「sel」の検索結果

Use the free built-in .NET SDK analyzers and analysis levels with gradual Roslyn warning promotion. USE FOR: the repo wants first-party .NET analyzers; CI should fail on analyzer warnings; the team needs AnalysisLevel or AnalysisMode guidance. DO NOT USE FOR: third-party analyzer selection by itself; formatting-only work. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use the open-source free `coverlet` toolchain for .NET code coverage. Use when a repo needs line and branch coverage, collector versus MSBuild driver selection, or CI-safe coverage commands. USE FOR: coverlet setup; CI line or branch coverage; choosing between collector and MSBuild drivers. DO NOT USE FOR: coverage report rendering by itself; repos that intentionally use a different coverage engine. INVOKES: inspect the repository context, edit targeted files, and run relevant build, test, lint, or validation commands when changes are made.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Guides technology selection and implementation of AI and ML features in .NET 8+ applications using ML.NET, Microsoft.Extensions.AI (MEAI), Microsoft Agent Framework (MAF), GitHub Copilot SDK, ONNX Runtime, and OllamaSharp. Covers the full spectrum from classic ML through modern LLM orchestration to local inference. Use when adding classification, regression, clustering, anomaly detection, recommendation, LLM integration (text generation, summarization, reasoning), RAG pipelines with vector search, agentic workflows with tool calling, Copilot extensions, or custom model inference via ONNX Runtime to a .NET project. DO NOT USE FOR projects targeting .NET Framework (requires .NET 8+), the task is pure data engineering or ETL with no ML/AI component, or the project needs a custom deep learning training loop (use Python with PyTorch/TensorFlow, then export to ONNX for .NET inference).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manual QA harness for the senpi coding agent itself. MUST USE after changing packages/ai, packages/agent, packages/coding-agent, or packages/tui — a green typecheck and `npm test` are NOT QA. Drives the real CLI from source in an isolated sandbox (never touches ~/.senpi or real credentials) across four channels: remote RPC (--mode rpc JSONL stdio), TUI smoke (node-pty on Windows, tmux on POSIX), mock loop (a local fake model server for deterministic, zero-token agent-loop runs), and CLI smoke (--help/--print/--list-models). Every helper ships a --self-test. Use whenever someone says qa senpi, test the agent, verify my change, rpc qa, tui qa, mock-loop qa, smoke the cli, or needs evidence that an agent-loop, tool, keybinding, or provider change works end to end. Capture evidence to local-ignore/qa-evidence/.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

System hardening, detection engineering, security baseline monitoring, patch management, defense-in-depth architecture, and security posture improvement

