「protect」の検索結果

Provider-independent color grading and finishing direction for generated video, ads, trailers, product films, social clips, explainers, and mixed-source edits. Use when planning, directing, reviewing, or QAing color correction, shot matching, exposure, contrast, saturation, skin/product color protection, look development, LUT/reference use, SDR/HDR color management, delivery constraints, generated-media artifacts, editor/compositor handoff, and finishing QC.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Provider-independent workflow for producing terminal, IDE, documentation, browser, desktop, and application demonstration videos. Use when choosing authentic capture, browser automation, synthetic UI, or hybrid treatment; scripting actions and narration; resetting demo state; protecting secrets and personal data; directing cursor/callouts; creating crop variants; and reviewing workflow truth, readability, accessibility, and provenance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate, reproduce, and safely fix a bug with regression protection. Composes context, diagnosis, architecture, code quality, and testing guardrails into a reproduce-first repair workflow. Use when the user says 'fix this bug', 'debug this', 'investigate this failure', 'patch this regression', 'repair this issue', or 'why is this broken'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when setting up HOL Guard, protecting local AI harnesses, reviewing Guard approvals or receipts, or scanning agent plugins, skills, MCP servers, and marketplace packages before use.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detect template version drift and guide migration to the latest template version. Compares current repo against the template, identifies what's outdated, and automates safe updates while protecting product-specific content. Triggers on requests to sync with template, update template version, check for template drift, or when user asks "sync template", "update to v3", "template drift", "check template version".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Mask, redact, and anonymize sensitive data (PII, PCI, PHI) in databases, logs, and APIs. Use when protecting PII in dev/staging environments, redacting sensitive data from logs, anonymizing data for analytics, or applying k-anonymity and differential privacy for GDPR-compliant data sharing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects attacks from server logs and blocks malicious IPs with CrowdSec, an open-source, crowd-sourced alternative to fail2ban. Use when a user asks to block brute force attempts, protect SSH or a web server, set up a community blocklist firewall, add a WAF, or install CrowdSec with Docker.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Clerk is a hosted authentication and user-management service with drop-in UI components, social login, email/password, organizations, RBAC and webhooks. Use when adding sign-in to Next.js, React, or Express apps, protecting routes with clerkMiddleware, setting up multi-tenant organizations and roles, or syncing Clerk users to your own database.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Auth.js (formerly NextAuth.js) is an open-source authentication library that adds OAuth sign-in, magic links, credentials and WebAuthn to Next.js, SvelteKit, Express and other frameworks. Use when a user asks to add login with Google or GitHub, set up NextAuth v5, protect routes with middleware or proxy, add roles to the session, or connect a database adapter such as Drizzle or Prisma. Notes that the project is in maintenance mode under Better Auth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert integration of Supabase Auth with Next.js App RouterUse when "supabase auth next, authentication next.js, login supabase, auth middleware, protected route, auth callback, session management, authentication, auth, supabase, nextjs, middleware, session" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security engineering that protects applications, data, and users from real-world threatsUse when "security, authentication, authorization, encryption, OWASP, vulnerability, XSS, SQL injection, CSRF, secrets, password, JWT, OAuth, permissions, audit, compliance, security, authentication, authorization, encryption, vulnerabilities, OWASP, compliance, audit" mentioned.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

One-command GitHub repository health audit. Checks for missing standard files, GitHub configuration, branch protection, documentation quality, and code hygiene. Produces a scored health report with prioritized fix recommendations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

API Security Best Practices workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Implement secure API design patterns including authentication, authorization, input validation, rate limiting, and protection against common API vulnerabilities and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

API Security Best Practices workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Implement secure API design patterns including authentication, authorization, input validation, rate limiting, and protection against common API vulnerabilities and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

API Security Best Practices workflow skill. Use this skill when the user needs Implement secure API design patterns including authentication, authorization, input validation, rate limiting, and protection against common API vulnerabilities and the operator should preserve the upstream workflow, copied support files, and provenance before merging or handing off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

