「coverage」の検索結果

Use when module planning and source coverage are done and the run needs writer-ready per-module packs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit/regression checks for the evidence-first survey pipeline: citation health, per-section coverage, placeholder leakage, and template repetition.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map papers from the core set to each outline subsection and write `outline/mapping.tsv` with coverage tracking.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit one research Workspace for declared Unit outputs and Pipeline target Artifacts, writing `output/CONTRACT_REPORT.md`; use for mid-Run coverage snapshots or final delivery completeness, not deep provenance integrity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a tutorial module plan exists and the run needs an auditable module-to-source grounding file before prose.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use dotnet-diagnostics-mcp for MCP-driven .NET CPU, allocation, GC, and test-host profiling. USE FOR: profiling unit tests or investigating runtime bottlenecks. DO NOT USE FOR: writing test assertions, coverage collection, or precise microbenchmark timing. INVOKES: connect the MCP server, select target processes, collect bounded profiles, and attribute hotspots to source.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ALWAYS USE for test work that requires changes: write, add, generate, repair, or strengthen tests for existing code in xUnit, MSTest, NUnit, pytest, Vitest/Jest, Go, or another framework. Includes regression cases, failing or flaky tests, coverage-driven additions, and audit-then-fix requests. Focused work stays direct; broad or multi-stage work invokes test-engineer. DO NOT USE for only running tests, analysis-only audits, framework/platform migrations, a test blocked on a missing production seam (testability-obstacle), or MSTest API/configuration corrections that do not design new cases (writing-mstest-tests). Within an active test-engineer pipeline, reuse supplied guidance and do not re-enter this skill.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audits existing tests in any language using formal, research-backed test smell names and the testsmells.org 19-smell academic taxonomy. Use when the caller asks for an academic or citable test-smell review, named smell categories, or a formal severity-ranked smell assessment. Covers Assertion Roulette, Conditional Test Logic, Mystery Guest, Eager Test, Sleepy Test, Unknown Test, Sensitive Equality, and the rest of the catalog across .NET, Python, JavaScript/TypeScript, Java, Go, Ruby, Rust, Swift, Kotlin, PowerShell, and C++. DO NOT USE FOR a quick pragmatic test review (use test-anti-patterns), writing or running tests, framework migration, coverage, or assertion-diversity metrics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the open-source free `Meziantou.Analyzer` package for design, usage, security, performance, and style rules in .NET. Use when a repo wants broader analyzer coverage with a single NuGet package. USE FOR: the repo uses or wants Meziantou.Analyzer; the team wants one analyzer pack that covers design, usage, security, performance, and style. DO NOT USE FOR: repos that already enforce an overlapping analyzer baseline and do not want extra diagnostics; formatting-only work. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use Biome in .NET repositories that ship Node-based frontend assets and want a fast combined formatter-linter-import organizer for JavaScript, TypeScript, CSS, JSON, GraphQL, or HTML. USE FOR: biome.json or @biomejs/biome setup; fast frontend formatting and linting; replacing overlapping frontend style tools deliberately. DO NOT USE FOR: ESLint-only plugin coverage; runtime site audits such as headers, accessibility, or browser behavior. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the open-source free `Stryker.NET` mutation testing tool for .NET. Use when a repo needs to measure whether tests actually catch faults, especially in critical libraries or domains. USE FOR: the repo uses or wants Stryker.NET; mutation testing is needed for high-risk code. DO NOT USE FOR: every PR path by default in a large repo; simple coverage collection. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Grade curated individual tests for readiness, A-F quality and improvements. ALWAYS USE FOR: grade tests, review only a named test, per-test readiness or quality bands for supplied methods, bodies, file spans or bounded PR diffs, including existing tests. Return Pass/Failed/Uncertain/Not applicable; unresolved/empty scopes omit grades. Compose read-only per-test evidence. Polyglot. DO NOT USE FOR: suite audits (test-engineer/test-anti-patterns), concrete fix/feature detection proof (test-value-evidence), writing/fixing tests, or coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

