1,708 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Read funnels, retention curves, and event data as a designer — separating a design problem from a tracking artefact. Use when handed product data you did not design and asked why people drop off. For choosing what to measure, use `metrics-definition` (ux-strategy); for running a controlled test, use `a-b-test-design` (prototyping-testing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Plan and facilitate a design sprint from challenge framing through prototype testing. Use when compressing discovery into days. For ongoing team cadence, use `team-workflow`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design unbiased survey instruments — question wording, scales, and sampling — to measure attitudes at scale. Use when you need quantitative breadth. For behavioural experiments, use `a-b-test-design` (prototyping-testing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use to extend an existing agent project with memory, app integration, VPC, multi-agent, migration, model, browser, code interpreter, payments, or resource removal. Triggers: "add memory", "remember across sessions", "call agent from app", "invoke agent from code", "agent auth", "streaming", "VPC", "VPC connectivity", "can't reach from VPC", "multi-agent", "A2A", "A2A auth", "orchestrator not delegating", "specialist not called", "migrate Bedrock Agent", "migration issue", "change model", "browser tool", "code interpreter", "delete agent", "tear down", "agentcore remove", "cross-account memory", "add payments capability to my agent", "wire payments plugin", "integrate x402 payments with the agent I'm building", "add MPP payments", "Machine Payments Protocol". External APIs via Gateway: use agents-connect. New project: use agents-get-started. CLI/dev-server errors: use agents-debug. Runtime x402/MPP payments: use agents-pay. Migration-specific Strands vs LangGraph routes here.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds, runs, debugs, and operates event-driven applications using EventBridge Event Bus - a managed, centrally governed publish/subscribe event bus that an organization can share across many teams and accounts. Applicable when workloads need event-driven architectures, decoupling, choreography, asynchronous integration, pub/sub, fan-out, event ordering, delivered in sequence, event router, event broker, event bus, event store, event retention, event replay, deduplication, avro, protobuf, cloudevents, uses events or messages. Designed as a centrally managed event bus platform allowing governance and control - such as subscriber control, revocation, per-account throttling - while giving application owners flexibility across an organization spanning multiple accounts, with end-to-end open-standards observability and cost allocation. Also helps reduce costs in high fan-out scenarios where multi-account forwarding adds cost. A serverless, managed alternative to self-managed event streaming platforms.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds, runs, debugs, and operates applications on AWS Lambda MicroVMs — Firecracker-isolated, snapshot-resumable serverless compute environments running inside a container with up to 8 hr lifetimes. Applicable when workloads need strong isolation between tenants, isolated serverless compute, sandbox compute, or secure multi-tenant execution. Also suited for AI/agent code-execution sandboxes, interactive code playgrounds and notebooks (Jupyter, REPLs, dev environments running user-supplied code), reinforcement-learning environments, multi-tenant CI executors and build runners, sessionful game or simulation servers, or isolated security scanners. Also applicable when the workload needs long-lived sessions, a real port-listening server (gRPC, WebSocket, custom TCP protocols), state preserved across periods of inactivity (suspend/resume), container-level access (FUSE, eBPF, custom syscalls), or session-affine routing.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Analyze a target's TLS configuration — negotiated protocol version, cipher suite, certificate chain, expiry, and downgrade vectors. Use when: SOC2 auditor flagged your endpoint for "weak TLS" but you don't know which control failed (TSC CC6.7 transmission integrity vs CC6.6 encryption) or which cipher is the problem. Threshold: any negotiated TLSv1.0 or TLSv1.1, OR a cipher with RC4 / 3DES / null / EXPORT, OR a cert with under 30 days to expiry, OR a chain that fails hostname verification. Trigger with: "audit tls", "check ssl config", "weak tls", "analyze tls".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Deploy and orchestrate Vertex AI ADK agents using A2A protocol. Manages AgentCard discovery, task submission, Code Execution Sandbox, and Memory Bank. Use when asked to "deploy ADK agent" or "orchestrate agents". Trigger with phrases like 'deploy', 'infrastructure', or 'CI/CD'.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grida AI agent system work: `@grida/daemon` (DaemonServer, loopback HTTP perimeter, files/workspaces, secrets store, daemon discovery) and `@grida/agent` (the agent tenant: sessions, providers/BYOK, runtime/tool execution, skills discovery, prompts, tiers, sandbox hosts). Use for `packages/grida-daemon/**`, `packages/grida-ai-agent/**`, desktop sidecar protocol changes, agent chat transport, and bugs in agent state or streams. For pure Electron window, preload, menu, deep-link, or CDP work, use `desktop`.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Discipline for the seam between two SDKs (or two sides of one contract) that the same hand writes. The failure mode: "we own both sides" produces dirty contracts no foreign reviewer would accept. The exercise: pretend the other side is FFI, IPC, or a network protocol you cannot rewrite. Spawn an adversarial subagent profiled as the producer's maintainer; negotiate the change as a feature request, not a PR. Companion to $sdk-design. Language-agnostic — applies to a TS package + its consumer, a Rust crate + its WASM binding, two services sharing a wire format, or any other boundary the same author writes both ends of.