「nda」の検索結果

Use this skill any time a spreadsheet file is the primary input or output. This means any task where the user wants to: open, read, edit, or fix an existing .xlsx, .xlsm, .xltx, .csv, or .tsv file (e.g., adding columns, computing formulas, formatting, charting, cleaning messy data); create a new spreadsheet from scratch or from other data sources; or convert between tabular file formats. Trigger especially when the user references a spreadsheet file by name or path — even casually (like "the xlsx in my downloads") — and wants something done to it or produced from it. Also trigger for cleaning or restructuring messy tabular data files (malformed rows, misplaced headers, junk data) into proper spreadsheets. The deliverable must be a spreadsheet file. Do NOT trigger when the primary deliverable is a Word document, HTML report, standalone Python script, database pipeline, or Google Sheets API integration, even if tabular data is involved.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design Gmail, Drive, Sheets, and Calendar automations with scope-aware plans. Use for repeatable daily task automation with explicit OAuth scopes and audit-ready outputs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assess lateral movement and pivot paths across authorized internal trust boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan reproducible ML experiment runs with explicit parameters, metrics, and artifacts. Use before model training to standardize tracking-ready experiment definitions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit and optimize a skill system with evidence. Use for skill architecture, token or context waste, role and prompt boundaries, routing hits or misfires, plugin packaging, registry/docs/source drift, duplicate workflows, or deciding whether a reusable change belongs in a skill. Runs deterministic checks first and applies only authorized, minimal fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GStack spec method for turning fuzzy intent into an executable spec with goals, non-goals, acceptance criteria, risks, and downstream role boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when splitting content work between a raw drafting model/window, an editor-in-chief, and the user's final taste review. It keeps prompts loose enough for judgment while preserving facts, account boundaries, and publish gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GStack guard method for strengthening scope boundaries, forbidden actions, stop conditions, and validation gates for an agent or workstream.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GStack engineering-manager plan review for architecture, data flow, APIs, migrations, edge cases, tests, performance, release risk, and implementation boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prompt and workflow for generating conventional commit messages using a structured XML format. Guides users to create standardized, descriptive commit messages in line with the Conventional Commits specification, including instructions, examples, and validation. Use when writing commit messages for a repository that follows Conventional Commits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate pragmatic CI/CD pipelines from detected project stack signals — fast baseline generation, repeatable checks, environment-aware deployment stages. Use when setting up CI for a new project, refactoring existing pipelines, or standardizing deployment workflows across multiple repos.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

GitHub Copilot to craft immersive, high-performance web experiences with advanced motion, typography, and architectural craftsmanship. Use when a web page should feel premium and immersive rather than standard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive guide for creating professional UI/UX designs in Penpot using MCP tools. Use this skill when: (1) Creating new UI/UX designs for web, mobile, or desktop applications, (2) Building design systems with components and tokens, (3) Designing dashboards, forms, navigation, or landing pages, (4) Applying accessibility standards and best practices, (5) Following platform guidelines (iOS, Android, Material Design), (6) Reviewing or improving existing Penpot designs for usability. Triggers: "design a UI", "create interface", "build layout", "design dashboard", "create form", "design landing page", "make it accessible", "design system", "component library".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate flat, minimal light/dark-aware SVG diagrams as standalone HTML files, using a unified educational visual language with 9 semantic color ramps, sentence-case typography, and automatic dark mode. Best suited for educational and non-software visuals — physics setups, chemistry mechanisms, math curves, physical objects (aircraft, turbines, smartphones, mechanical watches), anatomy, floor plans, cross-sections, narrative journeys (lifecycle of X, process of Y), hub-spoke system integrations (smart city, IoT), and exploded layer views. If a more specialized skill exists for the subject (dedicated software/cloud architecture, hand-drawn sketches, animated explainers, etc.), prefer that — otherwise this skill can also serve as a general-purpose SVG diagram fallback with a clean educational look. Ships with 15 example diagrams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

PostgreSQL-specific code review assistant focusing on PostgreSQL best practices, anti-patterns, and unique quality standards. Covers JSONB operations, array usage, custom types, schema design, function optimization, and PostgreSQL-exclusive security features like Row Level Security (RLS). Use when reviewing SQL, schema, or functions written for PostgreSQL.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structured decision-making framework for technical proposals and trade-off analysis. When the user faces a choice between multiple approaches (architecture decisions, tool selection, refactoring strategies, migration paths), this skill produces a 1-3-1 format: one clear problem statement, three distinct options with pros/cons, and one concrete recommendation with definition of done and implementation plan. Use when the user asks for a "1-3-1", says "give me options", or needs help choosing between competing approaches.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews and fixes Swift concurrency: Swift 6 strict-concurrency compiler errors, Sendable conformance, actor isolation, @MainActor, and data-race safety. Use when migrating async code to Swift 6 or resolving concurrency diagnostics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Establishes a project's quality bar as a written contract and stops agents quietly lowering it. Interviews the user on which dimensions matter, supplies sane default thresholds when they have no number in mind, records everything in CONSTRAINTS.md, and watches the diff for a weakened bar — new @ts-ignore or eslint-disable suppressions, skipped or deleted tests, assertions stripped out, unimplemented stubs, thresholds edited down. Use when no quality bar is written down, when the user says "set up constraints" or "define our standards", when the user wants dimensions they care about — accessibility, web performance, coverage — set up as enforced constraints, when an agent keeps silencing checks or skipping tests to get to green, when you need a coverage or performance threshold and don't know what number to pick, or when an agent writes more code than anyone will read.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when designing new API endpoints, defining module boundaries or contracts between teams, creating component prop interfaces, or changing an existing public interface. Covers naming, versioning, error shapes, and designing surfaces that are hard to misuse.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when writing, reviewing, or refactoring production code where reliability, portability, maintainability, explicit contracts, resource safety, and cross-language coding standards matter across Python, TS/JS, C, C++, Rust, or Go.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cloud design patterns for distributed systems architecture covering 42 industry-standard patterns across reliability, performance, messaging, security, and deployment categories. Use when choosing architecture patterns for reliability, performance, messaging, or security in a distributed cloud system.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when building or modifying user-facing interfaces: new components and pages, responsive layouts, interactivity and state management, or fixing visual and UX issues. Covers component architecture, styling, accessibility, and state boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Cross-functional organizational health check combining signals from all C-suite roles. Scores 8 dimensions on a traffic-light scale with drill-down recommendations. Use when assessing overall company health, preparing for board reviews, identifying at-risk functions, or when user mentions org health, health check, or health dashboard.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when raw SaaS numbers need turning into a health verdict — MRR, ARR, churn, CAC, LTV, payback, burn multiple, NRR. Calculates the metrics, benchmarks them against industry standards, and returns prioritized, plain-English advice as a senior SaaS CFO would.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。