improve test coverage with better verification strategies. Supports Python (pytest, unittest, hypothesis) and Java (JUnit, property testing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Checks whether a new version of a repository preserves the behavior observed by tests on the old version. Use this skill when comparing two versions of code to detect regressions, verify refactoring safety, validate bug fixes don't break existing functionality, or ensure backward compatibility. Detects differences in function outputs, exceptions, observable states, and performance between versions. Generates reports highlighting potential regressions (critical, high, medium, low severity), improvements, and areas requiring verification. Triggers when users ask to check for regressions between versions, compare test behavior across versions, verify behavior preservation, or validate that changes don't break existing tests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compares HEAD with the latest published version to analyze real changes, group by type, and recommend version bumps. Use before publishing a release to understand what actually changed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hardware verification tool for checking functional equivalence between two RTL designs (Verilog). Use when users need to: (1) Verify if two RTL versions are functionally equivalent, (2) Compare original vs. refactored RTL code, (3) Validate design changes or optimizations, (4) Identify semantic vs. cosmetic differences, (5) Generate counterexamples for non-equivalent designs. Analyzes interface alignment, state variables, logic differences, and produces detailed equivalence verdicts with plain language explanations. Particularly effective for design verification, code reviews, and regression testing of RTL modifications.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research your competitors and build an interactive battlecard. Outputs an HTML artifact with clickable competitor cards and a comparison matrix. Trigger with "competitive intel", "research competitors", "how do we compare to [competitor]", "battlecard for [competitor]", or "what's new with [competitor]".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when choosing between engines or models for an agent pipeline and the answer must come from measurement on your own data, not from marketing pages: speech recognition for meeting recordings, the model that turns a transcript into notes, the critic model that checks it. Runs every variant in an isolated container, measures time, cost per hour of input (USD and RUB, with price source and date) and quality (WER/CER and course terms for ASR; code checks plus a judge of a different model for LLM steps), writes results.json/csv and one static analytics page. Triggers on "бенчмарк", "сравни движки", "сколько стоит час записи", "какую модель взять для пайплайна", "benchmark the pipeline", "compare ASR engines".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decide whether a task deserves its own git worktree and, if chosen, run it end to end: branch from the integration branch rather than the current tree, keep the main working copy untouched while the task runs, compare the result against the untouched baseline before declaring it done, and prepare it for a pull request instead of merging. Use when a request says to do the work in a new worktree or branch, when a change is large or risky enough that the main tree should stay usable, when several tasks need to run in parallel on one repository, when a result has to be diffed against current behavior, and when deciding where screenshots, builds, and other artifacts produced in a worktree should end up.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Teach any topic deeply from first principles and build evidence-based paths toward exceptional capability. Use when a user asks to understand, explain, learn, or deep-dive into a topic; asks why or how something works, why it matters, how alternatives compare, or what different perspectives reveal; requests current paradigms, a complete roadmap or curriculum, deliberate practice and feedback, or a top-1%-level mastery plan. Answer explanation questions completely before offering a curriculum; route explicit mastery goals to an adaptive practice and proof-of-capability system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run an honest market-fit and viability audit of any project or idea and produce a decision doc, not code. Use when someone asks "is this viable as a business", "audit the market fit", "make the case and compare to competitors", "should I apply to YC or bootstrap", or wants to validate a project, product, or market before investing more time. Gathers verifiable traction data first, researches the competitive field, gets an independent cold read, writes a doc with pre-committed pass/middle/kill criteria and a concrete week-1 assignment, then hardens it with an adversarial review loop.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Tạo một video MỚI cho series "so sánh / phân biệt kiến thức" của repo này — clip dọc TikTok/Reels/Shorts 30-40s, layout 3-zone cố định theo DESIGN.md, voiceover tiếng Việt sinh bằng VieNeu TTS (local), Edge TTS (miễn phí) hoặc Vbee TTS, dựng bằng HyperFrames. Dùng skill này khi người dùng nói "làm video so sánh X vs Y", "phân biệt X và Y", "thêm video mới vào series", "tạo video so sánh kiến thức", hoặc yêu cầu bất kỳ video nào theo đúng format sẵn có của repo (thư mục videos/<slug>/). KHÔNG dùng cho video ngoài format này (promo sản phẩm, video từ URL, slideshow, thêm phụ đề cho footage có sẵn).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Think and work like an expert Ecotoxicologist. Use when a task calls for Ecotoxicologist judgment. Reasons from bioavailability (BLM/WHAM), OECD 201–222 tiered tests, and ECx/SSD HC5–PNEC derivation; compares PEC/PNEC under REACH/PPP frames while treating third-phase BCF artifacts, mixture CA departures, and mesocosm exposure mismatch as first-class failure modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate several distinct design directions from one HTML source plus a contrast sheet that shows every direction side by side. Use when the user says /reimagine-it variations, "show me options", "give me three takes", "which direction works best", or wants to compare design directions before choosing one. CLI: npx reimagine-it variations -i page.html -n 4 -o review/. Part of the reimagine-it Content-Derived Design suite.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Med peer benchmarking: select actual biotech/pharma peers via the med universe (drug/indication overlap where possible) and compare med-relevant metrics — pipeline depth, catalyst density, cash position, margins, valuation multiples.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Competitive landscape analysis, competitor comparison, peer positioning, market share dynamics, competitive moat assessment, Porter five forces, industry competition, competitive advantage analysis, market positioning, strategic group mapping, compare competitors
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze influencer performance metrics across TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, Bilibili, and Kuaishou. Compare engagement rates, audience growth, content consistency, and cross-platform presence for data-driven partnership decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze content performance across YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, and Twitter to identify what works. Compares engagement rates, format effectiveness, posting cadence impact, and audience response patterns across platforms for content strategy optimization.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find and compare installable Agent Skills from public repositories, then verify provenance, compatibility, and installation commands. Use when the user asks to discover a Skill for a task; do not install anything unless explicitly requested.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find and prioritize ethical backlink and digital-PR opportunities using SandBase DataForSEO backlink data. Use when asked to analyze backlink profiles, find referring-domain gaps, compare link competitors, or prepare a link-outreach target list.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search, extract, and compare high-quality public sources with Exa through SandBase. Use when asked for deep web research, source discovery, current evidence, topic investigation, company research, or citation-ready findings.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs alchemical free-energy calculations including relative binding free energy (RBFE / FEP+) and absolute binding free energy (ABFE) via OpenFE, FEP+, GROMACS, AMBER pmemd, and OpenMM with explicit lambda window scheduling, soft-core potentials, REST2 enhanced sampling, MBAR/BAR analysis, and cycle closure validation. Compares ML alternatives (Boltz-2 affinity, DeepDock). Use when ranking analogs by binding affinity beyond docking accuracy, performing prospective lead optimization, or validating SAR predictions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Differential abundance and state analysis for cytometry data. Compare cell populations between conditions using statistical methods. Use when testing for significant changes in cell frequencies or marker expression between groups.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。