1,532 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Deep single-page SEO analysis covering on-page elements, content quality, technical meta tags, schema, images, and performance. Use when user says "analyze this page", "check page SEO", "single URL", "check this page", "page analysis", or provides a single URL for review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan a feature or initiative through a computed route: the conductor derives the canon delta and assembles the document package — from a zero-document null route for small fixes to an umbrella PRD with one spec per capability for large initiatives. Modes, named as the first word: sdd (full package), sources (MRD → BRD → URD) for market research, customer discovery, and business or user requirements, iso (BRS → StRS → SyRS → SRS) for ISO 29148 and regulated work, research for a technical investigation — never market research — that the research instrument closes either by scope coverage (a research document) or by a recommendation (an rnd). Explicit form: plan research <topic>. Use for 'plan the X redesign', 'create a roadmap', 'plan a new feature', 'I need market research before we plan', 'we're regulated — start the ISO requirements cascade', 'investigate X before we plan', 'compare the alternatives for Y' — a new investigation, not a finished report already in hand. Not for recording a decision or documenting existing code — use /archcore:document. Not for checking docs against code — use /archcore:review.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review generated or changed documentation before it ships — READMEs, API references, docstrings, PHPDoc/JSDoc, changelogs, tutorials, and doc sites. Best used reactively after an agent writes or edits docs, after code changes documented behavior, or before publishing docs. Use when the user says 'review the docs', 'is this documentation accurate', 'update the docs', 'write a README', 'document this API', 'add a docstring', or 'add a changelog entry'. Core job: verify every referenced function, flag, endpoint, config key, and code sample against the source; catch docs-vs-code drift; strip filler and unverifiable claims. DO NOT USE for production code review (use clean-code-guard), test review (use test-guard), marketing copy or blog posts, prose style editing of non-technical writing, or documentation site theming.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when organizing AAAI supplementary material, including the technical appendix, multimedia appendix, and code/data ZIPs, while respecting that AAAI supplements are due with the paper, treated as immutable after submission, must stay double-blind, and should never hide main-paper-critical evidence from reviewers who skim the appendix.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when packaging AAAI code, data, multimedia appendices, technical appendices, reproducibility evidence, and post-acceptance artifact releases without violating double-blind or immutable-supplement rules.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when preparing an accepted AAAI paper for camera-ready source submission to AAAI Press, including proceedings page limits, two-column template compliance, copyright transfer, purchased extra technical pages, deanonymization, registration, oral or poster presentation, and final public artifact release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing an AAAI main technical track submission for OpenReview readiness, double-blind anonymity, page limits, reproducibility checklist, supplementary material, author limits, multiple-submission policy, and AAAI AI-use policy compliance.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Calls significant loops from protein-directed and targeted 3C assays (HiChIP, PLAC-seq, Capture Hi-C/PCHi-C, ChIA-PET) where the contact background is peak-anchored and coverage-biased, so generic Hi-C loop callers (cooltools dots, Juicer HiCCUPS) use the wrong null. Covers FitHiChIP (config-driven coverage+distance-decay spline regression, peak-to-peak vs peak-to-all foreground, loose vs stringent background, coverage vs ICE bias), MAPS (positive Poisson regression on bias factors for PLAC-seq/HiChIP), hichipper (restriction-site-distance bias model + library QC), CHiCAGO (Delaporte two-component Brownian+technical background for asymmetric bait x other-end Capture Hi-C), the with/without separate-ChIP anchor decision, and differential loops via diffloop. Use when calling loops from HiChIP/PLAC-seq/Capture Hi-C, choosing FitHiChIP/MAPS/CHiCAGO, picking peak-to-all vs peak-to-peak, setting the loop FDR, supplying ChIP peaks as anchors, QCing a HiChIP library, or comparing loops between conditions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Designs genomics experiments so technical nuisance variation (batch, lane, plate, flow cell, operator, reagent lot, processing day) is balanced against the biological variable of interest and therefore estimable rather than confounded, using constrained sample-to-batch assignment (designit, OSAT), the confounder/mediator/collider distinction, and the principle that no post-hoc correction recovers a fully confounded design. Covers detecting hidden batches with surrogate variable analysis, a decision table for downstream correction (ComBat-seq, RUVSeq, SVA) whose execution is deferred to differential-expression/batch-correction, and reproducibility metadata. Use when assigning samples to sequencing batches/lanes/plates, avoiding batch-condition confounding, deciding whether a design is salvageable by correction, choosing a correction method, or estimating the number of hidden batches. For the experimental unit, randomization, and blocking concepts see experimental-design/randomization-blocking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Download raw sequencing reads from NCBI SRA using sra-tools (prefetch, fasterq-dump, vdb-validate) or the ENA mirror. Use when pulling FASTQ for SRR/ERR/DRR accessions, deciding between SRA-direct, ENA mirror, or AWS/GCP cloud mirror (STRIDES), handling --include-technical for 10x and other single-cell records, validating with MD5/vdb-validate, navigating SRR/SRX/SRS/SRP/PRJNA hierarchy, or finding accessions via pysradb. Encodes SRA cloud-egress economics, the fasterq-dump uncompressed-scratch trap, and the --max-size default that silently truncates large prefetches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Classify constitutional (germline) copy number variants for clinical reporting using the 2019 ACMG/ClinGen technical standards points-based framework, with ClassifyCNV and AnnotSV for semi-automated scoring. Covers the separate copy-number-loss and copy-number-gain rubrics, the five-tier classification, ClinGen haploinsufficiency/triplosensitivity and dosage-sensitive regions, de novo and segregation evidence, and population-frequency benign evidence. Use when assigning pathogenic/likely-pathogenic/VUS/likely-benign/benign to a constitutional CNV, scoring a CNV against ACMG/ClinGen criteria, or distinguishing the automatable evidence from the case-specific evidence requiring manual input.