「compare」の検索結果

Quantifies CRISPR editing outcomes with CRISPResso2 (Clement 2019 Nat Biotechnol) across Cas9-nuclease (indels, HDR), CBE and ABE base editors (target conversion + bystander), and prime editor (pegRNA-templated) modes. Covers single-amplicon (CRISPResso), multi-sample batch (CRISPRessoBatch), pooled-amplicon (CRISPRessoPooled), WGS off-target (CRISPRessoWGS), and sample-comparison (CRISPRessoCompare) workflows; quantification-window math that controls what is called edited; substitution-vs-indel diagnostic to distinguish BE from Cas9 contamination; MMEJ deletion pattern interpretation; allele-frequency tables; and failure modes from amplicon misalignment or contamination. Use when quantifying editing from amplicon sequencing, choosing CRISPResso mode by design, distinguishing intended edits from bystanders and indel byproducts, debugging low-alignment runs, or generating publication-grade editing reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Differential abundance and state analysis for cytometry data. Compare cell populations between conditions using statistical methods. Use when testing for significant changes in cell frequencies or marker expression between groups.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Calculates species richness, diversity, and turnover using the Hill number framework with iNEXT coverage-based rarefaction/extrapolation, asymptotic diversity estimation, and beta diversity partitioning (betapart turnover vs nestedness). Compares assemblages using coverage-standardized rather than size-standardized rarefaction. Use when quantifying biodiversity from species abundance or incidence data, comparing diversity across sites, or constructing rarefaction curves. Not for clinical 16S microbiome alpha/beta diversity (see microbiome/diversity-analysis).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Competitive intelligence and market positioning analysis. Researches competitors, compares features, pricing, and tech stacks, then produces a prioritized gap analysis with actionable roadmap. Trigger on: competitors, competitive analysis, gap analysis, feature comparison, market research, what are we missing, who are our competitors, pricing comparison, market positioning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delegate tasks to AI agents via Box0. Use when the user asks to review code, check security, run tests, compare tools, get multiple perspectives, research a topic, analyze data, write docs, or any task that could benefit from specialized or parallel execution. Also use when the user mentions agent names or says "ask", "delegate", "get opinions from", or "have someone".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Papers With Code MCP tools for searching and reading AI/ML papers, discovering recent and trending research, finding related work and paper lineage, browsing tasks, methods, conferences, organizations, and frameworks, and inspecting benchmark leaderboards with model-size and metric filters through the public Papers With Code catalog. Use whenever the user asks to find papers, survey literature, compare research, inspect an arXiv paper, explore AI/ML taxonomy or conferences, discover benchmarks or state-of-the-art models, or mentions Papers With Code, the PwC MCP server, or paperswithcode.co/mcp.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Papers With Code CLI (`pwc`) for searching and reading AI/ML papers, discovering recent and trending research, finding related work and paper lineage, browsing tasks, methods, conferences, organizations, frameworks, and benchmark leaderboards, and submitting authenticated paper edits through the public Papers With Code catalog. Use whenever the user asks to find papers, survey literature, compare research, inspect an arXiv paper, explore AI/ML taxonomy or conferences, discover benchmarks or state-of-the-art models, or mentions Papers With Code, `pwc`, or `pwc-cli`.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Research products across the web with Firecrawl and produce a shopping recommendation or cart-ready summary. Use when the user wants to compare products, find the best option, evaluate reviews, respect budget/preferences, or shop with a saved browser session.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when prompting a learner to complete hands-on MATLAB coding exercises, guided practice, debugging drills, code tracing, small MATLAB projects, or MATLAB-script assessment during tutoring. Use when the tutor should create a complete runnable MATLAB script, execute it through MATLAB tools, compare the produced outputs with expected outputs, and evaluate MATLAB programming style.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides parallel exploration of multiple implementation approaches using git worktrees. Use when facing decisions with multiple valid paths. Triggers on: explore options, compare approaches, parallel exploration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conducts deep technical research for Aha Loop stories. Use before implementing stories involving unfamiliar libraries or architectural decisions. Triggers on: research this, investigate, explore options, compare alternatives.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect template version drift and guide migration to the latest template version. Compares current repo against the template, identifies what's outdated, and automates safe updates while protecting product-specific content. Triggers on requests to sync with template, update template version, check for template drift, or when user asks "sync template", "update to v3", "template drift", "check template version".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has a Xiaohongshu niche and needs to find, compare, and extract reusable content structures from low-follower high-performing posts, or diagnose why a post did or did not become a breakout using click rate, retention, and interaction signals. Trigger phrases: "找对标", "低粉爆款", "拆爆款", "内容骨架", "点击率", "停留时长", "互动率", "competitor pattern", "viral post structure". Do not use before the monetization direction is clear.