「ploi」の検索結果

Provides binary exploitation techniques for CTF challenges. Use when you already have a vulnerable native target or service and need to turn memory corruption or low-level primitives into code execution or privilege escalation, such as buffer overflows, format strings, heap bugs,

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides reverse engineering techniques for CTF challenges. Use when the main job is to understand how a compiled, obfuscated, packed, or virtualized target works before exploiting or solving it, including binaries, APKs, WASM, firmware, custom VMs, bytecode, game clients, malwar

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Web race condition exploitation — TOCTOU, single-packet attack, limit overrun, parallel race testing

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provides web exploitation techniques for CTF challenges. Use when the target is primarily an HTTP application, API, browser client, template engine, identity flow, or smart-contract frontend/backend surface, including XSS, SQLi, SSTI, SSRF, XXE, JWT, auth bypass, file upload, req

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Siber Vatan CTF playbook — flag formats, web/reverse/forensics/blockchain/OSINT/stego/crypto recipes, and pivot heuristics tailored to the Turkish CTF circuit.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pwn/Binary kategorisi SKILL.md — BOF, ROP, kernel exploit araçları kurma rehberi

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CTF competition assistant helping participants solve security challenges. Challenge analysis, vulnerability identification, exploitation technique suggestions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Web kategorisi SKILL.md — SQLi, XSS, SSRF tarayıcı ve exploit araçları kurma rehberi

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ask the local Claude CLI to review plans, diffs, full codebases, completed work, and exploit chains when the user explicitly wants a Claude second opinion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects fileless malware and in-memory attacks that execute entirely in RAM without writing persistent files to disk, evading traditional antivirus. Use when building detections for PowerShell-based attacks, reflective DLL injection, WMI persistence, and registry-resident malware. Activates for requests involving fileless malware detection, in-memory attacks, PowerShell exploitation, or living-off-the-land techniques.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect privilege escalation attempts including token manipulation, UAC bypass, unquoted service paths, kernel exploits, and sudo/doas abuse across Windows and Linux.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect and prevent API enumeration attacks including BOLA and IDOR exploitation by monitoring sequential identifier access patterns and authorization failures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect cyber attacks targeting OT historian servers (OSIsoft PI, Ignition, Wonderware) that sit at the IT/OT boundary and serve as pivot points for lateral movement between enterprise and control networks, including data manipulation, unauthorized queries, and exploitation of historian-specific vulnerabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and execute a comprehensive red team engagement covering reconnaissance through post-exploitation using MITRE ATT&CK-aligned TTPs to evaluate an organization's detection and response capabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and configure a resilient command-and-control infrastructure using BishopFox's Sliver C2 framework with redirectors, HTTPS listeners, and multi-operator support for authorized red team engagements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deploy and configure the Havoc C2 framework with teamserver, HTTPS listeners, redirectors, and Demon agents for authorized red team operations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes network traffic captures and flow data to identify adversary activity during security incidents, including command-and-control communications, lateral movement, data exfiltration, and exploitation attempts. Uses Wireshark, Zeek, and NetFlow analysis techniques. Activates for requests involving network traffic analysis, packet capture investigation, PCAP analysis, network forensics, C2 traffic detection, or exfiltration detection.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Signals scout that watches a PostHog project's most-viewed dashboards and insights for recent anomalies — sudden bursts, drops, flat-lines, and trend breaks at the daily or hourly level. It discovers what the team actually looks at (view counts, dashboard access), curates a durable watchlist in the scratchpad, and balances re-checking known high-value insights (exploit) against discovering new ones (explore) across runs, since no single run can cover a busy project. Anomalies are scored by robust deviation from each insight's own seasonality-matched baseline; it emits a finding only when a move clears the confidence bar, otherwise it updates the baseline memory and closes out empty. Self-contained peer in the signals-scout-* fleet.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Chains a somatic (tumor-normal) SNV/indel and structural-variant pipeline end to end with GATK Mutect2 (or Strelka2), wiring the somatic-specific machinery - panel-of-normals and gnomAD germline-resource priors, GetPileupSummaries/CalculateContamination, and LearnReadOrientationModel FFPE/oxoG orientation-bias filtering fed into FilterMutectCalls. Use when calling somatic mutations from a tumor-normal pair (or tumor-only with PoN caveats), deciding which artifact filter removes which class of false positive, reasoning about VAF/purity/ploidy and clonal-vs-subclonal detection, adding somatic SV/CNV or TMB/MSI/signatures, or routing variants to AMP/ASCO/CAP tier and oncogenicity interpretation (never germline ACMG).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates an end-to-end de novo genome assembly project, routing each step to the right genome-assembly skill rather than restating it. Profiles the genome first (k-mer spectrum -> size, heterozygosity, ploidy), QCs reads, chooses an assembly path by data type (SPAdes for Illumina, Flye for noisy long reads, hifiasm for HiFi, metaFlye for communities), polishes only when needed, decontaminates, scaffolds with Hi-C, and finishes with three-axis QC (contiguity + completeness + correctness). Use when assembling a genome from raw reads and deciding which assembler, whether to polish, and how to prove the result is good.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs novel molecules using REINVENT 4 (de novo, scaffold decoration, linker design, R-group, molecular optimization), MolMIM, Diffusion-based generators (DiGress, DiffSMol), and JT-VAE with explicit handling of multi-parameter optimization (MPO), goal-directed scoring functions, transfer/reinforcement/curriculum learning, synthetic accessibility scoring, and chemical space exploration vs exploitation. Use when designing new chemical matter against a target, decorating a scaffold, linking fragments, or optimizing a hit for multiple ADMET / activity properties simultaneously.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert penetration tester specializing in ethical hacking, vulnerability assessment, and security testing. Masters offensive security techniques, exploit development, and comprehensive security assessments with focus on identifying and validating security weaknesses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

How to identify and test for account takeover vulnerabilities in web applications. Use this skill whenever the user mentions account takeover, authentication bypass, password reset attacks, email verification bypass, session hijacking, or any technique to compromise user accounts. This includes testing authorization issues, unicode normalization attacks, reset token reuse, CORS/CSRF/XSS exploitation, cookie manipulation, and OAuth vulnerabilities.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evaluates genome assembly quality across the three orthogonal axes - contiguity (QUAST auN/NG50/NGx, not bare N50), completeness (BUSCO/compleasm gene-space plus Merqury k-mer completeness), and correctness (reference-free Merqury QV, Inspector/CRAQ structural errors, asmgene false-duplication/collapse). Covers why N50 is the most-gamed metric, why QV measured on the polishing reads is circular, distinguishing uncollapsed haplotigs from real WGD, and the EBP/VGP 6.C.Q40 standard. Use when judging whether an assembly is good enough to annotate or publish, comparing assemblers, diagnosing a fragmented or duplicated assembly, or assessing a phased diploid assembly.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。