821 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Portfolio Analyzer — sector allocation analysis vs SPY benchmark, geographic exposure, correlation matrix, concentration risk (HHI), beta-weighted portfolio delta, dividend/income analysis, and prioritized rebalancing recommendations. Triggered by "trade portfolio" or "analyze my portfolio".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants help with pricing decisions, packaging, monetization strategy, or subscription models. Also use when the user mentions 'pricing', 'price', 'monetization', 'freemium', 'Van Westendorp', 'how much should I charge', 'pricing tiers', 'good-better-best', 'SaaS pricing', 'subscription model', 'free vs paid', 'packaging', 'pricing page', 'annual vs monthly', or is deciding between free and paid models. Make sure to use this whenever someone is making ANY pricing decision — even questions like 'should I charge for this?' or 'is freemium right for us?' or 'my conversion rate is low, is it the price?' are pricing strategy questions. Covers value-based pricing, tier structure, price psychology, and competitor benchmarking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate AI model performance with metrics, benchmarks, and comparison. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-model-evaluator related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design AI evaluation frameworks with benchmarks. TRIGGERS - Use when user needs help with ai-eval-framework related tasks.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate a local skill with the terum-skills CLI — hygiene, trigger evals and execution cases against a baseline, billed to the user's own Claude Code — after confirming the cost, and show the result as a Markdown board. Use when the user asks to eval, test, score or benchmark a skill, or to see whether an edit made it better.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create new skills, modify and improve existing skills, and measure skill performance. Use when users want to create a skill from scratch, edit, or optimize an existing skill, run evals to test a skill, benchmark skill performance with variance analysis, or optimize a skill's description for better triggering accuracy.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Intake for an autonomous research run (Arbor). Use when the user wants to optimize a metric in a repo over many isolated experiments — 'optimize this benchmark', 'improve the model F1 overnight', 'beat the leaderboard'. Discovers the repo/eval/splits, measures the baseline, confirms a Research Contract, then emits a ready-to-send /auto-research command. Does NOT start the run itself.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
学术、竞赛与资质凭证核验：对论文、专利、竞赛名次、职业证书、开源社区身份、公开 benchmark 成绩逐条比对权威公开源，核对作者顺序、名次分母与定语、专利法律状态、头衔层级，识别申请写成授权、Workshop 写成主会、省略分母等拔高手法。凡是简历上出现可对外部权威源核对的凭证就使用本技能——包括用户说"他这个论文是真的吗""这个竞赛奖含金量如何""专利查得到吗""他说自己是 Committer 靠谱吗"时。
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Roast the current repo's design system with real data. Runs a deterministic scanner (no tokens, ~1s) that counts everything that betrays a design system, from colours and their near-identical twins to greys, spacing values, typefaces, duplicated and never-imported components, inline styles, !important and arbitrary Tailwind values, and compares them against Ideal Design System norms, a benchmark of 119 public repos (a 34-repo core fleet plus groups for shadcn, Tailwind, MUI, Mantine, Chakra, Ant Design and web components) and 10 reputable design systems, generates a shareable HTML diagnosis, and can generate design-system-rules.md, the agent rules file that stops the mess regrowing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when assessing the maturity of a CTI programme, the user asks "how mature is our CTI?" / "what should we improve next?", or wants a benchmark against the five-level model across six dimensions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when validating, benchmarking, or monitoring LLM application performance. Keywords: RAG evaluation, LLM-as-a-judge, CI/CD gating, trajectory scoring, test suites, prompt quality.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Agent-native design engine that makes AI do more useful work: route the prompt, fork a template, weave IFQ ambient craft, verify the artifact, and only install export tooling when requested. One prompt -> shippable HTML, with optional MP4 / GIF / PPTX / PDF / SVG. Triggers include prototype, hi-fi mockup, slide deck, motion demo, infographic, dashboard, whitepaper, changelog, business card, social cover, brand from scratch, design critique, mp4/gif export, 60fps, keynote, PPTX, A-vs-B benchmark. Do not use for production web apps, SEO-critical sites, backend systems, or pure copy edits.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user wants a related-work survey, technical lineage, task timeline, or paper-map around a baseline paper, research task, benchmark, or project direction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performance regression detection using the browse daemon. (gstack).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
