「erd」の検索結果

Local speech-to-text on Apple Silicon with two cross-checking MLX engines: NVIDIA Parakeet TDT v2 (parakeet-mlx) and Qwen3-ASR 1.7B (mlx-audio, hotword biasing). Batch JSONL with word timestamps, confidence, provenance, and an agreement verdict. No NeMo or PyTorch. Use when transcribing audio files, identifying game or legacy voice clips by content, telling speech from SFX, serving an OpenAI-compatible STT endpoint, or dictating. For push-to-talk into any text field, use the Handy app.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Independent re-derivation gate for proposed changes during autonomous execution. Evaluates a change (code diff, config edit, engine evolution, schema change) against the work's authority matrix and a 4-check protocol: invariant compliance, scope authorization, detection narrowness, and regression risk. Returns structured JSON with pass/fail per check, an overall verdict (APPROVE / REQUEST_CHANGES / REJECT), and blockers. Profile-driven thresholds (strict for unattended runs, lenient for desk supervision). Use when an autonomous agent proposes an engine change, when reviewing a Claude Code-authored modification before merge, or when an unattended profile requires independent re-derivation. Trigger on: "review/approve this proposed change," "critic-gate this," "is this change safe," "is this safe to merge," "should I let this land," "run the critic." Do NOT use for handoff-readiness checks (use rootnode-handoff-trigger-check), general code review, or design-time correctness. Authority matrix required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates whether work-in-design is ready to hand off from a chat design conversation to autonomous execution (Claude Code, n8n, agent runtime). Runs a 7-condition gate: spec stability, verification surface, invariants, pump-primer, work decomposition, rollback cost, token budget headroom. Three invocation modes — deliberate (caller provides work_context, returns JSON verdict), proactive sensing (Claude detects handoff signals in design conversation and offers the check), conversational walkthrough (Claude walks the 7 conditions as discussion topics). Returns structured JSON in all modes. Use when designing a Claude Code deployment, scoping an autonomous run, or deciding next move. Trigger on: "ready to hand off," "ready for execution," "is this CC-ready," "handoff check," "walk me through readiness," "are we ready to ship this," "should I just hand this off," or proactive detection. Do NOT use for evaluating completed work, runtime selection, or prompt quality. Profile-agnostic.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with iOS/macOS Keychain Services (SecItem queries, kSecClass, OSStatus errors), biometric authentication (LAContext, Face ID, Touch ID), CryptoKit (AES-GCM, ChaChaPoly, ECDSA, ECDH, HPKE, ML-KEM), Secure Enclave, secure credential storage (OAuth tokens, API keys), certificate pinning (SecTrust, SPKI), keychain sharing across apps/extensions, migrating secrets from UserDefaults or plists, or OWASP MASVS/MASTG mobile compliance on Apple platforms.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial, security-first review of a pull request from an EXTERNAL or untrusted contributor — a fork PR, a first-time or unknown author, anyone without write access — before a maintainer merges it. Use this whenever you're reviewing, triaging, or deciding whether to merge a PR opened against tbh-meter by someone outside the maintainer team: 'review PR #123', 'someone opened a PR — is it safe to merge?', 'check this contributor's changes', 'can we take this fork PR?', 'is this contribution legit?'. This is supply-chain DEFENSE, not ordinary code review: every merged PR auto-updates onto every user's machine and ships a memory-reading .exe plus an unsandboxed Electron app, so the author and the PR description are UNTRUSTED and the diff is the only evidence. It posts its verdict as a real GitHub review — an inline comment pinned to each problematic line (via the pulls/reviews API), not just one summary comment. NOT for your own or a fellow maintainer's branch (use self-review for that), and prefer this over the generic review flow for anything coming from outside the team.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive a GitHub Copilot (or any bot reviewer) pull-request review to a clean pass without babysitting it: fix each finding in its own commit, reply to the review thread with the fix sha, resolve the thread, re-request the bot, and poll for the async re-review. Covers the thread node-id (PRRT_...) vs comment databaseId distinction, the resolveReviewThread GraphQL mutation, the copilot-pull-request-reviewer[bot] slug, and how to read the bot's verdict (COMMENTED plus a "human review recommended" banner is not a blocking finding). Use when Copilot has left review comments on your PR, when bot review threads must be closed out with an auditable fix-reply-resolve trail before merge, or when you need to verify that a re-review actually landed on the new HEAD rather than the old one.