4,554 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when Codex is already in the validation phase of a security scan or the user explicitly asks to determine whether one or more candidate security findings are valid. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review a pull request, commit, branch diff, or working-tree patch for security vulnerabilities.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for a standard, single-pass security audit of an entire repository or a scoped path, package, folder, or submodule with no diff to review. This is the default repository scan. Do not use for PR, commit, branch, or working-tree diffs, or for deep, multi-pass scans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when Codex is already in the attack-path-analysis phase of a security scan or the user explicitly asks to trace a security finding from source to sink and calibrate severity. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turn vulnerability notes, disclosure reports, PoCs, source code, or Codex Security findings into self-contained, sceptically validated, natural-sounding vulnerability reports. Use for one vulnerability or a disclosure campaign; a Codex Security scan is optional.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user supplies or imports existing security findings, vulnerability reports, or security/vulnerability Jira/Linear tickets from scanners, advisories, GitHub, Atlassian Rovo, Linear, or similar backlog sources and wants static repo-impact triage. Do not use for discovery, duplicate-bug triage, validation, or fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when Codex is already in the finding-discovery phase of a security scan or the user explicitly asks to discover candidate security findings in a repository or code change. Do not use as the primary trigger for full PR, commit, branch, patch, or repository scans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bump, validate, publish, and announce a public @bex-co/bex-security release using upstreamVersion-bex.N. Use only when explicitly asked to cut or publish a Bex Security release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use only when the user explicitly requests verification that a security fix remediates a reported vulnerability. Do not invoke automatically while implementing fixes, reviewing ordinary code changes, or running tests. Do not use for non-security fixes, candidate finding validation, or full repository scans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Track validated Codex Security findings in Linear, Jira, GitHub issues, or draft GitHub security advisories. Use it for one finding or an explicitly selected batch of up to 25 findings tracked as Linear, Jira, or GitHub issues. Includes duplicate checks, exact previews, approval-gated writes, and readback. Do not use it for scans or fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security review skill: comprehensive security checklist and patterns. Use when adding authentication, handling user input, working with secrets, or creating API endpoints.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks 'is my site secure', 'run a security audit', 'check for vulnerabilities', 'was my site hacked', or 'fix the vulnerable plugins'. Runs the Respira security audit, reads its indicators, coverage and known vulnerabilities honestly, never calls a partial scan clean, and fixes what it finds one approved step at a time.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use for security and trust boundaries. Triggers: auth, secrets, XSS, CSRF, SQL injection, JWT, OAuth, OWASP, PII, uploads, payments, supply chain, CI integrity, agent security, threat model.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automated security scanning pipeline covering SAST (Semgrep), SCA (OWASP dependency-check), SBOM generation (Syft), vulnerability scanning (Grype), and secrets detection (detect-secrets). Invoked by security-architect for pre-commit gates, CI integration, and finding triage.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OAuth 2.1, JWT (RFC 8725), encryption, and authentication security expert. Enforces 2026 security standards.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design security-conscious interfaces that protect users without frustrating them. Use when the user asks about MFA, password UX, breach notifications, trust indicators, secure forms, account recovery, or making security feel safe rather than scary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce a visible, evidence-backed privacy and security report for a local iOS app by scanning permission declarations, network code, dependencies, persistence, and risky APIs, while complementing the official Claude Code security-guidance plugin. Use after implementation, in a live security lane, or before claiming that an app is offline and account-free.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply GitHub repository security protections tier by tier — rulesets, read-only Actions token, secret scanning + push protection, Dependabot, and (gated) required status checks / required PR with a GitHub App bypass for a CI auto-commit bot. Mutating and confirmation-gated: always assess first, apply the no-regret baseline, then decide required checks separately. Use when hardening a public user-owned repo after an audit, when a repo has no branch protection, when adding required checks without breaking a bot that pushes to the default branch, or when provisioning a GitHub App bypass actor for trusted automation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configure Nginx as a web server and reverse proxy. Covers static file serving, reverse proxy to upstream services, SSL/TLS termination with Let's Encrypt, location blocks, load balancing, rate limiting, and security headers. Use when serving static files in production, reverse proxying to backend services (Node.js, Python, R/Shiny), terminating SSL/TLS, load balancing across instances, or adding rate limiting and security headers to harden an endpoint.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit project dependencies for version staleness, security vulnerabilities, and compatibility issues. Covers lock file analysis, upgrade path planning, and breaking change assessment. Use before a release to ensure dependencies are current and secure, during periodic maintenance reviews, after receiving a security advisory, when upgrading to a new language version, before submitting to CRAN or npm, or when inheriting a project to assess its dependency health.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Entry point for rafter. Invoke when a sub-skill is unclear, or when the task needs `rafter run` (remote SAST+SCA), `rafter secrets` (local secrets-only), `rafter audit`, policy checks, or command-risk evaluation. Scope by security surface, not task label: engage when the diff touches auth, credentials/secrets/tokens, untrusted input, SQL, shell/exec, file paths, deserialization, crypto, network endpoints, data deletion, or dependencies; for research/experimental/local-only code with none of that, a quick surface check is enough. When such surface IS present and no rafter skill or CLI call has been made, invoke this before handing the task off — an un-evaluated "done" on genuine security surface is not done.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security scanner for AI Agent skills, plugins, and MCP servers. Use when: user asks to scan a skill, check if a plugin is safe, vet an MCP server, review skill security, detect malicious code, supply chain safety, or says 'is this safe to install', 'scan this skill', 'check this MCP server', 'security scan', 'vetting', 'skill safety', 'prism scan', '安全扫描', '这个插件安全吗', '扫描一下', '检查安全性', '安装前检查', '技能审查'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Intercepts and analyzes HTTP/HTTPS traffic from mobile applications using Burp Suite proxy to identify insecure API communications, authentication flaws, data leakage, and server-side vulnerabilities. Use when performing mobile application penetration testing, assessing API security, or evaluating client-server communication patterns. Activates for requests involving mobile traffic interception, Burp Suite mobile proxy, API security testing, or mobile HTTPS analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Auto-activates during requirements analysis to assess security risks using OWASP Top 10 framework, identify security requirements, and recommend mitigation strategies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。