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Agent self-evolution system. Collects signals from user feedback, stores execution trajectories (golden + correction pairs), analyzes patterns, proposes mutations to workspace files, and generates HTML reports. Trigger with "/evolve" or when the user asks to improve agent behavior. Also use when the user says "remember this pattern", "don't do X again", or "that was a good approach, save it".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute read-only SQL queries against multiple Microsoft SQL Server databases. Use when: (1) querying MSSQL/SQL Server databases, (2) exploring database schemas/tables, (3) running SELECT queries for data analysis, (4) checking database contents. Supports multiple database connections with descriptions for intelligent auto-selection. Blocks all write operations (INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE, DROP, etc.) for safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute read-only SQL queries against multiple MySQL databases. Use when: (1) querying MySQL databases, (2) exploring database schemas/tables, (3) running SELECT queries for data analysis, (4) checking database contents. Supports multiple database connections with descriptions for intelligent auto-selection. Blocks all write operations (INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE, DROP, etc.) for safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Execute read-only SQL queries against multiple PostgreSQL databases. Use when: (1) querying PostgreSQL databases, (2) exploring database schemas/tables, (3) running SELECT queries for data analysis, (4) checking database contents. Supports multiple database connections with descriptions for intelligent auto-selection. Blocks all write operations (INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE, DROP, etc.) for safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ENHANCE overlay on [[dspy]] — the upfront rubric for choosing a reasoning SHAPE (Predict / ChainOfThought / ReAct / ProgramOfThought) BEFORE you write a prompt or pick an optimizer. The local `dspy` skill lists the modules but never surfaces the *selection criterion*: reasoning shape is chosen by task structure, not by reflexively defaulting to CoT. Activate every time a new LM-calling node/step is added to a pipeline. Do NOT activate for one-shot prompts, optimizer/teleprompter choice (that is the dspy SOP's job), or non-LM control flow. Search keywords: chain of thought vs ReAct, when to use CoT, reasoning type, ReAct vs CoT vs PoT, which dspy module, predict vs chain of thought.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adds and tunes a reranker stage for RAG using the retrieve-wide, rerank-narrow pattern. Use when relevant documents appear in the initial top-N but are buried by noise, top-1 precision or MRR is low despite adequate recall, or too many marginal chunks consume context. Covers cross-encoder, API, and local rerankers; N-to-k selection; and latency/cost tradeoffs. Do not use when retrieval recall itself is failing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Project-kickoff rubric for the self-host vs managed-cloud decision — when is running your own inference engine / LLM platform worth the ops cost vs paying per-token for a managed API? Decide on two axes — VOLUME (a cost-crossover slider) and COMPLIANCE (a hard gate). Use at kickoff when choosing where to run inference, or when cost / data-residency pressure forces a re-evaluation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-engine decision rubric for self-hosting or recommending an LLM serving stack. Picks among vLLM, SGLang, TensorRT-LLM, TGI, llama.cpp, Ollama, and MLX as a function of (hardware × workload × constraint), not "which is fastest". Activates whenever a coder-agent must choose, defend, or migrate a serving runtime.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Neutral, framework-agnostic decision tree for project kickoff: "which agent / RAG / LLM framework should I reach for?" Synthesizes the ecosystem sections of 7 landmark-project SOPs (LangGraph, LlamaIndex, DSPy, CrewAI, vLLM, Aider, Dify) into one layered rubric. Core stance: frameworks are LAYERS, not competitors — a real project usually combines DSPy (compile) + LlamaIndex (retrieve) + LangGraph (orchestrate) + vLLM (serve), and you choose ONE per layer, not one to rule all. Use when starting any LLM/agent/RAG project, or whenever the "which framework?" question is asked. Deliberately neutral — unlike vendor docs and the LangChain-biased `framework-selection` on skill.sh, this skill has no horse in the race.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-framework enhancement overlay for choosing a multi-agent topology BEFORE writing any agent. A binary-question rubric — is single-agent + tools enough? do agents need to know about each other? does the output need one voice? — maps the answer to single-agent / supervisor / swarm / sequential / hierarchical. Activates when a coder agent is tempted to "split the work into roles" or reaches for a multi-agent framework. Encodes the *selection rubric* that the per-framework skills assume but never surface. Search keywords: when to use multi-agent, single vs multi agent, do I need multiple agents, supervisor vs swarm, multi-agent vs single agent, agent team design.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Selects the correct CLAUDE.md or LESSONS.md template via decision trees. Use when starting a project or unsure which fits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Same-epoch comparison of training runs across wandb, neptune, tensorboard, or mlflow. Aligns runs at the student's current step (never current-vs-final-of-baseline) and separates proxy metrics from downstream targets. Use when the user asks to compare runs, check if a run is improving, track lag against a baseline, rank experiments, or evaluate run-vs-run performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user wants to design experiments, plan ablation studies, structure baselines, or create incremental evaluation strategies. Triggers on phrases like "design ablation", "plan experiment", "what experiments should I run", "baseline comparison", or "experiment matrix".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract lessons from the current session, or sweep the project's past sessions when asked, and route them to the appropriate knowledge layer (project AGENTS.md, auto memory, existing skills, or new skills). Use when the user asks to "self-improve", "distill this session", "distill past sessions", "sweep past sessions", "extract lessons from all sessions", "save learnings", "update AGENTS.md with what we learned", "capture session insights", "remember this for next time", "extract lessons", "update skills from session", or "what did we learn".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract lessons from the current session, or sweep the project's past sessions when asked, and route them to the appropriate knowledge layer (project AGENTS.md, auto memory, existing skills, or new skills). Use when the user asks to "self-improve", "distill this session", "distill past sessions", "sweep past sessions", "extract lessons from all sessions", "save learnings", "update CLAUDE.md with what we learned", "capture session insights", "remember this for next time", "extract lessons", "update skills from session", or "what did we learn".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit the turbo skill lessons that /self-improve writes into this repo's .turbo/handoff/ from other projects, apply the ones the user approves, delete the consumed handoffs, commit and push, and update the installed Turbo skills. Use when the user asks to "read .turbo/handoff and let me know what you think", "read the handoff files and let me know what you think", "review the lesson handoffs", "apply the self-improve handoffs", or "process the turbo handoffs".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Draft an Instagram caption with the hook in the first 125 characters, a skimmable body, and one clear CTA, using a 2026 hook formula chosen by goal (saves, shares, comments, follows). Runs the humanizer pass and, on approval, publishes with the image or video you supply via the Publora media flow. Use to caption a single image or a Reel. Not for slide-by-slide carousels (use ig-carousel-planner) or auditing a draft (use ig-humanizer --mode audit).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Remove the AI tells readers react to in an Instagram caption or carousel slide: 2026 vocabulary by density, reveal bridges, staccato stacks, stacked triads, performed sincerity, emoji storms; caps em dashes. Includes --mode audit (first-125 hook, length, hashtags, emoji, CTA, media) and --mode profile. Not for beating AI detectors (no edit reliably does). Not for writing from scratch (use ig-caption-writer or ig-carousel-planner). Keywords: humanize, de-AI caption, audit before posting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reverse-engineer the hook from a viral Instagram Reel or carousel, given a URL or a pasted caption. Identifies which of the 10 canonical 2026 formulas it uses (number-first, contrarian, relatable, confession, listicle, before/after, myth-buster, framework, pattern-interrupt Reel, how-I Reel), explains why it worked, names the primary goal, and returns a blank template mapped to your topic. Use to learn from a post you admire. Not for writing your own (use ig-caption-writer or ig-carousel-planner).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。