4,733 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Use descriptive anchor text. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Highlight author credentials and expertise. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Provide clear affiliate disclosures. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when reviewing rendered HTML, interactive components, or design-system patterns related to Use only allowed ARIA attributes for each role. Check native semantics first, then inspect keyboard behavior, focus flow, accessible names, and screen-reader output where relevant.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Implement valid Article structured data. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Implement comprehensive author markup. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Audit all noindex pages. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Audit and refine AI-generated content. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Display clear author bylines. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when auditing metadata, crawlability, structured data, or indexability related to Create a dedicated About page. Verify the rendered HTML and HTTP response rather than relying only on source files.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the team wants to catch desktop app users up on recent features with a one-time "What's new" dialog (apps/examples/desktop-app). Guides deciding whether a catch-up is warranted, picking the highlights from the changelog, writing tight copy, adding the entry to webview/lib/whats-new-content.ts, and previewing it from Settings → About. Not for individual releases — those only appear on the About page's release notes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when preparing, tagging, and publishing a Cline desktop app (apps/examples/desktop-app) release — stable (desktop-vX.Y.Z from main), beta (desktop-vX.Y.Z-beta.N from desktop-experimental, shipped as the side-by-side "Cline Beta" app), or nightly (artifact-only test build of main's HEAD, tagged desktop-nightly-<stamp> after it builds). Guides changelog drafting, version bumps in package.json + tauri.conf.json, tagging, and the desktop-publish GitHub workflow that builds, signs, notarizes, and updates the per-channel auto-update feed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
QA the omo Senpi adapter (packages/omo-senpi, packages/senpi-task) against the REAL senpi binary in strict isolation, and write every artifact to the one canonical evidence path .omo/evidence/omo-senpi-adapter/<slug>/. The live drivers under packages/omo-senpi/scripts/qa/ create their own isolated SENPI_CODING_AGENT_DIR and ignore the caller's, so the real ~/.senpi/agent is never written. Ships scripts/resolve-evidence-dir.mjs, which is the ONLY sanctioned way to pick an evidence directory: it rejects traversal, separators, absolute paths, and stray roots such as local-ignore/qa-evidence. Use whenever someone changes anything under packages/omo-senpi or packages/senpi-task, or wants to QA, smoke-test, verify, or debug the Senpi adapter, the task/team engine, the DAG, task RPC, or skill delivery. Triggers: senpi qa, qa senpi, senpi-qa, test senpi adapter, verify senpi task, senpi task e2e, senpi team e2e, task dag qa, live senpi driver, senpi evidence path.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Full PR lifecycle in a fresh task-owned git worktree: implement via the ulw-loop skill with mandatory evidence-bound manual QA → reviewer-readable English PR → verification loop (CI + Cubic, where Cubic is skipped only when its quota is exhausted) → merge by default → worktree cleanup. Decomposes one task into the smallest atomic, independently-mergeable PRs and builds the independent ones concurrently via one worktree per PR driven by parallel subagents or a team. Unbounded loop: any failing gate sends you back to fix-and-re-QA inside that PR's worktree. Use whenever implementation work needs to land as a PR. Triggers: 'create a PR', 'implement and PR', 'work on this and make a PR', 'implement issue', 'land this as a PR', 'split into atomic PRs', 'parallel PRs', 'work-with-pr', 'PR workflow', 'implement end to end', even when user just says 'implement X' if the context implies PR delivery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Codex-only team orchestration: run a named team of cooperating Codex workers with durable, script-managed state. MUST USE when the user asks Codex to create, run, coordinate, inspect, archive, or delete a team of agents/threads/sessions, or to work on something as a team in parallel. FIRST inspects the active tool surface (checking tool_search for deferred tools) and tells the user the route: native MultiAgentV2 agents (flat spawn_agent with task_name) when available, Codex App threads as the fallback, or a plain-subagent split when neither set exists. The main session is always the leader; members are defined by a concrete part, ownership area, or perspective - never a vague job role; a bundled cross-platform script writes the .omo/teams state plus an auto-generated member field manual. Use a team when the work is not perfectly isolated but parallelizing helps; use plain subagents when scope is perfectly isolated or the goal is ambiguous. Triggers: team mode, teammode, make a team, run as a team, team of agents, coordinate threads, parallel Codex threads, archive the team.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
