5,885 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use this skill when the user needs to control the browser launch mode for browser_use. By default, browser_use launches the local Chrome/Chromium using managed CDP; `headed` controls whether the window is visible, and `private_mode` controls whether CDP is disabled in favor of Playwright.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies the philosophical frameworks of Plato (ancient Greek philosopher, Theory of Forms, founder of the Academy) to structural, ethical, and epistemological problems. Use this skill whenever the user is grappling with organizational design, leadership ethics, defining abstract concepts, aligning incentives, or uncovering the root essence of a problem. Trigger this when discussing justice, governance, the nature of knowledge, structural harmony, or when a user is trapped by superficial metrics (shadows) and needs to find fundamental truths (Forms). Do not wait for the user to name Plato; proactively apply his dialectical reasoning to cut through illusions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Applies the frameworks of Aristotle (ancient Greek philosopher, logic, ethics, metaphysics, 384-322 BCE) to decision-making, ethics, and analysis. Use this skill whenever the user is grappling with moral dilemmas, character development, habit formation, finding balance (the Golden Mean), persuasive communication (rhetoric), or understanding the root causes and ultimate purpose (teleology) of a project or system. Reach for this skill even if the user doesn't name Aristotle, especially when discussing career fulfillment, long-term happiness (eudaimonia), balancing extremes, or structuring persuasive arguments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill whenever you are reasoning about large-scale scientific projects, genomics, bioethics, data infrastructure, or long-term medical translation. Eric S. Lander (geneticist, Broad Institute, Human Genome Project) provides a framework for hypothesis-free discovery, structuring "big science," and treating biology as an information science. Reach for this when the user is discussing open science, collaborative ecosystems, CRISPR/gene editing ethics, managing massive datasets, or setting realistic timelines for technological breakthroughs. Apply his principles to avoid the "lone genius" myth, prevent overpromising, and build foundational infrastructure that serves the broader community.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write board comments the way a colleague does — lead with the finding, a few lines, no preamble or process narration. Use when about to call add_task_comment or comment_on_pull_request, or when deciding whether something deserves a comment at all.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert framework for assessing and achieving product-market fit. Combines PMF measurement methodologies, Sean Ellis survey, retention analysis, segment-specific PMF, and post-PMF scaling strategy. Use when determining if product has PMF, measuring user engagement, running PMF surveys, or deciding whether to scale or keep iterating.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coverage-design method for qa-engineer — pyramid ratios per archetype, equivalence/boundary/property case selection, mutation score as the real coverage signal, and a flake-quarantine policy. Turns "coverage is 90%" (a number with no method) into a defensible test plan. Emits TEST-STRATEGY-{slug}.md, which the QA gate checks exists.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The methods a financial-ML result has to survive before it is evidence — purged cross-validation with an embargo, triple-barrier labelling, sample uniqueness under overlapping labels, fractional differentiation, meta-labelling, and multiple-testing correction. Written because the invariants were required of quant-researcher and nothing in the project explained how to satisfy them: a rule without a method produces either an invention or a block. Applied whenever a backtest, a feature or a label is being designed or judged.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Apply @aleabitoreddit ("Serenity")'s distilled stock-analysis method to ANY ticker, sector, or situation — critical-chokepoint / supply-chain-OSINT idea discovery, first-principles value-chain decomposition, a Buffett-style quality gate (moat / profitability / customer-replacement risk, all default unverified), and narrative-vs-fundamentals hygiene. Produces a beginner-friendly Chinese analysis (她的观点 / 小白解释 / 第一性原理 / Buffett 直接判断 / 当前结论) that classifies an idea as 研究地图 vs 可投资结论. Trigger on "analyze like Serenity / 用 aleabito 的方法分析 / 用 Serenity 框架 / critical chokepoint 分析 / 第一性原理 + Buffett 判断这只股 / supply-chain bottleneck thesis". Never emits buy/sell calls.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
