「valuation」の検索結果

Use only for MSBuild failure investigation, build-performance analysis, or review of existing build XML/extension contracts. A plan to convert a working legacy/non-SDK project to SDK style or migrate packages.config is a project-system migration, NOT a build-file review: do not activate, even to check scope. Framework/API upgrades are also excluded. Activate for advisory Import/Exists hook and NuGet packed-import questions even without a checkout or failed build; .csproj/.fsproj/.vbproj/.props/.targets conditions; custom-target inputs/outputs; .binlog capture/replay; failing dotnet build/restore/pack/publish or MSBuild-based test builds; slow evaluation, compilation, copying, or no-change builds; and controlled timing comparisons. Exclude SDK installation alone, C# refactoring, runtime profiling, assertions after successful builds, and non-MSBuild builds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use ML.NET to train, evaluate, or integrate machine-learning models into .NET applications with realistic data preparation, inference, and deployment expectations. USE FOR: ML.NET integration; local model training or retraining; inference pipelines, model loading, evaluation, and deployment review. DO NOT USE FOR: unrelated stacks; generic tasks that do not need this specific guidance. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a framed and root-caused problem needs its assumptions made explicit before design or planning begins — explicit Assumptions, Unknowns, and a Validation plan. This should trigger when an issue's Assumption Analysis point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to surface hidden assumptions and unknowns before committing to an approach. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a problem under exploration needs its surrounding system context identified before design begins — Existing systems, Integrations, Ownership, and External dependencies. This should trigger when an issue's Context Mapping point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to map the systems, integrations, owners, and external dependencies relevant to a problem. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a problem or issue needs explicit framing before deeper analysis begins — establishing the Problem statement, Current state, Desired state, Stakeholders, and Success criteria. This should trigger when an issue's Problem Framing point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to frame a problem before root-cause analysis, design, or planning begins. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a problem under exploration needs its quality attributes (non-functional requirements) identified and prioritized before architecture and design begin. This should trigger when an issue's Quality Attribute Discovery point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to discover and prioritize candidate quality attributes for a problem, before any ADR or design work starts. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a framed problem needs root-cause investigation rather than a symptom-level fix, applying Five Whys, Fishbone (Ishikawa), Current Reality Tree, and constraint identification. This should trigger when an issue's Root Cause Analysis point of view needs evaluation, or when a maintainer directly asks to find the root cause of a problem before proposing a fix. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Project-kickoff rubric for the self-host vs managed-cloud decision — when is running your own inference engine / LLM platform worth the ops cost vs paying per-token for a managed API? Decide on two axes — VOLUME (a cost-crossover slider) and COMPLIANCE (a hard gate). Use at kickoff when choosing where to run inference, or when cost / data-residency pressure forces a re-evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Build and govern a 50-200 example domain-specific held-out benchmark sampled from real traffic. Distinct from public benchmarks (MMLU/HumanEval/GSM8K via lm-evaluation-harness) which measure GENERAL capability. Only a held-out domain set predicts whether THIS system works on YOUR data. Collect real examples, label, hold out (never train/prompt on it), size 50-200, version it, refresh on drift.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decomposed, multi-criteria metric design for LLM pipelines. The metric IS the model — change the metric and the optimizer changes behavior. Decompose by default; bool during compile, float during eval; calibrate against human; mitigate judge bias. Search keywords: LLM-as-judge, llm as judge, eval metric, evaluation score, scoring function, rubric, RAGAS, G-Eval, judge bias, verbosity bias, how to evaluate LLM output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Universal discipline for any LM-driven loop — agent retries, plan-act-observe, multi-agent handoffs, optimiser passes, test-fix cycles. Encodes the one rule every framework documents quietly and every team relearns expensively: the LM in the loop is NEVER a reliable terminator. Termination must be provided by an explicit counter + exit predicate + stagnation signal + escalation path that live OUTSIDE the LM's control. This is a tool- level, framework-agnostic skill. It maps onto LangGraph (recursion_limit + state counter + interrupt), CrewAI (max_iter + max_rpm + human_input), Claude / OpenAI SDKs (max_iterations + tool_use_budget), DSPy (declared evaluation budget), Aider (REPL + explicit retry cap), and AutoGen (max_consecutive_auto_reply). Search keywords: infinite loop, recursion limit, recursion_limit, GraphRecursionError, max iterations, max_iter, agent stuck, agent won't stop, runaway agent, ReAct loop not terminating, agent repeating itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs multiscale chunking for RAG by embedding small units for retrieval precision and returning larger context for synthesis. Use when fixed-size chunks either lose surrounding context or dilute relevance in long documents, manuals, filings, or codebases. Covers sentence-window and parent-child or auto-merging strategies, base chunk sizing, and evaluation. Do not use when a single chunk scale already meets retrieval and generation needs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF 1.0) and adjacent guidance to AI / ML systems — model lifecycle governance, fairness and bias evaluation, robustness, transparency, accountability, third-party model risk, monitoring for drift, and AI incident response. Broader than prompt-injection (which is the security slice). Use when the user mentions 'AI risk,' 'AI governance,' 'NIST AI RMF,' 'AI compliance,' 'ML governance,' 'model risk management,' 'AI fairness,' 'AI bias,' 'algorithmic accountability,' 'AI Bill of Rights,' 'EU AI Act,' 'AI transparency,' 'model card,' 'AI red team,' 'AI safety,' 'responsible AI,' 'model drift,' 'concept drift,' 'AI monitoring,' 'AI incident,' or needs to assess or govern an AI / ML system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to design experiments, plan ablation studies, structure baselines, or create incremental evaluation strategies. Triggers on phrases like "design ablation", "plan experiment", "what experiments should I run", "baseline comparison", or "experiment matrix".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Token supply dynamics, vesting analysis, inflation modeling, and valuation frameworks for crypto tokens

