「analyzing」の検索結果

Use when analyzing suspected malware through static, dynamic, and behavioral techniques, including IOC extraction, YARA or Sigma rules, sandboxing, and anti-analysis behavior.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure debugging, bundle analysis, and ecosystem tools for React applications. Use when setting up Vite/webpack build tooling, analyzing bundle size, debugging re-renders with React DevTools, or configuring ESLint and StrictMode for React projects.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conduct high-quality, persona-driven code reviews. Use when reviewing PRs, critiquing code quality, or analyzing changes for team feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when anything in a Phoenix app is slow, times out, or uses too much memory, even if the cause looks obvious. Load it before analyzing or fixing: it runs measured Ecto, LiveView and OTP checks and ranks fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when anything in a Phoenix app is slow, times out, or uses too much memory, even if the cause looks obvious. Load it before analyzing or fixing: it runs measured Ecto, LiveView and OTP checks and ranks fixes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Find similar vulnerabilities and bugs across codebases using pattern-based analysis. Use when hunting bug variants, building CodeQL/Semgrep queries, analyzing security vulnerabilities, or performing systematic code audits after finding an initial issue.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Detects fail-open insecure defaults (hardcoded secrets, weak auth, permissive security) that allow apps to run insecurely in production. Use when auditing security, reviewing config management, or analyzing environment variable handling.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a feature architecture by analyzing existing codebase patterns and conventions, then provide a comprehensive implementation blueprint with specific files to create or modify, component designs, data flows, and a build sequence. Use this skill when the user asks for an architecture design, an implementation plan for a non-trivial feature, or when dispatched as a sub-task during feature-dev architecture phase.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Track and visualize ML training experiments with Trackio. Use when logging metrics during training (Python API), firing alerts for training diagnostics, or retrieving/analyzing logged metrics (CLI). Supports real-time dashboard visualization, alerts with webhooks, HF Space syncing, and JSON output for automation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Performs root-cause analysis of a bug — from a GitHub issue, an issue URL, or a free-text description — before any reproduction or fix is written. TRIGGER when: triaging or diagnosing a bug, investigating why something misbehaves, an issue number/URL handed over for analysis, needing the root cause before touching code. DO NOT TRIGGER when: a failing reproduction test already exists and you are ready to fix → opsmill-dev-fixing-bugs; writing that reproduction test → opsmill-dev-test-driving-bugs; capturing a new bug as a ticket → opsmill-dev-creating-issues.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Writes a single failing test that reproduces a bug after its root-cause analysis is complete, before any fix is written. TRIGGER when: a bug has a completed root-cause analysis and you need the failing reproduction test, writing a test that proves a bug exists, the second step of the bug-fixing pipeline. DO NOT TRIGGER when: still triaging or diagnosing the bug → opsmill-dev-analyzing-bugs; implementing the fix once the test exists → opsmill-dev-fixing-bugs; general feature test-first work → superpowers test-driven-development.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Implements and validates the fix for a bug once a failing reproduction test exists. TRIGGER when: a bug has a failing reproduction test and you are ready to make it pass, implementing the root-cause fix, the final step of the bug-fixing pipeline. DO NOT TRIGGER when: no reproduction test exists yet → opsmill-dev-test-driving-bugs; still diagnosing, or asked to fix a bug with no analysis or reproduction test yet → opsmill-dev-analyzing-bugs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes recent CI failures on pull requests to identify flaky tests, using retry outcomes (failed attempt → green re-run) and cross-PR recurrence as evidence, and maintains a local longitudinal ledger so flakiness can be tracked over time. TRIGGER when: the user wants to find flaky tests, correlate recent CI failures, check which tests fail across PRs or recover on retry, or refresh the flakiness trend report. DO NOT TRIGGER when: babysitting a single PR's CI until green → monitoring-pull-requests; diagnosing or fixing one specific failing test → the bug-analysis skills.