「privacy」の検索結果

What you can build and do with an always-on AI agent that has episodic memory. Covers concrete product ideas, workflows, emergent capabilities from persistence plus memory, and real-world examples of deployed persistent agents. Helps you go from "I have the architecture" to "here's what it actually does for me." Activate on: "what can an always-on agent do", "persistent agent use cases", "agent applications", "proactive agent ideas", "what to build with episodic memory", "always-on agent product", "personal AI assistant ideas", "/always-on-agent-applications". NOT for: building the architecture (use always-on-agent-architecture), designing inputs (use always-on-agent-inputs), safety and privacy (use always-on-agent-safety).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Architecture and systems design for building always-on AI agents with episodic memory. Covers the memory hierarchy (core/recall/archival), persistence layers, agent server infrastructure, vector stores, and framework selection. Provides concrete deployment patterns for agents that maintain identity and learn across sessions. Activate on: "always-on agent", "persistent agent architecture", "episodic memory system", "agent memory design", "long-running agent", "stateful agent", "agent that remembers", "MemGPT architecture", "Letta deployment", "/always-on-agent-architecture". NOT for: choosing what data to feed the agent (use always-on-agent-inputs), brainstorming applications (use always-on-agent-applications), safety and privacy concerns (use always-on-agent-safety), general agentic patterns (use agentic-patterns).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Query and manage GPS travel data from Geomanic — your privacy-first GPS tracking platform.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for ethical thinking, or when a plan could harm or unfairly burden people: "should we do this?", "is this fair?", "privacy or bias risk", "who gets hurt?". Maps stakeholders, harms, power and consent. Skip for legal advice, neutral fact lookups and implementation-only work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reviewing data flows, support macros, refund templates for GDPR/CCPA/HIPAA fit — regime, consent, PII redaction (email, order-id), breach triage. Triggers 'is this GDPR-safe', 'PII redact'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply the Opquast Digital Quality Framework (245 rules, 14 categories) when building, reviewing, or auditing websites and web applications. Use for web development quality assurance, accessibility compliance, security hardening, privacy implementation, e-commerce best practices, and holistic digital quality checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when reading, writing, or watching the macOS clipboard — NSPasteboard types and multiple representations, the changeCount polling pattern, the transient/concealed pasteboard conventions clipboard tools must respect, and the Sequoia paste-privacy alerts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent Media OS, the single skill for every media need in a HyperFrames project. Resolve BGM, SFX, image, icon, brand logo, voice, color grade, or LUT into a frozen local file or paste-ready block + ledger record (one verb, `resolve`); generate via TTS / music / image models when the catalog misses; produce voiceover, transcription, captions, and background removal through one shared audio engine; operate on media (cut / reframe / transform); and reuse assets across projects. Also use for vague feedback that real footage looks dark, flat, boring, should feel retro/camcorder/print/ASCII, needs privacy, or needs a media reveal.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Produces a deep, honest peer-review of how someone uses Claude Code by statistically analyzing their local session data (~/.claude/usage-data/ and ~/.claude/projects/). Trigger whenever the user asks to review, analyze, audit, or critique their own Claude Code usage, workflow, habits, or skill level — including phrases like "analyze my cc usage", "review my cc sessions", "peer review my cc workflow", "deeper than /insights", or any ask for an honest audit of their AI workflow. Also covers portfolio/hiring-manager framings (e.g. "portfolio for Anthropic/OpenAI/xAI"), but ALWAYS ask the user in Step 0 which version to build (self / hr / both) before running — never silently produce an HR report, because that version goes to outsiders and needs explicit privacy setup. The HTML report is laid out ledger-first for SELF (opening band, output/team/leak/trend ledgers, then peer review, 9-dim scoring, try-this-week, case study, claim-indexed evidence). The HR variant is a recruiter version v1: identity card, earned badges (threshold-based, earned-only), allowlist-filtered output ledger, one case study, and a methodology & scope disclosure — no scores, no peer-review memo, no charts.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review public repository changes for secrets, private paths, signing identities, bundle IDs, generated artifacts, local logs, and private workflow leaks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Apply public, contributor-safe commit hygiene without maintainer-private automation, timestamps, ledger rules, or push policy.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load when evaluating an Islamic software feature, provider policy, AI behavior, moderation, monetization, privacy, defaults, ranking, self-hosting, or deployment model for provider responsibility and Islamic value-sensitive design; not for generic fiqh rulings or ordinary technical implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load when the user asks to be grilled or stress-tested on a plan, OR when starting Tier 0 (Sovereign), Tier 1 (Security), or Tier 2 (Privacy) tasks with underspecified requirements.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Load when working on Tier 0 Sovereign (payments, money, orders), Tier 1 Security (auth, tenancy, migrations), or Tier 2 Privacy (PII, erasure) tasks to enforce advanced model tier, Invariant-Breaker adversarial tests, and zero-PII telemetry validation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Determine whether an app is ready to submit, then drive the current App Store release flow with asc, including validation, staging, review submission, first-time availability, subscriptions, IAP, Game Center, and App Privacy checks.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from the NIST Framework for Cyber-Physical Systems (SP 1500-201/202/203, v1.0, 2017). Use for engineering and analyzing cyber-physical systems (CPS) and IoT: the CPS Framework's aspect × facet grid (nine aspects of concern examined through conceptualization, realization, and assurance facets), cross-property trustworthiness risk management (safety/security/privacy/reliability/resilience together), data interoperability (syntactical/semantic/contextual, canonical models, identifiers, provenance), the timing aspect (time-interval classes, time domains, time-aware networking) and secure/resilient time (GNSS jamming/spoofing, PTP/NTP attacks, holdover, the clock-error model and Allan/MTIE metrics), plus the use-case requirements method. Bridges IT and OT under a clock. Scope limits: a 2017 living/draft document, thin on post-2017 standards and on detailed control catalogs; it names but does not reproduce ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010 and 15288 process text or permission-licensed third-party figures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Протокол для безопасного создания, публикации, релиза, аудита и обслуживания репозиториев GitHub: проверка локальных правил и блокировок, создание .gitignore перед первым git add, проверка конфиденциальности, подготовка README/i18n/баннера/метаданных, проверка тегов релиза и релизов GitHub, а также обновление профилей организаций, файлов llms.txt и ссылок в реестрах.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

