「did」の検索結果

Review an openai-guardrails-python release plan or final release candidate against the previous remote tag, determine the compatible release type, audit runtime and packaging risk, inspect current CI, and produce an English ship-or-block report. Use for pre-release readiness checks, not ordinary PR review or implementation.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Search and inspect the installed Blueish Blender Asset Library without mutating it. Use when a user asks for a local Blender asset, node preset, Blueish asset, Asset Browser entry, or named source, or when the Router has selected a node-centric/reusable Geometry Nodes, material, simulation, rigging, compositor, or NPR route with eligible local catalogs; return compatible, attributable candidates for the Router-approved workflow.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Monthly social media performance review for SMBs. Analyses post-level and account-level data from Instagram, LinkedIn, Facebook, or TikTok. Identifies what worked, what didn't, and why. Produces a client-ready report and specific recommendations that feed back into the content calendar. Accepts CSV exports, screenshots, or manual data input.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Push interfaces past conventional limits with technically ambitious implementations. Whether that's a shader, a 60fps virtual table, spring physics on a dialog, or scroll-driven reveals — make users ask "how did they do that?"

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user has a vague research direction and wants to explore feasible specific topics. Outputs a structured analysis with candidate topics, innovation/feasibility scoring, and a pre-survey of 20–30 representative works. Single-stage, no Python runtime.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Answer "where did I stop?" for this project. Gives three short groups, done, open and next, taken from the last chat, the recorded to-dos, the last handoff note and git. Use when the user comes back to a project, starts a new chat, or asks where they left off. It writes nothing.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Author a HyperFrames slideshow — a presentation, pitch deck, or interactive deck with discrete slides, fragment reveals, branching, hotspot navigation, and built-in presenter mode with speaker notes; also converts an existing page into a deck. Output is a navigable deck, not a rendered MP4. If the user didn't explicitly ask for a slideshow, confirm before authoring. Unclear → /hyperframes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Generate, refine, compare, and when needed validate distinctive names for startups, AI products, developer tools, protocols, open-source projects, apps, product families, local businesses, services, companies, nonprofits, and other organizations. Use when asked to name or rename a business, brand, product, venture, shop, studio, or organization; derive a name from an existing project or concept; create a company and product naming system; compare candidates; or check company, domain, package, repository, marketplace, or trademark conflicts. Default to a fast no-browse creative pass; use current validation when the user requests availability or research, or is choosing a final name. Do not claim legal clearance, purchase domains, or present stale or unverified availability as fact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Inspect an unfamiliar repository, interpret a broad Markdown user journey at runtime, operate the real product through its supported web, API, CLI, desktop, or mobile surface, and produce an auditable pass, fail, or blocked judgment with screenshots, logs, recordings, and a step timeline when available. Use when asked to run smoke tests, validate an end-to-end user journey, dogfood a product, test a release candidate, or execute a non-deterministic workflow that may include authentication or human checkpoints. Do not use as a substitute for deterministic unit, integration, or scenario tests.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Profile and debug Hermes sessions from their JSONL transcripts. Find a session and its subagents, build a queryable event table, summarize the work as a hierarchical table of contents, break down wall time, inference, tools, tokens, and estimated cost per agent, identify errors and improvement opportunities, and export a shareable Perfetto trace. Use when a user wants to inspect what a Hermes session did, debug agent or subagent activity, understand session cost or latency, create a session timeline, generate a trace, or learn how to improve the next agent run.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Retrieve relevant information from a knowledge base using semantic, keyword, or hybrid search to ground a query. Use when the task starts with a corpus or index that must be searched; use context-ranking when candidate chunks already exist and only need ordering.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Optimize a complete candidate context package by deduplicating, filtering, ordering, and allocating its token budget. Use when retrieved or assembled material is noisy or exceeds the useful context budget; use context-ranking for scoring chunks and context-compression for shrinking selected content.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Rank an existing set of context chunks by relevance, diversity, freshness, and utility. Use when retrieval has already produced candidates that must be scored or reranked; use context-retrieval when the source corpus still needs to be searched.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Computational Social Scientist. Use when a task calls for Computational Social Scientist judgment. Reasons from social mechanisms, measurement validity, and sampling frames through DAGs, fixed-effects and IV/DiD/RDD designs, ERGM/SAOM network models, and human-audited text classifiers while treating unobserved homophily, network interference and SUTVA violations, platform-driven selection, bot contamination, and digital-skew unrepresentativeness as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Think and work like an expert Causal Inference Scientist. Use when a task calls for Causal Inference Scientist judgment. Reasons from structural causal models, potential outcomes, and identification logic through DAGs and do-calculus, doubly-robust estimators (AIPW/TMLE, IPTW, g-formula), and design-based methods (IV, RD, Callaway-Sant'Anna DiD, synthetic control) while treating colliders and M-bias, positivity/overlap failure, and unmeasured confounding (Rosenbaum bounds, E-values) as first-class failure modes.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Testing workflow skill for finding high-value test candidates, writing focused tests, generating realistic workloads, reviewing test value, and diagnosing test-suite health. Use for prompts about what to test next, adding or improving tests, reviewing whether a test is worth keeping, low-signal or flaky tests, workload scenarios, or test-suite trust. Do not use for general QA discussion unless the user wants a concrete testing workflow or artifact.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Manage per-feature living documents that capture decisions, constraints, and reasoning across AI sessions during active development. Scoped to feature-level work — design, implementation, bugfix, refactor — not for codebase-wide assessments or product-wide specifications (those define their own document lifecycles). Handles creating new context documents, loading existing ones, and enriching them with new decisions. Use when starting a new feature, resuming work, making technical decisions, resolving questions, or when context needs to persist across sessions. Use this skill whenever the user mentions 'load context', 'update context', 'context doc', 'decisions', 'continue where we left off', 'what did we decide', or 'capture this decision'.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Source technical and professional talent by combining LinkedIn profiles, GitHub contributions, and company intelligence. Identifies candidates with specific skills, assesses expertise depth, and provides outreach context for recruiting teams.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Analyzes CRISPR drug-modifier (chemogenomic) screens with drugZ (Li & Hart 2019 Genome Med), a bidirectional Z-score method that identifies synthetic-lethal sensitizing genes and resistance-conferring suppressor genes from vehicle vs drug comparisons. Covers vehicle-anchored design (not Day-0), the bidirectional Z math giving 2-3x sensitivity over MAGeCK / STARS / edgeR / RIGER on drug screens, per-gene sumZ and normZ, synth (sensitizer) vs supp (suppressor) FDR, multi-dose handling, integration with control sgRNAs, and comparison with MAGeCK MLE with dose covariate. Use when running a drug-modifier CRISPR screen, identifying sensitizing or resistance genes for a drug candidate, choosing drugZ vs MAGeCK MLE for chemogenomic analysis, troubleshooting low-effect drug screens where MAGeCK lacks sensitivity, or designing a drug-screen layout (vehicle vs drug arms).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Resolves GWAS associations to candidate causal variants and credible sets via SuSiE, susie_rss, FINEMAP, CAVIAR, DAP-G, PAINTOR, PolyFun, SuSiEx, MultiSuSiE, and FOCUS. Use when narrowing a GWAS lead SNP to a 95 percent credible set, choosing between in-sample and reference LD, calibrating non-sparse loci with SuSiE-inf or FINEMAP-inf, integrating functional priors via PolyFun, fine-mapping across ancestries with SuSiEx, diagnosing LD mismatch via estimate_s_rss and kriging_rss, handling HLA or long-range LD, or feeding credible sets into coloc.susie for colocalization.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