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply when facing a novel UI interaction or architectural decision with no precedent in the codebase. Build 2-3 competing prototypes and compare side by side before committing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has a Xiaohongshu niche and needs to find, compare, and extract reusable content structures from low-follower high-performing posts, or diagnose why a post did or did not become a breakout using click rate, retention, and interaction signals. Trigger phrases: "找对标", "低粉爆款", "拆爆款", "内容骨架", "点击率", "停留时长", "互动率", "competitor pattern", "viral post structure". Do not use before the monetization direction is clear.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Designs the public interface of a module before any implementation exists: writes the caller scenarios first, produces three candidates with genuinely different shapes, type-checks each one against the scenarios, scores them on measurable criteria and records the decision. Use when someone says "design the API for this module", "what should this signature look like", "compare interface options", "this function is awkward to call", "show me alternatives before I build it", or is about to add a module, library entry point, endpoint or command that other code will depend on.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert guidance for Comet ML, the platform for tracking machine learning experiments, managing models, and monitoring production ML systems. Helps developers log experiments, compare model versions, and build reproducible ML pipelines with automatic code/data versioning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Braintrust is a hosted platform for evaluating and tracing LLM applications: it runs a task over a dataset, scores the outputs, stores each run as an experiment and logs production traces. Use when a user asks to write or run a Braintrust eval, score LLM outputs with autoevals, compare prompt or model versions as experiments, run evals in CI and fail on regressions, trace OpenAI or Anthropic calls with Braintrust, manage evaluation datasets, or use the bt CLI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run AI agent and LLM evaluations in CI/CD pipelines — automated quality gates that fail the build when AI output quality drops. Use when someone asks to "test my AI agent", "add evals to CI", "catch prompt regressions", "compare models", "evaluate LLM output quality", "set up AI quality gates", or "benchmark my agent before deploying". Covers eval frameworks (Cobalt, Promptfoo, Braintrust), LLM-as-judge scoring, threshold-based assertions, and GitHub Actions integration.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Head-to-head SEO comparison of two domains powered by the DataForSEO API. Side-by-side metrics across keywords, traffic, backlinks, referring domains, and shared keyword overlap with a verdict on which domain has the stronger SEO position.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Full SEO toolkit for Claude Code, powered by the DataForSEO API. Replaces the data layer of an SEO agency: keyword research, competitor analysis, rank tracking, backlink audits, technical site crawls, content gap analysis, and client-ready PDF reports — all with real Google search data, not scraping. Use when the user says "seo", "keyword research", "rank check", "backlinks", "competitor analysis", "site audit", "content gap", "compare domains", or passes a domain / URL / keyword for SEO analysis.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements snapshot/golden file tests with temporal normalization so tests don't break daily. Use when implementing tests that compare output against expected snapshots.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit whether a paper's EVALUATION DESIGN actually measures what it claims and whether its reporting is complete — the validity layer family D (experiment-forensics) cannot reach. Three patterns: train/test leakage means the reported score may not measure generalization (HP-EVAL-LEAKAGE — adopts the Kapoor & Narayanan 8-type / 3-category leakage taxonomy; the illegitimate-proxy / sampling-bias / pretraining-contamination subtypes hand off as needs_external_check, naming but NEVER running Oren-2023 exchangeability / Shi-2023 Min-K% / Golchin-2023 Time-Travel / BIG-bench canary); a load-bearing LLM judge is conflicted (same model/family as a compared system) or unvalidated (no human-agreement, no bias control) (HP-JUDGE-VALIDITY); a declared condition/metric is dropped or switched to favor the method, or 'best' is chosen with no held-out set (HP-SELECTIVE-REPORTING). Verdict-bearing at L0/L1 from the DESCRIBED protocol — NOT repo-gated like experiment-forensics; L2 only CONFIRMS against split/preprocessing/result files. A fresh cross-model reviewer (gpt-5.6-sol xhigh, read-only, fresh thread per pass) PROPOSES findings, each span-anchored to a ledger claim_id; tools/adjudicate_findings.py DECIDES the verdict. Leakage and under-reporting are usually HONEST methodological errors — every finding describes a discrepancy to CHECK, never an accusation. An LLM generating GROUND-TRUTH labels is HP-FAKE-GT (experiment-forensics) — routed there, not here. Emits eval-design-forensics.findings.json; computes NO verdict. Detect-only. Triggers: "eval design audit", "evaluation validity", "train/test leakage", "data leakage", "is the score measuring generalization", "LLM judge bias", "is the judge validated", "selective reporting", "cherry-picked results", "评估设计审计", "评测有效性", "数据泄漏", "训练测试集泄漏", "裁判模型有没有验证", "选择性报告".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Advanced Evaluation workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs This skill should be used when the user asks to "implement LLM-as-judge", "compare model outputs", "create evaluation rubrics", "mitigate evaluation bias", or mentions direct scoring, pairwise comparison, position bias, evaluation pipelines, or automated quality assessment and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。