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bring how named experts would think about the question. Use when the user wants expert thinking on a tradeoff, choice, or stuck problem — not a verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a set of structures into absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity estimates with ADMET-AI, and read them as a developability verdict rather than a table of numbers. Use this skill to run batch prediction over a library, interpret each endpoint against its DrugBank-approved percentile, and flag the liabilities that stop a series — hERG blockade, CYP inhibition, poor Caco-2 permeability, high clearance, and plasma protein binding. Also trigger on ADMET-AI, admet_ai, Chemprop-RDKit, hERG liability, CYP3A4 inhibition, Caco-2, bioavailability prediction, or developability triage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user runs /toolchain-health and wants a trustworthy green/yellow/red verdict on the installed toolchain with ranked repairs. Not for tasks that require source or remote-system changes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a human invokes triage on a new configured Slack issue report. Not for triaging reports from other channels or posting more than one verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ES — Critica a fondo una idea, plan, pitch o proyecto entero sin validar ni adular: asume que va a fracasar y lo demuestra por ocho ángulos (premisas, mercado, competencia, viabilidad, números, ejecución, pre-mortem y punto ciego), investiga fracasos reales cuando hay herramientas, y entrega un veredicto franco con la lista priorizada de qué arreglar. Activar con /abogado-del-diablo, "hazme pedazos esto", "critica mi idea sin filtros", "dime por qué va a fallar", "destruye este plan", "segunda opinión brutal", "pre-mortem". EN — Harshly critiques an idea, plan, pitch, or whole project without validating; assumes it will fail and proves it across eight angles, then returns a blunt verdict with a prioritized fix list. Trigger on "devil's advocate", "red team this", "tear this apart", "why will this fail", "brutal second opinion", "pre-mortem".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Perform a read-only NowStack Mobile launch audit across product, web, iOS, Android, backend, auth, payments, email, storage, analytics, stores, and operations. Returns an evidence-backed GO or NO-GO verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent eXperience Interface (AXI) router — the main entry point for agent-ergonomic CLIs. Use whenever the agent needs GitHub, browser automation, human review, quota routing, Slack, Notion, AWS/Docker/K8s, databases, GitLab (glab-axi), Oracle DB (oracle-axi), tmux/herdr/WezTerm sessions (cyber-mux), or any AXI-catalog tool; when choosing AXI vs MCP vs raw CLI; when building or reviewing an agent-facing CLI; or when the user says axi, gh-axi, chrome-devtools-axi, TOON output, agent ergonomics, or "prefer AXI". When in doubt about which external tool interface to use, start here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create today's daily_reports/YYYYMMDD.md by carrying over pending TODOs and recent experiment results from yesterday's report. Use at the start of a session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Land a PR by monitoring conflicts, resolving them, waiting for checks, and squash-merging when green; use when asked to land, merge, or shepherd a PR to completion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

On-demand journal peer review simulation expert — supports 7 research paradigms (experimental/computational/empirical_survey/interpretive/mixed_methods/systematic_review/interdisciplinary) with 6-step review workflow, outputting targeted revision suggestions based on journal-specific review standards.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run the strict-mode sprint contract review after Phase 2c. Spawns a fresh vcsdd-adversary instance to review `contracts/sprint-N.md` and writes a PASS/FAIL verdict under `reviews/contracts/sprint-N/output/`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Phase 3 (adversarial review) for the active VCSDD feature. Spawns a fresh vcsdd-adversary agent with zero Builder context to review implementation against spec. Produces binary PASS/FAIL verdict per dimension.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run Phase 1c (spec review gate) for the active VCSDD feature. Spawns a fresh vcsdd-adversary instance to review the behavioral spec and verification architecture. Records PASS/FAIL gate verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create a git commit for the current VCSDD phase. Auto-generates a conventional commit message from state.json including phase, sprint, gate verdict, and affected bead IDs. Tags with vcsdd/<feature>/phase-<id>.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a user asks to scan, investigate, or characterize a URL. Submits to URLScan (unlisted by default), cross-references with VirusTotal and OTX, extracts the parent domain and resolved IP for follow-up investigation. Returns verdict, redirect chain, contacted infrastructure, and screenshot. Invoked by /cti-orchestrator when the target is a URL.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need authoritative classification, threat-name, MITRE ATT&CK mapping, dynamic-analysis or sandbox results on a file hash, or when you need network threat intelligence for a URL/domain/IP from ReversingLabs Spectra Analyze (A1000). Returns verdict, risk score, AV detection ratio, threat name, behavioural tags, and pivot candidates (parent containers, extracted files, related samples by family). Commonly invoked by /hash-investigation and /malware-analysis. Other agents/skills can chain this for deeper malware enrichment beyond VirusTotal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to submit a URL for live scanning via URLScan.io and retrieve results, or search existing scans for a domain. Returns verdict, final URL after redirects, resolved IP, contacted domains/IPs, and screenshot URL. Commonly invoked by /url-investigation and /domain-investigation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to check an IP, domain, file hash, or URL against VirusTotal's reputation database. Returns detection ratio, verdict, community score, and key findings. Commonly invoked by investigation skills (/ip-investigation, /domain-investigation, /hash-investigation, /url-investigation) and by analysts enriching IOCs. Other agents/skills can chain this for VirusTotal enrichment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。