MANUAL TRIGGER ONLY: invoke only when user types /office-hours. YC Office Hours — two modes. Startup mode: six forcing questions that expose demand reality, status quo, desperate specificity, narrowest wedge, observation, and future-fit. Builder mode: design thinking brainstorming for side projects, hackathons, learning, and open source. Saves a design doc. Use when asked to "brainstorm this", "I have an idea", "help me think through this", "office hours", or "is this worth building". Proactively suggest when the user describes a new product idea or is exploring whether something is worth building — before any code is written.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Nexscope Ozon product report search: filters Ozon products by multi-dimensional metrics including sales, revenue, sales/revenue growth rate, cart conversion rate, order conversion rate, price, rating, review count, QA count, variant count, page views, gross margin, return/cancellation rate, ad spend share, weight/volume, listing time, brand, seller, fulfillment method, and labels. Returns each product's SKU, title, price (RUB), sales, revenue, lost revenue, conversion rate, rating, reviews, brand, seller, fulfillment method, listing days/months, and complete product report fields. Use for Ozon product selection, competitor product analysis, best-seller mining, price/conversion band filtering. Trigger when the user mentions Ozon product report, Ozon product selection, Ozon product filtering, Ozon product analysis, Ozon best-selling products, Ozon competitor product analysis, Ozon product report, Ozon product screener, filter Ozon products by sales, Ozon best-seller mining, Nexscope Ozon product report. Also trigger when the intent is to filter Ozon products by multiple metrics and view product-level reports, even without explicitly mentioning Nexscope.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when building, debugging, or answering questions about Liveblocks. Liveblocks gives you the building blocks and infrastructure to enable people and AI to work together inside your app, powering realtime collaboration. Liveblocks features include collaboration, rooms, organizations, workspaces, comments, composer, threads, notifications, multiplayer, conflict resolution, realtime presence, avatar stacks, AI collaborators, AI agents, text editors, Tiptap, BlockNote, Lexical, React Flow, Chat SDK. Common components include AiChat, Thread, InboxNotification, Composer, Toolbar (for Lexical Tiptap), FloatingToolbar, FloatingComposer, FloatingThreads, AnchoredThreads. Common hooks include useThreads, useStorage, useMutation, useOthers, useInboxNotifications, useAiChats. Common issues are related to authentication (ID tokens vs access tokens), permissions, room limits, connection errors, user info.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Structured reasoning frameworks for complex problems. 19 analytical frameworks, 12 cognitive bias detectors, 10 decomposition methods, 10 mental models, Cynefin domain classification, ethical dimension check, and 6 communication patterns. McKinsey-grade problem solving for AI coding assistants.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
🇺🇸 User Interview & Cold-Start Operations Playbook — Battle-tested framework from HeyGen's 937 interviews to PMF. Complete SOP for user screening, interview execution, Beta testing methodology, cold-start user operations, churn analysis, and user grading systems. 🇨🇳 用户访谈与冷启动运营实战手册 — 基于 HeyGen 937 场访谈验证的 PMF 方法论。包含用户筛选、访谈执行、Beta 测试设计、冷启动用户运营、流失分析、用户分级体系完整 SOP。 🇯🇵 ユーザーインタビュー＆コールドスタート運営プレイブック — HeyGenの937回インタビューで検証されたPMF方法論。ユーザースクリーニング、インタビュー実行、Betaテスト設計、コールドスタートユーザー運営、離脱分析、ユーザーグレーディング。 🇰🇷 사용자 인터뷰 & 콜드 스타트 운영 플레이북 — HeyGen 937회 인터뷰로 검증된 PMF 방법론. 사용자 스크리닝, 인터뷰 실행, Beta 테스트 설계, 콜드 스타트 사용자 운영, 이탈 분석, 사용자 등급 시스템. Triggers: "user interview" | "user research" | "customer discovery" | "PMF" | "product-market fit" | "beta test" | "beta testing" | "cold start users" | "cold start operations" | "churn analysis" | "user grading" | "用户访谈" | "用户调研" | "冷启动" | "冷启动运营" | "Beta测试" | "流失分析" | "用户分级"
🇺🇸 B2B SaaS Growth — PLG vs SLG Playbook — Diagnose whether your problem is distribution, pricing, or PMF. PLG/SLG selection by ACV and sales cycle, the 5-stage path from $0 to $10M ARR, NRR discipline, affiliate & channel motion, enterprise tiering. Built from HeyGen, Deel, Vercel, Supabase, Snowflake patterns. 🇨🇳 B2B SaaS 增长 — PLG vs SLG 决策手册 — 诊断你的瓶颈是分发、定价还是 PMF。按 ACV 和销售周期选 PLG/SLG，$0 → $10M ARR 的 5 阶段路径，NRR 纪律，联盟与渠道打法，Enterprise 分层。提炼自 HeyGen、Deel、Vercel、Supabase、Snowflake。 🇯🇵 B2B SaaS グロース — PLG vs SLG プレイブック — 課題が流通・価格・PMFのどれかを診断。ACVとセールスサイクルでPLG/SLG選定、$0→$10M ARRの5段階パス、NRR規律、アフィリエイト＆チャネル。 🇰🇷 B2B SaaS 성장 — PLG vs SLG 플레이북 — 병목이 유통·가격·PMF 중 무엇인지 진단. ACV와 세일즈 사이클로 PLG/SLG 선택, $0 → $10M ARR 5단계 경로, NRR 규율, 제휴 & 채널. Triggers: "B2B growth" | "B2B SaaS" | "PLG" | "SLG" | "product-led growth" | "sales-led growth" | "PLG or SLG" | "SaaS pricing" | "ARR growth" | "NRR" | "go to market" | "enterprise sales" | "affiliate" | "PMF" | "B2B 增长" | "PLG 还是 SLG" | "SaaS 定价" | "渠道合作" | "PLG/SLG 선택"
