「aims」の検索結果

Verify completion and success claims with fresh evidence. Use before claiming a task is complete, a fix works, tests pass, or a feature is ready for GO.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Adversarial verification of one SDD Composy task in verify_required: reproduce every claim with fresh commands, build the truth table, refute stale evidence, and produce the verdict that gates complete. Use when review is done and the task claims to be finished — 'verificar a TASK-003', 'a task está pronta mesmo?', 'is this task really complete'. Do NOT use for QA, code review, or a general 'verify my work' outside an SDD task.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Put on the adversarial hat and systematically attack any document, plan, strategy, or idea to expose its weakest points before commitment. Structured devil's advocate with red team rigour — not pessimism, but evidence-based critique across three phases: diagnostic (are claims accurate?), creative (is the problem artificially constrained?), challenge (are solutions robust?). Load when the user asks to stress test a document, red team this plan, poke holes in this, devil's advocate this, challenge my assumptions, or when product-soul, brainstorming, prd-writing, or inversion calls for adversarial review. Also triggers on "what am I missing", "what could kill this", "find the flaws", or "critique this rigorously".

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyse experiment results, run validity checks (SRM, exposure parity, data integrity, novelty/primacy), interpret causally, make a ship/iterate/kill decision against the pre-declared rule, and append to cumulative learnings. Forces honest readouts — strips significance claims from underpowered or peek-violating tests; never lets directional results masquerade as causal wins. Load when results exist, or when the user says "read out this experiment", "analyse the test", "did the test win", "interpret the results", "what did we learn", "ship or kill", or when the experimentation orchestrator routes here.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Delimits putative species boundaries from molecular data within the de Queiroz 2007 unified-lineage framework using ASAP (Puillandre 2021 successor to ABGD), mPTP C++ (Kapli 2017 successor to bPTP; bPTP is Python NOT R), GMYC single/multi-threshold (Pons 2006; Fujisawa 2013), multilocus BPP v4 with prior calibration from data (NOT defaults; Yang 2015), SNAPP + BFD* for SNP delimitation, DELINEATE (Sukumaran 2021) speciation-process modeling to address Sukumaran & Knowles 2017 PNAS critique that MSC delimits structure not species, integrative-taxonomy congruence (Padial 2010; Carstens 2013), Dsuite for introgression testing before sister claims (Malinsky 2021), and Meyer & Paulay 2005 barcoding-gap-absence caveat. Use when delineating species from DNA barcoding data, resolving cryptic complexes, choosing among ASAP/mPTP/BPP/DELINEATE, calibrating BPP priors, distinguishing introgression from ILS, or applying the Sukumaran-Knowles oversplitting correction.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs subgroup and heterogeneous treatment effect (HTE) analyses for clinical trials. Covers Mantel-Haenszel pooling, Breslow-Day, interaction tests in regression, RERI for additive interaction, modern data-adaptive HTE methods (STEPP, SIDES, causal forests, X/R-learners), Bayesian shrinkage (Dixon-Simon, MAP, EXNEX), graphical multiplicity (Bretz-Maurer), and credibility frameworks (Sun BMJ, EMA 2019). Use when analyzing treatment effects across patient subgroups for regulatory submissions or precision-medicine claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use this skill when the user asks about workers compensation for trucking — required by state law, classification of drivers, premium calculation (rate × experience modifier × payroll), Common Claim types in trucking, returning injured drivers to work, claims management, premium reduction strategies, and the difference between WC and Occupational Accident insurance for owner-operators. Reference state WC laws + IFTA / fleet insurance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Validate one Coval judge against independent human labels, with grouped development/test separation, class-specific errors and uncertainty. Use for trust claims or calibration; without real labels, prepare review rather than inventing ground truth.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

THE full UI surface checklist (S1–S18) run on one assigned surface. Use for a named surface check, `/surface-check <surface>`, or a claimed `surface-certification` Work Loop item. NOT for fleet selection or claims (use surface-certification-loop).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

The cross-repo scheduling system (sch_* tables, matrx-scheduler). Use when touching features/scheduling/**, /schedules or /administration/scheduling, migrations/sch_*.sql, a scheduled agent, cron, trigger, lease, or claim, or debugging ghost tasks, missed fires, double-runs, or stuck claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinator for the fleet that repairs and independently certifies registered UI surfaces through Work Loop claims. Use for pilot batches, recurring certification, repair rounds, or retroactive rechecks after surface-check rules change. NOT for one assigned surface (use surface-check).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Debug and troubleshoot WorkOS AuthKit authentication issues with Convex. Use when authentication fails, JWT validation errors occur, user identity returns null, email claims are missing, admin access checks fail, or sign in button does not work. Supports Netlify deployment.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[70] CLOSE. Manage task lifecycle with correct statuses and no duplicates. Ensure each task has one status, artifacts match claims, and no task appears in multiple places. Use when managing task lists, updating progress, or ensuring task tracking integrity across systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when about to claim work is complete, fixed, or passing, before committing or creating PRs - requires running verification commands and confirming output before making any success claims; evidence before assertions always

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Local-first insurance record organizer for tracking policies, renewals, claims logs, and related insurance records. Use when the user wants to store policy details, list recorded policies, track renewal dates, log claim events, or summarize insurance records. NEVER provides insurance advice, recommends coverage amounts, or facilitates policy purchases.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find and own a defensible market position. Use when messaging sounds like competitors, conversion is weak despite awareness, repositioning a product, or testing positioning claims. Includes Crawl-Walk-Run rollout methodology and the word change that improved enterprise deal progression.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Three-layer verification pipeline for AI output. Extracts verifiable claims, finds supporting or contradicting sources via web search, runs adversarial review for hallucination patterns, and produces a structured verification report with source links for human review.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Human verification for AI agents. Submit claims, draft responses, or observation requests to human domain experts via the 2O API. Returns structured verdicts with confidence scores and evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate or materially revise a repository-local test plan, QA plan, acceptance matrix, or regression checklist on explicit request or when one concrete testability gap blocks formal DEFINE; do not trigger for ordinary implementation, test execution, TDD, review, or completion claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate or edit a source-grounded newsletter issue, digest, or briefing from provided or researched sources. Use for weekly/monthly updates, curated links, executive digests, community newsletters, or "turn these sources into a newsletter"; do not use for UI landing pages, marketing campaign design, unsourced news claims, or long-form research reports.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyze source data, tables, CSV/XLSX extracts, metrics, or experiment results with explicit data-authenticity checks. Use for profiling, cleaning assumptions, statistical summaries, segmentation, trend analysis, or "analyze this data"; do not use for spreadsheet file surgery, chart design only, database migrations, or claims without data provenance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Structure source-grounded consulting-style analysis for strategy, market, product, operations, or decision memos. Use for MECE problem framing, hypotheses, options, tradeoffs, executive recommendations, or "consulting analysis" requests; do not use for legal/financial advice, implementation, data computation, chart rendering, or unsourced business claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when choosing a journal for a finished or nearly finished manuscript, when index status in Scopus, SSCI, ESCI, or TR Dizin must be confirmed, when a venue looks predatory, or when a cover letter needs drafting from the manuscript's actual claims.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。