「trust」の検索結果

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Biologist — designing a study and identifying its true experimental unit before data collection starts, running a power analysis to size a sample, judging whether a published or preclinical finding warrants trust without independent replication, sequencing IACUC/IBC/field-permit approvals before biosafety or wildlife work begins, or scoping a grant-funded research plan against realistic funding odds.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of a Biological Technician — troubleshooting a failed assay or contaminated culture, deciding whether a batch of lab data is trustworthy enough to report, auditing a bench's SOP/QC discipline, or diagnosing calibration and reagent-lot problems behind inconsistent results.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Adhesive Bonding Machine Operator — distinguishing an open-time violation from a pot-life check, controlling bond line thickness with calibrated spacers rather than clamping pressure alone, verifying surface prep with a test rather than visual cleanliness, or confirming actual part temperature reached full cure rather than trusting chamber setpoint and elapsed time.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a task needs the judgment of an Application Security Engineer — checking whether an endpoint verifies object-level authorization (not just authentication), running threat modeling at design time rather than deferring security review to the end, triaging a dependency vulnerability by actual reachability rather than CVSS score alone, combining SAST/DAST/SCA tooling to cover their distinct blind spots, or applying context-specific output encoding to untrusted input. Distinct from an information security analyst — this role works inside the SDLC to prevent vulnerabilities before they ship, not detect and respond to intrusions in production.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent review resolution with trust-but-verify methodology. Accepts a PR number/URL or a local code-review report file. Extracts review comments, verifies each with parallel agents using confidence scoring (0-100), filters false positives, presents a triage report for approval, then applies fixes and replies. Use when user runs /resolve-review, mentions "resolve PR comments", "address review feedback", "fix PR suggestions", "handle review comments", or "resolve review findings".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive SEO analysis for any website or business type. Orchestrates 52 sub-skills (52 active): full site audits, technical SEO (CWV/INP), schema, E-E-A-T content quality, images, sitemaps, GEO for AI Overviews, llms.txt generation, AI crawler audit, plus live GSC and Ahrefs MCP data. GSC: overview, drops, opportunities, brand-vs-nonbrand, cannibalization, compare, content-decay, index-issues, new-keywords. Ahrefs: overview, backlinks, keywords, competitors, content-gap, broken-links, new-links, anchor-analysis, dr-history, top-pages. Cross-MCP: serp, content-brief, brand-radar, site-audit-pro, report. Local: log-analysis, ai-content-check, internal-links, local, migration-check, obsidian-kb. AI Readability: llms-txt, robots-ai. Performance: lighthouse-audit, core-web-vitals, page-experience. Quality & AI Search: rich-results, ai-optimization, eeat-audit, helpful-content. Triggers on: "SEO", "audit", "schema", "Core Web Vitals", "sitemap", "E-E-A-T", "AI Overviews", "GEO", "technical SEO", "content quality", "structured data", "GSC", "Ahrefs", "backlinks", "keywords", "search console", "domain rating", "local SEO", "migration", "lighthouse", "pagespeed", "LCP", "INP", "CLS", "page experience", "interstitials", "mobile friendly", "rich results", "rich snippets", "schema eligibility", "AI optimization", "AI search readiness", "EEAT", "trust signals", "helpful content", "people-first", "content quality gate".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Shared in-workflow quality gates for code/PR skills — the gate model, trust tiers, and the three primitives (evidence-before-done, independent judge, anti-gaming). DO NOT TRIGGER directly — referenced by consumer skills via relative path.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design rigorous experiments — hypotheses, controls, randomization, power analysis, and preregistration. Use when planning any study where you need trustworthy causal conclusions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cloudflare guidance — DNS, CDN caching, WAF, Workers, Pages, Zero Trust, and edge performance tuning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write personalized pitch emails to journalists, podcasters, newsletter writers, and analysts using AIDA adapted for media pitching and Ryan Holiday's journalist psychology from "Trust Me I'm Lying." Different from press releases (use /press-release-writer for those). Use when the user asks to pitch a journalist, pitch a reporter, "get coverage in X", media outreach, podcast pitch, analyst briefing request, or wants to land a story. Reads brand voice and positioning from knowledge/. For the press release itself, see press-release-writer. For the underlying customer story, see case-study-writer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess team health using Patrick Lencioni's Five Dysfunctions of a Team model. Use when a leader says "my team feels off", "we have trust issues", "people aren't speaking up in meetings", "accountability is a problem", "we keep missing commitments", "the team is siloed", "we're not working well together", or "I want to do a team health check". Also trigger when someone describes symptoms like passive agreement in meetings, blame culture, missed deadlines without escalation, or people optimizing for their own metrics over team goals.