「erd」の検索結果

Land a PR by monitoring conflicts, resolving them, waiting for checks, and squash-merging when green; use when asked to land, merge, or shepherd a PR to completion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

"Apply the DeLone and McLean Information Systems Success Model to evaluate IS effectiveness through six interdependent dimensions. Use this skill when the user needs to assess system quality, information quality, or service quality of an IS, diagnose why users are dissatisfied, measure net benefits of a system investment, or when they ask 'how do we measure IS success', 'why are users unhappy with this system', or 'is our system delivering value'.".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects version drift between machine-readable law YAML files and the binding geldende wettekst on wetten.overheid.nl at the YAML's claimed valid_from. Catches the silent failure where authored content lags behind ingevoerde wijzigingen — a YAML dated 2025-01-01 still carrying pre-Stb.-X text. Activate as Step 0 of every regelrecht-stelselanalyse micro-cycle, before any YAML edit. Strict by design: no bypass, no normalization beyond whitespace within a single paragraph; the geldende wettekst is leading and is mirrored verbatim, including errata. Use proactively when starting a stelselanalyse cycle, before harvest/migrate/extend, or when user mentions "drift", "versie", "geldende tekst", or worries that a YAML may be stale relative to wetten.overheid.nl.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Genereert uit een (semi-)gevalideerd regelrecht-corpus een geloofwaardige service-PoC (burger- + behandelaar-portaal, of een headless beslis-service) en zet die in als validatie-instrument met uitvoeringsexperts — om tastbaar te maken wat nodig is om een wet rechtvaardig in de praktijk te brengen, gezien vanuit de betrokkene. Gebruik dit als workshop-fase ná de logica-/scenariovalidatie (audit-products) om de dienstverlening-kant te valideren: welke service impliceert de wet, waar zit menselijk oordeel, welke last ligt bij de burger, welke termijnen, waar is de wet hard of onduidelijk. Dossier-agnostisch; de regelrecht-methode (hooks, legal_character, untranslatables, source/implements, type_spec, receipts) is de vaste taal. Voor de logica-/scenariovalidatie zelf: zie de zusterskill regelrecht-audit-products.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maakt regelrecht-scenario's vindbaar en hun norm-ketens leesbaar/geassert. Aan de invoerkant — vertaal een platte lijst leaf-parameters naar benoemde casus-assen + een herbruikbare persona-bibliotheek, met een reverse-lookup casus-matrix. Aan de uitvoerkant — maak de norm-keten zichtbaar via keten-checkpoints (assert elke knoop op het kritieke pad, niet alleen de endpoint) en golden-trace-snapshots + branch-coverage. Gebruik dit bij het schrijven of opschonen van scenario-/feature-files, het terugvinden of ontwerpen van een specifieke casus in een grote variabelenlijst, het reviewen van engine-traces, of het regressie-bestendig maken van cross-law-ketens zodat een ketenfout niet stil achter een correcte endpoint verdwijnt. Dossier-agnostisch; de regelrecht-methode is de vaste taal. Haakt aan op regelrecht-stelselanalyse (engine-tests / meta-check) en regelrecht-audit-products (testcase-scenario's).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects sensitive data stored insecurely on mobile devices (Android/iOS). Trigger on: SharedPreferences, NSUserDefaults, SQLite, Room DB, DataStore, Core Data, Keychain misconfiguration, external storage, backup exposure, plaintext files, unencrypted databases, adb backup, iCloud backup, NSFileProtection, EncryptedSharedPreferences, SQLCipher, allowBackup, FLAG_SECURE, keyboard cache, sensitive logs. Covers MASVS-STORAGE-1 (local storage) and MASVS-STORAGE-2 (exposure to unauthorized actors).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Container and Kubernetes security assessment. Tests container escape vectors, Docker/containerd socket exposure, K8s RBAC misconfigurations, pod security violations, exposed API servers, etcd access, service account token abuse, image layer secrets, private registry attacks, SSRF to metadata services, cross-namespace network bypass, CIS benchmarks, crypto miner detection, resource exhaustion, and admission controller gaps. Both external and internal (compromised pod) perspectives. Uses trivy, kube-bench, kubectl, nuclei, dive, amicontained, and docker-bench-security. Covers OWASP Kubernetes Top 10 and all 22 Kubernetes Goat attack scenarios.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Triages an Aikido security findings CSV against a local codebase. For each finding, reads the flagged file, traces the code path, and verdicts it as KEEP OPEN or CLOSE with a specific reason. Outputs a reviewed CSV and a self-contained HTML evidence report. Run this at the end of a pentest when an Aikido CSV is available.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