投行并购 (投行并购 / 交易撮合 (Investment Banking M&A / Dealmaking) — 面向并购顾问、企业融资、卖方/买方交易执行的职业认知操作系统，从业者(分析师 Analyst / 经理 Associate / 副总裁 VP / 董事 Director / 董事总经理 MD / 内部公司发展 Corp Dev / PE 投资人)、想入行者、以及服务这行(法律/会计/估值/咨询)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 投行 M&A 的核心世界观分歧: **价格 vs 价值 (price 是市场愿意付的, value 是内在的, deal 在两者缝隙里成交) ⇄ 确定性 vs 最高价 (certainty of close 对卖方常胜过纸面最高报价) ⇄ 顾问/中介 vs 委托代理 (banker 是 agent, 客户利益 vs 成交费的激励冲突真实存在, 「banker 总想成交」是行业原罪批判)**; 更深层 — 「过程/竞价纪律 (controlled auction 制造竞争张力、信息不对称管理) ⇄ 关系/信任 (relationship banking、长期 coverage、reputational capital)」, 「叙事/包装 (the story, equity story, positioning) ⇄ 数字/尽调 (the numbers, diligence, quality of earnings)」, 「估值的科学外衣 (DCF/comps 的伪精确) ⇄ 谈判的真实定价 (价格由 leverage、竞争、时机决定)」; (b) 估值与分析正典 (最标准化、最易蒸出高质量+CLI 化) — DCF (折现现金流: FCF 预测/WACC 折现率/terminal value 终值/Gordon growth vs exit multiple), Comparable Companies (可比公司/trading comps: EV/EBITDA, EV/Revenue, P/E), Precedent Transactions (先例交易/deal comps: control premium 控制权溢价), LBO (杠杆收购模型: IRR/MOIC/debt schedule/sources & uses), Accretion/Dilution (增厚/摊薄分析: EPS 影响、pro forma), Sum-of-the-Parts (分部估值/SOTP), Football Field (估值区间图), Merger Model (合并模型: synergies 协同/purchase accounting/goodwill), Sensitivity/scenario; (c) 交易流程与产出物 — 卖方流程 (sell-side: teaser 简介 → NDA → CIM/IM 信息备忘录 → management presentation → IOI 意向函 → data room 数据室 → LOI/term sheet → confirmatory diligence → SPA 买卖协议 → signing → closing), 买方流程 (buy-side: thesis/sourcing → outreach → valuation → bid → exclusivity → diligence → financing → close), auction 类型 (broad/targeted/negotiated/preemptive bid); 产出物: pitchbook 推介材料、CIM、fairness opinion 公平意见、board presentation、fee letter、engagement letter; (d) 交易结构与条款 — consideration (cash/stock/mix/earnout 对赌)、deal protections (breakup fee 分手费/go-shop/no-shop/MAC 重大不利变化条款)、representations & warranties 陈述与保证、escrow 托管、working capital adjustment 营运资金调整、reverse termination fee、collar 价格区间、tender offer vs merger、hostile vs friendly、defensive tactics (poison pill 毒丸/white knight 白衣骑士/staggered board); (e) 行业结构与角色 — bulge bracket (高盛/摩根士丹利/JPM/BofA/花旗) vs elite boutique (Centerview/Evercore/Moelis/Lazard/PJT/Perella) vs middle market (Houlihan Lokey/William Blair/Harris Williams) vs regional/independent; analyst→associate→VP→director→MD 晋升金字塔; coverage (行业组) vs product (M&A/ECM/DCM/leveraged finance/restructuring); sponsors group (服务 PE); 买方包括 PE/strategic acquirer/corp dev; (f) 量化指标与节奏 — deal fee (success fee 业内通常约 1-2% 视规模递减/retainer/Lehman formula)、league table 排行榜、pitch→mandate 转化、deal velocity、hours culture (analyst 80-100h/week 文化批判)、bonus/comp 结构、deal sheet (简历上的成交清单); (g) 争议/批判 — fairness opinion 是否橡皮图章 (利益冲突: 出意见的 banker 也收成交费)、estimate 的伪精确 (DCF garbage in garbage out、假设驱动结论)、banker 永远建议成交 (deal 偏见、empire building 助推 CEO 自利并购)、协同效应系统性高估 (大量并购毁灭价值、winner's curse 赢家诅咒)、analyst 血汗工厂文化 (2021 高盛 13 人 deck 事件、过劳死争议)、advisory 价值 vs 中介寻租之争、bulge vs boutique 的利益独立性叙事 (boutique 标榜「无承销利益冲突」)、SPAC 泡沫与 de-SPAC 教训; (h) 流派/思想谱系 — 估值学派 (Aswath Damodaran 估值教父/纽大、Tim Koller McKinsey《Valuation》、McKinsey valuation 体系) vs 公司金融教科书派 (Rosenbaum & Pearl《Investment Banking》行业圣经、Brealey Myers Allen、CFI/WSP/BIWS 培训体系) vs 交易实战派 (Bruce Wasserstein《Big Deal》、Joseph Perella/Felix Rohatyn 老派 dealmaker、现代 boutique 创始人) vs 行为/批判派 (并购毁灭价值的学术证据、Damodaran 对协同/控制权溢价的批判、Matt Levine《Money Stuff》解构华尔街逻辑) vs PE/buy-side 视角 (LBO 数学、value creation 杠杆/运营/multiple expansion)。不含: 二级市场股票交易/卖方研究 (equity research)、零售财富管理/private banking、纯 ECM/IPO 承销执行 (虽相关但聚焦 M&A advisory)、纯 PE 投后运营、量化交易/对冲基金策略、纯公司财务报表会计。) Master OS — automated mastery of 投行并购 / 交易撮合 (Investment Banking M&A / Dealmaking) — 面向并购顾问、企业融资、卖方/买方交易执行的职业认知操作系统，从业者(分析师 Analyst / 经理 Associate / 副总裁 VP / 董事 Director / 董事总经理 MD / 内部公司发展 Corp Dev / PE 投资人)、想入行者、以及服务这行(法律/会计/估值/咨询)的视角。覆盖: (a) 第一性张力 — 投行 M&A 的核心世界观分歧: **价格 vs 价值 (price 是市场愿意付的, value 是内在的, deal 在两者缝隙里成交) ⇄ 确定性 vs 最高价 (certainty of close 对卖方常胜过纸面最高报价) ⇄ 顾问/中介 vs 委托代理 (banker 是 agent, 客户利益 vs 成交费的激励冲突真实存在, 「banker 总想成交」是行业原罪批判)**; 更深层 — 「过程/竞价纪律 (controlled auction 制造竞争张力、信息不对称管理) ⇄ 关系/信任 (rela

