Report which workflow artifacts exist, which RFCs are implemented and reviewed, what has drifted, and the next step.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
1,384 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Report which workflow artifacts exist, which RFCs are implemented and reviewed, what has drifted, and the next step.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Researches an open-ended question — options, possible solutions, prior art, trade-offs, or how something works — and produces a durable, evidence-backed, adversarially-validated report that recommends an option without committing the team to any artifact. Use when you want to research approaches, weigh options, survey prior art or the state of the art, or understand how something works before committing to a direction. Does not diagnose a bug, failure, or root cause — use investigate. Does not specify a feature — use plan-a-feature. Does not create or update a coding standard — use coding-standard. Does not compare two concrete artifacts for gaps — use gap-analysis. Does not assess an existing module's architecture — use architectural-analysis. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Splits a body of context into a sequence of vertical-slice build phases where each phase is independently demonstrable to a real user and each builds on the previous. Use when the user wants to plan, sequence, phase, slice, break down, or order the build of a feature, capability, system, or initiative, and produces a plain-language phased build outline. Does not produce implementation detail — use plan-implementation. Does not specify behavior that has not been decided — use plan-a-feature. Does not perform gap analysis between two artifacts — use gap-analysis. Does not break a plan into independently-grabbable work items — use plan-work-items.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Performs a gap analysis between two artifacts (a current state and a desired state) and produces a plain-language, stakeholder-readable report indexed by stable gap IDs. Use when the user wants to compare, evaluate, audit, or reconcile one artifact against another. Does not investigate runtime bugs — use investigate. Does not assess module-level architecture — use architectural-analysis. Does not research open-ended options with no second artifact to compare against — use research.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Draft, rewrite, or review reader-facing prose so it is specific, useful, and recognizably the author's without inventing facts or performing humanness. Use for essays, articles, newsletters, documentation, talks, launch copy, and other important prose that feels generic, hollow, or AI-shaped. Supports co-write, rewrite, review, and lint modes.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answer from the user's own indexed documents with Guaardvark's local RAG, browse and read indexed files section by section, remember facts across sessions, and process or fetch new material. Use when the user asks what their documents say, wants a source-cited answer from their files, says "remember this", or asks to index a PDF, DOCX, spreadsheet, image or URL.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Orchestrate production-grade Blender work by probing the installed Blender version, retrieving relevant official Blender documentation, assigning visual design intent, classifying shape grammar and geometry/deformation/procedural/physics/shading needs, comparing direct Blender components with node systems, creating staged artifacts, and routing to specialist skills. Use for every non-trivial Blender creation, reconstruction, simulation, animation, environment, or scene-modification request, especially when the user does not know whether to use topology, Boolean, Array, curves, snapping, Displace, simulation, Geometry Nodes, or shading.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create GRACE 4 worker and reviewer subagent presets that understand .grace artifacts, scopes, assertions, and verification evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Answer questions about a GRACE 4 project by navigating .grace current-state artifacts and file-local semantic markup.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Explain GRACE 4 methodology, .grace artifacts, semantic anchors, change lifecycle, verification, and migration boundaries.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review GRACE 4 integrity across .grace artifacts, active changes, scopes, assertions, code anchors, and verification evidence.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze formal verification artifacts (Isabelle, Coq, Dafny, etc.) and produce structured reports identifying the precise boundary between verified, assumed, and unverified components. Use when assessing verification coverage, understanding trust boundaries, auditing formal proofs, or documenting verification scope. Reports explicitly list verified code, assumptions, axioms, trusted computing base, and unverified components. Conservative and explicit about verification status without attempting to repair or mask gaps.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyzes and verifies semantic equivalence between two functions, classes, or modules by examining control flow, data flow, and observable behavior. Use when comparing code implementations (refactored vs original, different implementations of same functionality, migration verification), determining if two code artifacts produce identical behavior, identifying behavioral differences between code versions, or validating that code changes preserve semantics. Supports formal reasoning and symbolic execution approaches.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Implements any user intent, requirement, story, bug fix or change request by producing clean working code artifacts that follow the project's existing architecture, patterns and conventions. Use when the user wants to build, fix, tweak, refactor, add or modify any code, component or feature.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications. Generates creative, polished code that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A vibrant claymation-meets-data interface for Clay.com (GTM data-orchestration platform). Anchors on white canvas with dark-navy primary CTAs, custom rounded display type, and saturated single-color feature cards — hot pink, deep teal, lavender, peach, ochre — that punctuate long-scroll explainer pages. Brand voltage comes from 3D-rendered claymation illustrations (mountains, characters, mascots) used as full-bleed hero artifacts and the bright multi-color card surfaces showing product UI fragments.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Create distinctive, production-grade frontend interfaces with high design quality. Use this skill when the user asks to build web components, pages, artifacts, posters, or applications (examples include websites, landing pages, dashboards, React components, HTML/CSS layouts, or when styling/beautifying any web UI). Generates creative, polished code and UI design that avoids generic AI aesthetics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Propose a new change with all artifacts generated in one step. Use when the user wants to quickly describe what they want to build and get a complete proposal with design, specs, and tasks ready for implementation.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design one-off HTML artifacts (landing, deck, prototype).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
A clean, calendar-software-first interface anchored on white canvas with black primary CTAs and custom Cal Sans display typography. The system reads as friendly modern SaaS — generous whitespace, soft-rounded cards (~12px), product UI fragments shown directly inside cards, and a dark navy footer that visually closes long-scroll pages. Brand voltage comes from the Cal Sans display headline (a custom geometric face) and from product UI artifacts shown in-card rather than from accent colors.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Repo-local workflow skill for large coding tasks. Initializes .agent/tasks/TASK_ID artifacts, installs project-scoped Codex and Claude subagents, updates AGENTS.md plus the repo's Claude guide file with the workflow, and runs a spec-freeze → build → evidence → verify → fix loop with fresh-session verification.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when the user asks "что сегодня", "задачи на сегодня", "план на день", or wants the current department's living weekly plan refreshed from task facts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。