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Identify differentially bound regions across CLIP-seq conditions (knockdown vs control, treatment vs vehicle, disease vs healthy) using DEWSeq (sliding-window DESeq2), Flipper (Skipper-downstream), ASpeak, edgeR, or limma-voom. Use when computing condition-level changes in RBP binding intensity, choosing peak-level vs window-level vs crosslink-level testing, designing replicate experiments, or distinguishing biological binding shifts from technical confounders.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill whenever the user wants to create or improve a presentation for an academic context — conference papers, seminar talks, thesis defenses, grant briefings, lab meetings, invited lectures, or any presentation where the audience will evaluate reasoning and evidence. Triggers include: 'conference talk', 'seminar slides', 'thesis defense', 'research presentation', 'academic deck', 'academic presentation'. Also triggers when the user asks to 'make slides' in combination with academic content (e.g., 'make slides for my paper on X', 'create a presentation for my dissertation defense', 'build a deck for my grant proposal'). This skill governs CONTENT and STRUCTURE decisions. For the technical work of creating or editing the .pptx file itself, also read the pptx SKILL.md.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Writing effective code documentation - API docs, README files, inline comments, and technical guides. Use for documenting codebases, APIs, or writing developer guides.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically creates user-facing changelogs from git commits by analyzing commit history, categorizing changes, and transforming technical commits into clear, customer-friendly release notes. Turns hours of manual changelog writing into minutes of automated generation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Search library/framework documentation via llms.txt (context7.com). Use for API docs, GitHub repository analysis, technical documentation lookup, latest library features.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when medium-to-large changes need explicit requirements, technical design, and task planning before implementation, especially for multi-module work, unclear acceptance criteria, or architecture-heavy requests.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when writing, rewriting, or improving technical docs (quickstarts, how-tos, tutorials, concept pages, or API references).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SEO and GEO (Generative Engine Optimization) for organic traffic and AI search visibility. Covers technical SEO, content SEO, keyword strategy, schema markup, and optimization for AI search engines (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini). Use when the user needs SEO audit, keyword research, GEO optimization, schema markup, or says 'SEO', 'search optimization', 'keywords', 'organic traffic', 'AI search', 'GEO', or 'rank higher'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Clean a raw transcript before ingestion: punctuate, paragraph, label speakers, fix mistranscribed technical terms, and split long recordings by topic. Use this skill when the user drops an auto-generated transcript, subtitle file, podcast or lecture transcript, meeting recording text, or asks to process a video or audio source. Do NOT use for text that is already prose, for summarising a transcript, or for the ingestion itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep research and discovery before building something new. Explores local projects for reusable code, researches competitors, reads forums and reviews, analyses plugin ecosystems, investigates technical options, and produces a comprehensive research brief. Three depths: focused (30 min), wide (1-2 hours), deep (3-6 hours). Triggers: 'research this', 'discovery', 'explore the space', 'what should I build', 'competitive analysis', 'before I start building', 'research before coding'. Not for cited fact-checking research reports (a separate harness does those); this is pre-build product discovery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guide users through a structured workflow for co-authoring documentation. Use when user wants to write documentation, proposals, technical specs, decision docs, or similar structured content. This workflow helps users efficiently transfer context, refine content through iteration, and verify the doc works for readers. Trigger when user mentions writing docs, creating proposals, drafting specs, or similar documentation tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Help a technical founder build whatever they want on Claude Managed Agents — an internal worker, a piece of their product, a customer-facing agent. Find out what they want to build, scope a v0, launch it in their account, grade it, iterate, and (if it should run on a clock) put it on a scheduled deployment, with everything bigger laid out as v1/v2. Use when a founder says "launch my agent", "/launch-your-agent", "build me a managed agent", or wants to build something on CMA. Keywords: managed agents, CMA, founder, launch, scheduled deployment, outcome rubric.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reduce defensive writing in drafts and revisions by removing unnecessary caveats, disclaimers, hedges, apology-like framing, negative self-limiting statements, and over-explanations while preserving necessary scope, accuracy, safety, legal, ethical, and methodological limits. Use when drafting or revising academic writing, papers, essays, abstracts, introductions, contribution statements, discussions, conclusions, technical explanations, grant writing, product writing, policy writing, professional reports, or any text the user wants to be clearer, stronger, more direct, more concise, more confident, less verbose, less caveated, less apologetic, or less defensive.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。