「capture」の検索結果

Use when building email features, emails going to spam, high bounce rates, setting up SPF/DKIM/DMARC authentication, implementing email capture, ensuring compliance (CAN-SPAM, GDPR, CASL), handling webhooks, retry logic, making emails accessible (alt text, headings, contrast, screen readers), or deciding transactional vs marketing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Install or diagnose the local GreenBubbles CLI and read-only WeChat access. Use for a missing CLI, failed database access, source selection, or initial owner-operated key capture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Extract sourced FF&E specifications from supplied product PDFs into reviewable structured data. Use for fact sheets, spec sheets and price books; not web-page capture, EPD extraction or automatic schedule adoption.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Route Shift documentation, architecture notes, and tickets correctly. Use when Codex is about to create or move docs, write an architecture plan, capture a design decision, create a ticket, or update repo documentation for Shift.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Construction safety incident reporting and analysis. Capture incidents, conduct investigations, track corrective actions, and analyze trends for prevention.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews pull requests with scope validation, requirements compliance, and line comments. Use when reviewing GitHub or GitLab PRs.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Converts a Claude Code session into a blog post, case study, or Reddit post. Use when publishing dev blog content or community posts from real sessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Automates desktop GUI workflows via computer use API with screenshot capture. Use when scripting GUI interactions or recording browser sessions for tutorials.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Converts a Claude Code session JSONL file into an animated GIF terminal replay. Use when creating demos or visual evidence from past sessions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Captures and retrieves PR-review findings in memory palaces. Use after PR review to store architectural decisions, patterns, and standards for future reference.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Models a business in its own language. Use when the domain has real business rules to capture.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when a pipeline DOT file has passed structural validation but may still have flow inefficiencies, spec fidelity gaps, or information loss in prompts. Use after dotfile-audit or dotfile-from-spec when you want to deeply verify a pipeline captures everything from the original spec. Use when prompts might be missing critical domain rules, data models, or invariants.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use XcodeBuildMCP to build, run, launch, and debug the current iOS project on a booted simulator. Trigger when asked to run an iOS app, interact with the simulator UI, inspect on-screen state, capture logs/console output, or diagnose runtime behavior using XcodeBuildMCP tools.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Assemble a report-ready walkthrough.md for a SOLVED engagement - populate the Evidence gallery from the poc/ images captured during the engagement, and draft the step-by-step reproduction from state/loot/log (Killchain.md for pentest/bugbounty, state.md's Chain/Status for ctf) without fabricating. Use when asked to "write the walkthrough", "assemble the walkthrough", "close out the box/engagement", or at close-out once an engagement is marked SOLVED.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture a Burp Suite Repeater request/response as a PoC image (targets/<eng>/poc/) by driving the Burp MCP + the Kali GUI. Replays a request in a Repeater tab, sends it, and grabs the request+response panes - a Burp-native PoC (client report / CTF writeup). Use when you want the evidence to come from Burp rather than a curl/terminal card, or whenever you drive a target through Burp and need the images. Pairs with hunt-burp.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Main app unit testing patterns (BaseUnitTest, BDD naming, mockito-kotlin, AssertJ, StateFlow/LiveData capture, coroutine dispatchers). Use when writing, editing, exploring, debugging, or reviewing unit tests in the store management app. For POS (WooPos*) tests, use the `pos-tests` skill instead.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Prove that a reported run caused its intended real effect. Walk the executor path from entry to effect, capture one observable per hop, and report a result a no-op could not produce.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Comprehensive patterns for creating, maintaining, and managing Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) that capture the context and rationale behind significant technical decisions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture and retrieve durable YYLO Ledger artifact Records with intentional profiles, payload modes, provenance, retention, and secret-safe immutable evidence.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Capture structured feedback on the Han skills and agents used in the current session and optionally post it as a GitHub issue to testdouble/han. Use at the end of any session where one or more han-* skills or agents ran, to rate a run, log what worked and what didn't, or submit observations for maintainers. Does not review code, investigate bugs, or research options; use code-review, investigate, or research for those. Does not provide feedback on skills or agents from non-Han plugins.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run a comprehensive code review on local source files. Use this skill when the user asks to review, audit, inspect, evaluate, or check code, even if they never use the word "review." Does not post comments to GitHub pull requests — use post-code-review-to-pr for that. Does not analyze architectural structure or module boundaries — use architectural-analysis for that. Does not explain code or a PR to build understanding before reviewing — use code-overview for a written overview, or code-walkthrough to be paced through it one step at a time. Does not map bounded contexts or domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis for that. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Evidence-based investigation of issues, bugs, API calls, integrations, and other aspects of software development that need a deep dive to find the root cause and solutions. Use when you need to debug, troubleshoot, diagnose, or figure out why something is broken. Does not review code for quality or style — use code-review for auditing changes or post-code-review-to-pr for posting review feedback to GitHub. Does not assess architectural health or structural risk — use architectural-analysis for architectural concerns. Does not research open-ended options, prior art, or how something works when nothing is broken — use research for that. Does not plan the structural change a root cause calls for — use plan-a-change. Does not map bounded contexts or domain boundaries — use ddd-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback for that.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Researches an open-ended question — options, possible solutions, prior art, trade-offs, or how something works — and produces a durable, evidence-backed, adversarially-validated report that recommends an option without committing the team to any artifact. Use when you want to research approaches, weigh options, survey prior art or the state of the art, or understand how something works before committing to a direction. Does not diagnose a bug, failure, or root cause — use investigate. Does not specify a feature — use plan-a-feature. Does not create or update a coding standard — use coding-standard. Does not compare two concrete artifacts for gaps — use gap-analysis. Does not assess an existing module's architecture — use architectural-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan, produce, or diagnose evidence-backed product demo videos and screen-recorded promotional walkthroughs. Use when the user asks to make a product demo, launch video, feature showcase, app walkthrough, demo reel, or polished recording; wants every important capability shown without a slow feature tour; asks to remove dead time or fix narration-to-action pacing; or needs a repeatable script, capture plan, and verified final media. Do not use for fictional commercials with no real product proof, general-purpose video editing, or documentation-only tutorials that do not need a promotional narrative.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。