「viewer」の検索結果

Review a pull request for correctness, regressions, and missing tests. Use when a mid-level developer needs structured review guidance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review infrastructure-as-code changes for safety and correctness. Use when a mid-level developer needs a second look on IaC.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A strict code reviewer, pair programmer, debugger, and mentor for Python, Bash, Google Apps Script, JavaScript, and Swift/Apple platforms. Use when writing, reviewing, debugging, planning, or securing code, or for senior-level rigor, a security review, or mentoring. Mode triggers — REVIEW: (critique + refactor), EXPLAIN: (teach), MVP:/PROTOTYPE: (lean-but-safe), DEBUG: (root-cause), AUDIT: (report-first); default is pair-programming. Drives a spec→plan→TDD→verify loop with a deterministic-first, verify-before-asserting (anti-hallucination) discipline. Enforces a security floor (secrets, injection, input validation, isolation, least privilege, authn) and a backup/continuity floor on a phase-aware rigor ladder (Prototype→MVP→Production) — cheap ≠ insecure. Covers testing & fuzzing, SAST/secret-scan/type-check/supply-chain gates, multi-tenant data protection, resilience & DR, scalability, CI/CD, cloud/containers/DBs, and accessible UI — deep references read on demand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Fans Claude work out over the Anthropic API from surfaces with no native subagents, chiefly claude.ai chat and projects, with parallel calls with a shared cached context, streaming, long-lived conversation threads with cached history, and named agent pools; also delegates to Gemini through the Cloudflare AI Gateway on any surface. Use for multi-perspective analysis, a panel of reviewers, or task decomposition from claude.ai, or for Python code that calls several Claude instances concurrently over the API.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a diff with the reviewer fleet, funneled to one triaged verdict. Targets the current working diff, a path, or an inbound GitHub PR.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Periodic multi-reviewer sweep of the whole codebase — surfaces a triaged checkpoint report.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when receiving code review feedback (especially if unclear or technically questionable), when completing tasks or major features requiring review before proceeding, or before making any completion/success claims. Covers three practices - receiving feedback with technical rigor over performative agreement, requesting reviews via code-reviewer subagent, and verification gates requiring evidence before any status claims. Essential for subagent-driven development, pull requests, and preventing false completion claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

複数のAI（自分/Codex/Grok/Cursor等）でPRをレビューするスキル。GitHub PRの差分を取得し、各AIの視点を統合したレビューを提供する。GitHubへの投稿はユーザーの明示OK後に行う。「PRレビューして」「コードレビューして」「PR#123をチェック」で使用。

