9,095 件 ・ 関連度順
概要と使いどころ
Leverages Ahrefs REST API v3 to identify content gap opportunities through competing domain analysis. Pulls referring domains data, anchor text distributions, and DR metrics to prioritize content creation for link-worthy topics.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Add or update automated tests for a change using the repository’s verification rules in `AGENTS.md`. Use when implementing a feature, bugfix, refactor, or regression test; prefer stable integration/API/UI coverage and pull deeper test strategy from the bundled references.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Step 5 of the PaperOrchestra pipeline (arXiv:2604.05018). Iteratively refine drafts/paper.tex by simulating peer review and applying targeted revisions, with strict accept/revert halt rules. Maintains a worklog and snapshots each iteration so revert is real, not symbolic. TRIGGER when the orchestrator delegates Step 5 or when the user asks to "refine the draft", "iterate on the paper", or "run peer review on this paper".
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refactor with tests first, one change at a time, never mix refactoring with bug fixes or new features
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reflective Memory. Use when working with memory, reflection, context management, or intent tracking. Provides the reflective memory practice — how and when to use keep tools for capturing insights, tracking commitments, and maintaining awareness.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Evolve an existing agent definition by refining its persona in-place or creating an advanced variant. Covers assessing the current agent against best practices, gathering evolution requirements, choosing scope (refinement vs. variant), applying changes to skills, tools, capabilities, and limitations, updating version metadata, and synchronizing the registry and cross-references. Use when an agent's skills list is outdated, user feedback reveals capability gaps, tool requirements have changed, an advanced variant is needed alongside the original, or the agent's scope needs sharpening after real-world use.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Extract maximum value from existing code — performance optimization, API surface refinement, and dead weight elimination. The art of turning base code into gold through systematic identification and amplification of value-bearing patterns. Use when optimizing a working but sluggish codebase, refining an API surface that has accumulated cruft, reducing bundle size or memory footprint, or preparing code for open-source release — when code works correctly but doesn't shine and needs polish rather than a full rewrite.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Reference Hildegard von Bingen's Physica natural history knowledge. Covers classification of plants, stones, animals, fish, birds, elements, and trees with their medicinal, symbolic, and practical properties. Enables cross- referencing between categories and application guidance. Use when exploring a specific plant, stone, or animal from Hildegard's perspective, researching medieval natural history and cosmology, cross-referencing properties across categories, or integrating Physica knowledge into health, spiritual, or creative practice.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Four-stage alchemical code transmutation — nigredo (decomposition), albedo (purification), citrinitas (illumination), rubedo (synthesis) — with meditate and heal checkpoints between stages. Transforms tangled or legacy code into optimized, well-structured output through systematic material analysis. Use when transforming legacy code into modern equivalents, refactoring deeply tangled modules where incremental fixes keep failing, converting a codebase between paradigms, or when simpler refactoring approaches have stalled and a full-cycle transformation is needed.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Diagnoses and fixes Claude behavioral issues in system prompts and Projects using tested countermeasure templates. Use when "Claude is too verbose," "keeps hedging," "agrees with everything," "claims it did something it didn't," "won't use a tool," "fix Claude's output," "tune Claude's behavior," "Claude ignores my preferences," "adds unsolicited disclaimers," "uses too many lists." Covers ten tendencies: agreeableness (output-content + persistent-preference), hedging, verbosity, list overuse, fabricated precision, over-exploration, tool miscalibration (over- and under-triggering), LaTeX defaulting, editorial drift, self-referential fabrication. Also use when auditing a system prompt for behavioral calibration or recalibrating a pre-4.7 prompt, and when users describe recurring output problems without naming a tendency. Do NOT use for scoring a prompt's overall quality — use rootnode-prompt-validation if available.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Vue 3 SFC structure, Composition API + <script setup>, file naming, project layout, props/emits/slots typing, defineModel, composables, lifecycle, watchers, UI library detection. Vue 2 fallback notes. Use this skill to: - Structure a new SFC with `<script setup>`, template, scoped styles. - Type props/emits/slots correctly via macros. - Pick `ref` vs `reactive` (prefer `ref`). - Build composables that compose cleanly. - Apply lifecycle hooks correctly. - Detect UI library (Vuetify/Quasar/PrimeVue/Naive UI/Element Plus/shadcn-vue) and mirror its patterns. Do NOT use this skill for: - State management lib choice (see vue-state-management). - Routing (see vue-routing). - Forms (see vue-forms). - Testing (see vue-testing).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
NestJS decorator usage: built-in route/param/class decorators, custom decorators via `createParamDecorator` and `SetMetadata`, metadata reflection via `Reflector`. Apply when designing controllers, guards, interceptors, or custom decorators. Use this skill to: - Pick the right built-in decorator for routes, params, and DI. - Compose decorators (`@UseGuards(A, B) @UseInterceptors(C)`). - Build custom param decorators (e.g., `@CurrentUser()`). - Use metadata for role-based logic (Reflector + SetMetadata). - Avoid common decorator mistakes. Do NOT use this skill for: - General module/DI patterns (see nest-conventions). - GraphQL-specific decorators (see nest-advanced). - ORM entity decorators (see nest-data-layer).
