「director」の検索結果

Interactive feature development workflow from idea to implementation. Creates requirements (EARS format), design documents, and implementation task lists. Use when creating feature specs, requirements documents, design documents, or implementation plans. Triggered by "kiro" or references to .kiro/specs/ directory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when managing the file-based todo tracking system in the todos/ directory. It provides workflows for creating todos, managing status and dependencies, conducting triage, and integrating with slash commands and code review processes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

This skill should be used when the user asks to "create a plugin", "scaffold a plugin", "understand plugin structure", "organize plugin components", "set up plugin.json", "use ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}", "add commands/agents/skills/hooks", "configure auto-discovery", or needs guidance on plugin directory layout, manifest configuration, component organization, file naming conventions, or Claude Code plugin architecture best practices.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate comprehensive component guideline documentation for SEED Design System. Use when creating or updating design guideline documentation in ./docs/content/docs/components directory. This skill helps create high-quality documentation similar to action-button.mdx.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create new Claude Code Skills with proper YAML frontmatter, progressive disclosure structure, and complete directory organization. Use when you need to build custom skills for specific workflows, generate skill templates, or understand the Claude Skills specification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turborepo monorepo build system guidance. Triggers on: turbo.json, task pipelines, dependsOn, caching, remote cache, the "turbo" CLI, --filter, --affected, CI optimization, environment variables, internal packages, monorepo structure/best practices, and boundaries. Use when user: configures tasks/workflows/pipelines, creates packages, sets up monorepo, shares code between apps, runs changed/affected packages, debugs cache, or has apps/packages directories.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create exercise directory structures with sections, problems, solutions, and explainers that pass linting. Use when user wants to scaffold exercises, create exercise stubs, or set up a new course section.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Show Arch Studio help, available skills, agents and host-specific commands. Use for help, how do I use Arch Studio, what is Norma, or a capability directory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Consolidate IBRK trade CSV files from a directory into a summary report. Groups trades by symbol, underlying, date, strike, buy/sell, and open/close. Outputs both markdown and CSV.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create new Claude Code Skills with proper YAML frontmatter, progressive disclosure structure, and complete directory organization. Use when you need to build custom skills for specific workflows, generate skill templates, or understand the Claude Skills specification.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Get a local business found on Google -- audit and optimize the Google Business Profile, local pack ranking factors, review velocity, NAP consistency across directories, and location pages. For businesses whose customers search "near me," this outranks everything else in marketing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turn a marketing brief or product offer into a finished short-form video ad built in HyperFrames — hook, script, shot-by-shot storyboard, scene-by-scene HTML composition, captions, and voiceover. Outputs platform cuts (vertical 9:16, square, 16:9). Use when you need a launch ad, product promo, social video, or paid-creative concept ready to render.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Active Directory attack hunting - enumeration to domain dominance. Spray-safe (lockout gate), AS-REP/Kerberoast, ACL + ADCS (ESC1-16), delegation, DCSync, lateral movement. Wiki-first, FIND schema output.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adaptive, targeted web fuzzing - deterministic wordlist selection (wl-pick.sh) plus judgment. Picks the right SecLists list per surface (content/vhost/api/params/artifacts) smallest-first, calibrates filters against soft-404s, recurses, escalates T0 harness -> T1 seclists -> T2 cewl -> T3 app-specific on signal, pivots to hidden-param fuzzing, and detects/handles WAF/Cloudflare/throttle (backoff, origin-bypass, or hard STOP on the DoS tell). Engagement-type aware (ctf loud, pt calibrated, bb stealth). Use for "fuzz", "content discovery", "directory brute", "vhost fuzz", "find hidden params", "which wordlist", "gobuster/ffuf/feroxbuster/cewl/arjun".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements HIPAA Privacy Rule requirements under 45 CFR §164.500-534 for covered entities and business associates. Covers minimum necessary standard, treatment-payment-operations exceptions, directory opt-out, personal representative rules, and authorization requirements. Keywords: HIPAA Privacy Rule, PHI, minimum necessary, TPO, authorization, covered entity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Skill for discovering and researching autonomous AI agents, tools, and ecosystems using the AgentFolio directory.