"Apply the SERVQUAL model (Parasuraman, Zeithaml, and Berry, 1988) to measure service quality gaps across five dimensions. Use this skill when the user needs to diagnose service quality shortfalls, benchmark customer expectations against perceptions, design service improvement programs, or when they ask 'where is our service failing', 'what do customers expect vs experience', or 'how do we measure service quality'.".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and draft multi-email sequences with full copy, timing, branching logic, exit conditions, and performance benchmarks. Use when building onboarding, lead nurture, re-engagement, win-back, or product launch flows, when you need a complete drip campaign with A/B test suggestions, or when mapping a sequence end-to-end with a flow diagram.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when designing, redrawing, or validating research-paper figures and tables, including Matplotlib plots, LaTeX tables, benchmarks, captions, legends, annotations, color, and typography. Preserves exact evidence and checks rendered PDFs for clipping, overlap, and readability.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Container and Kubernetes security assessment. Tests container escape vectors, Docker/containerd socket exposure, K8s RBAC misconfigurations, pod security violations, exposed API servers, etcd access, service account token abuse, image layer secrets, private registry attacks, SSRF to metadata services, cross-namespace network bypass, CIS benchmarks, crypto miner detection, resource exhaustion, and admission controller gaps. Both external and internal (compromised pod) perspectives. Uses trivy, kube-bench, kubectl, nuclei, dive, amicontained, and docker-bench-security. Covers OWASP Kubernetes Top 10 and all 22 Kubernetes Goat attack scenarios.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review contracts with clause-by-clause risk scoring, market benchmarks, negotiability ratings, and redline suggestions. Use when the user pastes an NDA, SaaS/MSA, M&A LOI, or payment agreement and wants a Contract Safety Score, CUAD-based risk breakdown, or /review as [position] analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Consult this skill BEFORE proposing a fix to any CLI gap or schema gap that touches evidence, trust magnitude, evidence types, evidence grades, the TM formula, or star-level promotion gates. Also read it whenever an issue mentions citations, stars, commits, contributors, views, reviewers, percentile, arxiv, github-stars-own, repo-own, social-signal, benchmark-result, peer-review, self-attestation, fusion-recipe, verifier-attestation, or proxy-containment — those are the 10 canonical evidence types and the raw inputs that feed their formulas. Also read it when asked whether a skill qualifies for a given star level (0★–6★): the Star Bar and promotion gates live in `META.md`, not in the TM methodology page. Reading both prevents proposing a calibration that satisfies the TM grade threshold but violates a Star Bar installability or link requirement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Top-level orchestrator for the Gaia Skill Tree evidence verification pipeline. Run this when you want to do a full evidence pass — collecting raw sources, verifying live GitHub star counts, running Phase 2B benchmark-source verification, adversarially auditing for quality/formatting issues, and checking that every URL is reachable — all in one coordinated sequence. Trigger phrases: "run the evidence pipeline", "full evidence pass", "verify evidence", "evidence verification pipeline", "run ev-pipeline", "check all evidence", "audit the data lake", "evidence quality sweep", "refresh evidence", "validate evidence sources". Also aliased as /evidence-verification-pipeline. Use the individual sub-skills (ev-collection, ev-star-verification, ev-adversarial-audit, ev-link-validation) only when you need to re-run one phase in isolation; for end-to-end work, always start here.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Canonical entry point for the full Gaia evidence verification pipeline. Invoke as /evidence-verification-pipeline or /ev-pipeline — both names trigger this skill. Use whenever you need to run the evidence phases end-to-end: collecting raw evidence from the data lake, verifying live GitHub star counts, running Phase 2B benchmark-source verification, running adversarial auditing for noise and URL errors, and checking link health via Firecrawl. Also use when someone says "run the evidence pipeline", "verify the evidence lake", "audit evidence", "run ev-pipeline", "full evidence check", "pipeline run", "prepare evidence for ingestion", or "refresh the data lake". This is the pre-ingestion step — run it before importing any evidence into the registry.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Batch wrapper for /gaia-ingest. Ingests a bounded set of already-verified evidence rows through CLI-only writes, uses --no-build on every row, appraises Trust Magnitude for every affected named skill, then runs exactly one build and validation pass. Use for an L4-approved intake after /ev-pipeline; benchmark-result rows also require a Phase 2B report and explicit human gate approval.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Phase 1 of the Gaia evidence verification pipeline. Use this skill whenever you need to gather, consolidate, or refresh raw evidence for named skills in the registry. Trigger phrases: "collect evidence", "populate the data lake", "gather sources", "run ev-collection", "Phase 1", "compile the evidence index", "refresh the unified lake", "aggregate skill evidence", "build the evidence database". Also invoke as the first step before running ev-star-verification, ev-adversarial-audit, or ev-link-validation — nothing downstream is meaningful without a fresh, compiled index. Covers GitHub repo links, stargazer signals, YouTube showcases, arXiv papers, peer reviews, benchmark results, blog/newsletter posts, and self-attestation artifacts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。