QA the omo Codex Light edition (lazycodex / packages/omo-codex) itself, in strict isolation so ONLY our plugin is exercised, never the user's real ~/.codex. The first-party method drives the real `codex app-server` against an isolated CODEX_HOME plus a LOCAL mock model (no real API call), and proves a plugin hook fired by asserting hook/started + hook/completed notifications. Also: isolated install verification, per-component hook probes, a tmux TUI smoke, and runtime log observation (RUST_LOG / logs SQLite / /debug-config). Ships tested helper scripts each with a --self-test. Use whenever someone changes anything under packages/omo-codex or wants to QA, smoke-test, verify, or debug the Codex plugin, its hooks/components, the installer/config.toml, the app-server flow, or the Codex TUI. Triggers: codex qa, qa codex, codex-qa, test codex plugin, verify codex hook, codex app-server, lazycodex qa, isolated CODEX_HOME, prove codex hook fired, codex tui test.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explore-first planning consultant that writes one decision-complete work plan before coding. Use only on an explicit user request for the ulw-plan workflow or a plan before implementation; it never self-activates on a bare ulw run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Contribute a verified bug fix for LazyCodex, lazycodex-ai, omo-codex, bundled Codex skills, or upstream Codex CLI bugs. Opens a fork PR only for upstream openai/codex; LazyCodex-owned defects become a verified-fix issue on code-yeongyu/lazycodex (never a PR — that repo is a generated distribution mirror). Use when the user asks to fix a bug, contribute a bug fix, contribute to fix bug, open a PR for a bug, or debug and PR a LazyCodex/Codex defect.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Adversarial multi-agent planning skill. Self-orchestrates 5 hostile category members (unspecified-low, unspecified-high, deep, ultrabrain, artistry) via team-mode for ruthless cross-critique debate, distills only the defensible insights, then MANDATORILY hands the distilled insight bundle to the `plan` agent for executable plan formalization. Use when planning needs maximum rigor and surfacing of weak assumptions, blind spots, and over-engineering. Triggers: 'hyperplan', 'hpp', '/hyperplan', 'adversarial plan', 'hostile planning', 'cross-critique plan', '하이퍼플랜', '적대적 계획', '교차 비평'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Publish oh-my-opencode to npm by triggering the GitHub Actions publish workflow and verifying its artifacts. Ship-only: never runs pre-publish-review or re-reviews merged code unless the user explicitly asks. Argument: <patch|minor|major|explicit-semver>. Triggers: publish, release, deploy, npm publish.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Nuclear-grade 12-agent pre-publish release gate. Runs /get-unpublished-changes to detect all changes since last npm release, spawns up to 10 ultrabrain agents for deep per-change analysis, invokes /review-work (orchestrator manual QA plus one gate reviewer) for holistic review, and 1 oracle for overall release synthesis. Runs ONLY when the user explicitly asks for a pre-publish review — a plain publish/release request MUST NOT trigger this; /publish ships directly. Triggers: 'pre-publish review', 'review before publish', 'release review', 'pre-release review', 'ready to publish?', 'can I publish?', 'pre-publish', 'safe to publish', 'publishing review', 'pre-publish check'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The binding ultrawork-mode directive. This file IS the directive; read it only when ultrawork mode is requested and the directive is not already in the conversation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Read this skill before the first step of any request to do something in an app on the person's own computer (Notes, Finder, System Settings, any desktop app), to look at their screen, or for "computer use". Computer use (desktop control) lets Claude take screenshots of the person's desktop and control it with clicks, typing and scrolling through the Claude desktop app; its tools are named mcp__computer-use__* when the session runs in the desktop app and mcp__remote-devices__computer_* when a cloud session is linked to the person's computer; before computer use is turned on for a conversation there may be no such tools, only an enable__mcp__remote-devices__computer tool, which turns it on. It covers turning it on, picking the right tool, the access flow, and the safety rules for tiered apps, links and financial actions. It is not for websites, which go through Claude in Chrome or the built-in browser and their own skills.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
The shared Claude Docs viewer — an artifact TYPE. An artifact made from it is a doc: a live document that people and Claude read and edit together (people may also call it a page). The doc's content does not live in this artifact's files at all — it lives in the Claude Docs service and is read and written ONLY through the Claude Docs connector (its create, batch, read and update tools). Read this before touching such an artifact: it says what the files are, that an instance owns none of its own, how to change what the doc says (the connector, never a publish), and where a comment on the doc — including one sent to you from it — is read and answered (the connector's comment verbs; never these files, never the artifact's comment relay).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。