安全创建、发布、Release、审计和维护 GitHub 仓库的规范协议：检查本地规则与锁文件，在首次 git add 前创建 .gitignore，运行隐私检查，准备 README/i18n/Banner/元数据，验证 release 标签与 GitHub releases，并更新组织 Profile、llms.txt 文件及注册表链接。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GitHub リポジトリを安全に作成、公開、リリース、監査、保守するためのプロトコル。ローカルルールとロックの確認、最初の git add 前の .gitignore 作成、プライバシーチェックの実行、README/i18n/バナー/メタデータの準備、リリースタグおよび GitHub releases の検証、組織プロファイル、llms.txt ファイル、レジストリリンクの更新を行います。

Protocolo para crear, publicar, lanzar, auditar y mantener repositorios de GitHub de forma segura: verificar reglas locales y bloqueos, crear .gitignore antes del primer git add, realizar verificaciones de privacidad, preparar README/i18n/banner/metadatos, verificar etiquetas de release y lanzamientos de GitHub, y actualizar perfiles de organización, archivos llms.txt y enlaces a registros.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verweist auf das öffentliche, anbieterneutrale Modul build-your-users-mind: ein datenschutzbewusstes Verfahren zum Aufbau eines empirischen Theory-of-Mind-Präferenzmodells eines autorisierten Nutzers aus dessen eigenen Interaktionsprotokollen. Verwenden, wenn eine zuständige Person ein Entscheidungsavatar-Profil erstellen, validieren, anbinden oder pflegen möchte, ohne das persönliche Profil oder seine Belege zu veröffentlichen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Hosting-Muster, um eine lokal gebaute Anwendung (eigene Datenbank, eigener API-Key, In-Process-State) sicher hostbar zu machen, ohne Nutzerverwaltung zu bauen. Kernzug — der Host speichert nichts, der Browser des Besuchers speichert alles — sodass Pro-Besucher-Accounts, Zugriffsprüfungen und Löschfristen gegenstandslos werden, statt gelöst werden zu müssen. Nutzen, wenn eine lokal gebaute App für mehrere Besucher gehostet werden soll, bei "mach das ohne Login hostbar", "keine Nutzerkonten bauen", "Datenschutzerklärung für ein gehostetes Tool verkleinern", "wer ist verantwortlich, wenn wir nichts speichern" oder beim Wählen/Implementieren eines Server-Modus (`local`, `huckepack-gift`, `huckepack-only-host`, `pay-membership`). Liefert eine Data-Flow-Plan-Vorlage, eine Datenschutz-Vorlage und eine rechtliche Ersteinschätzung (DSGVO/TDDDG/UWG, deutsch) als Referenzen.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ordnet freiwillig bereitgestellte Kontaktdaten datensparsam und erkennt mögliche Dubletten.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Technology Officer archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings cited to the exact passage, technology risks (architecture, build versus buy, vendor lock-in, security of design, engineering capacity), what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CTO review", "pressure-test the technical side of this plan", "what would a CTO ask about this" or "rehearse the technology seat before the review". Do not use for cash, payback or budget questions, use cfo-reviewer instead; for capacity and timeline questions, use coo-reviewer; for security controls, privacy or compliance, use ciso-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。