「incident」の検索結果

Typosquat and malicious-package detection across installed dependencies (or a single prospective addition) — cross-checks AI-malware family intelligence, package-name similarity to known popular packages, low maintainer-health signals. Use when auditing a freshly-onboarded repo, vetting a single suspicious package, gating CI on supply-chain risk, or investigating an incident.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Review+fix protocol with optional pre-core git diff review and safety guardrails (unsoundness, invariants, footguns, incidental complexity). Use when prompts say "/tw-fix this PR", "fix current branch", "fix this diff", "repair CI red", or "apply a minimal patch", and when crash/corruption/invariant-break issues need correction with a validation signal. Stop only after self-review exhausts actionable changes, each full cycle reaches post-self-review rerun plus terminal diff-review closure, and two consecutive zero-edit full cycles are clean.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Knowledge base from NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0. Use for cybersecurity risk management, GOVERN, IDENTIFY, PROTECT, DETECT, RESPOND, RECOVER, Organizational Profiles, CSF Tiers, supply chain risk, enterprise risk management, incident response. Covers the CSF 2.0 document only; does not cover specific SP 800-53 controls, NIST RMF system authorization steps, or sector-specific regulations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Turns one long support ticket thread (helpdesk history, email chain, chat transcript, call notes) into a one-page DRAFT escalation summary: the customer's ask in their own words, account context as stated, a dated history, what was tried and the stated result of each attempt, the current state, and what is needed from whom by when, every line referenced to a message and every missing fact marked UNKNOWN. Use when the user asks to "escalate this ticket", "summarise this thread for tier two", "write the hand-over for this case", "what has been tried so far", "brief engineering on this customer issue" or "prepare the escalation note". Do not use for a batch of tickets, use ticket-triage-pack instead; for the review after an outage, use incident-postmortem-drafter. Drafts for human review; never approves, authorises or signs off.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Investigate the root cause of a recurring or systemic defect across a series of incidents, not a single one. Use on the third recurrence, or when someone asks 'why again?', 'five whys', 'fix the root'. Skip for one or two ordinary cases, an already proven simple cause, or a one-off external outage. Triggers: /five-whys, five whys, fix the root.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A set of resources to help me write all kinds of internal communications, using the formats that my company likes to use. Claude should use this skill whenever asked to write some sort of internal communications (status reports, leadership updates, 3P updates, company newsletters, FAQs, incident reports, project updates, etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Set up alerting rules, configure on-call rotations, and manage incident response workflows.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when the user asks to "run my launch day", "build a launch day runbook / war room", or "decide CONTINUE or ROLLBACK after the push"; produces a pre-conditions gate check (launch-readiness-auditor SHIP verdict + the authoritative date in launch-registry — missing either stops the skill), a dated hour-blocked runbook with owners (morning irreversible pushes, daytime monitoring loop, evening consolidation), a forced observation-window verdict after every irreversible action against pre-declared kill criteria, a P0-P3 incident ladder with rollback playbooks, and T-0 status lines for the registry proposal protocol. Not for channel submission content and platform rules — use community-launch-runner; not for media replies — use press-media-relations. 发布日runbook/作战室/观察窗/回滚裁决/发布日指挥

