1,525 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Summarize a sprint's worth of Claude Code activity — sessions grouped by project (cwd), per-model cost breakdown, token efficiency (cache hit rate, compaction baselines), subagent effectiveness from workflow API, velocity metrics (turn_count, turn_duration_ms), and tool diversity across the sprint.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compile a weekly productivity report using Agent Monitor data — daily_sessions and daily_events trends, per-session costs from pricing engine, token volumes (input/output/cache_read/cache_write + baselines), tool usage top 20, session completion rates by status, and workflow intelligence metrics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Generate a daily standup summary from recent Claude Code sessions — completed work grouped by project (cwd), session costs from the pricing engine, tool invocations, error/compaction/APIError events, and turn velocity metrics from session metadata (turn_count, total_turn_duration_ms).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Calculate a productivity score using actual Agent Monitor metrics — session completion rates, cache efficiency (cache_read vs input), compaction pressure (baseline tokens), turn velocity (turn_count / total_turn_duration_ms), tool success ratio (PreToolUse vs PostToolUse), and the workflow intelligence API's complexity and effectiveness scores.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detect quality and efficiency regressions over time using Agent Monitor data — rising error rate (APIError events), falling cache hit rate, growing compaction frequency, and climbing cost-per-session. Splits history into an earlier baseline window and a recent window and reports which metrics are getting worse, by how much, and where. Use when checking whether things are degrading or trending in the wrong direction.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
One-line summary of key Agent Monitor metrics — active sessions, total cost from the pricing engine, events today from daily_events, top tool from tool_usage, and current model from the most recent session. Use for a fast at-a-glance check without leaving the terminal.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Record a dated snapshot of the vault's health numbers and compare against previous snapshots so trends are visible. Use this skill for a monthly or quarterly check, when the user asks whether the vault is improving, or asks to track its numbers over time. Do NOT use for a one-off graph analysis, which is second-brain-graph, or for structural repairs.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyse the vault's link graph and report on its shape: orphan rate, average degree, components, hubs, bridges and clusters, with what each number means for retrieval. Use this skill when the user asks about the health or structure of their graph, wants metrics, asks which pages are most connected or most isolated, or asks whether the vault is fragmented. Do NOT use for fixing what it finds, which is second-brain-lint, or for answering a content question.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automatically invoke this skill whenever the user asks why a Fabric capacity is busy, throttled, at 90 or 100 percent, or what is consuming CUs; asks for current capacity utilization, carry forward or per-item CU usage; wants to query or repair the Microsoft Fabric Capacity Metrics app or its semantic model; or wants to start, pause or monitor a capacity from a script or status bar.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Kubernetes diagnostics for metrics, health checks, resource comparisons, and cluster analysis. Use when analyzing cluster health, comparing environments, or gathering diagnostic data.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
How to read experiment results without fooling yourself. Confidence intervals, p-values, multiple testing, sequential testing, CUPED, heterogeneous treatment effects, ratio metrics, network effects, dashboard reconciliation, and the interpretation failures that produce confidently wrong shipping decisions. Use this skill whenever the user is reading a finished experiment result panel and about to make a ship, kill, or iterate decision, or when an experiment number does not match the dashboard number. Triggers on read experiment results, result panel, ship or kill decision, p-value, confidence interval, statistical significance, multiple testing, peeking, sequential testing, CUPED, variance reduction, heterogeneous treatment effects, ratio metric, network effects, inconclusive test, experiment versus dashboard mismatch. Use `experiment-design` instead when the test has not run yet and the question is hypothesis, sample size, duration, or what to test.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Improve an open-source GitHub skill and open a friendly suggestion PR upstream: fork, run skill-creator's retrofit, attach asm eval before/after metrics. Don't use for local-only skills, authoring from scratch, bulk repos, or registry publish.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A comprehensive stock deep analysis tool that combines real-time quotes, fundamental metrics, technical indicators, and growth analysis into a single professional report. Supports A-share, US stocks, HK stocks. Generates detailed investment recommendations with risk assessment and actionable trading strategies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Weekly engineering retrospective. Analyzes commit history, work patterns, and code quality metrics. Per-person breakdowns with praise and growth areas. Modes: default 7d, 24h, 14d, 30d, compare, global cross-project. Shipping streaks and tweetable summary.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze codebase health metrics including complexity and dependencies
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Track DeFi protocol metrics including TVL, yields, and liquidations
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Expert delivery management for release planning, deployment strategy, incident response, change management, SLA/error-budget tracking, and DORA metrics across continuous delivery pipelines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design and run statistically rigorous A/B tests and experiments. Use when planning experiments, calculating sample sizes, designing test variants, selecting metrics, analyzing results, or when someone says "let's test that."
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design RAG pipelines: chunking, retrieval evaluation, and architecture. Use when building a RAG system, selecting a chunking strategy, choosing a vector database, optimizing retrieval quality, or evaluating with RAGAS metrics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Post-signup user onboarding optimization covering activation metrics, time-to-value reduction, onboarding flow design, empty state optimization, multi-channel coordination, and stalled user recovery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes social media campaign performance across platforms with engagement metrics, ROI calculations, and audience insights for data-driven marketing decisions
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design an executive dashboard spec: north-star metrics, charts, alert thresholds. "design a CMO dashboard"
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build custom LLM evaluation pipelines using the OpenJudge framework. Covers selecting and configuring graders (LLM-based, function-based, agentic), running batch evaluations with GradingRunner, combining scores with aggregators, applying evaluation strategies (voting, average), auto-generating graders from data, and analyzing results (pairwise win rates, statistics, validation metrics). Use when the user wants to evaluate LLM outputs, compare multiple models, design scoring criteria, or build an automated evaluation system.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audits a legal document against legal design principles. Scores the document on six pillars: language patterns (bureaucratese, archaisms, passive voice, nominalization), readability (Flesch Reading Ease and language-specific equivalents), structure and navigation, hidden conditions (material obligations buried away from their headings), statutory duplication (restating the law instead of citing it), and visual hierarchy where layout is available. Assessment-only; does not rewrite the document. Works on English, French, and German documents, inferring the applicable jurisdiction from the document's language and textual signals: governing-law clause, statute citations, party addresses. Use when a user shares a legal document (contract, NDA, T&C, privacy policy, internal policy) asking how good the drafting is from a legal design perspective, whether it is readable, whether it contains buried clauses or restates the law, or how it scores on Flesch / LIX / Amstad / Kandel-Moles readability metrics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。