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

DeFi yield evaluation including fee APR, real vs nominal yield, net APY after costs, and yield sustainability analysis

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Wallet evaluation, monitoring, and copy-trade strategy design for Solana DEX trading

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Iteratively review and revise a plan until no new findings survive evaluation. Use when the user asks to "refine the plan", "iterate on the plan", "tighten the plan", or "improve the plan".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building durable AI agents or agentic workflows with Inngest and AgentKit, including model calls, tool calls, multi-agent networks, human approval, realtime progress, provider rate limits, crash-safe execution, and Agent Evals handoff. Covers AgentKit, `step.ai`, `step.run`, `step.waitForEvent`, native realtime, and when to use lower-level Inngest primitives instead of an in-memory agent loop. Use `inngest-agent-evals` with this skill when the user wants scoring, sessions, experiments, deferred scorers, or outcome-based evaluation for the agent.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Classical ML in Python: classification, regression, clustering, dim reduction, evaluation, tuning, preprocessing pipelines. Linear models, tree ensembles, SVMs, K-Means, PCA, t-SNE. Use PyTorch/TF for deep learning; XGBoost/LightGBM for scale.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Out-of-core DataFrame for billion-row data via lazy evaluation and memory-mapped files. Use when data exceeds RAM (10 GB–TB) for fast aggregation, filtering, virtual columns, and visualization without loading. Supports HDF5, Arrow, Parquet, CSV with cloud (S3, GCS, Azure). Built-in ML transformers (scaling, PCA, K-means). In-memory: polars; distributed: dask.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fast in-memory DataFrame with lazy evaluation, parallel execution, Arrow backend. Use for tabular data in RAM (1–100 GB) when pandas is too slow. Expression API: select, filter, group_by, joins, pivots, window. Lazy mode enables predicate/projection pushdown. Reads CSV, Parquet, JSON, Excel, DBs, cloud. Larger-than-RAM: Dask; GPU: cuDF.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze contractor bids against CWICR benchmarks. Identify pricing anomalies, compare bid components, and support bid evaluation decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Drive the agentkit CLI (aliases agentkit / ak) to scaffold, build, deploy, and manage agents on Volcengine AgentKit from the terminal — runtimes, knowledge bases, memory collections, tools, harnesses, invocation, SSO auth, sandboxes, and evaluation datasets. Use when a user wants to create/deploy an agent project, call or inspect a deployed runtime, manage AgentKit resources, or resolve a CLI/auth/deploy error. Does NOT handle non-AgentKit deployment, general Docker/k8s operations, Volcengine IAM management, or writing agent application code (use veadk-agent-development for that).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。