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Open, create, read, analyze, edit, or validate Excel/spreadsheet files (.xlsx, .xlsm, .csv, .tsv). Use when the user asks to create, build, modify, analyze, read, validate, or format any Excel spreadsheet, financial model, pivot table, or tabular data file. Covers: creating new xlsx from scratch, reading and analyzing existing files, editing existing xlsx with zero format loss, formula recalculation and validation, and applying professional financial formatting standards. Triggers on 'spreadsheet', 'Excel', '.xlsx', '.csv', 'pivot table', 'financial model', 'formula', or any request to produce tabular data in Excel format.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize SQL query performance through EXPLAIN analysis, indexing strategies, and query rewriting for PostgreSQL, MySQL, and SQL Server. Use when debugging slow queries, analyzing execution plans, or improving database performance.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure and collect crash dumps for modern .NET applications. USE FOR: enabling automatic crash dumps for CoreCLR or NativeAOT, capturing dumps from running .NET processes, setting up dump collection in Docker or Kubernetes, using dotnet-dump collect or createdump. DO NOT USE FOR: analyzing or debugging dumps, post-mortem investigation with lldb/windbg/dotnet-dump analyze, profiling or tracing, or for .NET Framework processes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate MSBuild binary logs (binlogs) for build diagnostics and analysis. USE FOR: adding /bl:{} to any dotnet build, test, pack, publish, or restore command to capture a full build execution trace, prerequisite for binlog-failure-analysis and build-perf-diagnostics skills, enabling post-build investigation of errors or performance. Requires MSBuild 17.8+ / .NET 8 SDK+ for {} placeholder; PowerShell must quote the complete switch as '-bl:{}'. DO NOT USE FOR: non-MSBuild build systems (npm, Maven, CMake), analyzing an existing binlog (use binlog-failure-analysis instead).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose MSBuild build performance bottlenecks using binary log analysis. USE FOR: identifying why builds are slow by analyzing binlog performance summaries, detecting ResolveAssemblyReference (RAR) taking >5s, Roslyn analyzers consuming >30% of Csc time, single targets dominating >50% of build time, node utilization below 80%, excessive Copy tasks, NuGet restore running every build. Covers timeline analysis, Target/Task Performance Summary interpretation, and 7 common bottleneck categories. Use after build-perf-baseline has established measurements. DO NOT USE FOR: establishing initial baselines (use build-perf-baseline first), fixing incremental build issues (use incremental-build), parallelism tuning (use build-parallelism), non-MSBuild build systems.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Conversion funnel analysis with drop-off investigation. Use when analyzing multi-step processes, identifying conversion bottlenecks, comparing segments through a funnel, or optimizing user journeys.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Customer/user segmentation with actionable insights. Use when identifying distinct customer groups, analyzing segment-specific behavior, profiling high-value segments, or testing segmentation hypotheses.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Temporal pattern detection and forecasting. Use when analyzing trends over time, detecting seasonality, identifying anomalies in time series, or building simple forecasting models for planning.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rigorous A/B test statistical analysis. Use when analyzing experiment results, calculating statistical significance, checking for sample ratio mismatch, or validating test design before launch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Audit websites for SEO, technical, content, security, JS rendering, and AI readiness using SEOmator CLI. Returns LLM-optimized reports with health scores across 373 rules and 20 categories, and can diff two audits to show what a deploy changed. Use when analyzing websites, debugging SEO issues, checking site health, or comparing a site before and after a change.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write SEO-optimized blog posts, landing pages, and long-form page copy following Google's E-E-A-T and Helpful Content guidelines. Handles new content creation from a keyword, topic, or brief, and full-page rewrites. Use when asked to "write a blog post", "create a landing page", "write content about X", "content for keyword X", "draft an article", "blog post about", "landing page for", "service page", "product page copy", "rewrite this page", "how-to guide", or "listicle". NOT for analyzing/auditing existing content (seo-geo-optimizer, content-quality-auditor), title tags or meta descriptions (meta-tags-optimizer), or keyword expansion (keyword-research) — those skills own their triggers.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。