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Maps intelligence for local SEO: geo-grid rank tracking, GBP profile auditing via API, review intelligence across Google/Tripadvisor/Trustpilot, cross-platform NAP verification, competitor radius mapping, and LocalBusiness schema generation. Three tiers: free (Overpass + Geoapify), DataForSEO, and DataForSEO + Google. Use when user says "maps", "geo-grid", "rank tracking", "GBP audit", "review velocity", "competitor radius", or "SoLV".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit paid-ad landing pages for message match, mobile experience, performance, accessibility, trust, forms, consent, tracking, security, and conversion friction. Use for landing-page audit, post-click experience, LP audit, conversion-rate optimization, form optimization, ad-to-page message match, redirects, blocked navigation, or requests involving private, loopback, link-local, or metadata IP destinations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review a Yuzu pull request end to end with a static-first trust gate, isolated dynamic testing, adversarial Kimi/Codex review, a posted verdict, and head-SHA-bound re-review. Use when the user types forms such as "go PR123", "go 123", or "/go PR123"; use `--promote SHA` only after a collaborator accepts the static review of an external fork.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assists in designing and implementing secure n-tier serverless web applications and microservices on Google Cloud. Use when users need architecture designs, security checklists, Terraform code, or deployment guidance for multi-tier serverless apps, regional data residency / European sovereignty compliance, zero-trust private VPC networking, or Private Service Connect. Don't use for VM, GKE, or non-Google Cloud architectures.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when Agentforce run costs are climbing, you need to forecast scale, or you want to reduce tokens per conversation without hurting quality. Covers topic (now subagent) design impact on cost, prompt/template reuse, grounding size discipline, caching, and model-tier selection. Triggers: 'agentforce cost', 'tokens per conversation too high', 'reduce agentforce runs spend', 'forecast agentforce scale cost', 'einstein trust layer tokens'. NOT for capping spend per user with a budget gate and fallback — use agentforce/agent-rate-limit-strategy. NOT for org-wide model-tier and BYOLLM platform strategy — use architect/ai-platform-architecture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Router for the 53 SfSkills `agentforce` skill packages. Agentforce and Einstein: agents, topics, actions, prompt templates, grounding, guardrails, evaluation and production readiness. Use when the request mentions Agentforce, agent topic, agent action, prompt builder, Einstein, Trust Layer, grounding, RAG, guardrails, agent evaluation, prompt injection. Finds and opens the exact skill package to read; it does not contain the guidance itself.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Pre-landing PR review. Analyzes diff against main for SQL safety, LLM trust boundary violations, conditional side effects, and other structural issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

ที่ปรึกษาวางแผนมรดกไทย — พินัยกรรม, trust, ส่งต่อทรัพย์สิน, ภาษีการรับมรดก, การโอนทรัพย์สินระหว่างรุ่น

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Add /compact command for manual context compaction. Solves context rot in long sessions by forwarding the SDK's built-in /compact slash command. Main-group or trusted sender only.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Verify a native LLM voting advisor before trusting advisor-sensitive evaluations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trust-boundary security audit of cqs — fans out unbiddable-auditor agents across 6 categories (RT-INJ/RT-FS/RT-RES/RT-DATA/RT-RELAY/RT-EXFIL), attacker mindset, run-the-attack PoC + regression guard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design AI-first interfaces that build ongoing relationships through memory, trust evolution, and collaborative planning, not just isolated screen interactions

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Polished, business-ready design with modern typography, structured layouts, and a trustworthy visual identity.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。