7,566 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Investigate LLM spend in PostHog — total cost over time, cost by model, provider, user, trace, or custom dimension, token and cache-hit economics, and cost regressions. Use when the user asks "how much are we spending on LLMs?", "which model / user / feature is most expensive?", "why did cost spike?", wants to build a cost dashboard or alert, or pastes a trace URL and asks about its cost.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guides agents through creating and safely sizing a Replay Vision scanner: choosing the scanner type (monitor/classifier/scorer/summarizer), shaping the RecordingsQuery that selects sessions, and — crucially — estimating observation volume and checking the org's monthly quota before creating, so a broad scanner doesn't exhaust the budget on its first scheduled sweep. TRIGGER when: user asks to create, set up, or configure a Replay Vision scanner, OR when you are about to call vision-scanners-create, OR when widening an existing scanner's query or sampling_rate via vision-scanners-update. DO NOT TRIGGER when: only reading scanners or observations, deleting a scanner, or running an existing scanner against a single session on demand (vision-scanners-scan-session).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Set up an LLM-judge evaluation that extracts canonical use cases for a PostHog feature at scale and streams the results to a Slack channel as a live feed. Use when someone wants to understand how users are actually using a specific AI/LLM-powered feature in production — what they're investigating, what questions they're trying to answer, and what patterns surface — without manually reading hundreds of traces. Assumes the feature emits `$ai_generation` and `$ai_evaluation` events with `$session_id` linkage to the trigger user's recording (the standard setup post the session-summary linkage PRs).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Solve a hard problem by trying multiple approaches in parallel using isolated git worktrees. Each attempt runs in its own branch, and the best solution is selected. Use for complex refactors, tricky bugs, or architectural decisions where multiple strategies could work.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create a recurring AI-generated PostHog report — schedule a free-text prompt to run on a cron, with the LLM-synthesized markdown delivered to email or Slack on each tick. Use when the user wants a recurring AI summary of X on any cadence (daily, weekly, monthly, yearly) rather than a one-off report. (To attach an AI summary to an existing insight/dashboard subscription instead of a free-text prompt, see `managing-subscriptions` and its `summary_enabled` option.)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Run TypeScript type checking after file edits and immediately flag type errors before moving on. Uses Cursor hooks for automatic enforcement.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configures the analytics side of a PostHog experiment — exposure criteria (default `$feature_flag_called` vs custom exposure events), primary and secondary metrics, the supported metric types (count, sum, ratio with `math` and `math_property`, retention with `retention_window_start` and `start_handling`), multivariate user handling ("Exclude" vs "First seen variant"), and how to read results once the experiment is live. Use when the user adds or edits a primary or secondary metric (e.g. "add a secondary metric tracking 'downloaded_file' per user"), sets up a ratio metric (e.g. "revenue from purchase_completed / pageviews"), sets up a retention metric (e.g. "$pageview → uploaded_file, 7-day window"), configures custom exposure (e.g. "only count users who hit /checkout"), changes multivariate handling, or asks "who is in the analysis?", "how do I measure impact?", "is this winning?", "what's the confidence level?", or "should I ship?".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Configures the rollout shape of a PostHog experiment — the variant split (50/50, 80/20, A/B/C ratios), the overall rollout percentage that gates how many users enter the experiment, and the disambiguation when a percentage like "roll out to 25%" could mean either. Use when the user mentions a rollout percentage, variant split, or traffic distribution; gives a ratio like 60/40, 70/30, or 80/20; asks "who sees the test variant?"; wants to increase, decrease, or change the rollout or split on a draft or running experiment; weighs equal vs uneven splits; or proposes a mid-experiment split change (often an anti-pattern that needs reset or end-and-restart).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
ALWAYS use this skill when committing code changes — never commit directly without it. Creates commits following Sentry conventions with proper conventional commit format and issue references. Trigger on any commit, git commit, save changes, or commit message task.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Ask which skill or flow fits your situation. A router over the user-invoked skills in this repo.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Google quantum computing framework. Use when targeting Google Quantum AI hardware, designing noise-aware circuits, or running quantum characterization experiments. Best for Google hardware, noise modeling, and low-level circuit design. For IBM hardware use qiskit; for quantum ML with autodiff use pennylane; for physics simulations use qutip.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Hardware-agnostic quantum ML framework with automatic differentiation. Use when training quantum circuits via gradients, building hybrid quantum-classical models, or needing device portability across IBM/Google/Rigetti/IonQ. Best for variational algorithms (VQE, QAOA), quantum neural networks, and integration with PyTorch/JAX/TensorFlow. For hardware-specific optimizations use qiskit (IBM) or cirq (Google); for open quantum systems use qutip.