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Grida Desktop Electron shell and release-impact work: BrowserWindow, preload, `window.grida`, menus, protocol/deep links, file associations, Forge, path-scoped bridge security, Electron-only UI bugs, and CDP / Playwright verification. Use for `desktop/`, `editor/app/desktop/**`, `editor/scaffolds/desktop/**`, `editor/lib/desktop/**`, `/desktop/*` CSP, GRIDA-SEC-004, and deciding whether linked-package or hosted-renderer changes require a native Desktop version bump or coordinated release. For implementing daemon/agent-tenant core behavior, use `agent-system` as well.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Interactive browser automation via Chrome DevTools Protocol. Use when you need to interact with web pages, test frontends, or when user interaction with a visible browser is required.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Upgrade Three.js games from prototype visuals to premium browser graphics: art-direction critique, procedural model building, material and texture libraries, world prop kits, shaders, VFX, lighting and render pipeline, LOD and instancing, render budgets, and a 10-category visual scorecard. Use when screenshots still look basic or the user asks for premium, AAA, high-fidelity, showcase, or less-basic graphics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Entrypoint for building, upgrading, and finishing Three.js browser games. Routes work across the sibling threejs-* skills for gameplay, graphics, UI, 3D/image/audio asset generation, debugging, and release. Use for any request to build, upgrade, polish, or ship a Three.js game as a whole, at any scope from a small arcade prototype to a premium release.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Prepare evidence-bounded, constructive peer-review drafts and structured manuscript assessments. Use for authorized review of scientific manuscripts, protocols, preprints, or research proposals; reporting-guideline selection; claim–evidence checks; methods, statistics, reproducibility, ethics, figure/table, and citation critique; or revision-response planning.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
SSRF playbook. Use when the server fetches URLs, resolves hostnames, imports remote content, or can be driven toward internal networks, cloud metadata, or secondary protocols.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
WAF bypass methodology and generic evasion techniques. Use when a web application firewall blocks injection payloads (SQLi, XSS, RCE) and you need to craft bypasses using encoding, protocol-level tricks, or WAF-specific weaknesses.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Traffic analysis and PCAP forensics playbook. Use when analyzing network captures including Wireshark filters, protocol analysis (HTTP/DNS/FTP/SMTP/USB/WiFi), data extraction, covert channel detection, PCAP repair, TLS decryption, and tshark command-line analysis.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
HTTP/2 protocol-specific attack playbook. Use when the target supports HTTP/2 and you need to exploit binary framing, HPACK compression, h2c upgrade smuggling, pseudo-header injection, stream multiplexing abuse, or H2→H1 downgrade translation flaws.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
DeFi attack pattern playbook. Use when analyzing flash loan attacks, price oracle manipulation, MEV sandwich attacks, governance exploits, bridge vulnerabilities, and token standard edge cases in decentralized finance protocols.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
401/403 bypass playbook. Use when encountering access-denied responses on admin panels, API endpoints, or restricted paths. Covers path manipulation, HTTP method tampering, header injection, protocol downgrade, and automated bypass tools.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Review designs, products, and features with Steve Jobs' standards: ruthless simplicity, focus, and end-to-end excellence. Use when the user mentions "Steve Jobs review", "design review", "product review", "what would Steve do", "insanely great", "this feels too complicated", "too many features", "product taste", "saying no", or "is this good enough to ship". Also trigger when critiquing a UI, feature, or roadmap for focus and simplicity, cutting scope to the essential, or pressure-testing the whole experience from first run to daily use. Covers the simplicity audit, the no list, design-is-how-it-works, end-to-end ownership, demo culture, and a Jobs-style review protocol with binary verdicts. For visual design fundamentals, see refactoring-ui. For usability audits, see ux-heuristics. For detail polish, see microinteractions.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Guided journey from a large aged codebase everyone fears to touch to one that is safe to change, legible, bounded, and resilient - paid down in place without a rewrite. Orchestrates eight skills phase by phase - working-with-legacy-code, refactoring-patterns, clean-code, software-design-philosophy, clean-architecture, pragmatic-programmer, release-it, domain-driven-design - asking the user questions at every decision point and recording results in the project docs/ folder (TESTING.md, TECH-DEBT.md, REMOVE-TECHNICAL-DEBT-PLAN.md) so the journey resumes across sessions. Use when the user wants to tame a legacy codebase, pay down technical debt safely, avoid a big-bang rewrite, or says 'we are afraid to touch this code'. For a fresh vibe-coded prototype, improve-code-quality; for greenfield structure, design-code-architecture; for a product-and-UX pass, improve-app; to optimize a working codebase for speed, architecture-optimization. For one framework in isolation, invoke that skill directly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Optimize web performance through network protocols, resource loading, and browser rendering internals. Use when the user mentions "my site is slow", "Core Web Vitals", "HTTP/2 or HTTP/3", "resource hints", "network latency", "render blocking", "TCP/TLS optimization", "service worker", "Cache-Control or caching strategy", or "critical rendering path". Also trigger when diagnosing slow page loads, optimizing time to first byte, choosing between WebSocket and SSE, or reducing bundle sizes. For UI visual performance, see refactoring-ui. For font loading, see web-typography.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。