「controls」の検索結果

Turns process notes, a walkthrough or interview transcript, a transcript of a meeting recording or a stale existing procedure into a draft standard operating procedure: purpose and trigger, scope, definitions, roles with a RACI table, numbered steps with the check that closes each one, records produced, controls as stated, and open questions for the process owner. Every step traces to the source or reads UNKNOWN. Use when the user asks to "write an SOP from these notes", "turn this walkthrough into a procedure", "document how we do this", "draft the standard operating procedure for", "build a RACI for this process" or "tidy up this old procedure". Do not use for technical runbooks with commands and rollback, use runbook-drafter instead; for meeting minutes and action lists, use transcript-to-actions. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Data Officer archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage, data and AI governance risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CDO review", "pressure-test the data governance in this plan", "what would a CDO say about this", "check the metric definitions and data sources" or "prepare this for the data governance board". Do not use for security controls or third-party security risk, use ciso-reviewer instead; for contract, liability or regulatory terms, use general-counsel-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck, plan or contract summary in character as a General Counsel archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings that cite the exact passage or clause, legal risks, what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Meeting preparation, not legal advice. Use when the user asks to "run a general counsel review", "what would legal say about this", "pressure-test the legal exposure in this deal" or "prepare me for the deal committee". Do not use for price, term, renewal or vendor leverage, use procurement-reviewer instead; for lawful basis and data flows, use cdo-reviewer; for security controls, use ciso-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reviews a proposal, business case, deck or plan in character as a Chief Technology Officer archetype and returns a DRAFT review in the chat with a verdict, findings cited to the exact passage, technology risks (architecture, build versus buy, vendor lock-in, security of design, engineering capacity), what would change the verdict and five interrogation questions. Use when the user asks to "run a CTO review", "pressure-test the technical side of this plan", "what would a CTO ask about this" or "rehearse the technology seat before the review". Do not use for cash, payback or budget questions, use cfo-reviewer instead; for capacity and timeline questions, use coo-reviewer; for security controls, privacy or compliance, use ciso-reviewer. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

- Research companies, directors, shareholders and ultimate beneficial ownership in official corporate registries, filings and offshore datasets — OpenCorporates, UK Companies House and the PSC register, SEC EDGAR, US Secretary of State registries, EU business registers, GLEIF LEI… Use when asked who owns or controls a company, to find a person's other directorships, or to unpick a group structure

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Deployless delivery-model audit. Use first when adapting any repository toward single-mainline development, automatic deployment from main, runtime release controls, production-trace-driven iteration, AI PR governance, or multi-agent delivery workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Continuous production path for deployless repositories. Use after mainline governance and release controls exist, when a repo needs CI/CD changes to automatically deploy, publish, or promote artifacts from main across any language, runtime, or hosting platform.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Operational safety for deployless repositories. Use after mainline deployment and runtime release controls are designed, when a repo needs traces, replay tests, observability, rollback drills, smoke checks, compatibility windows, or expand-contract migration safety.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use for release-level accessibility and performance review, including WCAG 2.2 AA, keyboard/focus, target size, reduced motion, semantic controls, Core Web Vitals, images/fonts/JavaScript, and animation or 3D performance budgets.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design scalable SEO page systems using templates, structured data sources, quality thresholds, internal linking, indexation controls and anti-thin-content gates.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "remember project context", review saved findings, initialize runtime memory, archive stale work, reconcile notes, or erase a subject; manages authorized HOT/WARM/COLD working memory across all disciplines while preserving registry event ownership and privacy controls. Not for changing canonical registry facts - route those through the owning registry. 项目记忆/跨会话

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Plan and execute reference-driven movement using first/last frames, driving video, and model-specific motion controls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Map and attack the authentication, authorization, session, tenant, federation, and machine-identity boundaries of a system, proving whether access controls actually hold rather than whether they appear to. Use whenever work touches login, sessions, tokens, roles, permissions, multi-tenancy, password reset, invitations, OAuth/OIDC/SAML, API keys, service accounts, webhooks, admin impersonation, or any question of "can this actor do or see this thing." Prefer this over a generic security pass for identity-heavy surfaces. Part of the audit suite; inherits the shared constitution while its own job is proving or disproving access boundaries.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Design a test strategy around product risk, business invariants, failure modes, and existing controls, deciding what deserves testing and at which boundary rather than maximising coverage. Use whenever the user asks how to test something, wants a test plan or strategy, is deciding between unit/integration/contract/E2E/property/concurrency testing, or wants to know whether existing tests actually protect what matters. Prefer this over writing tests immediately. Part of the audit suite; inherits the shared constitution while its own job is proving risk coverage.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Coordinate multi-layer security scanning and hardening across application, infrastructure, and compliance controls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Run structured AI red team exercises for jailbreak resistance, data exfiltration risk, harmful output controls, and agent tool abuse resilience.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Configure agy-auto PreToolUse security gate to run Antigravity CLI (agy) unattended with layered policy controls instead of --dangerously-skip-permissions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Secure AI agents against prompt injection, tool abuse, and data exfiltration with defense-in-depth controls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Bind9 — bIND9 DNS server management covering zone files, named configuration, DNSSEC, RNDC controls, query logging, and server statistics. Use when managing BIND9 DNS servers, auditing zone configurations, troubleshooting DNS resolution, checking DNSSEC status, or monitoring BIND9 performance and query patterns.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Budibase — budibase low-code platform management covering application inventory, table and datasource health, screen layout analysis, automation monitoring, and user role auditing. Use when reviewing internal app configurations, investigating data connectivity issues, monitoring automation runs, or auditing user access controls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Aws Control Tower — aWS Control Tower landing zone and account management. Covers landing zone status, enrolled accounts, guardrails (controls), organizational units, baseline configurations, and drift detection. Use when auditing landing zone health, reviewing guardrail compliance, inspecting account enrollment, or troubleshooting Control Tower drift.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Azure Management Groups — azure Management Groups hierarchy and governance management. Covers management group tree structure, subscription placement, policy assignments, RBAC inheritance, compliance status, and governance auditing. Use when managing Azure tenant hierarchy, assigning policies to management groups, reviewing subscription organization, or auditing inherited access controls.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when working with Anecdotes — anecdotes compliance automation platform for managing security programs, controls, evidence, and multi-framework compliance. Covers control monitoring, evidence automation, plugin integrations, gap analysis, and audit readiness. Use when reviewing compliance status across frameworks, tracking evidence collection, analyzing control gaps, or preparing for security compliance audits.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Orchestrates the tdmcp feature team end-to-end: design/wireframe → build → integrate → QA → release. Use whenever the user wants to build, implement, develop, ship, or add one or more tdmcp features/tools/effects/controls/AI-prompts for TouchDesigner, or to run them through a coordinated design→develop→QA→deploy pipeline. Also use for follow-ups: re-run, continue, update, fix, or improve a feature/batch, ship the next version, or rebuild just one part of a previous run. Single feature or a whole batch.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。