793 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Analyzes destructive wiper malware by identifying raw-disk and MBR/VBR overwrite primitives, boot-record tampering, mass-deletion and backup-destruction behavior, and distinguishing wipers from ransomware. Activates for requests to analyze a wiper, identify destructive disk-overwrite behavior, or tell a wiper apart from ransomware.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Inject juice and game feel into gameplay code using the project's chosen middleware. Use when adding screen shake, tweens, particles, audio feedback, haptics, hitstop, or any form of "juice" to gameplay events. Triggers on requests like "add juice", "make this feel better", "add screen shake", "polish this feature", "add feedback to this action", "make the hit feel impactful", "add particles when", "screen shake on damage", "tween this", "add camera shake", "make this snappy", or any game feel, polish, or feedback work. Always reads ProjectConfig.yaml -> feel_tools and docs/GFD.md Feedback Matrix before generating code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Brownfield onboarding — audits existing project artifacts for template format compliance (not just existence), classifies gaps by impact, and produces a numbered migration plan. Run this when joining an in-progress project or upgrading from an older template version. Distinct from /project-stage-detect (which checks what exists) — this checks whether what exists will actually work with the template's skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When a GDD is revised, scans all ADRs and the traceability index to identify which architectural decisions are now potentially stale. Produces a change impact report and guides the user through resolution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Shape, implement, review, copy-edit, or harden Arcade user interfaces. Use for the website, terminal UI, game HUDs, interaction flows, responsive behavior, accessibility, Geist consistency, and any change affecting what a user sees, understands, chooses, or does. Skip backend-only, telemetry-only, generated-file, and test-only work with no shipped UI impact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Environmental Economist — valuing a non-market environmental good (clean air, a wetland, an endangered species) for a benefit-cost analysis, building a regulatory impact analysis (RIA) for a pollution rule, sizing natural resource damages after a spill or contamination event, or picking a discount rate for a policy with cost and benefit streams decades apart.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Equal Opportunity Representative or Officer — running an adverse-impact analysis on hiring or promotion selection rates, conducting an availability analysis to set affirmative action placement goals, evaluating a compensation-equity regression for unexplained pay gaps, or preparing an affirmative action plan (AAP) for an OFCCP audit.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an environmental scientist — scoping or reviewing a Phase I/Phase II environmental site assessment, interpreting soil or groundwater sampling results against regulatory action levels, drafting an environmental impact statement or NEPA scoping document, running a contaminant fate-and-transport screening calc, or assessing ecological risk to a receptor.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Database Architect — choosing a normalization level matched to the actual workload, resolving a CAP theorem tradeoff (consistency vs. availability) for a distributed data store, selecting a sharding/partition key aligned with the dominant query pattern, validating an indexing strategy against real query plans, or deriving RPO/RTO backup and replication requirements from actual business impact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Chief Sustainability Officer — evaluating an environmental/social initiative's business case, responding to ESG disclosure or regulatory requirements, assessing greenwashing risk, or prioritizing sustainability investments against their actual impact and cost.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Civil Engineer — sizing stormwater detention/drainage systems, checking foundation bearing capacity against a geotechnical report, verifying IBC/ASCE 7 code compliance for site civil work, reviewing construction RFIs against stamped drawings, or evaluating value-engineering changes for safety-margin impact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Business Continuity Planner — running a business impact analysis (BIA) to derive recovery time objectives, mapping process dependencies to find single points of failure, evaluating whether current recovery capability meets a process's maximum tolerable downtime, designing or debriefing a tabletop exercise, or building the cost-benefit case for a continuity investment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a licensed Architect — programming a building's spatial/functional requirements against a budget, developing a design concept against a zoning/code envelope, evaluating a fee proposal or scope-creep request, resolving a code-compliance conflict between disciplines, or working through a construction-phase change order's cost and schedule impact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Annotate genetic variants (GWAS hits, eQTLs, rare variants) with ENCODE functional data to interpret non-coding variation. Use when the user has variants of interest and wants to understand their regulatory context, identify causal variants from GWAS loci, assess variant impact on regulatory elements, perform enrichment testing of variant sets in tissue-specific annotations, or link variants to target genes through enhancer-gene maps. Handles the full post-GWAS workflow from variant set → tissue mapping → functional annotation → fine-mapping awareness → enrichment → variant-to-gene → prioritization. Use this skill for ANY variant interpretation task involving ENCODE chromatin, accessibility, TF binding, or 3D genome data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide for annotating ENCODE regulatory variants with ClinVar clinical significance. Use when users need to check if variants in ENCODE peaks have clinical associations, find pathogenic variants in regulatory regions, or assess variant clinical impact. Trigger on: ClinVar, clinical significance, pathogenic variant, variant classification, clinical variant, disease variant, VUS, benign, likely pathogenic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze features from user perspective and write user stories with acceptance criteria. Use when defining requirements, writing user stories, validating scope against project state, prioritizing features by impact, comparing approaches, analyzing user needs, or planning next work. Triggers: "user story", "acceptance criteria", "scope", "prioritize", "compare requirements", "user needs", "what to build next".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Image optimization analysis for SEO and performance. Checks alt text, file sizes, formats (WebP, AVIF), responsive images, lazy loading, CLS prevention, and Core Web Vitals image impact. Use when user says "image optimization", "alt text", "image SEO", "image size", "image audit", "WebP", "AVIF", "lazy loading", "CLS", "responsive images", or "Core Web Vitals images".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Find broken backlinks pointing to a domain using Ahrefs: links targeting 404 pages that can be reclaimed. Prioritizes highest-DR lost links for maximum recovery impact. Use when user says "broken backlinks", "broken links", "link reclamation", "dead backlinks", or "404 backlinks".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security audit of a codebase — web apps, APIs, services, CLI tools, libraries, daemons, and more. Use when asked to find security bugs, do a security review, audit for vulnerabilities, or pen-test the code. Focuses on exploitable issues with real impact, not theoretical concerns or industry-standard behavior.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic technical debt analysis across architecture, testing, documentation, and infrastructure. Investigates the codebase, scores findings by impact and effort, and generates a prioritized TECH_DEBT.md remediation plan. Delegates to specialized skills for code quality (scout) and linting (lint-fix). Use when assessing overall project health, planning cleanup sprints, or onboarding to an unfamiliar codebase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scout Rule — identify the top 3 highest-impact improvement opportunities in files you're already touching. Analyzes entire file content, not just changed lines. Focuses on pre-existing code quality, not PR bugs. Use when preparing a PR, during code review, or after completing a feature.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a codebase against well-known software design principles: SOLID, DRY, YAGNI, KISS, Law of Demeter, Separation of Concerns, Composition over Inheritance, and the code-relevant 12-Factor subset. Scores findings by impact and effort, runs adversarial debate on contested violations, and generates a prioritized DESIGN_AUDIT.md. Use when reviewing code quality beyond what linters catch, assessing design health before a refactor, or onboarding to an unfamiliar codebase. Can be invoked standalone or delegated from tech-debt.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coach senior leaders on strategic thinking, stakeholder management, presence, and organizational impact.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Master professional email — inbox zero systems, high-impact writing, etiquette, and managing email at scale.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。