4,584 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Persistent state tracking and Architecture Decision Records across sessions. Use when recording a decision, ADR, or progress that must survive session boundaries. Manages progress state, module health, dependency graphs, and ADRs for any workflow.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
🇺🇸 Open-Source Marketing & GitHub Stars Growth System — Decision framework for each growth stage. Pre-launch readiness → Show HN / Reddit / Product Hunt launch → 6-month growth loop. README rules, KOL outreach, dev-content matrix (dev.to / Zenn), anti-star-farming. Built from taking AFFiNE 0 → 60K stars. 🇨🇳 开源营销与 GitHub Star 增长系统 — 每个增长阶段的决策框架。Pre-launch 就绪 → Show HN / Reddit / Product Hunt 发布 → 6 个月增长循环。README 规则、KOL 合作、开发者内容矩阵（dev.to / Zenn）、防刷 star。提炼自 AFFiNE 0 → 60K star 实战。 🇯🇵 オープンソースマーケティング＆GitHub スター成長システム — 各成長段階の意思決定フレームワーク。Pre-launch → Show HN / Reddit / Product Hunt → 6ヶ月成長ループ。READMEルール、KOL連携、開発者コンテンツマトリックス。 🇰🇷 오픈소스 마케팅 & GitHub 스타 성장 시스템 — 각 성장 단계별 의사결정 프레임워크. 사전 출시 → Show HN / Reddit / Product Hunt → 6개월 성장 루프. README 규칙, KOL 아웃리치, 개발자 콘텐츠 매트릭스. Triggers: "open source marketing" | "GitHub stars" | "star growth" | "Show HN" | "Hacker News launch" | "OSS launch" | "developer marketing" | "Reddit launch" | "dev.to" | "open source growth" | "开源营销" | "GitHub star 增长" | "开源发布" | "Show HN 怎么发" | "开发者营销" | "オープンソース" | "오픈소스 성장"
Act as an end-to-end data scientist: turn business questions into defensible analysis, validated models, and decision-ready reports. Use whenever the user asks to analyze, explore, or profile a dataset or CSV/Parquet/Excel file; asks what drives a metric or why a number changed ("why did churn go up?"); wants to test whether a difference is real (A/B tests, experiments, "is this significant?", "how many samples do I need?"); wants a predictive model (churn, forecast, scoring, segmentation, classification, regression); asks to review an existing analysis, notebook, or model for flaws; or needs results written up for decision-makers. Triggers in any language ("phân tích dữ liệu", "xây model dự đoán", "kiểm định A/B"), even when they never say "data science" or "statistics".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Facilitate a full design-thinking engagement (Empathize, Define, Ideate, Prototype, Test) grounded in real user evidence. Use whenever the user wants to understand users deeply and design a solution for them: "run design thinking", "understand our users", "design user interviews", "synthesize these interview notes", "build personas", "write How-Might-We questions", "prototype this concept", "design a usability test", "our users are churning and we don't know why", in any language ("tư duy thiết kế", "nghiên cứu người dùng", "phỏng vấn khách hàng", "デザイン思考", "设计思维"), even when they never say "design thinking". Also use when the user drops raw interview notes, transcripts, or survey exports and wants insights, personas, or product decisions. Not for "is there a market for X" desk questions (market-researcher).
