「refactoring」の検索結果

Use when the user wants to rename, extract, split, move, or restructure code safely. Examples: "Rename this function", "Extract this into a module", "Refactor this class", "Move this to a separate file"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Workflow] Use when activating the Code Refactoring workflow for restructure and improve existing code without changing behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Code Quality] Use when you need restructure code without changing behavior using extract method, extract class, rename, move, and inline patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design, implement, and integrate generalized validation harnesses across a producer-consumer boundary after a local harness contract exists. Use when refactoring custom validation CLIs/MCPs for large polyrepos, extending Steward across sibling repos, or deploying a local tool to a consumer project for dogfooding and testing; use mcp-harness-repo-maintainer first for initial steward.yaml adoption and cold-start proof.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building, refactoring, or debugging a macOS menu bar app with SwiftUI, or when a MenuBarExtra misbehaves — the icon renders wrong or vanishes, the Settings window opens behind other apps, the popover cannot be closed, controls inside a .menu style do not render, the Dock icon comes back, or the app quits when the item is dragged off the menu bar. Triggers include menu bar app, status bar app, tray app, MenuBarExtra, NSStatusItem, LSUIElement, hide Dock icon.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Forces the laziest solution that actually works, simplest, shortest, most minimal. Channels a senior dev who has seen everything: question whether the task needs to exist at all (YAGNI), reach for the standard library before custom code, native platform features before dependencies, one line before fifty. Supports intensity levels: lite, full (default), ultra. Use on ANY coding task: writing, adding, refactoring, fixing, reviewing, or designing code, and choosing libraries or dependencies. Also use whenever the user says "ponytail", "be lazy", "lazy mode", "simplest solution", "minimal solution", "yagni", "do less", or "shortest path", or complains about over-engineering, bloat, boilerplate, or unnecessary dependencies. Do NOT use for non-coding requests (general knowledge, prose, translation, summaries, recipes).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