An adversarial job search that gets better as it goes. Set up a job-search workspace, search a careers board and score roles against the realistic applicant pool, build a resume and cover letter, review them with seven agents that return a verdict per submission channel, then write what the review finds back into the profile. Invoke with /slushpile and name what you want to do.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Curate evidence-backed collateralQuality and whole-book custodyModel labels. Use when adding a stablecoin or auditing Selector custody eligibility and DDR depeg-duration verdicts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a prioritized review queue of registry skills and catalog items that need attention. Use this skill whenever someone asks: "what needs review?", "what's overdue for audit?", "where are the weak spots in the registry?", "what should I audit next?", "run a health check on the registry", "show me flagged skills", "find problems in the registry", "what skills need fixing?", or "triage the registry". This is the triage layer — it surfaces candidates ranked P0–P4 so that focused work (via /gaia-audit) targets the right things first. Run this before any audit pass. Also invoke proactively when a PR changes registry/named/ at scale, or before a release, to catch regressions early.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Gaia Skill Tree image-generation and deterministic export harness for Ascension Overdrive v3. Use when generating, iterating, refining, cropping, color-grading, making transparent cutouts, compressing, upscaling, or validating production image assets. Always use image gen 2 / gpt-image-2 and never nano-banana.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Land a PR by monitoring conflicts, resolving them, waiting for checks, and squash-merging when green; use when asked to land, merge, or shepherd a PR to completion.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate that a story file is implementation-ready. Checks for embedded GDD requirements, ADR references, engine notes, clear acceptance criteria, and no open design questions. Produces READY / NEEDS WORK / BLOCKED verdict with specific gaps. Use when user says 'is this story ready', 'can I start on this story', 'is story X ready to implement'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates a UX spec, HUD design, or interaction pattern library for completeness, accessibility compliance, GDD alignment, and implementation readiness. Produces APPROVED / NEEDS REVISION / MAJOR REVISION NEEDED verdict with specific gaps.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Quality review of test files and manual evidence documents. Goes beyond existence checks — evaluates assertion coverage, edge case handling, naming conventions, and evidence completeness. Produces ADEQUATE/INCOMPLETE/MISSING verdict per story. Run before QA sign-off or on demand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validates completeness and consistency of the project architecture against all GDDs. Builds a traceability matrix mapping every GDD technical requirement to ADRs, identifies coverage gaps, detects cross-ADR conflicts, verifies engine compatibility consistency across all decisions, and produces a PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL verdict. The architecture equivalent of /design-review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate readiness to advance between development phases. Produces a PASS/CONCERNS/FAIL verdict with specific blockers and required artifacts. Use when user says 'are we ready to move to X', 'can we advance to production', 'check if we can start the next phase', 'pass the gate'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

用于创建带 draw.io / diagrams.net 源文件的可编辑技术图，包括架构图、ERD、UML、序列图、流程图、ML 模型图、官方形状检索、品牌符号、Graphviz 自动布局、代码结构图、.drawio 校验或 draw.io CLI 导出兜底。不要用于普通位图生成、手绘草图、交互式 Canvas/Three.js 场景或装饰性 SVG 动画；中文触发词包括 draw.io、diagrams.net、可编辑架构图、.drawio、ER 图、UML、序列图、自动布局、形状检索、代码结构图。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when creating editable technical diagrams with draw.io / diagrams.net sources, including architecture diagrams, ERD, UML, sequence diagrams, flowcharts, ML model diagrams, official shape lookup, brand symbols, Graphviz auto-layout, codebase structure maps, .drawio validation, or draw.io CLI export fallback. Do not use for ordinary raster image generation, freehand sketches, interactive canvas/Three.js scenes, or decorative SVG animation. Chinese triggers include draw.io, diagrams.net, editable architecture diagrams, .drawio, ER diagrams, UML, sequence diagrams, auto layout, shape retrieval, code structure diagrams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when proving that a frontend refactoring preserved existing behavior, selecting an appropriate safety net, validating each structural step, or assigning a PASS, PARTIAL, or NOT PROVEN preservation verdict.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Environmental Science Professor — deciding whether a field exercise crosses a weather/safety cancel threshold, building an NSF/EPA proposal budget, normalizing an interdisciplinary tenure case against the right benchmark, checking whether a mixed-methods field project needs IRB review, or handling a politically charged classroom topic without losing academic-freedom footing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Dredge Operator — selecting cutterhead, hopper, or mechanical dredge type for a given sediment/depth/environmental profile, classifying dredged material for open-water vs. confined disposal from sediment-testing results, tuning hydraulic slurry density against pipeline critical velocity, verifying channel controlling depth against project depth and overdepth tolerance, or setting turbidity-monitoring response during active dredging.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Computer Hardware Engineer — designing a power delivery network and selecting decoupling capacitors for a digital IC's core rail, budgeting a high-speed signal's rise time against trace impedance and via stub length, closing static timing on a board-level DDR or SerDes interface, sizing thermal resistance for a package's TDP, or reviewing a PCB layout for signal- or power-integrity risk before fab release.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。