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Statistical modeling — linear/logistic/ordinal/Poisson regression, ANOVA, Kruskal-Wallis, chi-square, Mann-Whitney, Cox survival, spline fits (R `ns()`), odds ratios, Cohen's d, F-statistic, p-value computation. Specializes in clinical-trial AE analysis (SDTM DM/AE), severity ordinal regression, and per-feature stat workflows.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Produce and interpret PCA, t-SNE, UMAP, and PHATE plots for high-dimensional omics data with rigor about which method preserves what (variance, local structure, manifold, transitions), hyperparameter sensitivity, and the well-documented limits of 2D embeddings. Covers PCA biplot/scree/loadings, t-SNE PCA initialization (Kobak-Berens 2019), UMAP n_neighbors/min_dist trade-offs, and the Chari-Pachter 2023 critique. Use when visualizing high-dimensional data — bulk PCA, single-cell embeddings, multi-omics integration projections.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build interactive HTML/web visualizations with plotly (Python/R), bokeh (Python), and gganimate/plotly frames for animation, with awareness of current Kaleido static-export model (post-orca-EOL), HTML file-size bloat, and the limits of interactive-only output for journal submission. Use when producing zoomable/hoverable plots for notebook EDA, supplementary HTML, dashboards, or animated time-course / iteration visualizations.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Rigorous methodology for evaluating ML models on established benchmarks. Covers proper train/val/test splits, baseline verification from original papers, exact metric formula discrepancies, data-leak detection checklist, multi-seed robustness, and honest reporting templates. Use when claiming to beat published baselines, writing methods papers, or auditing existing results.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze nonlinear dynamical systems — phase portraits, fixed points, stability analysis, bifurcation diagrams, Poincare sections, Lyapunov exponents, and chaos detection. Use for any autonomous or non-autonomous ODE system where qualitative behavior matters.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Automated dimensional analysis — Buckingham Pi theorem, non-dimensionalization, unit validation with pint, and characteristic scale estimation. Use before any physics computation to verify consistency and reduce parameter space.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Maps query single-cell data onto reference atlases and transfers cell-type labels using scArches surgery (scVI/scANVI), Symphony, Azimuth, CellTypist, scPoli, popV, and foundation models, with explicit out-of-distribution and label-transfer uncertainty. Use when annotating new single-cell datasets against a pre-trained reference, deciding which mapping method fits, or judging whether transferred labels are trustworthy. For de novo clustering and manual annotation see single-cell/cell-annotation; for batch integration without a reference see single-cell/batch-integration.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Fast in-memory DataFrame library for datasets that fit in RAM. Use when pandas is too slow but data still fits in memory. Lazy evaluation, parallel execution, Apache Arrow backend. Best for 1-100GB datasets, ETL pipelines, faster pandas replacement. For larger-than-RAM data use dask or vaex.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrates an end-to-end immune-repertoire pipeline from FASTQ to clonotypes, diversity, overlap, somatic hypermutation and lineages, routing on two forks. Use when deciding bulk vs single-cell (bulk amplicon/RNA-seq -> MiXCR analyze preset -> VDJtools/immunarch depth-normalized diversity and overlap -> figures; 10x paired VDJ -> MiXCR 10x preset or Cell Ranger -> scirpy gene-expression integration, chain QC, clonotype clusters); and TCR vs BCR (TCR -> exact CDR3-nt+V/J clonotypes, VDJtools diversity is fine; BCR -> somatic hypermutation makes exact clonotypes wrong -> Immcantation distToNearest/findThreshold clonal clustering, germline reconstruction, SHM, Dowser lineages); selecting the MiXCR 4.x preset by chemistry and activating its license; downsampling to equal depth before comparing diversity or overlap; and optionally annotating antigen specificity.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use this skill when working with symbolic mathematics in Python. This skill should be used for symbolic computation tasks including solving equations algebraically, performing calculus operations (derivatives, integrals, limits), manipulating algebraic expressions, working with matrices symbolically, physics calculations, number theory problems, geometry computations, and generating executable code from mathematical expressions. Apply this skill when the user needs exact symbolic results rather than numerical approximations, or when working with mathematical formulas that contain variables and parameters.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end post-GWAS causal inference pipeline orchestrating heritability partitioning, genetic correlation, Mendelian randomization with CHP-aware sensitivity (CAUSE / LHC-MR), colocalization, fine-mapping with SuSiE / FOCUS, mediation, TWAS triangulation, cis-pQTL drug-target MR, effector-gene prioritization (L2G / PoPS / cS2G), and GenomicSEM common-factor GWAS. Use when triangulating causal inference across multiple complementary methods, prioritizing tissues via stratified LDSC, nominating or de-risking drug targets, mapping a lead SNP to a candidate effector gene, modeling shared genetic architecture across correlated traits, or producing a STROBE-MR-compliant publication-grade evidence battery from GWAS summary statistics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
End-to-end GWAS workflow from VCF to association results. Covers PLINK QC, population structure correction, and association testing for case-control or quantitative traits. Use when running genome-wide association studies.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。