Use when identifying cybersecurity-specific regulations and incident reporting obligations. Covers NIS2, DORA, SEC cyber disclosure rules, CISA incident reporting, state breach notification laws, cyber insurance requirements, and security certification frameworks. USE FOR: NIS2, DORA, SEC cybersecurity rules, CISA, breach notification, incident reporting, SOC 2, ISO 27001, cyber insurance, FedRAMP, StateRAMP, CMMC, data breach response DO NOT USE FOR: implementing security controls (use security skills), security testing tools (use security/security-testing), general data privacy (use privacy-data-protection)
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use the corp-finance-mcp server tools for specialty finance, regulatory, and compliance calculations. Invoke when performing private credit (unitranche, direct lending, syndication), insurance (loss reserving, premium pricing, Solvency II SCR), FP&A (variance analysis, break-even, working capital, rolling forecast), wealth management (retirement planning, tax-loss harvesting, estate planning), restructuring (recovery analysis, distressed debt), real assets (property valuation, project finance), venture capital (dilution, convertible instruments, fund returns), ESG (scoring, climate/carbon, green bonds, SLL), regulatory capital (Basel III, LCR/NSFR, ALM), compliance (MiFID II best execution, GIPS reporting), credit derivatives (CDS pricing, CVA/DVA), convertible bonds (binomial tree pricing, scenario analysis), lease accounting (ASC 842/IFRS 16, sale-leaseback), pension & LDI (funding analysis, liability-driven investing), sovereign risk (bond analysis, country risk), real options (binomial valuation, decision trees), equity research (SOTP, target price), commodity trading (spread analysis, storage economics), treasury management (cash management, hedge effectiveness), infrastructure finance (PPP models, concession valuation), crypto (token valuation, DeFi analysis), municipal bonds (pricing, credit analysis), structured products (notes, exotic), trade finance (LC, supply chain), fund structuring (US onshore, UK/EU, Cayman/BVI offshore, Luxembourg/Ireland), transfer pricing (BEPS/Pillar Two, intercompany pricing), tax treaty (treaty network optimization, holding structures), FATCA/CRS (reporting, entity classification), economic substance (multi-jurisdiction testing), regulatory reporting (AIFMD Annex IV, SEC Form PF, CFTC CPO-PQR), AML compliance (KYC risk scoring, sanctions screening), fund of funds (J-curve, commitment pacing, manager selection, secondaries pricing), bank analytics (NIM analysis, CAMELS rating, CECL provisioning, deposit beta, loan book), carbon markets (credit pricing, ETS compliance, CBAM, offset valuation, shadow carbon price), private wealth (concentrated stock, philanthropic vehicles, wealth transfer, direct indexing, family governance). All computation uses 128-bit decimal precision.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Activates Warren Buffett's complete investment thinking system. The following scenarios must trigger it: analyzing any stock or company, evaluating investment opportunities, interpreting financial reports/annual reports/shareholder letters, assessing business moats or competitive advantages, evaluating management quality and integrity, making buy/hold/sell decisions, understanding core value investing concepts (compounding/intrinsic value/margin of safety/circle of competence/Mr. Market), analyzing any industry (insurance/banking/consumer/media/energy/railroads/technology), handling capital allocation/buybacks/dividends questions, assessing market sentiment and macro risks, exploring when to sell, analyzing institutional imperative or management behavior. Even if the user does not mention "Buffett," proactively trigger whenever the topic involves investment analysis, business quality assessment, or investment decision-making.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Despliega soluciones de IA para insurance claims automation con arquitectura modular, metricas auditables y decisiones alineadas al contexto del dominio.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write a hardening playbook for a system or service — CIS benchmark mapping and implementation steps. Use when asked to "harden this server", "apply the CIS benchmark", or "write a hardening playbook".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Write an Architecture Decision Record — document what was decided, why, what alternatives were considered, and what trade-offs were accepted. Use when asked to "write an ADR", "document this decision", or "why did we choose X".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Engineering ethics covering safety, professional codes of conduct, public welfare responsibility, whistleblowing, case studies (Challenger, Columbia, Hyatt Regency, Bhopal, Therac-25), and the ethical dimensions of design decisions. Includes the NSPE Code of Ethics, the iron ring tradition, risk communication, informed consent in engineering, and the duty to dissent. Use when analyzing ethical dimensions of engineering decisions, teaching professional responsibility, or reviewing designs for safety and public welfare.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Organizational strategy and management theory for business decision-making. Covers objectives-based management, the knowledge-worker firm, decentralization, the five management tasks, strategy-as-practice, managerial roles, and the distinction between efficiency and effectiveness. Use when structuring an organization, setting objectives, allocating decision rights, or critiquing a strategy document.