MANDATORY for static source-to-test pairing: find or list source files/modules without corresponding tests, or suggest test locations from repository structure. Invoke even for a tiny package; do not substitute manual globbing. Uses Roslyn for C#/.NET and tree-sitter for Python, TS/JS, Go, Java, Rust, Ruby, Kotlin, Swift, PowerShell, and C++. DO NOT USE FOR: real line/branch/Cobertura data, coverage-backed test priorities, CRAP risk, or grading existing tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review and optimize application data access that uses Entity Framework Core (EF Core). Use for EF Core performance and correctness reviews of services, repositories, imports, and background jobs: slow or memory-heavy queries, excessive round-trips, hidden SaveChanges, premature materialization, dynamic query construction, result-graph tracking, bulk writes, DbContext lifetime or overlapping operations, search semantics, paging, raw SQL, and model/index coverage. Use whether or not EF Core owns the schema. For EF Core, not Dapper or raw ADO.NET.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill before answering, planning, or editing whenever .NET tests or CI are switching from VSTest to Microsoft.Testing.Platform (MTP), or an MTP migration behaves differently. Triggers include "switch from VSTest"; MSTest/NUnit/xUnit MTP enablement; OutputType=Exe only for test projects in Directory.Build.props; EnableMSTestRunner, EnableNUnitRunner, UseMicrosoftTestingPlatformRunner, or YTest.MTP.XUnit2; .NET 10 global.json test.runner and TestingPlatformDotnetTestSupport; translating VSTest filters, logger, coverage, blame, or dump arguments; replacing VSTest@3; and exit code 8 or zero tests. Also use for xUnit v3 MTP filters during a v2-to-v3 upgrade. Do not use for framework conversion, TFM, UWP, or WinUI.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer a hard question by fanning it out to a PANEL of models running in parallel — each answering independently with web search and bash, none seeing the others' work — then having Opus 4.8 judge every response into a structured analysis (consensus, contradictions, partial coverage, unique insights, blind spots) and write a final answer grounded in it. The panel is two independent Opus 4.8 runs (slug opus4.8-4.8), Opus 4.8 + GPT-5.5 via codex (opus4.8-gpt5.5), Opus 4.8 + Gemini 3.1 Pro via agy (opus4.8-gemini3.1pro), or all three (opus4.8-gpt5.5-gemini3.1pro). Opus always judges and writes the final answer — the pipeline can't be reversed. Runs on local CLI subscriptions (no metered API), and saves a timestamped provenance .md per run. Use this whenever the user asks to "run it through Fusion", says /fusion, wants a multi-model / panel / ensemble answer, wants a question cross-checked across models, or wants a higher-confidence answer with consensus and blind spots surfaced — even if they don't say "fusion". General-purpose: any topic (research, law, strategy, technical, personal). Best for high-stakes research, design calls, and debugging where being confidently wrong is expensive.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when you need to add or review fuzz testing for Java APIs with CATS — including contract-driven negative testing, malformed payload validation, boundary input exploration, CI integration, reproducible failures, and local execution guidance. This should trigger for requests such as Add fuzz testing to a Java project; Use CATS for API negative testing; Review CI quality gates for API contract robustness; Improve boundary and malformed input test coverage; Run CATS fuzz tests against an OpenAPI contract. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing whether an OpenSpec change's execution goal, acceptance criteria, and implementation or verification tasks are aligned. This should trigger for requests such as Review this OpenSpec change with ATDD; Check acceptance criteria against tasks; Find acceptance criteria without task coverage; Detect tasks that diverge from the execution goal; Explain what is missing, vague, ambiguous, partial, absent, or divergent in this OpenSpec change. Part of Plinth Toolkit

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit CVE/vulnerability source coverage for a technology stack. Maps each component (container, library, base image, runtime) to authoritative CVE feeds, flags gaps, and produces audit-ready reports. Generic: works for any service or stack.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Measure process costs and fork budgets when changing startup, per-file, per-test, parallel workers, reporting, or coverage paths; use for fork census and performance comparisons.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when writing tests, validating features, or needing to verify code works. Triggers on "write tests", "add test coverage", "validate feature", "integration test", "end-to-end", "e2e test", "mock", "unit test". Enforces scenario-driven testing with real dependencies in .scratch/ directory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when creating new styled components or adding new CSS classes. Triggers on "create component", "new button", "new card", "add styles", "style component", "build UI element". Guides semantic naming, Tailwind composition, dark mode support, and test coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-language testing strategies and patterns. Triggers on: test pyramid, unit test, integration test, e2e test, TDD, BDD, test coverage, mocking strategy, test doubles, test isolation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

pytest testing patterns for Python. Triggers on: pytest, fixture, mark, parametrize, mock, conftest, test coverage, unit test, integration test, pytest.raises.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。