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Design guide + benchmarked pitfalls for building Monte-Carlo / Simulated Annealing refinement layers on top of greedy hex-grid layouts for code visualization (packages/gui/src/store/hexLayout.ts, sandbox/hex-sandbox, future Rust ports). Use when: (1) planning to add MC/SA on top of an existing hex-grid pack, (2) deciding whether a simpler SA would match a hierarchical MC with force-directed + chain drag, (3) budgeting wall-clock for million-node cold-start, (4) debugging "blob turns Swiss-cheese" or "folders stop nucleating" during MC refinement, (5) choosing between folder cohesion and raw Σ-link-length as cost function. Contains four hard-won, quantified lessons and anti-patterns that would take a full day of experiments to rediscover.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Comprehensive reference for building Mintlify documentation sites. Use when creating pages, configuring docs.json, adding components, setting up navigation, or working with API references. Routes to detailed reference files for all components and configuration options.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Research 3–5 confirmed same-industry or cross-industry websites and translate their brand narrative, page architecture, art direction, and visual-system evidence into one reusable Visual Reference Brief. Use when strong references are scarce, a site needs brand-led or premium positioning, a page lacks a narrative spine, or a key module lacks a credible design precedent. Do not create page content, a Design System, UI directions, HTML, or a permanent brand gallery.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
First-run conversational setup wizard for marketing-cli. Use when /cmo detects no populated brand files and no cmo-preferences.md, when the user just installed marketing-cli for the first time, or when they say things like "set up marketing", "start marketing", "marketing wizard", "I just installed marketing-cli", "onboard me", "first time", "initial setup". Asks 3 sharp questions (identity, posture, distribution preferences), records the answers to brand/cmo-preferences.md, then hands off to /cmo's foundation flow which spawns 3 research agents in parallel. The user never has to type /mktg-setup directly — /cmo auto-routes here on first run.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Lightweight refactor: audit → plan → approve → implement in a single Opus context, no sub-agent fan-out. Behavior preservation is the goal — verifies tests still pass, optionally commits, and offers a separate /code-review pass at the end. Use by default; reach for /refactor only when the cleanup needs parallel fan-out or exceeds one context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Refactoring pipeline: analyzes a target file or directory for code quality issues, plans safe incremental improvements, optionally writes tests first as a safety net, implements the changes, and reviews the result. Orchestrates refactor-planner → (test-writer) → parallel-task-orchestrator → code-reviewer.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Lightweight refactor: audit → plan → approve → implement in a single Opus context, no sub-agent fan-out. Behavior preservation is the goal — verifies tests still pass, optionally commits, and offers a separate /code-review pass at the end. Use by default; reach for /claude-setup:refactor only when the cleanup needs parallel fan-out or exceeds one context.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Use when legacy prompts or older framework flows reference `refactor-cleaner` and you need the modern runtime to resolve that capability cleanly.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
You are an expert in compounding growth and referral marketing with access to referral program data and third-party tools. Your goal is to help design and optimize programs that turn customers into Revenue (Cuan) engines.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Build a new-topic PPTX by reusing an existing reference deck's template (layouts / footers / fonts / palette) while replacing all content from primary sources. Use when "use this product deck's look for a different product deck", "use this deck as template for new topic", "参照デックの体裁で別内容を作る", "既存 PPTX を流用して別テーマで作り直す". Not for deck translation, from-scratch generation, or outline-only planning.
Super Base Context — project doc loader & synchronizer. Triggers even without explicit "load docs"/"sync docs." READ MODE — load architecture/modules/coding/decision docs when work references project state: code work (write/modify/remove); design (features/APIs/schemas/architecture); review (modules, past solutions); tech selection; ADR research; migration/refactor planning; performance/security analysis; tests; code reviews; any spec/plan/design/ADR referencing project. WRITE MODE — NET DELTA vs. last doc sync: additions/modifications/REMOVALS/deprecations of previously-synced code or decisions (docs revert: delete BCU file/ADR), AND rollbacks. User signals: sync docs/done/ready to commit/pre-commit/record decision. Auto-fires before final task-completion reply. WRITE MODE does NOT fire on: brainstorming, generic/read-only Q&A, in-session try-and-undo with no net change, already-synced.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。
Builds and audits a concept-ontology for a regelrecht corpus to decide and verify reference types — cross-law source-binding vs intra-law source-binding vs open-norm leaf vs external-fact leaf — and to catch concept conflation across laws. Core principle: a value's reference type is fixed by WHO derives it, and a binding is sound only when producer and consumer denote the SAME concept; the lexical surface (the word in the text) is not the concept. Detects false friends (one term, different concepts — e.g. a register-based vs a factual "naar de omstandigheden"-based residence/ingezetene concept), orphan plain-params (a value a regulation actually derives, modeled as a brute input), negation/complement re-entry (¬X modeled as an independent leaf next to X), and duplication (one concept re-entered as several independent leafs, losing the single-source-of-truth invariant). Produces a law-level glossary and a stelsel-level concept map with sound same-concept binding edges and flagged lexical-match-but-concept-mismatch edges. Use when deciding whether a value should be cross-law/intra-law/leaf, when the same term means different things across laws, or when a binding might silently conflate concepts.
日本語の概要は準備中です。原文の説明を表示しています。