1,245 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
ML/AI engineer — LLM integrations, prompt engineering, model pipelines, evals, RAG. Use when asked to "add AI to this", "integrate an LLM", "build a RAG pipeline", "evaluate model accuracy", or "improve this prompt".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extracts paper recommendations from social-media posts and online articles (小红书 / Xiaohongshu / RedNote, 微信公众号 / WeChat Official Accounts, Twitter / X threads, Reddit posts, Bilibili videos, blog posts, newsletters, Jina Reader URLs), identifies the underlying academic papers, locates the authoritative original sources (arXiv, conference proceedings, DOI), and triages relevance to the user's research before any library action. Use when the user forwards a social-media link, screenshot, or article that mentions a paper / method / model, asks to "find the original paper" from a blog or thread, shares a 调研贴 / 论文推荐 / paper recommendation post, or wants to evaluate whether a buzz-worthy paper is worth reading before adding it to Zotero.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Handles PR review comments and feedback resolution. Use when user wants to resolve PR comments, handle review feedback, fix review comments, address PR review, check review status, respond to reviewer, verify PR readiness, review PR comments, analyze review feedback, evaluate PR comments, assess review suggestions, or triage PR comments. Fetches comments via GitHub CLI, classifies by severity, applies fixes with user confirmation, commits with proper format, replies to threads.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Methods for assessing what people actually eat — 24-hour recall, food frequency questionnaires, diet diaries, biomarkers, duplicate-plate studies, and controlled feeding. Covers the relative strengths and biases of each instrument, how to choose among them for a given question, and how to interpret results in the presence of measurement error. Use when a user wants to estimate population-level intake, individual-level intake, or evaluate the plausibility of a dietary claim that depends on how intake was measured.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives and mastery learning as practical instructional design tools. Covers the six cognitive levels (remember, understand, apply, analyze, evaluate, create), the revised 2001 taxonomy, the knowledge dimension, mastery learning loops, formative vs. summative assessment, and the writing of learning objectives that are both specific and verifiable. Use when designing lessons, writing objectives, building assessments, or diagnosing why a learner is stuck at one cognitive level.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Practical argument analysis and construction -- how to identify, evaluate, reconstruct, and build real arguments in natural language. Covers argument identification (premises, conclusions, intermediate steps), charity and steel-manning, argument mapping, the distinction between deductive validity and inductive strength, burden of proof, and the rhetorical context in which arguments operate. Use when the goal is to engage with real-world argument rather than to formalize it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Techniques for generating novel ideas, reframing problems, and escaping fixed mental models. Covers lateral thinking (de Bono), Six Thinking Hats, random stimulation, provocation operators (PO), analogical transfer, assumption challenging, and divergent-then-convergent thinking cycles. Use when the goal is to produce new options or perspectives rather than evaluate existing ones.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate operational readiness: SLOs, alerting, runbooks, and rollback plan before launch. Use when reviewing a feature for production readiness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design, build, evaluate, or teach graph-based systems. Use for knowledge graphs, ontology/schema design, entity/relation/event extraction, entity resolution and fusion, GraphRAG or graph memory, and agent/task dependency graphs with concurrency, joins, failure handling, verification, or human gates.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Define and develop plugin mission statements — purpose, values, anti-patterns, and trade-offs. Use when creating a new plugin, auditing an existing plugin's alignment, or providing a reference for the alignment check loop to evaluate decisions against. Produces mission.json with [draft] status and writes an interview file for the human to refine it.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate a single skill's quality against its stated purpose. Classifies the skill's purpose type, then scores applicable quality categories — universal dimensions always apply; structural dimensions (scripts, references, assets) are scored only when warranted by the skill's purpose. A focused 20-line behavioral skill with no bundled resources scores fully on all applicable categories. Use when auditing skill quality, checking marketplace readiness, evaluating skill completeness, performing pre-publication evaluation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compatibility router for semantic skill tightening. Delegate goal recovery, authority, semantic conservation, evaluation contracts, and instruction optimization to Skill Lapidary rather than duplicating that system in Plugin Creator.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write and evaluate effective Python tests using pytest. Use when writing tests, reviewing test code, debugging test failures, or improving test coverage. Covers test design, fixtures, parameterization, mocking, and async testing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Execute structured acceptance checks and record their observed results for later comparison. Use to capture a pre-change baseline or a post-change verification state without treating expected nonzero baseline results as execution failure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Validate and iterate on the SDLC Layer Separation Architecture implementation across the check categories defined in its Evaluation Checklist — cross-references, doc completeness, knowledge-explorer layer filters, research entry metadata, integration points, and plan consistency. Produces a structured findings report and optionally applies safe fixes. Use when validating a first-pass implementation, before claiming layer work complete, auditing layer docs or schema, or running --dry-run to preview findings without changes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OCRs scanned or image-only corpora with vision-language models in three phases. Evaluate selects a system by measured CER or WER against stratified human ground truth. Run builds the production pipeline. Clean corrects raw OCR with LLM and rule-based passes, quality diagnostics, and span-level provenance. Use when choosing an OCR model for a corpus, measuring OCR accuracy, transcribing scans at scale, or correcting raw OCR. Born-digital documents with text layers go to doc-to-markdown.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Scaffolds or audits a social-science replication package and evaluates the manuscript and archived research objects against FAIR principles. Scaffold mode writes the folder structure, README, master.R, figure-table crosswalk, codebook, LICENSE placeholder, and .gitignore; audit mode grades the package against a pre-release checklist and audits data, code, materials, identifiers, licenses, access restrictions, and availability statements. Use when setting up or repairing a package, checking one before submission, auditing FAIR compliance, or drafting availability statements. Adapted from Yusaku Horiuchi’s replication-package-guide.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
OCR scanned or image-only corpora with vision-language models in three phases: `evaluate` picks a system by measured CER/WER against stratified human ground truth, `run` builds the production pipeline, and `clean` corrects raw OCR with LLM and rule-based passes, diagnostics, and span-level provenance. Born-digital documents with a text layer go to $doc-to-markdown.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
An AI analyst for buying B2B software. Investigates what vendors claim, checks the evidence, surfaces contradictions and unanswered questions, and produces a shareable Decision Brief with the questions to ask before you buy. Quick Eval by default; Deep Eval on request. Use when asked to evaluate, compare, vet, or research B2B software vendors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
When the user wants to plan, evaluate, or build a free tool for marketing purposes — lead generation, SEO value, or brand awareness. Also use when the user mentions "engineering as marketing," "free tool," "marketing tool," "calculator," "generator," "interactive tool," "lead gen tool," "build a tool for leads," or "free resource." This skill bridges engineering and marketing — useful for founders and technical marketers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
LLM prompt management and evaluation platform. Version prompts, run A/B tests, evaluate with metrics, and deploy with confidence using Agenta's self-hosted solution.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate agent performance using a structured scoring rubric
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Assesses agent capabilities by analyzing agent files and determining what tasks they can handle. Use when you need to evaluate if an existing agent can handle a task or if a new agent is needed. Reviews agent descriptions, skills, and workflows to determine capability match.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evaluate or operate DuckLake on MotherDuck when open table formats, bucket ownership, or file maintenance matter.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。