End-to-end post-GWAS causal inference pipeline orchestrating heritability partitioning, genetic correlation, Mendelian randomization with CHP-aware sensitivity (CAUSE / LHC-MR), colocalization, fine-mapping with SuSiE / FOCUS, mediation, TWAS triangulation, cis-pQTL drug-target MR, effector-gene prioritization (L2G / PoPS / cS2G), and GenomicSEM common-factor GWAS. Use when triangulating causal inference across multiple complementary methods, prioritizing tissues via stratified LDSC, nominating or de-risking drug targets, mapping a lead SNP to a candidate effector gene, modeling shared genetic architecture across correlated traits, or producing a STROBE-MR-compliant publication-grade evidence battery from GWAS summary statistics.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

cheat-on-skill 的核心。为用户选定的某个候选岗位生成个性化学习策略：差距分析 → 分阶段学习路径（资源+里程碑）→ 作品集清单 → 求职时间线 → 止损线。强调 AI 加速学习、诚实周期、可验证里程碑。触发词："我选XX做学习计划"/"这个岗位怎么学"/"给我学习路径"/"skill plan"/"制定转型策略"。前置：该岗位最好已在 skill-scan 的 candidate_roles 里、判定为可学。

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Safe refactoring workflow using trace-mcp — assess risk, find candidates, check impact, and rename symbols across all files without missing import sites or cross-file references.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Stop. That last message did not land: re-pitch it.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。