934 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Guide users through `pulp upgrade` — discover new CLI releases, interpret migration notes for the hop they're performing, and apply breaking-change fixes (CMake macro renames, API surface changes, config file moves). Handles "upgrade pulp", "what's new", "migrate my project", "show breaking changes", and the `/upgrade` slash command. Pairs with the embedded migration index shipped in the CLI binary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Leveraged-prototype dev loop (`pulp loop`) — focus marker plus normal watch/rebuild loop, with AOT analyzer guidance and deferred ar-swap/PR-monitor playbook. Use when porting an existing UI/bundle to Pulp, doing visual/behavioral parity work, or batching upstream framework gap fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up, format, fix, and clean up LaTeX regression and estimation tables in empirical economics or finance papers. Use when (a) creating a .tex, results.tex, main.tex, or preamble to display regression or estimation output from Python (pyfixest), Stata, or R — including any mention of estout, esttab, estauto, estwide, or table fragments; (b) formatting or repairing estout-style regression tables that overflow the right margin, have cramped or boxed notes, misaligned columns, or poor significance stars, or when asked to match a reference paper, make the note fill the table width, or choose among \estwide, \estauto, and landscape layouts; (c) diagnosing "Misplaced \omit" errors from \input-ed table fragments inside tabular environments. Covers \@@input, \estwide, \estauto, \estautoLT, \specialcell, \sym, minipage notes below tabulars, and the convert-and-verify workflow. Do NOT trigger for general LaTeX documents like beamer presentations, problem sets, letters, or CVs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Risk analysis and approach selection before planning. Use when requirements are ambiguous, approaches vary, or work touches hub/bridge nodes. Skip for typo fixes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Systematic 4-phase debugging framework for Unity projects with GameDebug wrapper generation. Use when encountering any bug, test failure, or unexpected behavior, before proposing fixes. Triggers on requests like "this doesn't work", "there's a bug", "it crashes when", "fix this error", "why is this happening", "null reference exception", "test is failing", "unexpected behavior", "something broke", or any debugging task. Four-phase framework (gather evidence, isolate, hypothesize, fix) that ensures understanding before attempting solutions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improve a skill using a test-fix-retest loop. Runs static checks, proposes targeted fixes, rewrites the skill, re-tests, and keeps or reverts based on score change.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review and resolve PR comments from GitHub. Validates each comment, fixes legitimate issues.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when moving expensive browser work off the main thread with Web Workers, SharedWorker, worker pools, Comlink, transferable objects, Vite/Webpack worker integration, or UI responsiveness fixes. Do not use for lightweight synchronous work or DOM manipulation; Chinese triggers include Web Worker, background thread, main thread blocking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when restructuring existing frontend code while preserving observable behavior, including responsibility extraction, module movement, conditional simplification, API cleanup, or data organization. Do not use for new feature behavior, behavior-changing bug fixes, dependency or framework migrations, or proven dead-code cleanup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when planning or implementing an intentional migration from JavaScript, jQuery, HTML/CSS, server-rendered templates, MPA legacy frontend code, or older framework code toward a modern frontend stack while preserving behavior. Do not use for routine legacy bug fixes that stay in the old stack; Chinese triggers include legacy projects, technology stack upgrades, jQuery migration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when planning, implementing, or reviewing frontend dependency upgrades, package migrations, lockfile changes, major framework version bumps, CVE remediation, peer dependency conflicts, ESM/CJS shifts, build-tool compatibility, or CI verification matrices; Chinese triggers include dependency upgrades, version upgrades, lockfile, peer dependency, CVE fixes, major version migrations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-agent review resolution with trust-but-verify methodology. Accepts a PR number/URL or a local code-review report file. Extracts review comments, verifies each with parallel agents using confidence scoring (0-100), filters false positives, presents a triage report for approval, then applies fixes and replies. Use when user runs /resolve-review, mentions "resolve PR comments", "address review feedback", "fix PR suggestions", "handle review comments", or "resolve review findings".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Dedicated Core Web Vitals deep-dive: pull field data (CrUX / PageSpeed Insights), fall back to Lighthouse lab data, score LCP, INP, and CLS against Google's thresholds at the 75th percentile, and run per-metric diagnosis playbooks with concrete fixes. Use when user says "core web vitals", "CWV", "LCP", "INP", "CLS", "page speed metrics", or "field data".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Survey any codebase as a senior advisor and produce prioritized, self-contained implementation plans for OTHER models/agents to execute. Strictly read-only on source code — never implements, fixes, or refactors anything itself. Use when asked to audit a codebase, find improvement opportunities (bugs, security, performance, test coverage, tech debt, migrations, DX), suggest features or where to take the project next (roadmap, product direction), or generate handoff plans for another agent to implement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Stress-tests a fuzzy or vague feature idea before any PRD, spec, or ticket is written. TRIGGER when: the user has a fuzzy feature idea — one or two paragraphs, vague on users / scope / success — and wants to harden it, or says "grill / stress-test / pressure-test this idea." DO NOT TRIGGER when: the idea is already turned into a spec or PRD; bug fixes or refactors; the idea is hardened and you are ready to write the PRD → creating-prd.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Watches an open pull request's CI until green and fixes failing checks. TRIGGER when: the user wants to watch a pull request's CI, babysit a PR until it goes green, or fix failing CI checks on an open PR. DO NOT TRIGGER when: opening the PR in the first place → pr; rebasing the branch onto its base → rebase.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full quality pass -- chains parallel UX + scalability audit, then QA verification, then consistency gate. Fixes everything it finds. Works with any stack.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run a focused tech debt reduction sprint — inventories all technical debt (TODOs, outdated deps, missing tests, god objects), fixes code smells, removes dead code, then hardens with a review pass. Use when a codebase feels sluggish, before a major feature push, or on a regular maintenance cadence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep codebase cleanup — kills dead code, fixes all lint/format warnings, removes orphaned files, cleans stale TODOs, strips security hazards, tightens TypeScript strict mode, and organizes imports. Triggers: clean up, dead code, unused imports, lint, technical debt cleanup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Autonomous SEO + AI-search optimization agent for 2026. Audits and fixes technical SEO, on-page metadata, structured data, Core Web Vitals (LCP/INP/CLS), llms.txt, Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) for ChatGPT/Perplexity/AI Overviews, E-E-A-T author signals.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit ML experiment tracking infrastructure for reproducibility gaps, parameter logging completeness, metric capture, artifact management, and pipeline orchestration. Covers MLflow, Weights and Biases, DVC, Sacred, Neptune, Hydra configs, model registries, and produces a reproducibility scorecard (0-30) with actionable fixes for data science teams.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep cross-layer consistency audit for any codebase. Traces every feature from UI to database, finds broken wiring, missing handlers, model mismatches, and security gaps. Auto-fixes critical and warning issues. Use this after building features, before releases, or whenever something feels off. Works with any tech stack.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deep code review driven by a short interview. Read-only reader agents analyze the chosen scope per angle, the lead verifies every finding, and each point is routed to the skill that fixes it. Never edits the code.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill to audit CLI adapter projects (like opencli) for missing output fields, then batch-generate fixes and submit PRs. Turns AI agents into adapter quality reviewers.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。