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Software design principles, patterns, and architecture from SOLID through distributed systems. Covers the five SOLID principles with violations and fixes, DRY/KISS/YAGNI heuristics, separation of concerns, 12 GoF design patterns organized by intent (creational, structural, behavioral), architectural patterns (MVC, MVP, MVVM, layered, hexagonal, microservices, event-driven), coupling and cohesion metrics, dependency injection, and the design decision framework for choosing between competing approaches. Use when making design decisions, reviewing architecture, refactoring code, or teaching software engineering principles.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Thinking frameworks for decisions and problem analysis. Use when evaluating options, root causes, or prioritizing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Traces decisions and requirements through GSD artifacts. Use when user asks "why did we...", "what happened to...", or mentions decision history.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Author and manage Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) in docs/specs/. Use when a significant architectural decision needs to be documented.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Access ClinPGx pharmacogenomics data (successor to PharmGKB). Query gene-drug interactions, CPIC guidelines, allele functions, for precision medicine and genotype-guided dosing decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Turns raw captures (dictated braindumps in a deliverable's inbox/, or recent macwhspr dictation-log entries) into proposed planning-wiki changes, shown as one unified diff. Classifies each statement as a decision, evidence claim, question, task, or dropped item, traces it to its capture paragraph, tags unconfirmed names, numbers, and citations UNRESOLVED, and writes decisions only with the author's assent. Edits only the planning wiki, never source files. Use when asked to intake, absorb notes, or process the inbox, or after dictating notes from a talk, meeting, or reading session.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interviews a researcher in rounds until an idea, design, or draft has no unexamined decision — numbered questions, each with why it matters and a recommended answer, facts looked up rather than asked, and settled decisions written to a file. Stages are idea (topic or hunch to a falsifiable question and contribution claim), design (estimand, identification, sample and power, measurement, analysis plan, pre-registration, venue), and defend (reviewer objections to a finished design or draft). Use when the user says "grill me", asks to stress-test or poke holes in an idea, design, or plan, asks what they are assuming, or brings an idea that is not yet a design. --plan grills software or process plans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plans a research project as a decision map that persists across sessions, resolving one ticket per session until the design is defensible and pre-registerable. The map lives as Markdown in the repository, literature sweeps run as parallel research tickets, and the resolved map compiles into a pre-analysis plan. Use at project start, when a design has more open decisions than one conversation can hold, or when planning restarts each session. Not for executing analyses or writing the paper.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interviews a researcher in rounds (idea, design, or defend stage) until no decision in a research idea, design, or draft is left assumed, recommending an answer to each question and writing settled decisions to a file. Use for 'grill me', stress-testing a design, or an idea not yet a design; --plan for software or process plans.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Codified expertise for returns authorization, receipt and inspection, disposition decisions, refund processing, fraud detection, and warranty claims management. Informed by returns operations managers with 15+ years experience. Includes grading frameworks, disposition economics, fraud pattern recognition, and vendor recovery processes. Use when handling product returns, reverse logistics, refund decisions, return fraud detection, or warranty claims.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Conduct market research, competitive analysis, investor due diligence, and industry intelligence with source attribution and decision-oriented summaries. Use when the user wants market sizing, competitor comparisons, fund research, technology scans, or research that informs business decisions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Advanced multi-agent reasoning system for complex questions requiring maximum accuracy. Uses adaptive technique selection, adversarial validation, multi-agent debate, and deep analysis. Trigger phrases "ai board", "expert panel", "deep analysis", "maximum accuracy", "thorough reasoning". Use for critical medical decisions, theological questions, philosophical analysis, complex technical problems, high-stakes decisions, or any question requiring 95%+ confidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。