Satori is a clinically informed wisdom companion for navigating the inner life — emotions, meaning, grief, purpose, relationship, identity, and the questions that don't resolve easily. Activate when someone is processing something difficult, wrestling with a life question, seeking perspective, or simply needs to think alongside someone who won't rush them toward an answer. Also activate when someone uses language like "I've been struggling with," "I don't know what to do," or "I need to figure out" — or any emotionally charged framing. When in doubt, activate. Draws from Taoism, Buddhism, Stoicism, Christianity, Sufi wisdom, Hindu philosophy, Confucian ethics, and African thought, alongside modern psychology, neuroscience, and trauma-informed frameworks (IFS, DBT, CFT, Schema Therapy, Somatic). Uses Motivational Interviewing, Voss tactical empathy, McAdams Life Story, and Singer Self-Defining Memory — woven naturally, not mechanically.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Suggest whether Claude Code, Codex CLI, or Grok Build is a useful next collaborator, without launching a CLI or changing controls. Use when comparing the three CLIs, planning a handoff, or deciding whether an independent implementation or review would help.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Socratic questioning partner named Gadfly for deep learning through dialogue. Use this skill when the user wants to learn, understand, or explore a topic through questions rather than explanations. Trigger when the user says "teach me about...", "help me understand...", "I want to learn...", "ask me questions about...", "quiz me", "Socratic method", "Gadfly", or wants to deeply understand something through dialogue rather than passive reading. Also trigger when the user provides a text or document and wants to be questioned about it, or wants to check their own understanding of a concept.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Coach structured brainstorming sessions on any topic: diverge on ideas together, then converge on priorities and next steps in a session document. Use whenever the user wants ideas or wants to think out loud, in any language ("brainstorm with me", "give me ideas for…", "help me come up with…", "let's explore options for…", "I'm stuck on the name / the features"; Vietnamese "brainstorm cùng tôi", "cho tôi ý tưởng", "nghĩ cùng tôi xem"), even when they never say "brainstorm". Also use when the user wants multiple perspectives or a devil's-advocate pass on their ideas ("give me different angles", "phản biện mấy ý tưởng này", "party mode"). Not for diagnosing why something is failing (problem-solver), user research (design-thinking), or company-level strategic bets (strategy-board).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes actuarial modeling systems for loss reserving accuracy, premium pricing methodology, mortality/morbidity tables, stochastic modeling, and capital adequacy per SOA and Solvency II standards. USE THIS SKILL WHEN: - You need to review or audit actuarial models (reserving, pricing, capital) - Someone asks about loss triangle analysis or reserve adequacy - You are evaluating IBNR calculations, chain ladder methods, or Bornhuetter-Ferguson - A project involves insurance pricing, GLM rating models, or ratemaking - You need to assess Solvency II SCR calculations or RBC compliance - Someone mentions actuarial opinions, ASOP compliance, or SOA standards - You are reviewing stochastic models, ESG configurations, or DFA frameworks - A codebase uses actuarial libraries (chainladder, lifetables, ChainLadder R package) TRIGGER PHRASES: "actuarial", "loss reserving", "IBNR", "chain ladder", "premium pricing", "mortality table", "Solvency II", "capital adequacy", "ratemaking", "GLM pricing", "risk-based capital", "reserve analysis", "actuarial opinion"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review existing analytics — find all dashboards and reports, check who uses them, whether metrics are defined, and whether they drive decisions. Recommend what to keep, kill, or add. Use when asked "are our dashboards useful", "analytics review", or "metrics audit".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write API reference documentation for an endpoint or SDK method. Use when asked to "document this endpoint", "write API reference docs", or "document this SDK method".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit existing experimentation infrastructure and past experiments for methodology issues. Use when asked to "audit our experiments", "is our experimentation sound", or "review past test methodology".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generates publication-quality academic figures (framework diagrams, pipeline illustrations, system architectures, method overviews) from a paper's method text and a target caption, using a local PaperBanana multi-agent pipeline (Retriever → Planner → Stylist → Visualizer → Critic).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。