SOP for auditing AI-generated code. Trigger when: - Reviewing, refactoring, or cleaning up AI-generated code to prevent regressions or hallucinated APIs. - Prompt contains: /ai-audit, code audit, AI cleanup, common flaws.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Idiomatic programming style, patterns, and conventions for TypeScript and JavaScript development. Trigger when: - Writing, refactoring, reviewing, or debugging TypeScript or JavaScript code. - Files matching the patterns **/*.ts, **/*.tsx, **/*.js, **/*.jsx, package.json are in the workspace or referenced. - Tasks involve: tsc, npm, yarn, pnpm, bun, eslint, prettier, vite, next.js. - Prompt contains keywords: typescript, ts, js, javascript, interface, type, async, await, promise, es6, node, deno.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Idiomatic programming style, patterns, and conventions for Rust development. Trigger when: - Writing, refactoring, reviewing, or debugging Rust code. - Files matching the pattern **/*.rs (including Cargo.toml, Cargo.lock) are in the workspace or referenced. - Tasks involve: cargo build, cargo clippy, cargo test, cargo check, rustc. - Prompt contains keywords: rust, cargo, clippy, borrow checker, lifetime, struct, enum, impl, Option, Result, match, unwrap, unsafe.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Idiomatic programming style, patterns, and conventions for Python development. Trigger when: - Writing, refactoring, reviewing, or debugging Python code. - Files matching the pattern **/*.py (including requirements.txt, pyproject.toml, setup.py) are in the workspace or referenced. - Tasks involve: python, pytest, pip, uv, virtualenv, flake8, black, mypy. - Prompt contains keywords: python, py, pep8, typing, list comprehension, decorator, generator, asyncio, yield, poetry.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Idiomatic programming style, patterns, and conventions for Go (Golang) development. Trigger when: - Writing, refactoring, reviewing, or debugging Go code. - Files matching the pattern **/*.go (including go.mod, go.sum) are in the workspace or referenced. - Tasks involve: go fmt, go test, go build, go vet, golangci-lint. - Prompt contains keywords: go, golang, goroutine, channel, select, interface, err != nil, defer, panic, gofmt, struct.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Core technical, safety, and maintainability rules for codebase edits. Trigger when: - Writing code, refactoring, modifying files, or creating unit tests. - Proposing commits, reviewing git history, or auditing code quality. - Modifying files in any programming language (e.g. *.go, *.rs, *.py, *.ts, *.js, *.c, *.cpp). - Prompt contains keywords: refactor, build, compile, lint, test, git, commit, rule priority, type safety, error handling, defensive programming.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Combine React's official "You Might Not Need an Effect" guidance with this project's stricter no direct useEffect stance. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React components that might reach for useEffect, derived state, event relays, reset logic, subscriptions, or client fetching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Combine React's official "You Might Not Need an Effect" guidance with this project's stricter no direct useEffect stance. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring React components that might reach for useEffect, derived state, event relays, reset logic, subscriptions, or client fetching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implement proven backend architecture patterns including Clean Architecture, Hexagonal Architecture, and Domain-Driven Design. Use when architecting complex backend systems or refactoring existing applications for better maintainability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Angular performance optimization and best practices guide. Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring Angular code for optimal performance, bundle size, and rendering efficiency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate coding tasks to Codex, Claude Code, or Pi agents via background process. Use when: (1) building/creating new features or apps, (2) reviewing PRs (spawn in temp dir), (3) refactoring large codebases, (4) iterative coding that needs file exploration. NOT for: simple one-liner fixes (just edit), reading code (use read tool), thread-bound ACP harness requests in chat (for example spawn/run Codex or Claude Code in a Discord thread; use sessions_spawn with runtime:"acp"), or any work in ~/clawd workspace (never spawn agents here). Claude Code: use --print --permission-mode bypassPermissions (no PTY). Codex/Pi/OpenCode: pty:true required.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when developing code using Test-Driven Development (TDD) methodology. Use this skill when the user wants to write tests first before implementation, needs guidance on the red-green-refactor cycle, or explicitly requests TDD-style development. Triggers include requests like "develop this feature using TDD", "write tests first", "help me with test-driven development", or "implement this following TDD practices". The skill guides through writing failing tests, implementing minimal code to pass, and refactoring while maintaining test coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing, evaluating, documenting, modernizing, reviewing, refactoring, or implementing software architecture and code-level structure, including requirements, context, architecture style selection, microservices patterns, WebAssembly/WASI/Component Model, UMA portable capabilities, runtime contracts, capability graphs, governed MCP/agent orchestration, clean code, code smells, Rust crate/library API architecture, Cargo feature/MSRV/SemVer policy, unsafe/FFI/no_std/library testing, modularity, views, NFR tactics, IAM/auth, security patterns, cost estimation, architecture-as-code fitness functions, ADR/RFC work, and engineering execution plans.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts rigorous authoring and review of Playwright E2E tests. Enforces accessibility-first locators, web-first assertions, strict isolation, and DAMP architecture. Use when generating, refactoring, or reviewing any Playwright test code.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user starts a non-trivial coding/building task in Claude Code (e.g. "帮我做个 X", "help me build Y", "add feature Z", "搭一个 Z"). Layers an AI-native pedagogical coat over normal coding work — surfaces implicit assumptions in user intent, annotates non-trivial design decisions inline with brief concept-scaffolding for terms the user may not know, and replaces "should I run it?" handoffs with rigorous AI self-verification plus a clean list of what only the user can verify. Skip for pure Q&A, single-line edits, read-only investigation, or refactoring along an existing pattern.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

하나의 긴 메서드를 grouping(Reorder/Chunk)·comment로 정돈해 책임을 드러낸 뒤 Arlo Belshee 6단계 네이밍(완전정직 이름 → Extract Method → Intent Revealing → Domain Abstraction)을 하나의 연속 흐름으로 관통하는 self-contained 워크플로우. "이 긴 메서드 이름이 하는 일을 안 드러낸다", "메서드 이름부터 정직하게 만들어서 쪼개줘", "이름 주도로 이 메서드 리팩토링" 요청 시 사용. 단, 여러 파일에 흩어진 개별 이름 스멜의 배치 교체는 /naming-process, 클래스 분리·도메인 이동 같은 대규모 구조 변경은 /system-wide-refactoring이 적합. /intent-revealing-names로 호출.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

git diff 기준 변경 파일을 자동 탐지해 Composed Method 지향 Tidying Process를 TDD 사이클 없이 독립 실행. 완료 후 선택 기법 제안. "변경 파일 정리", "tidying만", "방금 바꾼 코드 정돈", "tidy first", "/tdd-tidy" 요청 시 사용. 단, 다른 클래스로 로직을 옮기는 구조 변경은 /system-wide-refactoring이 적합. /tdd-tidy [commit-ref]로 호출.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze code for primitive obsession and plan value object extractions around domain concepts, validation, and grouped primitive fields. Use when the user says `/value-objects`, asks for value object refactoring, or runs `/refactor:value-objects`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。