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when starting any Blender asset task, planning a production pipeline, coordinating multiple disciplines, or matching a reference photo/concept art. Invoke for game-ready assets, hard surface, environment, character, creature, export, or any multi-skill Blender workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a human-readable, progressive-disclosure overview of unfamiliar code or a pull request's changes — why it exists (the real problem it solves or goal it serves for the business or a user), and from there what it does, how it flows, and where to start — so you can get up to speed before working on or reviewing it. Use when you want to understand, get oriented in, make sense of, explain, or get up to speed on a chunk of code, a file, a directory, a symbol, or a PR's changes. Writes the overview to a scratch file and changes no code. Does not review code quality or raise findings — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting them. Does not produce durable feature or system documentation — use project-documentation. Does not assess architecture or structural risk — use architectural-analysis. Does not diagnose bugs or root-cause failures — use investigate. Does not pace a person through the code one step at a time in conversation — use code-walkthrough.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs deep architectural analysis of a specified module, directory, or feature area by examining structural coupling, data flow, concurrency patterns, risk, and SOLID alignment. Use when the user wants to assess, evaluate, or review the architecture, design quality, dependency structure, coupling, cohesion, or technical debt of an existing part of the codebase. Not for investigating specific bugs, runtime errors, or failures — use investigate. Not for test planning — use automated-test-planning. Not for file-level code review — use code-review. Not for researching open-ended options, prior art, or how something works — use research. Not for designing a new interface or contract — use design-an-api. Not for planning the change its findings imply — use plan-a-change. Not for discovering bounded contexts, ubiquitous language, or where code boundaries diverge from domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis. Not for writing documentation or architectural decision records.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes an existing codebase using strategic Domain-Driven Design to discover bounded contexts, surface ubiquitous language and semantic collisions, find places where code boundaries diverge from domain boundaries, and produce an evidence-backed domain and context map. Use when the goal is DDD-specific: bounded context discovery, ubiquitous language analysis, domain model discovery, or mapping contested ownership and responsibility. The entire repository is a valid scope; no module or directory must be named first. Does not assess architectural coupling, cohesion, or technical debt — use architectural-analysis. Does not design service communication, integration patterns, or deployment topology — use architectural-analysis or plan-a-feature. Does not refactor code, diagnose bugs, or review code quality — use refactor, investigate, or code-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produce a standalone test plan by analyzing code for test coverage gaps and edge cases. Use when you need to create, generate, or draft a test plan for a branch, need to analyze test coverage, or need to identify what tests to write for specific files or directories. Does not produce a plain-language plan for a person to run tests by hand — use manual-test-planning for that. Does not write test code — use tdd to implement behavior test-first. Does not refine existing plans — use iterative-plan-review. Does not review code quality, security, or style — use code-review for full code review. Does not evaluate architectural testability or structural coupling — use architectural-analysis for architectural assessment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Walks a person through code changes one step at a time in conversation, starting at the entry point and following the flow that changes, showing a small chunk per step and explaining it in plain language. Defaults to the current branch's changes, and walks the code from the perspective of any context provided instead — a file, directory, symbol, pull request, plan, or ticket. Use when someone wants to be walked through, taught, paced through, or shown around code or a branch step by step, or to learn how a change works before reviewing or extending it. Stops after every step and waits, so the learner sets the pace. Paces through code that already exists and builds nothing — to build new work while being paced through it, use pairing. Does not produce a written overview to read alone — use code-overview. Does not review code quality — use code-review. Does not diagnose bugs — use investigate.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate or update repository-specific AGENTS.md instruction files from real repo evidence. Use when asked to create, design, scaffold, split, or improve root or scoped AGENTS.md files for Codex/Claude/agent workflows, especially when a repo needs directory-specific rules, validation commands, generated-file boundaries, or a short agent onboarding router.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Create complete Claude Code workflow directories with curated skills. Use when user wants to (1) create a new workflow for specific use case (media creator, developer, marketer, etc.), (2) set up a Claude Code project with pre-configured skills, (3) download and organize skills from GitHub repositories, or (4) generate README.md and AGENTS.md documentation for workflows. Triggers on phrases like "create workflow", "new workflow", "set up workflow", "build a xxx-workflow".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。