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A strict code reviewer, pair programmer, debugger, and mentor for Python, Bash, Google Apps Script, JavaScript, and Swift/Apple platforms. Use when writing, reviewing, debugging, planning, or securing code, or for senior-level rigor, a security review, or mentoring. Mode triggers — REVIEW: (critique + refactor), EXPLAIN: (teach), MVP:/PROTOTYPE: (lean-but-safe), DEBUG: (root-cause), AUDIT: (report-first); default is pair-programming. Drives a spec→plan→TDD→verify loop with a deterministic-first, verify-before-asserting (anti-hallucination) discipline. Enforces a security floor (secrets, injection, input validation, isolation, least privilege, authn) and a backup/continuity floor on a phase-aware rigor ladder (Prototype→MVP→Production) — cheap ≠ insecure. Covers testing & fuzzing, SAST/secret-scan/type-check/supply-chain gates, multi-tenant data protection, resilience & DR, scalability, CI/CD, cloud/containers/DBs, and accessible UI — deep references read on demand.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Open a GitHub PR via API as a flowing graph — branch + push + create_pr + mergeable poll, with structural protection against pushing to main/master/etc. Use when a Claude Code or Claude.ai container needs to land changes on GitHub via the API (no git CLI required) and the prose "create branch, push, open PR, wait for mergeable" workflow keeps drifting under context pressure.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Edit drafts into natural prose, inspect AI-sounding patterns, or review how a specified audience might respond passage by passage. Zero Slop runs inside the user's existing AI assistant with local tools that protect source details. Use for humanizing or de-slopping writing, polishing outward-facing prose, social drafts, final editorial checks, or an explicit simulated reader review. Preserve facts, voice and format; reader simulations are hypotheses, not human feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate a commit message, stage all changes, and push to remote after scanning for secrets, large files, and protected-branch risks. Skip for opening PRs, code review, or cutting releases/tags.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Applies the reasoning style of Judy Faulkner, founder and CEO of Epic Systems, to decisions around corporate governance, healthcare technology, and unconventional leadership. Use this skill whenever Claude is asked for advice on going public vs. staying private, M&A strategy (acquisitions), budgeting, reducing software-driven burnout, data privacy, or interoperability. Faulkner's thinking is highly independent, fiercely protective of long-term mission over short-term profits, and deeply skeptical of traditional corporate playbooks (like MBAs, strict budgets, and venture capital). Trigger this skill to channel her focus on organic growth, customer empathy, and treating software as 'mental clay'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede Labs agent-team orchestrator: split complex work into coordinated lanes with explicit file ownership, WIP collision detection, quality gates, escalation thresholds, rollback plans, and handoffs that prove what shipped. Use when one shared change needs safe parallel ownership across builders and reviewers, when a lane map must be resolved before anyone opens a file, or when running a repeatable public-repository contribution program with issue scoring, atomic task leases, isolated worktrees, and explicit publication authority. NOT FOR: one repo change a bundled DAG can run end to end (use suede-graph-flo-xr); findings-only review of a diff (use suede-code-review) or an A-F ship grade (use suede-code-grader); CI, branch protection, or merge-gate wiring (use suede-ci-gate); branch and worktree setup on a stale mirror (a private Suede Labs companion, not in this pack).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede AI full-stack surface builder that runs design, copy, and visual QA as one pass: landing pages, brand surfaces, product UI, dashboards, campaigns, launch pages, and reference-to-target restyles (suedify). Use when a build needs layout and words together, when a redesign or launch surface has to ship end to end, when the request is 'make this site look like that one', or when design, copy, asset, and QA lanes have to move at once. NOT FOR: a design-token, dark-mode, or single-component decision (use suede-design); copy with no layout work (use johnny-suede-write, or suede-copy for one standalone conversion surface); conversion and funnel architecture (use suede-site-alchemy); multi-agent orchestration protocols, WIP protection, and rollback trees (use suede-agent-teams).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Suede Thought Graph shipping search for a multi-file repo change. Use when competing implementation plans need one evidence-gated selection before any build. Halts on hazards, collisions, budget exhaustion, or no safe winner. Reads production; never deploys. NOT FOR: bulk independent work (use a separate private worker-fleet pass); findings-only diff review (use suede-code-review); CI or branch-protection wiring (use suede-ci-gate); copy-only shipping (use suede-ship-copy).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。