982 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Enriches indicators with context from threat-intel sources: planning lookups against reputation, passive DNS, WHOIS, and sandbox/sample databases, scoring confidence, and avoiding operational-security mistakes that tip off adversaries. Activates for requests to enrich IOCs, add threat context, or plan indicator lookups safely.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Detects DNS-based tunneling and data exfiltration in DNS logs: scoring high query volume to single domains, long/high-entropy subdomains, unusual record types, and encoded payload labels. Activates for requests to hunt DNS tunneling, detect DNS exfiltration, or analyze suspicious DNS query patterns.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hunts malicious PowerShell using script-block (EID 4104) and module logging: scoring encoded commands, download cradles, AMSI/logging bypass, and in-memory execution, then decoding payloads for triage. Activates for requests to hunt malicious PowerShell, analyze script-block logs, or detect encoded command abuse.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Decrypts statically embedded malware configuration blobs by trying common schemes (single-byte and multi-byte XOR, RC4, base64 layers) and scoring decoded output for config-like content. Activates for requests to decrypt an embedded config, recover hardcoded settings from a blob, or brute-force a configuration encryption scheme.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Compares two related malware samples to surface what changed between variants using section-level hashing, import-set differences, and fuzzy similarity scoring. Activates for requests to diff two samples, compare malware variants, or measure similarity between two binaries for variant tracking.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnose whether an LLM classifier's validation-gate failure is GOLD-BOUND before spending on prompt revision or model changes. Use when: (1) a scoring pipeline over-predicts a label (precision low, recall high) and a prompt clarification is proposed to tighten it, (2) a pilot/validation gate fails and the fix candidates are prompt edits, (3) inter-rater agreement on the weak label was already low (κ < ~0.6). Core check: if gold POSITIVES share the exact feature the revision would exclude, no prompt can pass a gold-scored gate — recall craters while precision barely moves. Also documents the verified surgical-pilot design (single-section diff, tune/holdout split, pre-registered gate, perturbation check on untouched sections).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Customs and Border Protection officer — scoring a shipment or traveler for secondary-inspection referral, evaluating a manifest discrepancy for contraband risk, deciding whether a traveler is admissible under immigration law, structuring a seizure or penalty referral, or triaging a primary-inspection queue under time pressure.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a correctional officer or jailer — scoring an inmate-classification instrument, deciding a use-of-force response level, running a cell/contraband search, preparing evidence for a disciplinary hearing, or screening an inmate for suicide/mental-health crisis risk.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a Compensation, Benefits, and Job Analysis Specialist — market-pricing a job against salary survey data, scoring a job through a point-factor or IPE job evaluation, running a pay-equity regression or cohort analysis, building or refreshing a salary structure and compa-ratio bands, classifying a job family's FLSA exemption status through the duties test, or modeling benefits plan cost (loss ratio, PEPM, self-funded vs. fully insured). Distinct from hr-people-manager (owns the comp/leveling judgment calls — whether to approve an exception, promote someone into a level), hr-specialist (owns individual-case leave/I-9/ADA/FLSA reclassification for one employee's drifted duties), and compensation-benefits-manager (owns pay philosophy, negotiation-range policy, and the department that runs this work). This role owns the mechanics: the survey match, the point score, the regression, the band math — the analysis those upstream policy and downstream judgment calls are made against.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of a biomedical/bioengineering engineer — running a design control phase (inputs, outputs, verification, validation) for a medical device, scoring a Design FMEA and deciding whether a failure mode needs mitigation, planning a human factors/usability validation study, building a design traceability matrix, or writing a design verification or risk-mitigation report. Distinct from a regulatory-affairs-specialist (owns the submission/clearance process, not the engineering itself) and from a clinical-data-manager/biostatistician (trial data and analysis, not device design).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when a task needs the judgment of an Art Therapist — matching art media to a client's regulation capacity via the Expressive Therapies Continuum, scoring a standardized directive (PPAT, KFD, DAP) with a validated instrument like FEATS as part of assessment, deciding between a directive and open-studio session structure, navigating informed consent and disposition for client-made artwork, or distinguishing an art-as-therapy approach from an art-psychotherapy approach for a given client.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-agent code review using the Pragmatic Quality framework. Orchestrates parallel review agents (CLAUDE.md compliance, bug scanning, git history, security) with independent confidence scoring to produce high-signal findings. Use when user runs /code-review, /review:code-review, requests a "code review", "review my changes", "PR review", or mentions "review diff", "review branch".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Multi-agent review resolution with trust-but-verify methodology. Accepts a PR number/URL or a local code-review report file. Extracts review comments, verifies each with parallel agents using confidence scoring (0-100), filters false positives, presents a triage report for approval, then applies fixes and replies. Use when user runs /resolve-review, mentions "resolve PR comments", "address review feedback", "fix PR suggestions", "handle review comments", or "resolve review findings".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Security-focused code review identifying high-confidence exploitable vulnerabilities with two-axis severity/confidence scoring, OWASP 2025 alignment, per-finding Haiku verification, and false positive filtering. Optional GitHub PR posting. Use when user runs /security-review, /review:security-review, requests a "security review", "security audit", "vulnerability scan", or mentions "find vulnerabilities", "check for exploits".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimize content for AI Overviews (formerly SGE), ChatGPT web search, Perplexity, and other AI-powered search experiences. GEO analysis enriched with Ahrefs Brand Radar AI visibility data when available. Includes brand mention signals, AI crawler accessibility, llms.txt compliance, passage-level citability scoring, and platform-specific optimization. Use when user says "AI Overviews", "SGE", "GEO", "AI search", "LLM optimization", "Perplexity", "AI citations", "ChatGPT search", "AI visibility", or "Brand Radar".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Standalone E-E-A-T scoring rubric for a URL or content draft. Scores Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trust 0-5 each using concrete detectable signals, framed per Google's creating-helpful-content doc. Use when user says "E-E-A-T", "EEAT", "experience expertise", "trust signals", or "author authority".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Circuit simulation workflows — SPICE simulation via ngspice, confidence scoring, RF chain analysis (scikit-rf), power/clock transient and AC analysis. Trigger on: "simulate", "run simulation", "spice", "check stability", "ripple analysis". Load the canonical sim skill from `project-skills/sim/SKILL.md`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run customer success — onboarding, health scoring, retention plays, expansion, and churn prevention.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze vendor and contractor coordination systems for performance scoring, competitive bid evaluation, SLA compliance tracking, and vendor risk assessment.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit academic peer review operations -- reviewer matching algorithms, conflict of interest detection, turnaround time optimization, review quality scoring, and editorial workflow management..
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit customer service triage systems for ticket routing, classification, and SLA compliance. Triggers: you need to evaluate ticket auto-classification accuracy, priority scoring models, skill-based routing logic.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit public sector and government resource allocation systems for budget optimization algorithms (zero-based, incremental, performance-based), service demand forecasting (ARIMA, Prophet, regression), equity-based distribution scoring (CDC SVI, environmental justice indices.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a rehabilitation recovery tracking system -- evaluate standardized outcome instruments (FIM, Barthel Index, SF-36, DASH, LEFS, PROMIS), functional assessment scoring accuracy, SMART goal and milestone tracking, regression detection with alert workflows, pain scale calibration (NRS.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Audit a resume builder or optimization tool for ATS compatibility, keyword matching accuracy, formatting standards, achievement quantification, skill extraction, and job-description alignment scoring. Use when reviewing resume software, career platforms, applicant tracking integrations, CV generators, or job application tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。