「code analysis」の検索結果

Analyzing behavioral experiment data — RT/accuracy preprocessing, mixed-effects models, and robust inference.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Bayesian data analysis — priors, likelihoods, posterior computation, model comparison, and honest reporting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Statistical methods for biology and medicine — study design, hypothesis testing, regression, and survival analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write complete business plans — executive summary, market analysis, financials, and investor-ready narratives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end bioinformatics analysis — sequence QC, alignment, and omics pipelines for research data.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Battery science fundamentals — cell components, electrochemistry metrics, testing protocols, and degradation analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Whole-codebase analysis powered by Gemini 2.5 Pro's 2M token context window. Triggers: bounded per-module analysis misses inter-module patterns or when you need a full-graph view before a major refactor.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when scoring a list of business or solution requirements against the *actual* capabilities of a specific Salesforce org so each row can be classified Standard / Configuration / Low-Code / Custom / Unfit, given an effort tier (S/M/L/XL), a risk tag, and an AppExchange suggestion when applicable. Trigger keywords: fit gap salesforce requirements, score requirements against salesforce capabilities, salesforce capability matrix, classify requirement as standard config custom, fit-gap effort tier, AppExchange alternative for requirement. NOT for requirements elicitation (use admin/requirements-gathering-for-sf). NOT for architecture decisions on the GAP rows (use architect/solution-design-patterns and standards/decision-trees/). NOT for license or edition selection (use architect/license-optimization-strategy and architect/org-edition-and-feature-licensing). NOT for OmniStudio-specific fit-gap (use architect/omnistudio-vs-standard-decision).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automatic quality control, linting, and static analysis procedures. Use after every code modification to ensure syntax correctness and project standards. Triggers onKeywords: lint, format, check, validate, types, static analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinates code quality: ln-511 metrics, ln-512 cleanup, inline agent review (Codex + Gemini), ln-513 regression, ln-514 log analysis. Returns quality_verdict + aggregated results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

CLI tools for Svelte 5 documentation lookup and code analysis. MUST be used whenever creating, editing or analyzing any Svelte component (.svelte) or Svelte module (.svelte.ts/.svelte.js). If possible, this skill should be executed within the svelte-file-editor agent for optimal results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Scientific research engine for hypothesis testing, literature gap analysis, experimental validation, and data-driven discovery. Enforces adversarial review (Reviewer 2), 32 quality gates, tree search over hypotheses, confounder harness for quantitative claims, and serendipity detection. TRIGGER when: user asks to analyze scientific data, test hypotheses, validate findings, search for research gaps, design experiments, or investigate results. DO NOT TRIGGER when: pure code review, documentation writing, devops tasks, general conversation, or non-scientific data transformation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Council — 5 independent AI perspectives + mutual critique + synthesis (adapted from karpathy/llm-council for Claude Code). For high-stakes decisions where the answer does NOT follow unambiguously from the data — go/no-go before real consequences, critiquing a methodology, choosing between competing approaches, pressure-testing a conclusion you're attached to, designing risk controls. NOT for log/data analysis (the council has no data access) and not for factual lookups. Triggers — "convene the council", "run it past the council", "go/no-go", "pressure-test this".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured second-pass reasoning after code review or plan evaluation. Offers named reasoning methods (pre-mortem, inversion, red team, Socratic, etc.) to re-examine findings through a specific lens. Use after /mk:review verdict or any time deeper analysis is needed on an existing output. NOT for initial review (see mk:review); NOT for creating implementation plans (see mk:plan-creator).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Decompile a function to C-like pseudocode for human-readable analysis. Use to understand function logic, review control flow, or prepare for code pattern matching.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Handle ethical requirements, IRB approval, trial registration, and pre-analysis plans for RCTs. Use when user mentions: research ethics, IRB, informed consent, trial registration, pre-analysis plan, PAP, data security, vulnerable populations, research transparency.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes single-cell pooled CRISPR screens (Perturb-seq, CROP-seq, Perturb-CITE-seq, ECCITE-seq, multiome) where each cell carries an sgRNA and a scRNA-seq / surface-protein / chromatin readout. Covers experimental design (direct-capture Perturb-seq Dixit 2016 vs CROP-seq 3'UTR-barcoded Datlinger 2017 vs ECCITE-seq vs Multiome), MOI for sgRNA assignment, escaper-cell filtering (Mixscape, Papalexi 2021), SCEPTRE NB GLM + permutation for low-MOI (Barry 2024 Genome Biol 25:124), the Pertpy framework, factor decomposition, genome-scale Perturb-seq (Replogle 2022 Cell, 2.5M cells), and per-perturbation single-cell DE. Use when running a single-cell CRISPR screen, choosing direct-capture vs CROP-seq architecture, filtering escaper cells, performing single-cell DE, integrating Perturb-seq with pathway analysis, scaling to GW CRISPRi via Replogle protocol, or analyzing multi-omics screens.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assesses ChIP-seq quality across antibody specificity, fragmentation, enrichment, replicate concordance, and library complexity. Computes FRiP, NSC/RSC (phantompeakqualtools), library complexity (NRF/PBC1/PBC2), deepTools plotFingerprint (JS distance, AUC, synthetic JS), ChIPQC, IDR with ENCODE Nself/Nt rules, and detects hyper-ChIPable artifacts. Use when validating an antibody, diagnosing failed peak calls, deciding whether to proceed with downstream analysis, grading against ENCODE thresholds, or auditing replicate concordance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert-level structural engineering covering structural analysis, steel and concrete design, load combinations, deflection, connections, and building codes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to know what will break if they change something, or needs safety analysis before editing code. Examples: "Is it safe to change X?", "What depends on this?", "What will break?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need CRAP score and coverage risk analysis to find high-risk code before refactoring or release. Keywords: CRAP score, risk hotspots, cyclomatic complexity, test coverage gaps, coverage threshold.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Explore open-source GitHub repository source trees via web browsing to analyze and compare feature implementations at the code level. Supports two modes: cross-project comparison and single-project deep dive. Use when evaluating how OSS projects implement a specific feature, choosing architecture patterns, or benchmarking implementation strategies.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GitHub Pull Request creation specialist. Analyzes user requirements to create PRs with structured titles and bodies matching the user's query language. Handles git change analysis, PR draft creation, user confirmation, and final PR creation via gh CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Specialized GitHub PR intelligence agent for automatically gathering comprehensive context from Pull Requests. Activate when users need CI failure analysis, review comment investigation, or PR status assessment. Triggers on requests like "CI 실패 원인 찾아줘", "gather review comments", "check PR status", "analyze PR".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。