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensure designs define data flow, state ownership, consistency boundaries, and cross-boundary writes to prevent drift and incidents.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Ensure designs define operability basics: SLO/SLI, monitoring, alerting, on-call actions, and incident handling expectations.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Reconstruct your recent working context from your own chat history, live state, and the shared record (user reports, prior fixes, incidents), then hand back a tight current-state brief. Use for 'recall my work on X', 'catch me up', 'what have I been working on', 'where did I leave off', before starting or resuming work.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Diagnose active BIRD daemon incidents across config, runtime, environment, sockets, logs, source, and tooling. Use when BIRD fails to start or reload, crashes, loses sessions/routes, behaves differently after lint passes, or when birdcc and bird -p disagree. Collect read-only evidence first, protect routing secrets, and route isolated config edits to bird-agent or pure implementation research to bird-source-explorer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Trace BIRD routing-daemon behavior through the actual C source tree. Use for implementation questions, suspected upstream bugs, parser/keyword origins, filter instructions, protocol state machines, route attributes, birdc commands, stack traces, or BIRD 2 versus BIRD 3 source comparisons. Prefer a local checkout or exact upstream tag/commit and cite concrete files, functions, and revisions. Route config linting to bird-agent and active incidents to bird-troubleshooting.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Write, review, discover, lint, format, and validate BIRD 2/3 routing-daemon projects with the @birdcc toolchain. Use for bird.conf, bird2.conf, bird3.conf, bird6.conf, .bird/.bird2/.bird3 files, bird.config.json, birdcc.config.json, include graphs, BIRD filters and protocols, birdcc init/lint/fmt/lsp, or bird -p checks. Treat BIRD 1 as legacy and verify it with the actual BIRD 1 binary. Route editor and CLI installation to birdcc-installer, GitHub Actions to birdcc-cicd, runtime incidents to bird-troubleshooting, and implementation archaeology to bird-source-explorer.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Govern FriendlyBet agent values, professional standards, anti-hallucination behavior, truthfulness, risk reporting, AI resource discipline, feedback loops, skill improvement, performance reviews, decision-rights hygiene, and team quality. Use when creating, reviewing, promoting, correcting, or retiring agents; reducing hallucinations or mistakes; reviewing AI/tool usage; handling agent incidents; or aligning work with Eyal's philanthropic user-first approach.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are an expert error analysis specialist with deep expertise in debugging distributed systems, analyzing production incidents, and implementing comprehensive observability solutions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

You are an expert error analysis specialist with deep expertise in debugging distributed systems, analyzing production incidents, and implementing comprehensive observability solutions.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Expert DevOps troubleshooter specializing in rapid incident response, advanced debugging, and modern observability.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

[Extended thinking: This workflow implements a sophisticated debugging and resolution pipeline that leverages AI-assisted debugging tools and observability platforms to systematically diagnose and res

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Use when acting as the orchestrator agent that drives Syntropic137 - running the dogfood loop, deciding what to dispatch next, landing agent PRs, deploying a beta, triaging failed executions, or keeping the scratchpad, paper cuts and retrospectives current. Trigger phrases include "orchestrator tick", "keep the loop running", "what should we dispatch next", "land these PRs", "why are PRs stacking up", "deploy the next beta", "pit stop", "the run failed, what now", "write the retro", "is the system helping", "scale quality", "learning loop for the orchestrator". Do NOT use for deciding whether one task belongs in a workspace or locally (see `dogfooding`), for turning one incident into an eval case (see `learning-loop`), for designing a workflow A/B experiment (see `workflow-experimentation`), or for release-branch and version-bump mechanics (see `devops`).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

A set of resources to help me write all kinds of internal communications, using the formats that my company likes to use. Claude should use this skill whenever asked to write some sort of internal communications (status reports, leadership updates, 3P updates, company newsletters, FAQs, incident reports, project updates, etc.).

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Multi-agent autonomous startup system for Claude Code. Triggers on "Loki Mode". Orchestrates 100+ specialized agents across engineering, QA, DevOps, security, data/ML, business operations, marketing, HR, and customer success. Takes PRD to fully deployed, revenue-generating product with zero human intervention. Features Task tool for subagent dispatch, parallel code review with 3 specialized reviewers, severity-based issue triage, distributed task queue with dead letter handling, automatic deployment to cloud providers, A/B testing, customer feedback loops, incident response, circuit breakers, and self-healing. Handles rate limits via distributed state checkpoints and auto-resume with exponential backoff. Requires --dangerously-skip-permissions flag.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。

Security audit, hardening, threat modeling (STRIDE/PASTA), Red/Blue Team, OWASP checks, code review, incident response, and infrastructure security for any project.

日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。