Code review automation for TypeScript, JavaScript, Python, Go, Swift, Kotlin, C#, .NET, Java, C, C++, Rust, Ruby, PHP, and Dart/Flutter. Analyzes PRs for complexity and risk, checks code quality for SOLID violations and code smells, generates review reports. Use when reviewing pull requests, analyzing code quality, identifying issues, generating review checklists.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when installing, bootstrapping, configuring, starting, verifying, operating, or troubleshooting Looper, looperd, the looper CLI, ~/.looper config, or runtime paths; when setting up Looper with opencode, claude-code, codex, cursor-cli, Grok Build, Pi, or Oh My Pi (omp); when registering repos or configuring planner/reviewer/fixer/worker loops; or when diagnosing status, logs, osascript, git, gh, LOOPER_TOKEN, writable path, or daemon startup issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede Labs agent-team orchestrator: split complex work into coordinated lanes with explicit file ownership, WIP collision detection, quality gates, escalation thresholds, rollback plans, and handoffs that prove what shipped. Use when one shared change needs safe parallel ownership across builders and reviewers, when a lane map must be resolved before anyone opens a file, or when running a repeatable public-repository contribution program with issue scoring, atomic task leases, isolated worktrees, and explicit publication authority. NOT FOR: one repo change a bundled DAG can run end to end (use suede-graph-flo-xr); findings-only review of a diff (use suede-code-review) or an A-F ship grade (use suede-code-grader); CI, branch protection, or merge-gate wiring (use suede-ci-gate); branch and worktree setup on a stale mirror (a private Suede Labs companion, not in this pack).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a codebase and generate or update its README.md according to best practices. The skill performs static analysis of the project structure, dependencies, scripts, and existing documentation, then produces a comprehensive, accurate README. **Triggers — use this skill when:** - User asks to "review", "update", "improve", or "generate" a README - User says "create a README for this project" - User mentions "document this repo", "add documentation" - User asks to "fix my README" or "make my README better" - User provides a codebase and asks for documentation help **Covers:** Any project type — Node.js, Python, Rust, Go, Java, Ruby, PHP, monorepos, static sites, CLI tools, libraries, APIs, Docker-based projects, and more. Works with both new READMEs (from scratch) and existing ones (update/improve).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert code reviewer. Analyze PR changes for correctness, security, performance, and quality. Returns findings as JSON. CRITICAL: this skill is costly, don't use it unless user explicitly requested to use it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Browser automation, web scraping, E2E testing, and visual regression with Playwright. Covers 30+ patterns: login flows, form testing, responsive design checks, broken link validation, API mocking, data extraction, PDF generation, accessibility audits (axe-core), performance budgets (Lighthouse), visual diffing, multi-browser testing (Chromium/Firefox/WebKit), mobile emulation, infinite scroll, shadow DOM, iframes, file downloads, auth state reuse, cookie consent handling, WebSocket monitoring, console error detection, HAR export, trace viewer, Docker CI, GitHub Actions, and parallel sharding. Use when user asks to test a website, take screenshots, check responsive design, automate a browser task, scrape data, validate forms, check broken links, test login, audit accessibility, or measure page performance. Do NOT use for unit testing, API-only testing, or static analysis. Requires Node.js 18+.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review employee reimbursement requests against the company's sample expense policy and draft submission notes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured pre-design questioning to surface hidden constraints before any architecture decision is locked in. Forces the architect/auditor/reviewer to enumerate what they DON'T know before proposing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a change before it is merged, from little or no input. With nothing typed it reviews the branch you are on, uncommitted work included, against its base, its PR and its ticket, so a developer can check their own work before asking for review. With PR links, repo#N or a branch it reviews someone else's change the same way, several repos at once. It judges the failed CI checks and every Bugbot and reviewer comment, gets a fresh breaker review, traces every other piece of code that uses what changed, proves each finding or marks it unproven, says what the merge needs (a build, env vars, migrations, deploy order) and how to check the deploy, never posts to GitHub, and offers fixes only after the report. Runs only when the user types it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The Trade Reviewer's procedure for journaling desk activity and reviewing trades from the exchange record - process graded separately from outcome, execution costs measured, one repeatable finding per review, plus the weekly desk review. Use after any send, when a trade closes, on the weekly routine, or when the user asks "how did that go".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Executes an approved implementation plan through fresh implementer and reviewer agents for each task, with explicit handoffs, focused tests, and task-by-task integration. Use for multi-task work where independent agent context improves implementation and review quality. Not for a single small edit, an unresolved design, or a failure that still needs root-cause analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prepares a focused code review request for a branch, commit, pull request, or substantial working-tree diff by defining the review boundary, contract, risk areas, evidence, and questions for an independent reviewer. Use before merge or when another agent needs to review an implementation. Not for processing feedback already received or for claiming runtime correctness.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a GitHub pull request or focused branch diff for correctness, regressions, security, compatibility, test gaps, and maintainability. Use when an implementation needs an independent source-aware review before merge. Produces prioritized findings with evidence and actionable fixes. Not for architecture-only audits, formatting preferences, or processing existing review feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit a .glb or .gltf and make it small, correct, and fast to load in a browser, with a measured before/after report. Use when a model is "too big" or "slow to load", when the user asks to "optimize this GLB", "compress this glTF", or "export for web", or when they mention Draco, meshopt, gltfpack, KTX2, Basis, texture VRAM, draw calls, or a Blender / CAD / photogrammetry / Pascal export headed for Three.js, React Three Fiber (drei useGLTF), Babylon.js, or model-viewer. Covers inspection, spec validation, geometry and texture compression, scene-graph cleanup, and the correctness checks (metres, Y-up, node names, animations, PBR fidelity, alpha modes, vertex colors) that must not regress. Not for editing or modelling geometry, authoring or laying out a scene, generating 3D from text or images, converting from FBX/OBJ/CAD, or debugging a runtime frame rate that has nothing to do with asset size.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review design specification documents for Go programs before implementation begins. Use this skill when a user has a Go spec, design doc, RFC, or PRD to review, wants feedback on a planned feature in a Go codebase, is about to start implementing from a spec, or asks "is this spec ready?" or "review this before I build it". Applies Go philosophy — simplicity, composition, explicit errors, context propagation — plus Cobra/Viper CLI conventions where applicable.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review code changes with several independent reviewers in parallel, then triage and present the findings. Use when the user says "run code review" or "review this code"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。